------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160966 Summary: some searches don't work properly with the new sqlite3- 3.5.8 Product: digikam Version: unspecified Platform: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: digikam-devel kde org ReportedBy: andi.clemens gmx net Version: (using 3.5.9, Arch Linux) Compiler: Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu OS: Linux (i686) release 2.6.24-ARCH Yesterday Archlinux updated their version of sqlite3 from 3.5.7 to 3.5.8. Everything seemed to work fine, but then I found out that that some of may advanced filters didn't work anymore. Further investigation brought me to the conclusion that the only filters not working properly anymore are those filters that look for images with a given rating. These searches took more then 15 seconds to complete, before that no images are even shown in the image list window and digikam also does not respond to any user input. Because sqlite3 was the only updated package, I strongly assume that no other reason could be possible for this behavior. So I checked out the latest digikam KDE3 SVN version, compiled it but still the same problem. I updated my other archlinux box with KDE4 installed, compiled the newest SVN version of digikam for KDE4 and installed it, all the filters work fine here. So I assume that something in 0.9.4beta4 is incompatible with the sqlite3-3.5.8 package. I attached a screenshot that shows the filter regions working fine and those that are not. Andi _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160966 ------- Additional Comments From andi.clemens gmx net 2008-04-18 10:19 ------- Created an attachment (id=24382) --> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=24382&action=view) some searches are very slow the colors in this screenshot represent: red - those search areas are not working anymore yellow - the used settings for the search "top rated", it takes up to 15 seconds to display 3 images that have 5 stars green - those searches / filters work fine _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160966 andi.clemens gmx net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|some searches don't work |some searches don't work |properly with the new |properly with the new |sqlite3-3.5.8 |sqlite3-3.5.8 ------- Additional Comments From andi.clemens gmx net 2008-04-18 10:21 ------- edit: red in the screenshot doesn't mean that they are not working anymore, but that those filters are VERY slow with the settings shown in the yellow dialog _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160966 caulier.gilles gmail com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|general |Database _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160966 ------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles gmail com 2008-04-18 10:25 ------- Andi, Are you compiled yourself digiKam or are you used pre-compiled packages ? Gilles Caulier _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160966 ------- Additional Comments From andi.clemens gmx net 2008-04-18 13:16 ------- I compiled from SVN (beta4), I don't use the official packages from archlinux because they don't have digikam-0.9.4beta in it... _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160966 ------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles gmail com 2008-04-18 13:32 ------- Andi, Are you some error messages on the console ? Gilles Caulier _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160966 ------- Additional Comments From andi.clemens gmx net 2008-04-18 13:39 ------- No, the only messages I get are written to the console during the startup: Found dcraw version: 8.83 KIPI (loading): WARNING: KIPI::PluginLoader:: createInstanceFromLibrary returned 0 for JPEGLossless (kipiplugin_jpeglossless) with error number 3 KIPI (loading): WARNING: KLibLoader says: libkdcraw.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory KIPI (loading): WARNING: KIPI::PluginLoader:: createInstanceFromLibrary returned 0 for Viewer (kipiplugin_viewer) with error number 3 KIPI (loading): WARNING: KLibLoader says: libkdcraw.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory KIPI (loading): WARNING: KIPI::PluginLoader:: createInstanceFromLibrary returned 0 for SendImages (kipiplugin_sendimages) with error number 3 KIPI (loading): WARNING: KLibLoader says: libkdcraw.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory KIPI (loading): WARNING: KIPI::PluginLoader:: createInstanceFromLibrary returned 0 for SlideShow (kipiplugin_slideshow) with error number 3 KIPI (loading): WARNING: KLibLoader says: libkdcraw.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory KIPI (loading): WARNING: KIPI::PluginLoader:: createInstanceFromLibrary returned 0 for RawConverter (kipiplugin_rawconverter) with error number 3 KIPI (loading): WARNING: KLibLoader says: libkdcraw.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160966 ------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles gmail com 2008-04-18 13:48 ------- Andi, No chance for you... your installation is fully broken. I can't understand how digiKam can start as well. You must uninstall all (libkipi, libkdcraw, likexiv2, kipi-plugins, and digiKam) and re-compile and re-install properlly. Gilles Caulier _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160966 ------- Additional Comments From andi.clemens gmx net 2008-04-18 13:53 ------- Strange... but why did it happen since the upgrade of sqlite3? All the other digikam functions seem to work normal. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160966 ------- Additional Comments From andi.clemens gmx net 2008-04-18 14:07 ------- Ok, I reinstalled everything from the archlinux repository, so now I'm running digikam 0.9.3 again. No error messages in the console, BUT the searching for images with a given rating is still messed up! It must be an issue with sqlite3-3.5.8.... _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160966 ------- Additional Comments From andi.clemens gmx net 2008-04-24 01:56 ------- I checked with another distribution (sidux): I installed sqlite3-3.5.8 and now all searches for a special rating are very slow... so the issue must be the sqlite upgrade... _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160966 arnd.baecker web de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marcel.wiesweg gmx de ------- Additional Comments From arnd.baecker web de 2008-04-24 22:27 ------- I checked with the sqlite experts. They pointed out that "Version 3.5.8 includes some important new performance optimizations", see http://www.sqlite.org/news.html, and that it might be possible that these slow things down for some reason. One suggestion was to use analyze, http://www.sqlite.org/lang_analyze.html You could try this in the following way: a) make a copy of digikam3.db (which is in the directory below which all images directories are) b) Then run sqlite3 digikam3.db and issue the command analyze; Quit via .quit Does this improve things? (The change written to the database can be checked by comparing a string dump: sqlite3 digikam3.db_ORIG .output before.dump .dump .quit and sqlite3 digikam3.db .output after.dump .dump .quit So if this analyze thing does not improve speed, we need to figure out, which searches are slow in terms of their sql statements. For this you would need to modify digikam/kioslave/digikamsearch.cpp by adding a kdWarning() << "SQL Query " << sqlQuery << endl; in the line before each of the two calls to m_db.execSql. Andy, do you think you can do this? Best, Arnd _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160966 ------- Additional Comments From andi.clemens gmx net 2008-04-24 23:56 ------- Sure... I know some C++, did my diploma thesis in it... so I guess this will be no problem... :-) I will try it tomorrow, now it is too late... I will post my results in here... _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160966 ------- Additional Comments From andi.clemens gmx net 2008-04-24 23:57 ------- Oh forgot to ask: Should I use the code for 0.9.3 or the current SVN repository for KDE3? _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160966 ------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles gmail com 2008-04-25 06:16 ------- Andi, Please, use the current SVN repository for KDE3. Thanks in advance. Gilles Caulier _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
Hi Andi,
well, why not go for svn... ;-) See http://www.digikam.org/?q=download/svn in particular below "Install digiKam in your Home Directory") Best, Arnd _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160966 ------- Additional Comments From arnd.baecker web de 2008-04-25 06:44 ------- Hi Andi, well, why not go for svn... ;-) See http://www.digikam.org/?q=download/svn in particular below "Install digiKam in your Home Directory") Best, Arnd _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160966 ------- Additional Comments From arnd.baecker web de 2008-04-25 07:17 ------- Just to outline the strategy I have in mind to hunt down the problem: a) isolate one sql statement corresponding to a slow search b) use the sqlite3 command line tool to reproduce that the search is slow (i.e. we would get rid of using digikam itself) c) then compare on the same machine with the previous version of sqlite3. d) put the database somewhere to download so that Gilles/Marcel/I can try to test/reproduce the problem on our machines e) report back to the sqlite team Thanks a lot Andi, that you have a look at this. If there is really a problem with sqlite, this would strike many digikam users in the near future if 3.5.8 is installed widely! _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160966 ------- Additional Comments From andi.clemens gmx net 2008-04-25 09:22 ------- OK I'll use SVN, I just asked because I recompiled 0.9.3 against the new sqlite3 some days ago so 'make' will run through a lot faster... :-) _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |