Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
173 messages Options
123456 ... 9
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

Rinus
Are there different versions around with the same version number?

I had the Idea that Gilles was a bit surprised when I told him that I am using 2.0.0.4 and Philip says "I just uploaded packages of the release of Digikam 2.0.0 beta4". I am already a couple of weeks using this version. I am no programmer, totaly new to Linux and digikam. I have no idea how I managed to have it on my computer.

Could there be any good reasen to remove my version and try Philip's one?
Rinus


Op 29-3-2011 22:05, Philip Johnsson schreef:
Just a note to all using my PPA.

I'm having problems with crashes when importing media from my camera using libgphoto2. It looks like the problem is in libgphoto2 but I didn't have the problem before i updated digikam 2 to beta 4. Doing some tests with libgphoto2 before a digikam 2.0 beta4 bug report is the right place.

Just so you know.

/Philip


On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Thanks Philip...

Gilles Caulier

2011/3/29 Philip Johnsson <[hidden email]>:
> I just uploaded packages of the release of Digikam 2.0.0 beta4 (no git code)
> on Launchpad and am curently on build. They should be available within the
> hour for anyone who want to try them out. As before you find digikam 2.0
> packages in my kubuntu-backports PPA for Ubuntu 10.10 (maverick) and
> instructions on how to install them are to be find in this thread.
>
> Happy digikaming!
>
> /Philip
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Philip Johnsson
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> You can also follow this guide (not made by me):
>> http://scribblesandsnaps.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/install-the-latest-beta-of-digikam-on-ubuntu-10-10/
>>
>> /Philip
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Photonoxx <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you have refresh your repository content ?
>>> (it should be with : sudo apt-get update)
>>>
>>> After that, if you install Digikam package, you will get the 1.9 version,
>>> if you want 2.0 beta, you have to install the digikam2 package.
>>>
>>> Le Thu, 24 Mar 2011 04:39:40 +0100, Ozzy <[hidden email]> a écrit:
>>>
>>> > Then, from CLI, how do I install the beta version?
>>> > I normally would type:
>>> >> sudo apt-get install digikam
>>> > but I don't want to install that one that is in the Ubuntu
>>> > repositories.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks.
>>> >
>>> > O.
>>> >
>>> > PS: I am so glad that there is no such a thing a stupid question.....
>>> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Philip Johnsson
>>> > <[hidden email]>wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> If you mean all the three PPAs then yes.
>>> >>
>>> >> /Philip
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> Nicolas Boulesteix
>>> Photographe chasseur de lueurs
>>> http://www.photonoxx.fr
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users


Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com
Versie: 10.0.1204 / Virusdatabase: 1498/3537 - datum van uitgifte: 03/29/11



_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

Philip Johnsson
No. It's just that the "beta3" packages was code from git (which was misleading) a few days after the beta3 was released and therefore got the name "beta4" (changed in upstream git code) when you looked in the about digikam dialog in Digikam. The real full beta4 was release the other day both as code and a new package updates on my PPA.

/Philip

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:17 AM, sleepless <[hidden email]> wrote:
Are there different versions around with the same version number?

I had the Idea that Gilles was a bit surprised when I told him that I am using 2.0.0.4 and Philip says "I just uploaded packages of the release of Digikam 2.0.0 beta4". I am already a couple of weeks using this version. I am no programmer, totaly new to Linux and digikam. I have no idea how I managed to have it on my computer.

Could there be any good reasen to remove my version and try Philip's one?
Rinus


Op 29-3-2011 22:05, Philip Johnsson schreef:
Just a note to all using my PPA.

I'm having problems with crashes when importing media from my camera using libgphoto2. It looks like the problem is in libgphoto2 but I didn't have the problem before i updated digikam 2 to beta 4. Doing some tests with libgphoto2 before a digikam 2.0 beta4 bug report is the right place.

Just so you know.

/Philip


On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Thanks Philip...

Gilles Caulier

2011/3/29 Philip Johnsson <[hidden email]>:
> I just uploaded packages of the release of Digikam 2.0.0 beta4 (no git code)
> on Launchpad and am curently on build. They should be available within the
> hour for anyone who want to try them out. As before you find digikam 2.0
> packages in my kubuntu-backports PPA for Ubuntu 10.10 (maverick) and
> instructions on how to install them are to be find in this thread.
>
> Happy digikaming!
>
> /Philip
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Philip Johnsson
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> You can also follow this guide (not made by me):
>> http://scribblesandsnaps.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/install-the-latest-beta-of-digikam-on-ubuntu-10-10/
>>
>> /Philip
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Photonoxx <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you have refresh your repository content ?
>>> (it should be with : sudo apt-get update)
>>>
>>> After that, if you install Digikam package, you will get the 1.9 version,
>>> if you want 2.0 beta, you have to install the digikam2 package.
>>>
>>> Le Thu, 24 Mar 2011 04:39:40 +0100, Ozzy <[hidden email]> a écrit:
>>>
>>> > Then, from CLI, how do I install the beta version?
>>> > I normally would type:
>>> >> sudo apt-get install digikam
>>> > but I don't want to install that one that is in the Ubuntu
>>> > repositories.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks.
>>> >
>>> > O.
>>> >
>>> > PS: I am so glad that there is no such a thing a stupid question.....
>>> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Philip Johnsson
>>> > <[hidden email]>wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> If you mean all the three PPAs then yes.
>>> >>
>>> >> /Philip
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> Nicolas Boulesteix
>>> Photographe chasseur de lueurs
>>> http://www.photonoxx.fr
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users


Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com
Versie: 10.0.1204 / Virusdatabase: 1498/3537 - datum van uitgifte: 03/29/11



_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users



_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

Philip Johnsson
I'm not sure I that was clear.

I'm aware of that my choice to use code from git (the place where developers submit and exchange code while developing) for my "beta3" packages have made things a bit confusing when it comes to what is what. As the developers had changed in the code to beta4 (only in the about dialogue window in digikam) in git a few days after the beta3 code was released as a official tarball release then the code in my packages got the beta4 name but was beta4 code in early development. The packages worked as they should but I think it might have made bug tracking more difficult and confusing for both users and developers. I won't release any more packages using code from git to stay away from this kind of confusion and only package official tarball releases, even though my debian changelog and the package naming pointed out that the code came from git and when.

And to complicate the issue a bit more there was a rebuild of my packages of beta3 git code against updated KDE 4.6.1 so it was linked against the new libmarble .11 and not the older libmarble .10 that KDE 4.6.0 used.

Hope this clear things out when it comes to naming.

/Philip


On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Philip Johnsson <[hidden email]> wrote:
No. It's just that the "beta3" packages was code from git (which was misleading) a few days after the beta3 was released and therefore got the name "beta4" (changed in upstream git code) when you looked in the about digikam dialog in Digikam. The real full beta4 was release the other day both as code and a new package updates on my PPA.

/Philip

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:17 AM, sleepless <[hidden email]> wrote:
Are there different versions around with the same version number?

I had the Idea that Gilles was a bit surprised when I told him that I am using 2.0.0.4 and Philip says "I just uploaded packages of the release of Digikam 2.0.0 beta4". I am already a couple of weeks using this version. I am no programmer, totaly new to Linux and digikam. I have no idea how I managed to have it on my computer.

Could there be any good reasen to remove my version and try Philip's one?
Rinus


Op 29-3-2011 22:05, Philip Johnsson schreef:
Just a note to all using my PPA.

I'm having problems with crashes when importing media from my camera using libgphoto2. It looks like the problem is in libgphoto2 but I didn't have the problem before i updated digikam 2 to beta 4. Doing some tests with libgphoto2 before a digikam 2.0 beta4 bug report is the right place.

Just so you know.

/Philip


On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Thanks Philip...

Gilles Caulier

2011/3/29 Philip Johnsson <[hidden email]>:
> I just uploaded packages of the release of Digikam 2.0.0 beta4 (no git code)
> on Launchpad and am curently on build. They should be available within the
> hour for anyone who want to try them out. As before you find digikam 2.0
> packages in my kubuntu-backports PPA for Ubuntu 10.10 (maverick) and
> instructions on how to install them are to be find in this thread.
>
> Happy digikaming!
>
> /Philip
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Philip Johnsson
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> You can also follow this guide (not made by me):
>> http://scribblesandsnaps.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/install-the-latest-beta-of-digikam-on-ubuntu-10-10/
>>
>> /Philip
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Photonoxx <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you have refresh your repository content ?
>>> (it should be with : sudo apt-get update)
>>>
>>> After that, if you install Digikam package, you will get the 1.9 version,
>>> if you want 2.0 beta, you have to install the digikam2 package.
>>>
>>> Le Thu, 24 Mar 2011 04:39:40 +0100, Ozzy <[hidden email]> a écrit:
>>>
>>> > Then, from CLI, how do I install the beta version?
>>> > I normally would type:
>>> >> sudo apt-get install digikam
>>> > but I don't want to install that one that is in the Ubuntu
>>> > repositories.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks.
>>> >
>>> > O.
>>> >
>>> > PS: I am so glad that there is no such a thing a stupid question.....
>>> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Philip Johnsson
>>> > <[hidden email]>wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> If you mean all the three PPAs then yes.
>>> >>
>>> >> /Philip
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> Nicolas Boulesteix
>>> Photographe chasseur de lueurs
>>> http://www.photonoxx.fr
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users


Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com
Versie: 10.0.1204 / Virusdatabase: 1498/3537 - datum van uitgifte: 03/29/11



_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users




_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

Rinus
Yeah right, my newbe face looks sometimes quite puzzled reading messages here. A bit elaboration helps, thanks!
Rinus
On 30-03-11 11:26, Philip Johnsson wrote:
I'm not sure I that was clear.

I'm aware of that my choice to use code from git (the place where developers submit and exchange code while developing) for my "beta3" packages have made things a bit confusing when it comes to what is what. As the developers had changed in the code to beta4 (only in the about dialogue window in digikam) in git a few days after the beta3 code was released as a official tarball release then the code in my packages got the beta4 name but was beta4 code in early development. The packages worked as they should but I think it might have made bug tracking more difficult and confusing for both users and developers. I won't release any more packages using code from git to stay away from this kind of confusion and only package official tarball releases, even though my debian changelog and the package naming pointed out that the code came from git and when.

And to complicate the issue a bit more there was a rebuild of my packages of beta3 git code against updated KDE 4.6.1 so it was linked against the new libmarble .11 and not the older libmarble .10 that KDE 4.6.0 used.

Hope this clear things out when it comes to naming.

/Philip


On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Philip Johnsson <[hidden email]> wrote:
No. It's just that the "beta3" packages was code from git (which was misleading) a few days after the beta3 was released and therefore got the name "beta4" (changed in upstream git code) when you looked in the about digikam dialog in Digikam. The real full beta4 was release the other day both as code and a new package updates on my PPA.

/Philip

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:17 AM, sleepless <[hidden email]> wrote:
Are there different versions around with the same version number?

I had the Idea that Gilles was a bit surprised when I told him that I am using 2.0.0.4 and Philip says "I just uploaded packages of the release of Digikam 2.0.0 beta4". I am already a couple of weeks using this version. I am no programmer, totaly new to Linux and digikam. I have no idea how I managed to have it on my computer.

Could there be any good reasen to remove my version and try Philip's one?
Rinus


Op 29-3-2011 22:05, Philip Johnsson schreef:
Just a note to all using my PPA.

I'm having problems with crashes when importing media from my camera using libgphoto2. It looks like the problem is in libgphoto2 but I didn't have the problem before i updated digikam 2 to beta 4. Doing some tests with libgphoto2 before a digikam 2.0 beta4 bug report is the right place.

Just so you know.

/Philip


On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Thanks Philip...

Gilles Caulier

2011/3/29 Philip Johnsson <[hidden email]>:
> I just uploaded packages of the release of Digikam 2.0.0 beta4 (no git code)
> on Launchpad and am curently on build. They should be available within the
> hour for anyone who want to try them out. As before you find digikam 2.0
> packages in my kubuntu-backports PPA for Ubuntu 10.10 (maverick) and
> instructions on how to install them are to be find in this thread.
>
> Happy digikaming!
>
> /Philip
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Philip Johnsson
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> You can also follow this guide (not made by me):
>> http://scribblesandsnaps.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/install-the-latest-beta-of-digikam-on-ubuntu-10-10/
>>
>> /Philip
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Photonoxx <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you have refresh your repository content ?
>>> (it should be with : sudo apt-get update)
>>>
>>> After that, if you install Digikam package, you will get the 1.9 version,
>>> if you want 2.0 beta, you have to install the digikam2 package.
>>>
>>> Le Thu, 24 Mar 2011 04:39:40 +0100, Ozzy <[hidden email]> a écrit:
>>>
>>> > Then, from CLI, how do I install the beta version?
>>> > I normally would type:
>>> >> sudo apt-get install digikam
>>> > but I don't want to install that one that is in the Ubuntu
>>> > repositories.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks.
>>> >
>>> > O.
>>> >
>>> > PS: I am so glad that there is no such a thing a stupid question.....
>>> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Philip Johnsson
>>> > <[hidden email]>wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> If you mean all the three PPAs then yes.
>>> >>
>>> >> /Philip
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> Nicolas Boulesteix
>>> Photographe chasseur de lueurs
>>> http://www.photonoxx.fr
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users


Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com
Versie: 10.0.1204 / Virusdatabase: 1498/3537 - datum van uitgifte: 03/29/11



_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users



_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users


_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

Philip Johnsson
In reply to this post by Philip Johnsson
I have now uploaded Digikam 2.0 beta4 packages for *ubuntu 11.04 (Natty) on my "extra" PPA on Launchpad. With Natty you won't need all the special backport PPAs as Natty have what is needed to build Digikam 2.0 but so far you only need my "extra" PPA.

As before the Digikam 2.0 beta4 packages are named digikam2, kipi-plugins2 and showfoto2 and will conflict with the stable Digikam 1.9. To make face detection and recognition to work make sure that you update the opencv packages in the "extra" PPA too as they are fixed so they support face detection features as they should (if anyone wonders why they need to be updated too).

Happy digikaming on Natty!

/Philip



On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:40 AM, ozzyprv <[hidden email]> wrote:

Philip Johnsson wrote:
>
> I'm not sure I that was clear.
>
> ...And to complicate the issue a bit more there was a ..........
>
> Hope this clear things out when it comes to naming.
>
> /Philip
>

No, it does not clear things. At least not for me.
But that is okay. YOU ARE DOING A FANTASTIC JOB.

O.

--
View this message in context: http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/Any-interests-in-Digikam-2-0-packages-and-digikam-PPA-tp3337801p3420071.html
Sent from the digikam-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________


_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

Jonas Norlander
2011/4/8 Philip Johnsson <[hidden email]>:

> I have now uploaded Digikam 2.0 beta4 packages for *ubuntu 11.04 (Natty) on
> my "extra" PPA on Launchpad. With Natty you won't need all the special
> backport PPAs as Natty have what is needed to build Digikam 2.0 but so far
> you only need my "extra" PPA.
>
> As before the Digikam 2.0 beta4 packages are named digikam2, kipi-plugins2
> and showfoto2 and will conflict with the stable Digikam 1.9. To make face
> detection and recognition to work make sure that you update the opencv
> packages in the "extra" PPA too as they are fixed so they support face
> detection features as they should (if anyone wonders why they need to be
> updated too).
>
> Happy digikaming on Natty!
>
> /Philip

Thanks very much!

Will try it later.

/ Jonas
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

Philip Johnsson
New updated packages of Digikam 2.0 beta4 is now available on my kubuntu-backports PPA for Maverick. The packages are rebuilds to use OpenCV 2.2 instead of OpenCV 2.1. OpenCV is the backend for face detection and recognition. I'm not sure of any improvements with the update more than hopefully newer is better...  The updated version of OpenCV supports OpenEXR images how or if it matters in Digikam when it comes to this feature I'm not sure of.

Make sure that you get the libcvaux2.2-data package installed too (you should get it installed automatically) as it's now the package that contain haarcascades that are used to make face detection and recognition. Without it nothing will happen if you try to run the face detection features in Digikam.

Happy digikaming!

/Philip



On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Jonas Norlander <[hidden email]> wrote:
2011/4/8 Philip Johnsson <[hidden email]>:
> I have now uploaded Digikam 2.0 beta4 packages for *ubuntu 11.04 (Natty) on
> my "extra" PPA on Launchpad. With Natty you won't need all the special
> backport PPAs as Natty have what is needed to build Digikam 2.0 but so far
> you only need my "extra" PPA.
>
> As before the Digikam 2.0 beta4 packages are named digikam2, kipi-plugins2
> and showfoto2 and will conflict with the stable Digikam 1.9. To make face
> detection and recognition to work make sure that you update the opencv
> packages in the "extra" PPA too as they are fixed so they support face
> detection features as they should (if anyone wonders why they need to be
> updated too).
>
> Happy digikaming on Natty!
>
> /Philip

Thanks very much!

Will try it later.

/ Jonas
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users


_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

Jonas Norlander
2011/4/13 Philip Johnsson <[hidden email]>:

> New updated packages of Digikam 2.0 beta4 is now available on my
> kubuntu-backports PPA for Maverick. The packages are rebuilds to use OpenCV
> 2.2 instead of OpenCV 2.1. OpenCV is the backend for face detection and
> recognition. I'm not sure of any improvements with the update more than
> hopefully newer is better...  The updated version of OpenCV supports OpenEXR
> images how or if it matters in Digikam when it comes to this feature I'm not
> sure of.
>
> Make sure that you get the libcvaux2.2-data package installed too (you
> should get it installed automatically) as it's now the package that contain
> haarcascades that are used to make face detection and recognition. Without
> it nothing will happen if you try to run the face detection features in
> Digikam.
>
> Happy digikaming!
>
> /Philip

Hi Philip!

Is it possible for you to include the patch from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271651 into your packages so
Digikam 2 can use NFS and CIFS network share's again? Perhaps better
to just compile the package "off line" from your PPA so I can test
them?

Thank you!

/ Jonas
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

Philip Johnsson
Digikam 2.0 beta5 is scheduled to be released 24/04/2011 so it's a few days overdue. Hopefully we will have an official new beta release any day now so in that case the patch and many more will be included in that release. If it takes longer then I might be able to release a patched update.

/Philip



On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Jonas Norlander <[hidden email]> wrote:
2011/4/13 Philip Johnsson <[hidden email]>:
> New updated packages of Digikam 2.0 beta4 is now available on my
> kubuntu-backports PPA for Maverick. The packages are rebuilds to use OpenCV
> 2.2 instead of OpenCV 2.1. OpenCV is the backend for face detection and
> recognition. I'm not sure of any improvements with the update more than
> hopefully newer is better...  The updated version of OpenCV supports OpenEXR
> images how or if it matters in Digikam when it comes to this feature I'm not
> sure of.
>
> Make sure that you get the libcvaux2.2-data package installed too (you
> should get it installed automatically) as it's now the package that contain
> haarcascades that are used to make face detection and recognition. Without
> it nothing will happen if you try to run the face detection features in
> Digikam.
>
> Happy digikaming!
>
> /Philip

Hi Philip!

Is it possible for you to include the patch from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271651 into your packages so
Digikam 2 can use NFS and CIFS network share's again? Perhaps better
to just compile the package "off line" from your PPA so I can test
them?

Thank you!

/ Jonas
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users


_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

Philip Johnsson
Digikam 2.0 beta 5 packages are now available for Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty)
on my ppa:philip5/extra PPA. As before install packages digikam2,
kipi-plugins2 and showfoto2 to try out Digikam 2.0 beta5. Remember
that it's still beta software and should not be used for production.

I will upload packages for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick) during this
evening. But with Maverick you need three PPAs ppa:philip5/extra,
ppa:philip5/kubuntu-backports and ppa:kubuntu-ppa/backports. Launchpad
have had long build cues the past days after the release of Natty so
it might take some time for the Maverick packages to get built and
ready for users to download.

Happy Digikaming!

/Philip
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

Randy Orrison-3
Hi,

I've installed this on Natty (had some problem earlier today, when
only parts of beta5 were available, and ended up removing beta4 and
then waiting until all of beta5 was available).  I'm having a problem
launching digikam:

$ /usr/bin/digikam
QSqlDatabasePrivate::removeDatabase: connection 'ConnectionTest' is
still in use, all queries will cease to work.
(the splash screen now comes up, and it says it's scanning)
/usr/bin/digikam: symbol lookup error: /usr/bin/digikam: undefined
symbol: _ZN11KDcrawIface12RExpanderBox12readSettingsER12KConfigGroup
(and now the spash screen disappears and DigiKam is nowhere to be seen)
$

I'm guessing there's some dependancy problem... what packages is it
likely to be?

$ dpkg -l | grep maverick~ppa shows:
ii  exiv2                                 0.21.1-maverick~ppa1
              EXIF/IPTC metadata manipulation tool
ii  kdegraphics-libs-data                 4:4.6.2-maverick~ppa1kde46
              data files for libraries from the kdegraphics module
ii  libexiv2-10                           0.21.1-maverick~ppa1
              EXIF/IPTC metadata manipulation library
ii  libkdcraw-20                          2.0.0+maverick~ppa1kde46
              RAW picture decoding C++ library
ii  libkexiv2-10                          2.0.0+maverick~ppa1kde46
              Qt like interface for the libexiv2 library
ii  libkface-1                            2.0.0+maverick~ppa2kde46
              wrapper library to perform face recognition and
detection
ii  libkipi8                              4:4.6.2-maverick~ppa1kde46
              library for apps that want to use kipi-plugins (runtime
version)
ii  libkmap-1                             2.0.0+maverick~ppa1kde46
              world map components library
ii  libkmap-1-data                        2.0.0+maverick~ppa1kde46
              world map components library - common data
ii  libksane0                             4:4.6.2-maverick~ppa1kde46
              scanner library for KDE 4 (runtime)
ii  liborc-0.4-0                          1:0.4.11-maverick~ppa1
              Library of Optimized Inner Loops Runtime Compiler
ii  libschroedinger-1.0-0                 1.0.10-maverick~ppa1
              library for encoding/decoding of Dirac video streams
ii  python-support                        1.0.12-maverick~ppa1
              automated rebuilding support for Python modules

Many of these seem relevant, but shouldn't they be upgraded to natty
packages?  As a specific example, libkipi8 in synaptic shows versions
4:4.6.2-maverick-ppa1kde46 (now) and 4:4.6.2-0ubuntu1 (natty).  If I
try to use synaptic's Force Version to get the natty package, it says
it's a downgrade.

Thank-you for all your hard work!

Randy


On 5 May 2011 19:17, Philip Johnsson <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Digikam 2.0 beta 5 packages are now available for Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty)
> on my ppa:philip5/extra PPA. As before install packages digikam2,
> kipi-plugins2 and showfoto2 to try out Digikam 2.0 beta5. Remember
> that it's still beta software and should not be used for production.
>
> I will upload packages for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick) during this
> evening. But with Maverick you need three PPAs ppa:philip5/extra,
> ppa:philip5/kubuntu-backports and ppa:kubuntu-ppa/backports. Launchpad
> have had long build cues the past days after the release of Natty so
> it might take some time for the Maverick packages to get built and
> ready for users to download.
>
> Happy Digikaming!
>
> /Philip
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

Philip Johnsson
Have you forced natty to use maverick sources with packages some how?
Look in your source-file (either in the file /etc/apt/source.list or
with a frontend like synaptic or kpackagekit) to see that it doesn't
have something with maverick. Otherwise it should upgrade. I know it
might been some problems as of the long build cue times on launchpad
as some packages have been finished long before others which ends up
in users systems with packages from different digikam versions.
Usually there are shorter cue times and gives no problems or just for
a very short time.

If you have problems the easiest way would be uninstall, clean and
reinstall alla digikam2 stuff which include its libs too. Try the
following:

sudo apt-get remove libkdcraw-20 libkexiv2-10 libkface-1 libkmap-1

sudo apt-get clean

sudo apt-get update

sudo apt-get install digikam2 kipi-plugins2 showfoto2     (and maybe
digikam2-doc kipi-plugins2-doc showfoto2-doc if you want helpfiles)

That should uninstall everything and bring digikam2 stuff with it,
clean cache and reinstall fresh new ones.

Hope that sort things out for you.

/Philip



On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Randy Orrison <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've installed this on Natty (had some problem earlier today, when
> only parts of beta5 were available, and ended up removing beta4 and
> then waiting until all of beta5 was available).  I'm having a problem
> launching digikam:
>
> $ /usr/bin/digikam
> QSqlDatabasePrivate::removeDatabase: connection 'ConnectionTest' is
> still in use, all queries will cease to work.
> (the splash screen now comes up, and it says it's scanning)
> /usr/bin/digikam: symbol lookup error: /usr/bin/digikam: undefined
> symbol: _ZN11KDcrawIface12RExpanderBox12readSettingsER12KConfigGroup
> (and now the spash screen disappears and DigiKam is nowhere to be seen)
> $
>
> I'm guessing there's some dependancy problem... what packages is it
> likely to be?
>
> $ dpkg -l | grep maverick~ppa shows:
> ii  exiv2                                 0.21.1-maverick~ppa1
>              EXIF/IPTC metadata manipulation tool
> ii  kdegraphics-libs-data                 4:4.6.2-maverick~ppa1kde46
>              data files for libraries from the kdegraphics module
> ii  libexiv2-10                           0.21.1-maverick~ppa1
>              EXIF/IPTC metadata manipulation library
> ii  libkdcraw-20                          2.0.0+maverick~ppa1kde46
>              RAW picture decoding C++ library
> ii  libkexiv2-10                          2.0.0+maverick~ppa1kde46
>              Qt like interface for the libexiv2 library
> ii  libkface-1                            2.0.0+maverick~ppa2kde46
>              wrapper library to perform face recognition and
> detection
> ii  libkipi8                              4:4.6.2-maverick~ppa1kde46
>              library for apps that want to use kipi-plugins (runtime
> version)
> ii  libkmap-1                             2.0.0+maverick~ppa1kde46
>              world map components library
> ii  libkmap-1-data                        2.0.0+maverick~ppa1kde46
>              world map components library - common data
> ii  libksane0                             4:4.6.2-maverick~ppa1kde46
>              scanner library for KDE 4 (runtime)
> ii  liborc-0.4-0                          1:0.4.11-maverick~ppa1
>              Library of Optimized Inner Loops Runtime Compiler
> ii  libschroedinger-1.0-0                 1.0.10-maverick~ppa1
>              library for encoding/decoding of Dirac video streams
> ii  python-support                        1.0.12-maverick~ppa1
>              automated rebuilding support for Python modules
>
> Many of these seem relevant, but shouldn't they be upgraded to natty
> packages?  As a specific example, libkipi8 in synaptic shows versions
> 4:4.6.2-maverick-ppa1kde46 (now) and 4:4.6.2-0ubuntu1 (natty).  If I
> try to use synaptic's Force Version to get the natty package, it says
> it's a downgrade.
>
> Thank-you for all your hard work!
>
> Randy
>
>
> On 5 May 2011 19:17, Philip Johnsson <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Digikam 2.0 beta 5 packages are now available for Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty)
>> on my ppa:philip5/extra PPA. As before install packages digikam2,
>> kipi-plugins2 and showfoto2 to try out Digikam 2.0 beta5. Remember
>> that it's still beta software and should not be used for production.
>>
>> I will upload packages for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick) during this
>> evening. But with Maverick you need three PPAs ppa:philip5/extra,
>> ppa:philip5/kubuntu-backports and ppa:kubuntu-ppa/backports. Launchpad
>> have had long build cues the past days after the release of Natty so
>> it might take some time for the Maverick packages to get built and
>> ready for users to download.
>>
>> Happy Digikaming!
>>
>> /Philip
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

Randy Orrison-3
Hi Philip,

The only lines in sources.list that mentioned maverick were commented
out, and in the repositories list in synaptic everything mentioning
maverick is unticked (and says "disabled on upgrade to natty"). I went
ahead with the removal, clean, update and re-install, and it's now
working fine. Now to find the time to learn how to use it!

Thanks again,

Randy


On 05/05/11 21:54, Philip Johnsson wrote:

> Have you forced natty to use maverick sources with packages some how?
> Look in your source-file (either in the file /etc/apt/source.list or
> with a frontend like synaptic or kpackagekit) to see that it doesn't
> have something with maverick. Otherwise it should upgrade. I know it
> might been some problems as of the long build cue times on launchpad
> as some packages have been finished long before others which ends up
> in users systems with packages from different digikam versions.
> Usually there are shorter cue times and gives no problems or just for
> a very short time.
>
> If you have problems the easiest way would be uninstall, clean and
> reinstall alla digikam2 stuff which include its libs too. Try the
> following:
>
> sudo apt-get remove libkdcraw-20 libkexiv2-10 libkface-1 libkmap-1
>
> sudo apt-get clean
>
> sudo apt-get update
>
> sudo apt-get install digikam2 kipi-plugins2 showfoto2     (and maybe
> digikam2-doc kipi-plugins2-doc showfoto2-doc if you want helpfiles)
>
> That should uninstall everything and bring digikam2 stuff with it,
> clean cache and reinstall fresh new ones.
>
> Hope that sort things out for you.
>
> /Philip
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Randy Orrison<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've installed this on Natty (had some problem earlier today, when
>> only parts of beta5 were available, and ended up removing beta4 and
>> then waiting until all of beta5 was available).  I'm having a problem
>> launching digikam:
>>
>> $ /usr/bin/digikam
>> QSqlDatabasePrivate::removeDatabase: connection 'ConnectionTest' is
>> still in use, all queries will cease to work.
>> (the splash screen now comes up, and it says it's scanning)
>> /usr/bin/digikam: symbol lookup error: /usr/bin/digikam: undefined
>> symbol: _ZN11KDcrawIface12RExpanderBox12readSettingsER12KConfigGroup
>> (and now the spash screen disappears and DigiKam is nowhere to be seen)
>> $
>>
>> I'm guessing there's some dependancy problem... what packages is it
>> likely to be?
>>
>> $ dpkg -l | grep maverick~ppa shows:
>> ii  exiv2                                 0.21.1-maverick~ppa1
>>               EXIF/IPTC metadata manipulation tool
>> ii  kdegraphics-libs-data                 4:4.6.2-maverick~ppa1kde46
>>               data files for libraries from the kdegraphics module
>> ii  libexiv2-10                           0.21.1-maverick~ppa1
>>               EXIF/IPTC metadata manipulation library
>> ii  libkdcraw-20                          2.0.0+maverick~ppa1kde46
>>               RAW picture decoding C++ library
>> ii  libkexiv2-10                          2.0.0+maverick~ppa1kde46
>>               Qt like interface for the libexiv2 library
>> ii  libkface-1                            2.0.0+maverick~ppa2kde46
>>               wrapper library to perform face recognition and
>> detection
>> ii  libkipi8                              4:4.6.2-maverick~ppa1kde46
>>               library for apps that want to use kipi-plugins (runtime
>> version)
>> ii  libkmap-1                             2.0.0+maverick~ppa1kde46
>>               world map components library
>> ii  libkmap-1-data                        2.0.0+maverick~ppa1kde46
>>               world map components library - common data
>> ii  libksane0                             4:4.6.2-maverick~ppa1kde46
>>               scanner library for KDE 4 (runtime)
>> ii  liborc-0.4-0                          1:0.4.11-maverick~ppa1
>>               Library of Optimized Inner Loops Runtime Compiler
>> ii  libschroedinger-1.0-0                 1.0.10-maverick~ppa1
>>               library for encoding/decoding of Dirac video streams
>> ii  python-support                        1.0.12-maverick~ppa1
>>               automated rebuilding support for Python modules
>>
>> Many of these seem relevant, but shouldn't they be upgraded to natty
>> packages?  As a specific example, libkipi8 in synaptic shows versions
>> 4:4.6.2-maverick-ppa1kde46 (now) and 4:4.6.2-0ubuntu1 (natty).  If I
>> try to use synaptic's Force Version to get the natty package, it says
>> it's a downgrade.
>>
>> Thank-you for all your hard work!
>>
>> Randy
>>
>>
>> On 5 May 2011 19:17, Philip Johnsson<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>>> Digikam 2.0 beta 5 packages are now available for Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty)
>>> on my ppa:philip5/extra PPA. As before install packages digikam2,
>>> kipi-plugins2 and showfoto2 to try out Digikam 2.0 beta5. Remember
>>> that it's still beta software and should not be used for production.
>>>
>>> I will upload packages for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick) during this
>>> evening. But with Maverick you need three PPAs ppa:philip5/extra,
>>> ppa:philip5/kubuntu-backports and ppa:kubuntu-ppa/backports. Launchpad
>>> have had long build cues the past days after the release of Natty so
>>> it might take some time for the Maverick packages to get built and
>>> ready for users to download.
>>>
>>> Happy Digikaming!
>>>
>>> /Philip

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

Dotan Cohen
In reply to this post by Philip Johnsson
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 19:36, Philip Johnsson <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> I think it's know to this list that I have Digikam 1.9 packages on my PPA
> for Ubuntu 10.10 but I have no idea on how may people use it or what the
> interest is, beside some people now and then get in touch with me about this
> and that with packages.
>
> I just started to build packages of Digikam 2.0 beta3 for myself and
> wondered about what the interest in them are for you guys? They are made as
> digikam2 packages so they won't automatically update if you prefer to use
> the stable Digikam 1.9 but will conflict if you try to install them both at
> the same time. I might upload them to my kubuntu-backports PPA as you will
> need stuff from KDE 4.6 to build.
>
> Second question is if you guys would prefer a separate digikam PPA with just
> digikam stuff instead of as it is now to use my "extra" and for exiv2 0.21.x
> support my kubuntu-backports PPA? For me it's easier to do as I'm doing now
> and upload my stuff to the "extra" PPA but I don't know how many of you
> don't want to use it because it includes a bunch of assorted updates that
> you want to leave as they are.
>
> Feedback on this from anyone who cares are appreciated.
>
> Happy digikaming!
>
> Regards,
>
> Philip
>

Hi Philip, I'm sorry that I missed this thread until now. I am very
interested in the Digikam 2 beta PPA. If it is for your own use, then
of course merge the Digikam PPA with "extra" PPA. But if it is
intended as a service to the community, then the proper thing to do
would be to have them separate.

Thanks!


--
Dotan Cohen

http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

Philip Johnsson
My PPA is not an official Digikam PPA but as you say for "my own use".
The purpose for my PPA is that I upload stuff to it as I use myself to
let friends and others benefit from the work I do anyway. As I use
them my self I just want them to work too. Therefor you find more
stuff than just Digikam related software in the extra PPA. Grab and
use the things you want and leave the rest if you just want some part
of the content otherwise use all the stuff. It's up to you...

/Philip


On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Dotan Cohen <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Philip, I'm sorry that I missed this thread until now. I am very
> interested in the Digikam 2 beta PPA. If it is for your own use, then
> of course merge the Digikam PPA with "extra" PPA. But if it is
> intended as a service to the community, then the proper thing to do
> would be to have them separate.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> --
> Dotan Cohen
>
> http://gibberish.co.il
> http://what-is-what.com
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

Dotan Cohen
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 17:32, Philip Johnsson <[hidden email]> wrote:

> My PPA is not an official Digikam PPA but as you say for "my own use".
> The purpose for my PPA is that I upload stuff to it as I use myself to
> let friends and others benefit from the work I do anyway. As I use
> them my self I just want them to work too. Therefor you find more
> stuff than just Digikam related software in the extra PPA. Grab and
> use the things you want and leave the rest if you just want some part
> of the content otherwise use all the stuff. It's up to you...
>
> /Philip
>

Thanks for your service, Philip! Your contribution to the community is
most certainly appreciated! I currently am running a Digikam beta that
don't know from where I downloaded (as a .deb), but it might have been
from your PPA. In any case, when I upgrade to Kubuntu 11.04 I will try
your PPA.

Have a peaceful weekend.


--
Dotan Cohen

http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

Dotan Cohen
In reply to this post by Philip Johnsson
I want to say thank you to Philip for his terrific Digikam packages. I
just installed from the PPA and it installed flawlessly, including
removal of Digikam 1.9 from the system. Thank you!

--
Dotan Cohen

http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

ozzyprv
I have done this before, but now I am getting this error:



W: Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/philip5/extraPPA/ubuntu/dists/natty/main/source/Sources  404  Not Found

W: Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/philip5/extraPPA/ubuntu/dists/natty/main/binary-i386/Packages  404  Not Found

E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

Does anybody know why?

Thanks Gang.

Oz.

 
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Dotan Cohen <[hidden email]> wrote:
I want to say thank you to Philip for his terrific Digikam packages. I
just installed from the PPA and it installed flawlessly, including
removal of Digikam 1.9 from the system. Thank you!

--
Dotan Cohen

http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users


_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

Philip Johnsson
You have added the PPA with the wrong adress. The correct one for
natty should read:

deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/philip5/extra/ubuntu natty main

/Philip


On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Ozzy <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I have done this before, but now I am getting this error:
>
>
>
>> W: Failed to fetch
>> http://ppa.launchpad.net/philip5/extraPPA/ubuntu/dists/natty/main/source/Sources
>> 404  Not Found
>>
>> W: Failed to fetch
>> http://ppa.launchpad.net/philip5/extraPPA/ubuntu/dists/natty/main/binary-i386/Packages
>> 404  Not Found
>>
>> E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old
>> ones used instead.
>
> Does anybody know why?
>
> Thanks Gang.
>
> Oz.
>
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Dotan Cohen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> I want to say thank you to Philip for his terrific Digikam packages. I
>> just installed from the PPA and it installed flawlessly, including
>> removal of Digikam 1.9 from the system. Thank you!
>>
>> --
>> Dotan Cohen
>>
>> http://gibberish.co.il
>> http://what-is-what.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?

Philip Johnsson
Packages of Digikam 2.0 beta6 and of course kipi-plugins 2.0 beta6
with all the updated goodies are now available on my "extra" PPA for
Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty). If I get time I'll try to update the packages to
2.0 beta6 for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick) this evening for people still
using Maverick.

Remember that Digikam 2.0 is still beta software and not yet meant for
production use. That said you can try out the coming stable features
with all the goodies now all ready. Let the developers know about
problems or crashes with nice bug reports if that is the case so they
can make even better software for the stable release. If there are any
installation or package problem using my PPA on (*)ubuntu then report
that to me.

You find the PPA at: https://launchpad.net/~philip5

If you don't know how to use the PPA with Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty) then
visit this link:

http://www.mohamedmalik.com/?p=1019

Happy digikaming!

/Philip
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
123456 ... 9