stupid user question...
Locked
 
|
Hi,
after long time I updated my svn version today, wanted to have a look on all the new features... But I can't find them. There is no light table, no thumbnails size adjustment in settings... I was already wondering before, when the Metadata-Plugin was lost (thought, digikam had thrown it out) - but now I see that there's something wrong with my version here. I did the compile_exiv2 and then compile_digikam as always and as shown on http://www.digikam.org/?q=download/svn (Install digiKam in your Home Directory). What did I miss? thanks Daniel -- Daniel Bauer photographer Basel Switzerland professional photography: http://www.daniel-bauer.com Madagascar special: http://www.sanic.ch _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Hi,
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Daniel Bauer wrote: > Hi, > > after long time I updated my svn version today, wanted to have a look on all > the new features... Definitively worth the effort ;-) ... > But I can't find them. There is no light table, no thumbnails size adjustment > in settings... I was already wondering before, when the Metadata-Plugin was > lost (thought, digikam had thrown it out) - but now I see that there's > something wrong with my version here. > > I did the compile_exiv2 and then compile_digikam as always and as shown on > http://www.digikam.org/?q=download/svn (Install digiKam in your Home > Directory). > > What did I miss? Hard to tell - Maybe something did not work out during the compile so that that the compile does not lead to a new digikam? (what does `which digikam` say, and an ls -l to that file?) Did you also install jasper before? (see http://www.digikam.org/?q=download/dependencies) Important is the --enable-shared during configure, i.e.: wget http://www.ece.uvic.ca/~mdadams/jasper/software/jasper-1.900.0.zip unzip jasper-1.900.0.zip cd jasper-1.900.0 export DIGIKAMDEST=/home/scratch/SOFTWARE/digikam ./configure --prefix=$DIGIKAMDEST --enable-shared make make install cd .. Then there is a problem, that if you have an old libexiv installed somewhere else, then this one is found and not the new one. (If this is the case, I can elaborate a bit more ...) Maybe you can go through the script step by step by copy and paste and see if any warnings show up, or if the output of the configure steps shows any missing dependencies ... As you managed to compile digikam from svn before, I am optimistic that it is just a tiny missing bit - don't hesitate to post your results, maybe it can be sorted out quickly! Best, Arnd _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Daniel Bauer-2
Hi Daniel,
Go to the "Help/About digiKam" menu and look witch version of digiKam you use... Gilles 2007/5/16, Daniel Bauer <[hidden email]>: Hi, _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
On Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2007, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Hi Daniel, > > Go to the "Help/About digiKam" menu and look witch version of digiKam you > use... > > Gilles Good evening Gilles, it says digiKam 0.9.2-svn (KDE 3.5.6 "release 85.1" openSUSE) using Kipi library 0.1.5 .. KExiv2 library 0.1.2-svn .. EXIV2 library 0.11.0 .. KDcraw library 0.1.0-svn .. Dcraw program 8.60 .. PNG library 1.2.8 .. Gphoto2 library 2.1.99.head.0 'till tomorrow :-) Daniel _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Arnd Baecker
Hi Arnd,
On Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2007, Arnd Baecker wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 16 May 2007, Daniel Bauer wrote: ... > > > > What did I miss? > > Hard to tell - Maybe something did not work out during the > compile so that that the compile does not lead to a new > digikam? Can I remove/delete just everything in the source and the binary directories and then run the complie scripts again? > (what does `which digikam` say, /opt/kde3/bin/digikam > and an ls -l to that file?) -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 23389 2007-04-24 13:47 /opt/kde3/bin/digikam But I think this only points to my "normal" Suse-rpm-Digikam. The svn version (installed in my home directory) I always start with the start script from the digikam site... > Did you also install jasper before? > (see http://www.digikam.org/?q=download/dependencies) > Important is the --enable-shared during configure, i.e.: Jasper 1.701.0-4 is installed from suse rpm. ... > Then there is a problem, that if you have an > old libexiv installed somewhere else, then > this one is found and not the new one. > (If this is the case, I can elaborate a bit more ...) I had this problem once earlier, but as much as I remember it was something missing in the compile..scripts that time, and that is solved since... However, since I use the scripts from the digikam site it always worked so far - except of those missing parts now :-) > > Maybe you can go through the script step by step by > copy and paste and see if any warnings show up, > or if the output of the configure steps shows > any missing dependencies ... > Yes, I guess I will try again tomorrow and let the output go into a file, so I can look if there are any messages... thanks Daniel _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Daniel Bauer-2
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Daniel Bauer wrote: > On Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2007, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > Go to the "Help/About digiKam" menu and look witch version of digiKam you > > use... > > > > Gilles > > Good evening Gilles, > > it says > > digiKam 0.9.2-svn (KDE 3.5.6 "release 85.1" openSUSE) I get digiKam 0.9.2-beta1 > using Kipi library 0.1.5 > .. KExiv2 library 0.1.2-svn 0.1.5 > .. EXIV2 library 0.11.0 0.14.0 > .. KDcraw library 0.1.0-svn > .. Dcraw program 8.60 > .. PNG library 1.2.8 > .. Gphoto2 library 2.1.99.head.0 Arnd _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Daniel Bauer-2
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Daniel Bauer wrote:
[...] > Can I remove/delete just everything in the source and the binary directories > and then run the complie scripts again? I would think so (maybe just move them to DIRNAME_, so that you could move stuff back, if needed ;-) > > (what does `which digikam` say, > > /opt/kde3/bin/digikam > > > and an ls -l to that file?) > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 23389 2007-04-24 13:47 /opt/kde3/bin/digikam > > But I think this only points to my "normal" Suse-rpm-Digikam. The svn version > (installed in my home directory) I always start with the start script from > the digikam site... Yes, sure ;-) - so this would mean to check the time-stamp of the digikam executable at the location determined by the script. [...] > Jasper 1.701.0-4 is installed from suse rpm. That should be fine then (assuming that the corresponding -devel is also installed) [...] > Yes, I guess I will try again tomorrow and let the output go into a file, so I > can look if there are any messages... OK (feel free to post it to me off-list, if necessary), Best, Arnd _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Daniel Bauer-2
ooops,
you have the wrong email adress here! Regards from Steve Canby > Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 22:42:12 +0200 > From: [hidden email] > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] stupid user question... > > On Wed, 16 May 2007, Daniel Bauer wrote: > > [...] > > > Can I remove/delete just everything in the source and the binary directories > > and then run the complie scripts again? > > I would think so (maybe just move them to DIRNAME_, > so that you could move stuff back, if needed ;-) > > > > (what does `which digikam` say, > > > > /opt/kde3/bin/digikam > > > > > and an ls -l to that file?) > > > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 23389 2007-04-24 13:47 /opt/kde3/bin/digikam > > > > But I think this only points to my "normal" Suse-rpm-Digikam. The svn version > > (installed in my home directory) I always start with the start script from > > the digikam site... > > Yes, sure ;-) - so this would mean to check the time-stamp of the > digikam executable at the location determined by the script. > > [...] > > Jasper 1.701.0-4 is installed from suse rpm. > > That should be fine then (assuming that the corresponding -devel > is also installed) > > [...] > > Yes, I guess I will try again tomorrow and let the output go into a file, so I > > can look if there are any messages... > > OK (feel free to post it to me off-list, if necessary), > > Best, Arnd > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Daniel Bauer-2
check the email address, its not 4 me!
Regards from Steve Canby > Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 22:42:12 +0200 > From: [hidden email] > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] stupid user question... > > On Wed, 16 May 2007, Daniel Bauer wrote: > > [...] > > > Can I remove/delete just everything in the source and the binary directories > > and then run the complie scripts again? > > I would think so (maybe just move them to DIRNAME_, > so that you could move stuff back, if needed ;-) > > > > (what does `which digikam` say, > > > > /opt/kde3/bin/digikam > > > > > and an ls -l to that file?) > > > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 23389 2007-04-24 13:47 /opt/kde3/bin/digikam > > > > But I think this only points to my "normal" Suse-rpm-Digikam. The svn version > > (installed in my home directory) I always start with the start script from > > the digikam site... > > Yes, sure ;-) - so this would mean to check the time-stamp of the > digikam executable at the location determined by the script. > > [...] > > Jasper 1.701.0-4 is installed from suse rpm. > > That should be fine then (assuming that the corresponding -devel > is also installed) > > [...] > > Yes, I guess I will try again tomorrow and let the output go into a file, so I > > can look if there are any messages... > > OK (feel free to post it to me off-list, if necessary), > > Best, Arnd > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Arnd Baecker
Hi Arnd, Gilles...
After renaming my svn directories and letting run the compile scripts again, it now seems to work, the new splash screen appears and the light table is here :-) I just wonder why it was necessary to remove all the source and binary stuff and beginn from the beginning? To update I always first run compile_exiv2.sh then compile_digikam.sh. Is there something I should also do to be sure that after running those scripts I have really the latest svn version? Well, however, I'm gonna play around with it now, lots of things to discover, I guess :-) thanks for all your work! kind regards Daniel > > digiKam 0.9.2-svn (KDE 3.5.6 "release 85.1" openSUSE) > I get digiKam 0.9.2-beta1 me 2 now :-) > > using Kipi library 0.1.5 > > .. KExiv2 library 0.1.2-svn > 0.1.5 now 0.1.6 > > .. EXIV2 library 0.11.0 > 0.14.0 I still see 0.11.0 maybe something in my settings I should change? Or update? > > .. KDcraw library 0.1.0-svn now 0.1.1 > > .. Dcraw program 8.60 > > .. PNG library 1.2.8 > > .. Gphoto2 library 2.1.99.head.0 _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
«
Return to digikam-users
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |