|
Johannes, Marcel,
Which release plan do you want for 1.2.0 release, about album treeview model view port ? I want also personally port preview widget to pure Qt4 with this release... What do you think about 1.2.0 release in 2 month ? Gilles Caulier _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
Hi,
Am 31.01.2010 15:40 schrieb Gilles Caulier: > Which release plan do you want for 1.2.0 release, about album treeview > model view port ? > > I want also personally port preview widget to pure Qt4 with this release... > > What do you think about 1.2.0 release in 2 month ? I would wait for the first user comments after merging back to trunk. Right now I have the feeling that there are not that much regression bugs but who knows. ;) If there aren't many bugs we could plan a fast release to my mind otherwise not. ;) There are two open issues from my point of view: 1. The Camera UI needs a model behind the icon view which could be a lot of work and I don't know when and how this should be done 2. I would really argue, that the complete source code needs to be restructured into folders that a) reflect the purpose of the classes and b) make clear, which file belongs to which library and how the dependencies work. I had so many problems finding out which file is in which library and for what reason and the digikam-folder is so bloated... Johannes _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
> Johannes, Marcel,
> > Which release plan do you want for 1.2.0 release, about album treeview > model view port ? I would propose to merge the model/view branch as soon as possible - tomorrow, next days. (maybe I misunderstood the message a few days ago). Any problems can be reported as bugs. It's normal to create bugs when developing after all ;-) In the two weeks afterwards we can have a look at Holger's database branch. I propose to merge if major regressions are fixed, but a bit of careful testing is needed for this branch. Code tends to go bad and mould if lying in a branch for too long ;-) _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
Am 31.01.2010 20:47 schrieb Marcel Wiesweg:
>> Johannes, Marcel, >> >> Which release plan do you want for 1.2.0 release, about album treeview >> model view port ? > > I would propose to merge the model/view branch as soon as possible - tomorrow, > next days. (maybe I misunderstood the message a few days ago). Any problems > can be reported as bugs. It's normal to create bugs when developing after all > ;-) I just try to integrate the changes back to trunk. Is this ok? Johannes _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Johannes Wienke-3
2010/1/31 Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]>:
> Hi, > > Am 31.01.2010 15:40 schrieb Gilles Caulier: >> Which release plan do you want for 1.2.0 release, about album treeview >> model view port ? >> >> I want also personally port preview widget to pure Qt4 with this release... >> >> What do you think about 1.2.0 release in 2 month ? > > I would wait for the first user comments after merging back to trunk. > Right now I have the feeling that there are not that much regression > bugs but who knows. ;) If there aren't many bugs we could plan a fast > release to my mind otherwise not. ;) > > There are two open issues from my point of view: > 1. The Camera UI needs a model behind the icon view which could be a lot > of work and I don't know when and how this should be done This can be done in a second time, as with 1.3.0 release. I know that Marcel has planed to work on this part too. > 2. I would really argue, that the complete source code needs to be > restructured into folders that a) reflect the purpose of the classes and agree. > b) make clear, which file belongs to which library and how the > dependencies work. I had so many problems finding out which file is in > which library and for what reason and the digikam-folder is so bloated... I'm totally agree. I would to do it since a long time, without to find right time. After merging model view branch is fine for me. Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
Am 31.01.2010 20:51 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> 2010/1/31 Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]>: >> 2. I would really argue, that the complete source code needs to be >> restructured into folders that a) reflect the purpose of the classes and > > agree. > >> b) make clear, which file belongs to which library and how the >> dependencies work. I had so many problems finding out which file is in >> which library and for what reason and the digikam-folder is so bloated... > > I'm totally agree. I would to do it since a long time, without to find > right time. After merging model view branch is fine for me. trunk doesn't take too long. Johannes _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Johannes Wienke-3
> > I would propose to merge the model/view branch as soon as possible - > > tomorrow, next days. (maybe I misunderstood the message a few days ago). > > Any problems can be reported as bugs. It's normal to create bugs when > > developing after all ;-) > > I just try to integrate the changes back to trunk. Is this ok? Of course! _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
2010/1/31 Marcel Wiesweg <[hidden email]>:
> >> > I would propose to merge the model/view branch as soon as possible - >> > tomorrow, next days. (maybe I misunderstood the message a few days ago). >> > Any problems can be reported as bugs. It's normal to create bugs when >> > developing after all ;-) >> >> I just try to integrate the changes back to trunk. Is this ok? > > Of course! > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-devel mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel > I recommend to merge both into 2 step : 1/ First model-view (done). Post an announce to users for testing regression and wait a little bit, for ex one or two weeks. 2/ Second Mysql port, Post another announce to users to be ready for 1.2 release. In both case, create a little page to digiKam.org to explain what's news in source code and which parts need to be tested by users for regression checks. Note : Johannes, Julien, please ask to publish your digiKam.org blog entry to dot.kde.org to increase audience using RSS flux. Blogs contents will be dispatched around the world via others news web sites. Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
Am 01.02.2010 08:47 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> Note : Johannes, Julien, please ask to publish your digiKam.org blog > entry to dot.kde.org to increase audience using RSS flux. Blogs > contents will be dispatched around the world via others news web > sites. Where do I have to ask for this? Johannes _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
Look on this page :
http://planetkde.org/ On the top menu, you have a link named "Add your blog" Gilles 2010/2/1 Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]>: > Am 01.02.2010 08:47 schrieb Gilles Caulier: >> >> Note : Johannes, Julien, please ask to publish your digiKam.org blog >> entry to dot.kde.org to increase audience using RSS flux. Blogs >> contents will be dispatched around the world via others news web >> sites. > > Where do I have to ask for this? > > Johannes > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-devel mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel > > Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
Ok, but why can't I edit my own blog post anymore on digikam.org? ;)
Am 01.02.2010 13:17 schrieb Gilles Caulier: > Look on this page : > > http://planetkde.org/ > > On the top menu, you have a link named "Add your blog" > > Gilles > > 2010/2/1 Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]>: >> Am 01.02.2010 08:47 schrieb Gilles Caulier: >>> Note : Johannes, Julien, please ask to publish your digiKam.org blog >>> entry to dot.kde.org to increase audience using RSS flux. Blogs >>> contents will be dispatched around the world via others news web >>> sites. >> Where do I have to ask for this? >> >> Johannes >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-devel mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-devel mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
2010/2/1 Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]>:
> Ok, but why can't I edit my own blog post anymore on digikam.org? ;) ??? Sorry ? Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
Am 01.02.2010 13:45 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> 2010/2/1 Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]>: >> Ok, but why can't I edit my own blog post anymore on digikam.org? ;) > > ??? Sorry ? Since you added the screenshot I don't see the edit link anymore. Johannes _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
Strange, i take a look
Gilles 2010/2/1 Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]>: > Am 01.02.2010 13:45 schrieb Gilles Caulier: >> >> 2010/2/1 Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]>: >>> >>> Ok, but why can't I edit my own blog post anymore on digikam.org? ;) >> >> ??? Sorry ? > > Since you added the screenshot I don't see the edit link anymore. > > Johannes > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-devel mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel > > Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
No idea (:=))) try again now. You have Admin right in you account
properties. Take a care... Gilles 2010/2/1 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: > Strange, i take a look > > Gilles > > 2010/2/1 Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]>: >> Am 01.02.2010 13:45 schrieb Gilles Caulier: >>> >>> 2010/2/1 Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]>: >>>> >>>> Ok, but why can't I edit my own blog post anymore on digikam.org? ;) >>> >>> ??? Sorry ? >> >> Since you added the screenshot I don't see the edit link anymore. >> >> Johannes >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-devel mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel >> >> > Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
Am 01.02.2010 13:59 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> No idea (:=))) try again now. You have Admin right in you account > properties. Take a care... Thanks, now I see them again. BTW: what is this "vocabularies" while posting a new entry? Johannes _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
2010/2/1 Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]>:
> Am 01.02.2010 13:59 schrieb Gilles Caulier: >> >> No idea (:=))) try again now. You have Admin right in you account >> properties. Take a care... > > Thanks, now I see them again. > > BTW: what is this "vocabularies" while posting a new entry? "vocabularies" ? What do you mean exactly ? Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
Am 01.02.2010 14:08 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> 2010/2/1 Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]>: >> Am 01.02.2010 13:59 schrieb Gilles Caulier: >>> No idea (:=))) try again now. You have Admin right in you account >>> properties. Take a care... >> Thanks, now I see them again. >> >> BTW: what is this "vocabularies" while posting a new entry? > > "vocabularies" ? What do you mean exactly ? That one headline when you edit or create a new entry. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
Ok, i see,
I think these view is obsolete now. I don't use it anymore. all is posted to automatically by RSS flux. I never tried to remove this view yet. Gilles 2010/2/1 Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]>: > Am 01.02.2010 14:08 schrieb Gilles Caulier: >> >> 2010/2/1 Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]>: >>> >>> Am 01.02.2010 13:59 schrieb Gilles Caulier: >>>> >>>> No idea (:=))) try again now. You have Admin right in you account >>>> properties. Take a care... >>> >>> Thanks, now I see them again. >>> >>> BTW: what is this "vocabularies" while posting a new entry? >> >> "vocabularies" ? What do you mean exactly ? > > That one headline when you edit or create a new entry. > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-devel mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel > > Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
