I recently noticed that digiKam edits the tags Exif.Image.Software,
Iptc.Application2.Program and Iptc.Application2.ProgramVersion by placing its signature in it. In doing so it is replacing information that was originally put there by the camera or by myself. I think this is not the correct way to go. Especially in the case of the exif-tag where the camera's firmware version is overwritten. As the standard states for the exif-tag; "This tag records the name and version of the software or firmware of the camera or image input device used to generate the image." In the case of the IPTC-tags, which are meant to "identify the program and programversion used to originate the object data", my personal information is overwritten. I would appreciate if this behavior is corrected, or made optional by implementing a configuration-setting. Caspar. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Agree,
Please make a new file in B.K.O on Metadata component. I will fix it for 0.9.2 release. Thanks in advance Gilles 2007/3/5, Caspar Maessen <[hidden email]>: > I recently noticed that digiKam edits the tags Exif.Image.Software, > Iptc.Application2.Program and Iptc.Application2.ProgramVersion by > placing its signature in it. In doing so it is replacing information > that was originally put there by the camera or by myself. > I think this is not the correct way to go. Especially in the case of the > exif-tag where the camera's firmware version is overwritten. As the > standard states for the exif-tag; "This tag records the name and > version of the software or firmware of the camera or image input device > used to generate the image." > In the case of the IPTC-tags, which are meant to "identify the program > and programversion used to originate the object data", my personal > information is overwritten. > > I would appreciate if this behavior is corrected, or made optional by > implementing a configuration-setting. > > Caspar. > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from cmaessen@casco.demon.nl
Dnia wtorek 06 marzec 2007, Caspar Maessen napisał:
> In the case of the IPTC-tags, which are meant to "identify the program > and programversion used to originate the object data", my personal > information is overwritten. Inserting digikam info could be acceptable when tags are empty. m. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Mick, post your comments in the B.K.O file created by Caspar...
Gilles 2007/3/6, Mikolaj Machowski <[hidden email]>: > Dnia wtorek 06 marzec 2007, Caspar Maessen napisał: > > In the case of the IPTC-tags, which are meant to "identify the program > > and programversion used to originate the object data", my personal > > information is overwritten. > > Inserting digikam info could be acceptable when tags are empty. > > m. > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |