speed up workflow
Locked
 
|
Hi list,
In case anyone is interested in the subject, I did an eperiment showing how to speed up workflow with digikam. The description and results are on my google+ profile https://plus.google.com/u/0/113408942588672463601/posts?hl=nl best regards, Rinus _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
On Tirsdag den 1. november 2011, sleepless wrote:
> Hi list, > > In case anyone is interested in the subject, > I did an eperiment showing how to speed up workflow with digikam. > The description and results are on my google+ profile > https://plus.google.com/u/0/113408942588672463601/posts?hl=nl Where? I might be silly, but I can not seem to find that. Do i need to log in or something? :$ -- Anders _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Op 01-11-11 19:30, Anders Lund schreef:
> On Tirsdag den 1. november 2011, sleepless wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> In case anyone is interested in the subject, >> I did an eperiment showing how to speed up workflow with digikam. >> The description and results are on my google+ profile >> https://plus.google.com/u/0/113408942588672463601/posts?hl=nl > Where? I might be silly, but I can not seem to find that. Do i need to log in > or something? :$ > else can too. Sorry if it does not work. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
Op 01-11-11 19:30, Anders Lund schreef:
> On Tirsdag den 1. november 2011, sleepless wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> In case anyone is interested in the subject, >> I did an eperiment showing how to speed up workflow with digikam. >> The description and results are on my google+ profile >> https://plus.google.com/u/0/113408942588672463601/posts?hl=nl > Where? I might be silly, but I can not seem to find that. Do i need to log in > or something? :$ > awetumn¨, in case you got into my page. Rinus _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
On 01.11.2011 19:30, Anders Lund wrote:
> On Tirsdag den 1. november 2011, sleepless wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> In case anyone is interested in the subject, >> I did an eperiment showing how to speed up workflow with digikam. >> The description and results are on my google+ profile >> https://plus.google.com/u/0/113408942588672463601/posts?hl=nl > > Where? I might be silly, but I can not seem to find that. Do i need to log in > or something? :$ I can't find something about digikam there, too. Thomas -- Thomas Guettler http://www.thomas-guettler.de/ _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
This is it:
First I let do digiKam, (www.digikam.org), in batch cue, local contrast enhencement, 95% of images improved greatly. Then I sorted all out using gwenview´s comparison function, which shots were the best. What was left I let digiKam do auto levels and a second batch auto exposure, and used again gwenview to select from each photo out of the three versions digikam created the one that I liked best. That you can get good results without individual editing is still to see on my page. best regards, Rinus Op 01-11-11 20:35, Thomas Güttler schreef: On 01.11.2011 19:30, Anders Lund wrote: _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Rinus
Hi,
I don't think you can see it unless you have "circled" the author. HTH Francesco --- (Apologies for brevity, top posting and poor citation - this email was sent from a mobile device) --- _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Rinus
On Tirsdag den 1. november 2011, sleepless wrote:
> >> In case anyone is interested in the subject, > >> I did an eperiment showing how to speed up workflow with digikam. > >> The description and results are on my google+ profile > >> https://plus.google.com/u/0/113408942588672463601/posts?hl=nl > > > > Where? I might be silly, but I can not seem to find that. Do i need to > > log in or something? :$ > > It is good to now that you find it under ¨Hi google+ Here is my > awetumn¨, in case you got into my page. > Rinus Thank you - I did not notice the small unfold link, so silly I am... I never used gwenview compare mode for photos, I either use the lighttable in digikam, or simply browse through my images in full screen, setting flags and ratings. And everytime I use batch mode, I end up either a little bit unhappy, or converting/editing manually anyway... But it is very convenient indeed! And of course I would take much more time... Maybe I will try if the weather is right this weekend, and get 7 images processed using batch que only. Looks like you live in a nice spot, btw :) -- Anders _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Op 01-11-11 21:05, Anders Lund schreef:
> On Tirsdag den 1. november 2011, sleepless wrote: >>>> In case anyone is interested in the subject, >>>> I did an eperiment showing how to speed up workflow with digikam. >>>> The description and results are on my google+ profile >>>> https://plus.google.com/u/0/113408942588672463601/posts?hl=nl >>> Where? I might be silly, but I can not seem to find that. Do i need to >>> log in or something? :$ >> It is good to now that you find it under ¨Hi google+ Here is my >> awetumn¨, in case you got into my page. >> Rinus > Thank you - I did not notice the small unfold link, so silly I am... > > I never used gwenview compare mode for photos, I either use the lighttable in > digikam, or simply browse through my images in full screen, setting flags and > ratings. And everytime I use batch mode, I end up either a little bit unhappy, > or converting/editing manually anyway... But it is very convenient indeed! And > of course I would take much more time... I add to the name _LC for local contrast _AL for auto level _AE for auto exposure and we need to have img.png img_AL.png img_AE.png img_LC.png img_LC_AL.png img_LC_AE.png after that we have to visually sort it out, that´s not a big prize taken the fact the the usabillity score is very high. I asked Gilles what he thinks about the implementation of doing all this on one selection. Picking the right one is so much quicker than manually editing. I am doing up to 1000 pictures per week. > Maybe I will try if the weather is right this weekend, and get 7 images > processed using batch que only. > > Looks like you live in a nice spot, btw :) I can´t complain. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Here's the direct link for the post.
https://plus.google.com/u/0/113408942588672463601/posts/EVWtk55Vecs I think it is public and anyone can see it. []'s Erick Moreno On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:24 PM, sleepless <[hidden email]> wrote: Op 01-11-11 21:05, Anders Lund schreef: -- Erick Moreno profiles.google.com/erickmoreno _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Rinus
2011/11/1 sleepless <[hidden email]>:
> Op 01-11-11 21:05, Anders Lund schreef: >> >> On Tirsdag den 1. november 2011, sleepless wrote: >>>>> >>>>> In case anyone is interested in the subject, >>>>> I did an eperiment showing how to speed up workflow with digikam. >>>>> The description and results are on my google+ profile >>>>> https://plus.google.com/u/0/113408942588672463601/posts?hl=nl >>>> >>>> Where? I might be silly, but I can not seem to find that. Do i need to >>>> log in or something? :$ >>> >>> It is good to now that you find it under ¨Hi google+ Here is my >>> awetumn¨, in case you got into my page. >>> Rinus >> >> Thank you - I did not notice the small unfold link, so silly I am... >> >> I never used gwenview compare mode for photos, I either use the lighttable >> in >> digikam, or simply browse through my images in full screen, setting flags >> and >> ratings. And everytime I use batch mode, I end up either a little bit >> unhappy, >> or converting/editing manually anyway... But it is very convenient indeed! >> And >> of course I would take much more time... > > Idealy you should have six variations in this way > > I add to the name > _LC for local contrast > _AL for auto level > _AE for auto exposure > > and we need to have > > img.png > img_AL.png > img_AE.png > img_LC.png > img_LC_AL.png > img_LC_AE.png > > after that we have to visually sort it out, that´s not a big prize taken the > fact the the usabillity score is very high. > > I asked Gilles what he thinks about the implementation of doing all this on > one selection. > Picking the right one is so much quicker than manually editing. I am doing > up to 1000 pictures per week. The right question is how to do it in GUI. - from Albumgui, there is no way to process filter as well with preview. Only kipi-plugins interface can do it, but these filter implementations are not shared with kipi-plugins (and we don't want do it) - from BQM, these filters are available for batch process. I think it's the right way to study a solution. The big problem is preview. It complicated to find right suitable solution, because to select right color enhancement filters, we need to judge manually. My proposal : create a "Magic" wrapper around these filters, which will select automaticallly the right one, accordingly with image content (typically to check histogram). Like this no need a gui to use right filters, and it can be Batch Processed This can be a subject for future GSoC students... If you like the idea, please fil this suggestion on the right file from KDE bugzilla. Gilles Caulier _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Op 02-11-11 08:30, Gilles Caulier schreef:
> 2011/11/1 sleepless<[hidden email]>: >> Op 01-11-11 21:05, Anders Lund schreef: >>> On Tirsdag den 1. november 2011, sleepless wrote: >>>>>> In case anyone is interested in the subject, >>>>>> I did an eperiment showing how to speed up workflow with digikam. >>>>>> The description and results are on my google+ profile >>>>>> https://plus.google.com/u/0/113408942588672463601/posts?hl=nl >>>>> Where? I might be silly, but I can not seem to find that. Do i need to >>>>> log in or something? :$ >>>> It is good to now that you find it under ¨Hi google+ Here is my >>>> awetumn¨, in case you got into my page. >>>> Rinus >>> Thank you - I did not notice the small unfold link, so silly I am... >>> >>> I never used gwenview compare mode for photos, I either use the lighttable >>> in >>> digikam, or simply browse through my images in full screen, setting flags >>> and >>> ratings. And everytime I use batch mode, I end up either a little bit >>> unhappy, >>> or converting/editing manually anyway... But it is very convenient indeed! >>> And >>> of course I would take much more time... >> Idealy you should have six variations in this way >> >> I add to the name >> _LC for local contrast >> _AL for auto level >> _AE for auto exposure >> >> and we need to have >> >> img.png >> img_AL.png >> img_AE.png >> img_LC.png >> img_LC_AL.png >> img_LC_AE.png >> >> after that we have to visually sort it out, that´s not a big prize taken the >> fact the the usabillity score is very high. >> >> I asked Gilles what he thinks about the implementation of doing all this on >> one selection. >> Picking the right one is so much quicker than manually editing. I am doing >> up to 1000 pictures per week. > The right question is how to do it in GUI. > > - from Albumgui, there is no way to process filter as well with > preview. Only kipi-plugins interface can do it, but these filter > implementations are not shared with kipi-plugins (and we don't want do > it) > > - from BQM, these filters are available for batch process. I think > it's the right way to study a solution. The big problem is preview. It > complicated to find right suitable solution, because to select right > color enhancement filters, we need to judge manually. > > My proposal : create a "Magic" wrapper around these filters, which > will select automaticallly the right one, accordingly with image > content (typically to check histogram). Like this no need a gui to use > right filters, and it can be Batch Processed > > This can be a subject for future GSoC students... If you like the > idea, please fil this suggestion on the right file from KDE bugzilla. way out. Fead ONE batch to digikam and find next morning all variation to select manually from. digikam takes list of PEF and generates img.png img_AL.png img_AE.png img_LC.png digikam changes in the batch cue all img.PEF to img_LC.png and generates img_LC_AL.png img_LC_AE.png I wake up and do the rest. regards, Rinus > Gilles Caulier > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
«
Return to digikam-users
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |