https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372755
Bug ID: 372755 Summary: CASIO EX-Z750 Product: digikam Version: 5.3.0 Platform: MS Windows OS: MS Windows Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: NOR Component: general Assignee: [hidden email] Reporter: [hidden email] Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 102372 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=102372&action=edit Photo file CASIO EX-Z750 I can not rotate the files received from the camera CASIO EX-Z750. With other cameras file the program works correctly. I tried about 10 different programs to organize photographic archive. In my opinion digiKam most comfortable, with the exception of support for the old photos from Casio. I would be very grateful for your help in this matter. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372755
Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #1 from Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> --- No problem here when rotating the image. Is the image not rotated? Error message in the console? Maik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372755
--- Comment #2 from Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> --- OK, confirmed for digiKam on Windows. Maik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372755
--- Comment #3 from D <[hidden email]> --- Created attachment 102374 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=102374&action=edit error In the version for Linux error is not repeated? I tested it on windows 8.0 64 and 86. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372755
--- Comment #4 from Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> --- There is an issue in libexiv2-0.25. Should be fixed in version 0.26. The question is when it appears. See here: http://dev.exiv2.org/issues/1106 Maik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372755
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #5 from [hidden email] --- Maik, Exiv2 0.26 is theoretically planed before end this year. But with Exiv2, this is always postponed. The solution for 5.4.0 and future release can be to use current code from svn/trunk when we bundle digiKam for Windows/OSX/Linux. This is not very difficult with CMake. I currently finalize AppImage with a lots of extra shared libs required by digiKam and i will factorize all scripts with OSX and Windows bundles. This will permit to have a fine control of all libs used by digiKam, as version and compilation options. What do you think about this plan. Gilles -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372755
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|general |Metadata-Engine -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372755
--- Comment #6 from Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> --- I think it's a good idea to use for some libs current svn/trunk code. Maik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372755
Christoph Feck <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|critical |normal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372755
--- Comment #7 from [hidden email] --- Git commit 84fa4a5e4b878d7ff689551668f4eeaf72e217b8 by Gilles Caulier. Committed on 22/11/2016 at 16:02. Pushed by cgilles into branch 'master'. Use Exiv2 current implementation from svn/trunk for AppImage Linux bundle M +10 -2 project/appimage/3rdparty/ext_exiv2/CMakeLists.txt A +21 -0 project/appimage/patches/exiv2-trunk.patch http://commits.kde.org/scratch/mwiesweg/digikam-sc/84fa4a5e4b878d7ff689551668f4eeaf72e217b8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372755
--- Comment #8 from [hidden email] --- The new windows installer 5.4.0 pre-release is now compiled with Exiv2 0.26-svn (not yet released). Can you check if problem is reproducible with this version of digiKam under Windows. The installer can be downloaded at this place : https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372755
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version Fixed In| |5.4.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #9 from [hidden email] --- Same problem than bug #373500. Using Exiv2 0.26 fix the problem. Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372755
--- Comment #10 from D <[hidden email]> --- Many thanks! 5.4.0 pre-release works fine. The problem is not repeated. In gratitude, I made a small donation. For me, the best program to organize photographic archive. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |