libkdcraw 0.1.3 testing

Hi
you can find new libkdcraw 0.1.3 here
http://www.linux.it/~anaselli/kipi-plugins/

That is meant for testing only please, packagers wait
for the official release that should be tomorrow at the
latest.

Please Gerhard, Gilles give me a feed back by tomorrow morning
so that new digikam can use it as soon as possible.

Thanks
        Angelo

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gerhard Kulzer-3]

Am Sunday 23 December 2007 schrieb Angelo Naselli:

> Hi
> you can find new libkdcraw 0.1.3 here
> http://www.linux.it/~anaselli/kipi-plugins/
>
> That is meant for testing only please, packagers wait
> for the official release that should be tomorrow at the
> latest.
>
> Please Gerhard, Gilles give me a feed back by tomorrow morning
> so that new digikam can use it as soon as possible.
>
> Thanks
> Angelo

I tried it with Canon's cr2 files, no problem.
Just in digiKam it still says libkdraw 0.1.2, whereas I made sure that all old
stuff has been deleted or replaced.

Merry Xmas
Gerhard

--
><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·... ><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·...¸ ><((((º>
http://www.gerhard.fr

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

lunedì 24 dicembre 2007, Gerhard Kulzer ha scritto:
> libkdraw 0.1.2


I'll check it thanks (maybe it has been added a new string somwhere)
Angelo

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

lunedì 24 dicembre 2007, Gerhard Kulzer ha scritto:
> Just in digiKam it still says libkdraw 0.1.2, whereas I made sure that all old
> stuff has been deleted or replaced.

As far as i can say that version has been calculate at compile time :/
That means if i change the library to a new compatible version it still
gives the same value...
We should add a better way to have runtime version of our libraries if needed,
maybe something like KDcraw::version() as static method...

The case we're disccusing now is in digikam main.cpp
and:
#include <libkdcraw/version.h>
which contains now (checked into tarball as well)
static const char kdcraw_version[] = "0.1.3";

and the call to have the version is:
QString(I18N_NOOP("Using KDcraw library version %1")).arg(kdcraw_version)

that means we have a wrong behaviour in digikam, e.g. a bug ;)

Cheers,
        Angelo

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gerhard Kulzer-3]

Am Monday 24 December 2007 schrieb Angelo Naselli:

> lunedì 24 dicembre 2007, Gerhard Kulzer ha scritto:
> > Just in digiKam it still says libkdraw 0.1.2, whereas I made sure that
> > all old stuff has been deleted or replaced.
>
> As far as i can say that version has been calculate at compile time :/
> That means if i change the library to a new compatible version it still
> gives the same value...
> We should add a better way to have runtime version of our libraries if
> needed, maybe something like KDcraw::version() as static method...
>
> The case we're disccusing now is in digikam main.cpp
> and:
> #include <libkdcraw/version.h>
> which contains now (checked into tarball as well)
> static const char kdcraw_version[] = "0.1.3";
>
> and the call to have the version is:
> QString(I18N_NOOP("Using KDcraw library version %1")).arg(kdcraw_version)
>
> that means we have a wrong behaviour in digikam, e.g. a bug ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Angelo

You are right, i recompiled digiKam and it's says 0.1.3 now.

Merry Xmas
Gerhard

--
><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·... ><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·...¸ ><((((º>
http://www.gerhard.fr

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

domenica 23 dicembre 2007, Angelo Naselli ha scritto:

> Hi
> you can find new libkdcraw 0.1.3 here
> http://www.linux.it/~anaselli/kipi-plugins/
>
> That is meant for testing only please, packagers wait
> for the official release that should be tomorrow at the
> latest.
>
> Please Gerhard, Gilles give me a feed back by tomorrow morning
> so that new digikam can use it as soon as possible.
>
> Thanks
> Angelo
>

Ok for me, but i can't upload it today, so i'll do tomorrow.

Merry Christmas to everybody
        Angelo

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

On Monday 24 December 2007 18:22:02 Angelo Naselli wrote:
> Merry Christmas to everybody

Thanks Angelo,

Merry Christmas to all kde-imaging folks :)

> Angelo

Valerio

P.S. : If I can, I'll surely wanna help you releasing next days.. for 2 days
I'm off (friends, parents and so on...)
--
Valerio Fuoglio
<[hidden email]> - http://www.valeriofuoglio.it
KDE Developer - KIPI Plugins - http://www.kipi-plugins.org

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

> Valerio
>
> P.S. : If I can, I'll surely wanna help you releasing next days.. for 2 days
> I'm off (friends, parents and so on...)
You're welcome, tell me when you're on line ;)

Cheers,
        Angelo


_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel