Ahh (:=)))
Gilles Le mar. 26 mai 2020 à 15:08, Brian Morrison <[hidden email]> a écrit : > > On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 23:49 +0200, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > Look like digiKam will be also added to official FlatHub repository > > soon : > > > > https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/1544#pullrequestreview-417884061 > > > > https://www.xkcd.com/927/ > > -- > > Brian > > |
In reply to this post by Brian Morrison
Hello!
In windows 10, the Build date: May 22 2020 (target: RelWithDebInfo) version is simple crashed in the middle of the face detection. I started the detection on about 10K+ images (Tiff and JPEG), with detect all and merge options. the face detection in the settings file is "3". In one minute its about 17% the next the whole digikam is vanished. No error, no logs, nothing. Any suggestion? Thanx Csaba |
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Done !!!
digiKam is now avaialble on FlatHub : https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.kde.digikam Best Gilles Caulier Le lun. 25 mai 2020 à 17:49, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> a écrit : > > Look like digiKam will be also added to official FlatHub repository soon : > > https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/1544#pullrequestreview-417884061 > > Gilles Caulier > > Le lun. 25 mai 2020 à 15:09, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> a écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > > Another important point : the Flatpak do not include yet the > > application translations files. It's relevant by the missing > > sunversion executable on the KDE server. > > > > And yes, all translations team from KDE project still to use > > subversion to host i18n data. > > > > As whole KDE migrate progressively from an own git/svn servers to > > gitlab, i read that i18n will also migrate to git in the near future. > > So wait and see... > > > > Best > > > > Gilles Caulier > > > > Le lun. 25 mai 2020 à 12:04, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> a écrit : > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I just updated the Flatpak notice page on digikam source repository : > > > > > > https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/-/tree/master/project/bundles/flatpak > > > > > > digiKam Flatpak is now compiled with ALL non-deprecated options, > > > including Web services using KIO. Look like the application resume is > > > well documented now, with plenty of screenshots. > > > > > > By non deprecated, i want mean the 2 ones : Baloo and Akonady > > > supports. Both make a mess with digiKam (especially Baloo). > > > > > > As i read, Flatpak is able to notify users when a new version is > > > published. I don't yet verified if it work well. > > > > > > On Flatpak, it's possible to rate and review the application. So don't > > > hesitate to promote the application. > > > > > > My best > > > > > > Gilles Caulier > > > > > > > > > Le dim. 24 mai 2020 à 12:24, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> a écrit : > > > > > > > > Hi all users, > > > > > > > > I would to give some feedback about the digiKam bundles migration advance... > > > > > > > > The current files provided by the project are listed below : > > > > > > > > - Linux AppImage 64 bits > > > > - Linux AppImage 32 bits > > > > - Macos Package installer 64 bits (based on Macports) > > > > - Windows installer 64 bits (compiled with MXE - MinGW) > > > > - Windows installer 32 bits (compiled with MXE - MinGW) > > > > > > > > Current problems for these bundles are listed below : > > > > > > > > - AppImage : not signed, do not support KIO extensions, do not support > > > > ICU (language extension), not published on official repository. > > > > - MacOS package : It's not relocatable, even if MacOS support well > > > > this feature. I don't found the time to finalize yet the install > > > > relocation support in bash script. Package is not published on MacOS > > > > store. > > > > - MXE Windows installer : not signed, not published on Windows store. > > > > Do not support KIO extension. > > > > > > > > But we have a new one starting to work and i working on : FlatPak > > > > > > > > This one is signed, published of official repository automatically > > > > (you can install it on Discover application for ex). It support ICU > > > > and KIO too... FlatPak is compiled on KDE infrastructure nightly and > > > > automatically. Only a 64 bits version is supported. > > > > > > > > This want mean that AppImage end of life is near. We will still > > > > publish officially the AppImage until 7.0.0, but later, if FlatPak do > > > > the job as well, AppImage will be dropped... > > > > > > > > For Windows, all the digiKam code compile fine under Microsoft Visual > > > > C++ compiler. This is the goal to obtain a signed and published > > > > version on Microsoft store. You can imagine that Microsoft will only > > > > support the official Windows compiler, and not GCC to permit to sign > > > > and publish application on the store. Don't forget, Microsoft is well > > > > Closed Source (:=)))) > > > > > > > > Microsoft compiler is just the hell. It slow and require a Windows > > > > operating system. The current cross compilation solution that we use > > > > work fully under Linux, and compilation time are reduced by 4/5 ! A > > > > full Linux Workflow is a non virus guaranty ! > > > > > > > > The Visual C++ workflow is also only available on 64 bits and is > > > > computed on KDE infrastructure, but the installer compilation is > > > > broken due to a weird configuration on KDE infrastructure. I currently > > > > try to found a work around. > > > > > > > > Personalty, i don't want to left MXE solution for the moment. > > > > > > > > For MacOS, the KDE infrastructure based on Craft compilation framework > > > > will be a solution to sing and publish a relocatable package for > > > > Apple. digiKam do not compile yet due to missing dependencies. > > > > > > > > Voilà, i hope to be enough clear with these technical points. > > > > > > > > My best > > > > > > > > Gilles Caulier |
Le 29/05/2020 à 12:29, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
> Done !!! > > digiKam is now avaialble on FlatHub : > > https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.kde.digikam > thanks :-) but... it didn't find the config that the 7.0 appimage uses. is there a way to copy the necessary files from appimage config (presumably in ~ or some toher place) to the flathub place? (its rather complicated to rebuild it) thanks jdd -- http://dodin.org |
Am Freitag, 29. Mai 2020, 12:45:06 CEST schrieb [hidden email]: > Le 29/05/2020 à 12:29, Gilles Caulier a écrit : > > Done !!! > > > > digiKam is now avaialble on FlatHub : > > > > https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.kde.digikam > > > > thanks :-) > > but... it didn't find the config that the 7.0 appimage uses. I'm not sure, but you might need to activate access to your home directory with flatseal (at least that solved some problem with other flatpaks for me)...
Martin > > is there a way to copy the necessary files from appimage config > (presumably in ~ or some toher place) to the flathub place? (its rather > complicated to rebuild it) > > thanks jdd > >
|
In reply to this post by jdd@dodin.org
Well I just installed this to try it and on openSUSE it seems I have to
start Discover in order to run Digikam and it is very slow when compared with my normal RPM starting up. So far I've not found any way to configure it so that for example it always runs on the same virtual desktop. Looks like it has not found my original config files as it is going through its normal first time run screens so I cancelled it. Not impressed considering it is taking over 400mb on disk and starts very very slowly. Now this could be partly due to openSUSE implementation but user friendly it is not! Stuart -- Website: https://www.stella-maris.org.uk or: https//www.broadstairs.org |
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Thanks and Congrats :-)
On 29/05/2020 12:29, Gilles Caulier wrote: > Done !!! > > digiKam is now avaialble on FlatHub : > > https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.kde.digikam > > Best > > Gilles Caulier > > Le lun. 25 mai 2020 à 17:49, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> a écrit : >> Look like digiKam will be also added to official FlatHub repository soon : >> >> https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/1544#pullrequestreview-417884061 >> >> Gilles Caulier >> >> Le lun. 25 mai 2020 à 15:09, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> a écrit : >>> Hi, >>> >>> Another important point : the Flatpak do not include yet the >>> application translations files. It's relevant by the missing >>> sunversion executable on the KDE server. >>> >>> And yes, all translations team from KDE project still to use >>> subversion to host i18n data. >>> >>> As whole KDE migrate progressively from an own git/svn servers to >>> gitlab, i read that i18n will also migrate to git in the near future. >>> So wait and see... >>> >>> Best >>> >>> Gilles Caulier >>> >>> Le lun. 25 mai 2020 à 12:04, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> a écrit : >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I just updated the Flatpak notice page on digikam source repository : >>>> >>>> https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/-/tree/master/project/bundles/flatpak >>>> >>>> digiKam Flatpak is now compiled with ALL non-deprecated options, >>>> including Web services using KIO. Look like the application resume is >>>> well documented now, with plenty of screenshots. >>>> >>>> By non deprecated, i want mean the 2 ones : Baloo and Akonady >>>> supports. Both make a mess with digiKam (especially Baloo). >>>> >>>> As i read, Flatpak is able to notify users when a new version is >>>> published. I don't yet verified if it work well. >>>> >>>> On Flatpak, it's possible to rate and review the application. So don't >>>> hesitate to promote the application. >>>> >>>> My best >>>> >>>> Gilles Caulier >>>> >>>> >>>> Le dim. 24 mai 2020 à 12:24, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> a écrit : >>>>> Hi all users, >>>>> >>>>> I would to give some feedback about the digiKam bundles migration advance... >>>>> >>>>> The current files provided by the project are listed below : >>>>> >>>>> - Linux AppImage 64 bits >>>>> - Linux AppImage 32 bits >>>>> - Macos Package installer 64 bits (based on Macports) >>>>> - Windows installer 64 bits (compiled with MXE - MinGW) >>>>> - Windows installer 32 bits (compiled with MXE - MinGW) >>>>> >>>>> Current problems for these bundles are listed below : >>>>> >>>>> - AppImage : not signed, do not support KIO extensions, do not support >>>>> ICU (language extension), not published on official repository. >>>>> - MacOS package : It's not relocatable, even if MacOS support well >>>>> this feature. I don't found the time to finalize yet the install >>>>> relocation support in bash script. Package is not published on MacOS >>>>> store. >>>>> - MXE Windows installer : not signed, not published on Windows store. >>>>> Do not support KIO extension. >>>>> >>>>> But we have a new one starting to work and i working on : FlatPak >>>>> >>>>> This one is signed, published of official repository automatically >>>>> (you can install it on Discover application for ex). It support ICU >>>>> and KIO too... FlatPak is compiled on KDE infrastructure nightly and >>>>> automatically. Only a 64 bits version is supported. >>>>> >>>>> This want mean that AppImage end of life is near. We will still >>>>> publish officially the AppImage until 7.0.0, but later, if FlatPak do >>>>> the job as well, AppImage will be dropped... >>>>> >>>>> For Windows, all the digiKam code compile fine under Microsoft Visual >>>>> C++ compiler. This is the goal to obtain a signed and published >>>>> version on Microsoft store. You can imagine that Microsoft will only >>>>> support the official Windows compiler, and not GCC to permit to sign >>>>> and publish application on the store. Don't forget, Microsoft is well >>>>> Closed Source (:=)))) >>>>> >>>>> Microsoft compiler is just the hell. It slow and require a Windows >>>>> operating system. The current cross compilation solution that we use >>>>> work fully under Linux, and compilation time are reduced by 4/5 ! A >>>>> full Linux Workflow is a non virus guaranty ! >>>>> >>>>> The Visual C++ workflow is also only available on 64 bits and is >>>>> computed on KDE infrastructure, but the installer compilation is >>>>> broken due to a weird configuration on KDE infrastructure. I currently >>>>> try to found a work around. >>>>> >>>>> Personalty, i don't want to left MXE solution for the moment. >>>>> >>>>> For MacOS, the KDE infrastructure based on Craft compilation framework >>>>> will be a solution to sing and publish a relocatable package for >>>>> Apple. digiKam do not compile yet due to missing dependencies. >>>>> >>>>> Voilà, i hope to be enough clear with these technical points. >>>>> >>>>> My best >>>>> >>>>> Gilles Caulier |
In reply to this post by Stuart T Rogers
Le 29/05/2020 à 13:24, Stuart T Rogers a écrit :
> Well I just installed this to try it and on openSUSE same for me openSUSE Leap 15.1 it seems I have to > start Discover in order to run Digikam no, I found it in the usual kde menu and it is very slow when compared > with my normal RPM starting up. the 7.0 beta appimage takes ages to start, not the flathub one :-) So far I've not found any way to > configure it so that for example it always runs on the same virtual > desktop. works for me (just tested) Looks like it has not found my original config files as it is > going through its normal first time run screens so I cancelled it. same, it's my first use of flatpak, looks like flatpak have it's own root, so it misses lot of my disks... jdd -- http://dodin.org |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from martin.tlustos@gmail.com
Le 29/05/2020 à 13:17, Martin Tlustos a écrit :
> I'm not sure, but you might need to activate access to your home > directory with flatseal (at least that solved some problem with other > flatpaks for me)... > nothing of that name in my openSUSE :-( jdd -- http://dodin.org |
In reply to this post by AndriusWild
First of all, thank you Gilles for all the work.
I have installed digikam in ubuntu using the flatpak command. It seems to work fine. However, I have one question. I wanted to re-use the configuration file and the color schemes from my appimage digikam. I found that the new digikamrc configuration file is now at ~/.var/app/org.kde.digikam/ (instead of ~/.config/), but I cannot find where the .color files should be placed now (they used to be at ~/.local/share/digikam/colorschemes)/. What should be the new path for these files? Thanks in advance. -- Sent from: http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/digikam-users-f1735189.html |
Le 29/05/2020 à 14:17, woenx a écrit :
> However, I have one question. I wanted to re-use the configuration file and > the color schemes from my appimage digikam. I found that the new digikamrc > configuration file is now at ~/.var/app/org.kde.digikam/ (instead of > ~/.config/), thanks, it solved part of my config problem for the rest, I had to understand that flatpak is a chrooted environment, I have to add my disk path with "flatpak override --filesystem=XXX" now it works :-) jdd -- http://dodin.org |
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Good news!
On my KDE Neon 18.04 the new digiKam on FlatHub works fine! Many thanks again for the past, present and future work! MarPar Il 29/05/20 12:29, Gilles Caulier ha scritto: > Done !!! > > digiKam is now avaialble on FlatHub : > > https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.kde.digikam > > Best > > Gilles Caulier > > Le lun. 25 mai 2020 à 17:49, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> a écrit : >> Look like digiKam will be also added to official FlatHub repository soon : >> >> https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/1544#pullrequestreview-417884061 >> >> Gilles Caulier >> >> Le lun. 25 mai 2020 à 15:09, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> a écrit : >>> Hi, >>> >>> Another important point : the Flatpak do not include yet the >>> application translations files. It's relevant by the missing >>> sunversion executable on the KDE server. >>> >>> And yes, all translations team from KDE project still to use >>> subversion to host i18n data. >>> >>> As whole KDE migrate progressively from an own git/svn servers to >>> gitlab, i read that i18n will also migrate to git in the near future. >>> So wait and see... >>> >>> Best >>> >>> Gilles Caulier >>> >>> Le lun. 25 mai 2020 à 12:04, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> a écrit : >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I just updated the Flatpak notice page on digikam source repository : >>>> >>>> https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/-/tree/master/project/bundles/flatpak >>>> >>>> digiKam Flatpak is now compiled with ALL non-deprecated options, >>>> including Web services using KIO. Look like the application resume is >>>> well documented now, with plenty of screenshots. >>>> >>>> By non deprecated, i want mean the 2 ones : Baloo and Akonady >>>> supports. Both make a mess with digiKam (especially Baloo). >>>> >>>> As i read, Flatpak is able to notify users when a new version is >>>> published. I don't yet verified if it work well. >>>> >>>> On Flatpak, it's possible to rate and review the application. So don't >>>> hesitate to promote the application. >>>> >>>> My best >>>> >>>> Gilles Caulier >>>> >>>> >>>> Le dim. 24 mai 2020 à 12:24, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> a écrit : >>>>> Hi all users, >>>>> >>>>> I would to give some feedback about the digiKam bundles migration advance... >>>>> >>>>> The current files provided by the project are listed below : >>>>> >>>>> - Linux AppImage 64 bits >>>>> - Linux AppImage 32 bits >>>>> - Macos Package installer 64 bits (based on Macports) >>>>> - Windows installer 64 bits (compiled with MXE - MinGW) >>>>> - Windows installer 32 bits (compiled with MXE - MinGW) >>>>> >>>>> Current problems for these bundles are listed below : >>>>> >>>>> - AppImage : not signed, do not support KIO extensions, do not support >>>>> ICU (language extension), not published on official repository. >>>>> - MacOS package : It's not relocatable, even if MacOS support well >>>>> this feature. I don't found the time to finalize yet the install >>>>> relocation support in bash script. Package is not published on MacOS >>>>> store. >>>>> - MXE Windows installer : not signed, not published on Windows store. >>>>> Do not support KIO extension. >>>>> >>>>> But we have a new one starting to work and i working on : FlatPak >>>>> >>>>> This one is signed, published of official repository automatically >>>>> (you can install it on Discover application for ex). It support ICU >>>>> and KIO too... FlatPak is compiled on KDE infrastructure nightly and >>>>> automatically. Only a 64 bits version is supported. >>>>> >>>>> This want mean that AppImage end of life is near. We will still >>>>> publish officially the AppImage until 7.0.0, but later, if FlatPak do >>>>> the job as well, AppImage will be dropped... >>>>> >>>>> For Windows, all the digiKam code compile fine under Microsoft Visual >>>>> C++ compiler. This is the goal to obtain a signed and published >>>>> version on Microsoft store. You can imagine that Microsoft will only >>>>> support the official Windows compiler, and not GCC to permit to sign >>>>> and publish application on the store. Don't forget, Microsoft is well >>>>> Closed Source (:=)))) >>>>> >>>>> Microsoft compiler is just the hell. It slow and require a Windows >>>>> operating system. The current cross compilation solution that we use >>>>> work fully under Linux, and compilation time are reduced by 4/5 ! A >>>>> full Linux Workflow is a non virus guaranty ! >>>>> >>>>> The Visual C++ workflow is also only available on 64 bits and is >>>>> computed on KDE infrastructure, but the installer compilation is >>>>> broken due to a weird configuration on KDE infrastructure. I currently >>>>> try to found a work around. >>>>> >>>>> Personalty, i don't want to left MXE solution for the moment. >>>>> >>>>> For MacOS, the KDE infrastructure based on Craft compilation framework >>>>> will be a solution to sing and publish a relocatable package for >>>>> Apple. digiKam do not compile yet due to missing dependencies. >>>>> >>>>> Voilà, i hope to be enough clear with these technical points. >>>>> >>>>> My best >>>>> >>>>> Gilles Caulier |
In reply to this post by jdd@dodin.org
I'll try that directory and copy my config into it and the filesystem
override. Both those worked OK. However I have no access to GIMP or any other application from within Digikam, another disadvantage and another complication. All in all seems far to over complicated for a photo management program. As for the menu it seems that the flatpak install has overwritten my menu item for the RPM installed version of digikam, not a good idea in my view. Stuart On 29/05/2020 14:39, [hidden email] wrote: > Le 29/05/2020 à 14:17, woenx a écrit : > >> However, I have one question. I wanted to re-use the configuration >> file and >> the color schemes from my appimage digikam. I found that the new >> digikamrc >> configuration file is now at ~/.var/app/org.kde.digikam/ (instead of >> ~/.config/), > > thanks, it solved part of my config problem > > for the rest, I had to understand that flatpak is a chrooted > environment, I have to add my disk path with "flatpak override > --filesystem=XXX" > > now it works > > :-) > > jdd > > -- Website: https://www.stella-maris.org.uk or: https//www.broadstairs.org |
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
this is great news, certainly for trying out the beta.
I do have a failure mode. I have 7 albums in my albumRoot, 4 of those will get flagged by this version and claim not to exist, eg. digikam.database: Folder does not exist or is not readable: "/Photos/albums2" digikam.database: Folder does not exist or is not readable: "/a7/teuben/Pictures" the first one is a true symlink, but the 2nd is a real mounted directory, so it's not that mount/bind issue I've seen with snaps. If I use this digikam4.db, the old digikam 6.4.0 acts worse: it sees the albums, but sees 0 photos, so starts this hours long process of reloading the database. No good for me. I guess I should try the latest appimage as well? - peter On 5/29/20 6:29 AM, Gilles Caulier wrote: > Done !!! > > digiKam is now avaialble on FlatHub : > > https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.kde.digikam > > Best > > Gilles Caulier > > Le lun. 25 mai 2020 à 17:49, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> a écrit : >> Look like digiKam will be also added to official FlatHub repository soon : >> >> https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/1544#pullrequestreview-417884061 >> >> Gilles Caulier >> >> Le lun. 25 mai 2020 à 15:09, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> a écrit : >>> Hi, >>> >>> Another important point : the Flatpak do not include yet the >>> application translations files. It's relevant by the missing >>> sunversion executable on the KDE server. >>> >>> And yes, all translations team from KDE project still to use >>> subversion to host i18n data. >>> >>> As whole KDE migrate progressively from an own git/svn servers to >>> gitlab, i read that i18n will also migrate to git in the near future. >>> So wait and see... >>> >>> Best >>> >>> Gilles Caulier >>> >>> Le lun. 25 mai 2020 à 12:04, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> a écrit : >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I just updated the Flatpak notice page on digikam source repository : >>>> >>>> https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/-/tree/master/project/bundles/flatpak >>>> >>>> digiKam Flatpak is now compiled with ALL non-deprecated options, >>>> including Web services using KIO. Look like the application resume is >>>> well documented now, with plenty of screenshots. >>>> >>>> By non deprecated, i want mean the 2 ones : Baloo and Akonady >>>> supports. Both make a mess with digiKam (especially Baloo). >>>> >>>> As i read, Flatpak is able to notify users when a new version is >>>> published. I don't yet verified if it work well. >>>> >>>> On Flatpak, it's possible to rate and review the application. So don't >>>> hesitate to promote the application. >>>> >>>> My best >>>> >>>> Gilles Caulier >>>> >>>> >>>> Le dim. 24 mai 2020 à 12:24, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> a écrit : >>>>> Hi all users, >>>>> >>>>> I would to give some feedback about the digiKam bundles migration advance... >>>>> >>>>> The current files provided by the project are listed below : >>>>> >>>>> - Linux AppImage 64 bits >>>>> - Linux AppImage 32 bits >>>>> - Macos Package installer 64 bits (based on Macports) >>>>> - Windows installer 64 bits (compiled with MXE - MinGW) >>>>> - Windows installer 32 bits (compiled with MXE - MinGW) >>>>> >>>>> Current problems for these bundles are listed below : >>>>> >>>>> - AppImage : not signed, do not support KIO extensions, do not support >>>>> ICU (language extension), not published on official repository. >>>>> - MacOS package : It's not relocatable, even if MacOS support well >>>>> this feature. I don't found the time to finalize yet the install >>>>> relocation support in bash script. Package is not published on MacOS >>>>> store. >>>>> - MXE Windows installer : not signed, not published on Windows store. >>>>> Do not support KIO extension. >>>>> >>>>> But we have a new one starting to work and i working on : FlatPak >>>>> >>>>> This one is signed, published of official repository automatically >>>>> (you can install it on Discover application for ex). It support ICU >>>>> and KIO too... FlatPak is compiled on KDE infrastructure nightly and >>>>> automatically. Only a 64 bits version is supported. >>>>> >>>>> This want mean that AppImage end of life is near. We will still >>>>> publish officially the AppImage until 7.0.0, but later, if FlatPak do >>>>> the job as well, AppImage will be dropped... >>>>> >>>>> For Windows, all the digiKam code compile fine under Microsoft Visual >>>>> C++ compiler. This is the goal to obtain a signed and published >>>>> version on Microsoft store. You can imagine that Microsoft will only >>>>> support the official Windows compiler, and not GCC to permit to sign >>>>> and publish application on the store. Don't forget, Microsoft is well >>>>> Closed Source (:=)))) >>>>> >>>>> Microsoft compiler is just the hell. It slow and require a Windows >>>>> operating system. The current cross compilation solution that we use >>>>> work fully under Linux, and compilation time are reduced by 4/5 ! A >>>>> full Linux Workflow is a non virus guaranty ! >>>>> >>>>> The Visual C++ workflow is also only available on 64 bits and is >>>>> computed on KDE infrastructure, but the installer compilation is >>>>> broken due to a weird configuration on KDE infrastructure. I currently >>>>> try to found a work around. >>>>> >>>>> Personalty, i don't want to left MXE solution for the moment. >>>>> >>>>> For MacOS, the KDE infrastructure based on Craft compilation framework >>>>> will be a solution to sing and publish a relocatable package for >>>>> Apple. digiKam do not compile yet due to missing dependencies. >>>>> >>>>> Voilà, i hope to be enough clear with these technical points. >>>>> >>>>> My best >>>>> >>>>> Gilles Caulier |
Install the application "flatseal" from flathub, then grant digikam access to your extra disks/filesystem location.
On May 29, 2020 10:16:37 AM PDT, Peter Teuben <[hidden email]> wrote:
this is great news, certainly for trying out the beta. |
thank you Mica, although it makes sense, this didn't seem to solve the problem. And of the 3 folders that are visible, one of them is already on another partition.
Here's the start of when I run: flatpak run org.kde.digikam Note that the directories
the "flatpak list" command tells me Name Application
ID Version
Branch Installation
On 5/29/20 7:15 PM, Mica Semrick wrote:
Install the application "flatseal" from flathub, then grant digikam access to your extra disks/filesystem location. |
I guess I'll wait for some of these issues to subside before trying the Flatpak version. Flatpak, Appimage, or more fundamental assembles, this is a fantastic piece of software for which I'm very thankful to have. Best to all, Jay Rutherford On Fri, May 29, 2020, at 19:39, Peter Teuben wrote:
|
In reply to this post by Mica Semrick
I used flatseal and it works as advertised. Be aware that for symlinks, you need to grant access to the underlying path, not the symlink. To wit: I have a Pictures directory in my home folder. Inside the pictures directory is a symlink to a Photos folder located on another drive /mnt/data/Photos. In order for the flatpak of digikam to be able to access via the symlink, I had to grant it permission to access the /mnt/data/Photos folder, not the symlink /home/user/Pictures/Photos. I entered the symlink in digikam after that and it worked perfectly. You must do the same if you store the database in another folder as well.
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 7:16 PM Mica Semrick <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
I never "appreciated" these issues about both flatpak and snap. AFAIK appimage doesn't have this. But it really turns me off about this. Basically I need to give access to all mount points. I also heard somewhere you can use mount with the bind option, because this micro-managing my life (e.g. popping in an external drive) is driving one nuts. This is not the posix file system my grandfather was using, to make up a quote. I can manage adding a bind option to the /etc/fstab file, but what about my /media links..... thanks for clarifications, i never expected this mess.
peter
On 5/29/20 8:01 PM, Carlos Echenique
wrote:
|
/media is there by default. If you regularly mount drives under /mnt just add that. You only have to do it once.
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 8:24 PM Peter Teuben <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |