[digikam] [Bug 373500] New: digicam segfaults when tagging face

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[digikam] [Bug 373500] New: digicam segfaults when tagging face

bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373500

            Bug ID: 373500
           Summary: digicam segfaults when tagging face
           Product: digikam
           Version: 5.3.0
          Platform: Appimage
                OS: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: crash
          Priority: NOR
         Component: Faces-Management
          Assignee: [hidden email]
          Reporter: [hidden email]
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 102718
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=102718&action=edit
Example image

Hi,
I am using the digikam-5.3.0-01-x86-64.appimage with Debian Testing and GNOME.

While adding a name to a face on some* photos (it doesn't matter if I tag them
at the unknown people tab or if I open the image in the preview and manually
add a face tag). The moment I press "confirm" digicam crashes with a segfault.
It seems that the change is saved.

* I am not sure with photos don't work, but it only happens on photos I took
some years ago and I think they are all made by the same camera (Casio Exilim
EX-Z57).

Steps to reproduce:

I added one image as an attachment which always produces a crash.
* open the image in the preview
* "add a face tag"
* when adding a name to the tag and pressing "confirm" digikam should crash

If there is anything I can add to help resolving the bug, just mention it.

Terminal Log:
digikam.general: Scheduled to write
digikam.general: Found FacesEngine identity 45 for tag 158
digikam.general: Writting tags
digikam.general: -------------------------- New Keywords ("test")
digikam.metaengine: xmlACDSee "<Categories><Category
Assigned=\"1\">test</Category></Categories>"
digikam.metaengine: MetaEngine::metadataWritingMode 0
digikam.metaengine: Will write Metadata to file
"/media/daten/Bilderfestplatte/Dürnstein 08022007/Dürnstein 08022007 003.jpg"
digikam.metaengine: wroteComment:  true
digikam.metaengine: wroteEXIF:  true
digikam.metaengine: wroteIPTC:  true
digikam.metaengine: wroteXMP:  true
/tmp/.mount_KNNFtr/AppRun: line 35: 22117 Segmentation fault    
digikam.wrapper $@

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[digikam] [Bug 373500] digicam segfaults when tagging face

bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373500

[hidden email] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[hidden email]
          Component|Faces-Management            |Metadata-Engine

--- Comment #1 from [hidden email] ---
It crash on Exiv2 shared lib.

It know that Exiv2 0.25 include in digiKam Linux AppImage 5.3.0 has long time
problem with Casio image.

I created a new 5.4.0 AppImage with this time Exiv2 0.26-svn including more
than 200 bugfixes. You can download it here :

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM

Gilles Caulier

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[digikam] [Bug 373500] digicam segfaults when tagging face

bugzilla_noreply
In reply to this post by bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373500

--- Comment #2 from Lukas Winkler <[hidden email]> ---
Thanks for the really quick answer.

That solved the problem.

Is the 5.4.0 appimage stable enough to use it instead of 5.3.0?

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[digikam] [Bug 373500] digicam segfaults when tagging face

bugzilla_noreply
In reply to this post by bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373500

[hidden email] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
   Version Fixed In|                            |5.4.0
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #3 from [hidden email] ---
yes, even it's a pre-release.

Note : 5.4.0 will have more than 60 bugfixes since 5.3.0.

Gilles Caulier

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.