Can you remind us where this is done. Or an example file even better. On Fri, May 29, 2020, 21:28 Carlos Echenique <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Install the application flatseal (its on flathub). Launch it. You will see the following: The highlighted part is where you add paths that you want to allow access to. You can see that /media and /run/media are already there. I added the /mnt entries for my system. Close flatseal and then launch digikam. You will now be able connect to the folders you desire.
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 9:37 PM Peter Teuben <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
flatpak run com.github.tchx84.Flatseal I use kubuntu, and it doesn't seem to be well integrated with it, or I didn't install enough infrastructure to make it findable via a gui. So I had to do the commandline way. But before you sent this email, I googled around a bit, and I
found this to work for me: sudo flatpak override org.kde.digikam --filesystem=/Photos
Especially the latter is a bit odd, since I have to symlinks in /Photos to /media USB drives..... weird. But to add to the confusion, those manually set directories are
not stored in the things listed in the flatseal app. Perhaps that
just "me" (i didn't sudo the flatpak instlall) vs. the override
, wihch required me to use sudo. I can't possibly be the only one struggling with this, so we should make these reminders available for the flatpak newbies. I'm sure it's all very powerful, but I'm still a bit underwhelmed.
I guess one could be nasty and symlink it back to your personal version in ~/.config, but I guess that could break if the flatpak KDE version differs from the system KDE version.
peter
PS: in kubuntu there is a Flatpak backend that can be installed
in their Discover tool. But surprise, surprise, you need to
restart the system, so I'll do that some other time to continue
this adventure.
On 5/29/20 11:11 PM, Carlos Echenique
wrote:
|
Did you log out/log in to enable the integration. I use bspwm and I had to do that. Your overrides are stored in ~/.local/share/flatpak/overrides; this does not require sudo. Using sudo makes it system wide.
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:31 PM Peter Teuben <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
haha, you made me look at the bswm youtube, this is quite something. I'll add your overrides to my writeup. On 5/29/20 11:42 PM, Carlos Echenique
wrote:
|
Interesting this flatseal, just installed it and opened it up but it
does not show the override I have used to access my home directory which allows Digikam to see my database and photo directories! Also as I said before it's a real pain that I am unable to access easily any other apps like GIMP, I guess unless they are installed using flatpak. Probably some way to do it but this all just seems total overkill in order to run Digikam. I simply cannot see a reason to run it locked down like this. Yes there are things where it would be very useful because there is real danger but not this. I'll stick to appimage (assuming it continues) or wait for the distro RPM. Stuart -- Website: https://www.stella-maris.org.uk or: https//www.broadstairs.org |
How did you add the override? Flatseal stores them in .local/share/flatpak/overrides not in the system in order to maintain the sandbox.
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 5:53 AM Stuart T Rogers <[hidden email]> wrote: Interesting this flatseal, just installed it and opened it up but it |
I used the flatpak override filesystem command in a console window.
Stuart On 31 May 2020 01:01:56 BST, Carlos Echenique <[hidden email]> wrote: >How did you add the override? Flatseal stores them in >.local/share/flatpak/overrides not in the system in order to maintain >the >sandbox. >Carlos Echenique Photographer, CE Photographic > >305.219.2433 | [hidden email] >Website: https://www.cephotographic.com ><https://www.facebook.com/echeniquephotos> ><https://flickr.com/photos/echenique> ><https://instagram.com/cephotographic> > > >On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 5:53 AM Stuart T Rogers ><[hidden email]> >wrote: > >> Interesting this flatseal, just installed it and opened it up but it >> does not show the override I have used to access my home directory >which >> allows Digikam to see my database and photo directories! >> >> Also as I said before it's a real pain that I am unable to access >easily >> any other apps like GIMP, I guess unless they are installed using >> flatpak. Probably some way to do it but this all just seems total >> overkill in order to run Digikam. >> >> I simply cannot see a reason to run it locked down like this. Yes >there >> are things where it would be very useful because there is real danger >> but not this. I'll stick to appimage (assuming it continues) or wait >for >> the distro RPM. >> >> Stuart >> >> >> >> -- >> Website: https://www.stella-maris.org.uk >> or: https//www.broadstairs.org >> -- Sent from my Samsung Galaxy J5 with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. |
Hmmm. The implementation of flatpak support is specific to the distro being used. I am using a spin of an Arch-based distro and that is where the files are placed on my system. YMMV.
On May 31, 2020, 2:34 AM -0400, Stuart Rogers <[hidden email]>, wrote:
I used the flatpak override filesystem command in a console window. |
In reply to this post by Mica Semrick
On Sun, 31 May 2020 15:48:58 -0400
Cirrus <[hidden email]> wrote: Hello Cirrus, >There's no unsubscribe info in the emails, so I'm clueless. As always, with a mailman list, it's in the headers: List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.kde.org/mailman/options/digikam-users>, <mailto:[hidden email]?subject=unsubscribe> -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)rad never immediately apparent" You only see me for the clothes that I wear Public Image - Public Image Ltd attachment0 (499 bytes) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by etrigan63
i ran into another beautiful feature of the flatpak..... I wanted to
edit a file with another app, gimp, but its not inthe list, since it can only look inside of it container (without going through contortions). Even /usr/bin/gimp doesn't work. I dunno about flatpak. On 5/31/20 9:32 AM, Carlos Echenique wrote: > Hmmm. The implementation of flatpak support is specific to the distro > being used. I am using a spin of an Arch-based distro and that is > where the files are placed on my system. YMMV. > > Carlos Echenique > CE Photography > [hidden email] > On May 31, 2020, 2:34 AM -0400, Stuart Rogers > <[hidden email]>, wrote: >> I used the flatpak override filesystem command in a console window. >> >> Stuart >> >> On 31 May 2020 01:01:56 BST, Carlos Echenique <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >>> How did you add the override? Flatseal stores them in >>> .local/share/flatpak/overrides not in the system in order to maintain >>> the >>> sandbox. >>> Carlos Echenique Photographer, CE Photographic >>> >>> 305.219.2433 | [hidden email] >>> Website: https://www.cephotographic.com >>> <https://www.facebook.com/echeniquephotos> >>> <https://flickr.com/photos/echenique> >>> <https://instagram.com/cephotographic> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 5:53 AM Stuart T Rogers >>> <[hidden email]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Interesting this flatseal, just installed it and opened it up but it >>>> does not show the override I have used to access my home directory >>> which >>>> allows Digikam to see my database and photo directories! >>>> >>>> Also as I said before it's a real pain that I am unable to access >>> easily >>>> any other apps like GIMP, I guess unless they are installed using >>>> flatpak. Probably some way to do it but this all just seems total >>>> overkill in order to run Digikam. >>>> >>>> I simply cannot see a reason to run it locked down like this. Yes >>> there >>>> are things where it would be very useful because there is real danger >>>> but not this. I'll stick to appimage (assuming it continues) or wait >>> for >>>> the distro RPM. >>>> >>>> Stuart >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Website: https://www.stella-maris.org.uk >>>> or: https//www.broadstairs.org >>>> >> >> -- >> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy J5 with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. |
Flatseal to the rescue, Peter.
On May 31, 2020, 9:03 PM -0400, Peter Teuben <[hidden email]>, wrote:
i ran into another beautiful feature of the flatpak..... I wanted to |
I know.... again. but this is getting tiring.
On 5/31/20 9:06 PM, Carlos Echenique wrote: > Flatseal to the rescue, Peter. > > Carlos Echenique > CE Photography > [hidden email] > On May 31, 2020, 9:03 PM -0400, Peter Teuben <[hidden email]>, wrote: >> i ran into another beautiful feature of the flatpak..... I wanted to >> edit a file with another app, gimp, but its not inthe list, since it can >> only look inside of it container (without going through contortions). >> Even /usr/bin/gimp doesn't work. >> >> I dunno about flatpak. >> >> On 5/31/20 9:32 AM, Carlos Echenique wrote: >>> Hmmm. The implementation of flatpak support is specific to the distro >>> being used. I am using a spin of an Arch-based distro and that is >>> where the files are placed on my system. YMMV. >>> >>> Carlos Echenique >>> CE Photography >>> [hidden email] >>> On May 31, 2020, 2:34 AM -0400, Stuart Rogers >>> <[hidden email]>, wrote: >>>> I used the flatpak override filesystem command in a console window. >>>> >>>> Stuart >>>> >>>> On 31 May 2020 01:01:56 BST, Carlos Echenique <[hidden email]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> How did you add the override? Flatseal stores them in >>>>> .local/share/flatpak/overrides not in the system in order to maintain >>>>> the >>>>> sandbox. >>>>> Carlos Echenique Photographer, CE Photographic >>>>> >>>>> 305.219.2433 | [hidden email] >>>>> Website: https://www.cephotographic.com >>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/echeniquephotos> >>>>> <https://flickr.com/photos/echenique> >>>>> <https://instagram.com/cephotographic> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 5:53 AM Stuart T Rogers >>>>> <[hidden email]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Interesting this flatseal, just installed it and opened it up but it >>>>>> does not show the override I have used to access my home directory >>>>> which >>>>>> allows Digikam to see my database and photo directories! >>>>>> >>>>>> Also as I said before it's a real pain that I am unable to access >>>>> easily >>>>>> any other apps like GIMP, I guess unless they are installed using >>>>>> flatpak. Probably some way to do it but this all just seems total >>>>>> overkill in order to run Digikam. >>>>>> >>>>>> I simply cannot see a reason to run it locked down like this. Yes >>>>> there >>>>>> are things where it would be very useful because there is real danger >>>>>> but not this. I'll stick to appimage (assuming it continues) or wait >>>>> for >>>>>> the distro RPM. >>>>>> >>>>>> Stuart >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Website: https://www.stella-maris.org.uk >>>>>> or: https//www.broadstairs.org >>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy J5 with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. |
In reply to this post by etrigan63
Le 01/06/2020 à 03:06, Carlos Echenique a écrit :
> Flatseal to the rescue, Peter. > you should understand that most new software do not take in account new users. I had to search half an hour to understand that flatpak kde software install is "discover" (never heard before of this sift) and there I could install flatseal, unknown in yast (I use openSUSE 15.1) thanks jdd -- http://dodin.org |
I'm sorry but I do feel that flatpak is a complete waste of time, there
are so many hoops to jump through to get digikam working as most users want and need that it is a wasted effort. Also probably most users would enable access to everything in order to be able to use apps they already have installed, thus completely negating the whole point of a sandbox! I very much doubt that anyone anywhere in the world has had a security issue directly caused by digikam so to have to run it sandboxed like this is a completely pointless. I have not had any problems with appimage to test beta versions and my distros RPM works perfectly with immediate access to everything I need accessible. Also being a rolling release I get the latest stable releases very quickly. Yes there probably are apps I would want to run sandboxed, if I needed them, but they are very few and far between and frankly none that I have seen so far available in flatpak. Yes you need to use Discover in openSUSE to do the installs etc and so far there is no access from YAST. Discover can be used to install normal openSUSE programs as well so it may become the norm in future, although personally I prefer YAST or commandline. Stuart On 01/06/2020 06:13, [hidden email] wrote: > Le 01/06/2020 à 03:06, Carlos Echenique a écrit : >> Flatseal to the rescue, Peter. >> > > you should understand that most new software do not take in account new > users. > > I had to search half an hour to understand that flatpak kde software > install is "discover" (never heard before of this sift) > > and there I could install flatseal, unknown in yast (I use openSUSE 15.1) > > thanks > jdd > -- Website: https://www.stella-maris.org.uk or: https//www.broadstairs.org |
Hi all,
Sorry for my late response in the thread, but i'm not at home actually, and busy in familly I start to group all information around Flatpak in a README.md file from git repository, here : https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/-/tree/master/project/bundles/flatpak There are plenty of details to append in the file due to the feedback here. Please use gitlab, fork the repository, and send a pull request. With gitlab, it's very simple, and ALL can be done with web interface. README.md file can be edited on line too... Thanks in advance for your contributions. Best Gilles Caulier Le lun. 1 juin 2020 à 10:22, Stuart T Rogers <[hidden email]> a écrit : > > I'm sorry but I do feel that flatpak is a complete waste of time, there > are so many hoops to jump through to get digikam working as most users > want and need that it is a wasted effort. Also probably most users would > enable access to everything in order to be able to use apps they already > have installed, thus completely negating the whole point of a sandbox! > > I very much doubt that anyone anywhere in the world has had a security > issue directly caused by digikam so to have to run it sandboxed like > this is a completely pointless. I have not had any problems with > appimage to test beta versions and my distros RPM works perfectly with > immediate access to everything I need accessible. Also being a rolling > release I get the latest stable releases very quickly. > > Yes there probably are apps I would want to run sandboxed, if I needed > them, but they are very few and far between and frankly none that I have > seen so far available in flatpak. > > Yes you need to use Discover in openSUSE to do the installs etc and so > far there is no access from YAST. Discover can be used to install normal > openSUSE programs as well so it may become the norm in future, although > personally I prefer YAST or commandline. > > Stuart > > On 01/06/2020 06:13, [hidden email] wrote: > > Le 01/06/2020 à 03:06, Carlos Echenique a écrit : > >> Flatseal to the rescue, Peter. > >> > > > > you should understand that most new software do not take in account new > > users. > > > > I had to search half an hour to understand that flatpak kde software > > install is "discover" (never heard before of this sift) > > > > and there I could install flatseal, unknown in yast (I use openSUSE 15.1) > > > > thanks > > jdd > > > > -- > Website: https://www.stella-maris.org.uk > or: https//www.broadstairs.org |
>
> With gitlab, it's very simple, and ALL can be done with web interface. ... and why is that any better than command line? :-) I use the command line for almost everything I do, including installing software. Anything that is GUI only is not a lot of use to me, and I don't believe I'm completely alone in this. -- Chris Green |
Hi,
No problem with CLI, but i would to see more and more contributor writing doc, notice, tuto. Using the web interface is a way to contribute quickly and easily, without to know all development bulldozers... Best Gilles caulier Le lun. 1 juin 2020 à 13:27, Chris Green <[hidden email]> a écrit : > > > > > With gitlab, it's very simple, and ALL can be done with web interface. > > ... and why is that any better than command line? :-) I use the > command line for almost everything I do, including installing > software. Anything that is GUI only is not a lot of use to me, and I > don't believe I'm completely alone in this. > > -- > Chris Green |
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Q : Someone can check if translations are embedded well in the digiKam
FlatPak bundle... I have a doubt as AppImage is more larger than FlatPak, and i'm sure that AppImage bundle includes all translation files. Best Gilles Caulier Le lun. 1 juin 2020 à 11:04, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> a écrit : > > Hi all, > > Sorry for my late response in the thread, but i'm not at home > actually, and busy in familly > > I start to group all information around Flatpak in a README.md file > from git repository, here : > > https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/-/tree/master/project/bundles/flatpak > > There are plenty of details to append in the file due to the feedback > here. Please use gitlab, fork the repository, and send a pull request. > > With gitlab, it's very simple, and ALL can be done with web interface. > README.md file can be edited on line too... > > Thanks in advance for your contributions. > > Best > > Gilles Caulier > > Le lun. 1 juin 2020 à 10:22, Stuart T Rogers > <[hidden email]> a écrit : > > > > I'm sorry but I do feel that flatpak is a complete waste of time, there > > are so many hoops to jump through to get digikam working as most users > > want and need that it is a wasted effort. Also probably most users would > > enable access to everything in order to be able to use apps they already > > have installed, thus completely negating the whole point of a sandbox! > > > > I very much doubt that anyone anywhere in the world has had a security > > issue directly caused by digikam so to have to run it sandboxed like > > this is a completely pointless. I have not had any problems with > > appimage to test beta versions and my distros RPM works perfectly with > > immediate access to everything I need accessible. Also being a rolling > > release I get the latest stable releases very quickly. > > > > Yes there probably are apps I would want to run sandboxed, if I needed > > them, but they are very few and far between and frankly none that I have > > seen so far available in flatpak. > > > > Yes you need to use Discover in openSUSE to do the installs etc and so > > far there is no access from YAST. Discover can be used to install normal > > openSUSE programs as well so it may become the norm in future, although > > personally I prefer YAST or commandline. > > > > Stuart > > > > On 01/06/2020 06:13, [hidden email] wrote: > > > Le 01/06/2020 à 03:06, Carlos Echenique a écrit : > > >> Flatseal to the rescue, Peter. > > >> > > > > > > you should understand that most new software do not take in account new > > > users. > > > > > > I had to search half an hour to understand that flatpak kde software > > > install is "discover" (never heard before of this sift) > > > > > > and there I could install flatseal, unknown in yast (I use openSUSE 15.1) > > > > > > thanks > > > jdd > > > > > > > -- > > Website: https://www.stella-maris.org.uk > > or: https//www.broadstairs.org |
In reply to this post by Stuart T Rogers
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 09:22:01 +0100
Stuart T Rogers <[hidden email]> wrote: > I'm sorry but I do feel that flatpak is a complete waste of time, > there are so many hoops to jump through to get digikam working as > most users want and need that it is a wasted effort. Also probably > most users would enable access to everything in order to be able to > use apps they already have installed, thus completely negating the > whole point of a sandbox! I disagree with you. 1. Creating a flatpak digikam does not mean that you will not be able to get it from your own distribution, if you are using Linux, whatever your distribution does. 2. Earlier, Gilles said that it takes him a huge amount of time to build and rebuild the appimages. If some other infrastructure can do it for him, this will mean that he will have more time to spend on: making dk even better or "having a life" or... Gilles is one of the main driving force behind DK, we have to trust him and his judgment. Thanks Gilles. -- sknahT vyS |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |