[digikam] [Bug 366109] New: Slideshow freezes on first image

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366109

            Bug ID: 366109
           Summary: Slideshow freezes on first image
           Product: digikam
           Version: 5.0.0
          Platform: MS Windows
                OS: MS Windows
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: NOR
         Component: SlideShow
          Assignee: [hidden email]
          Reporter: [hidden email]

The first image will be successfully displayed within the fullscreen window,
advancing to another image using the arrows or by waiting for the timer, will
change the image digiKam thinks it's showing, but not update the contents of
the fullscreen window (neither progress bar nor displayed image will change).

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Select an image
2. Click on the "Show full screen" button
3. Click on the "Next image" (double forward arrow) button

Actual Results:  
Nothing (no change in display whatsoever)

Expected Results:  
Change image to something else

Windows 10 Home x86, 3GiB RAM
Graphics: Intel® Q35 Express Chipset (WDDM 1.0)

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366109

Alexander Schlarb <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Slideshow freezes on first  |Slideshow freezes on first
                   |image                       |image (Windows)

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366109

Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[hidden email]
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #1 from Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 365410 ***

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366109

--- Comment #2 from Alexander Schlarb <[hidden email]> ---
I have compiled the latest git snapshot from source last week and can confirm
that this has been indeed addressed. Thanks!

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366109

[hidden email] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[hidden email]

--- Comment #3 from [hidden email] ---
Just to know, did you compiled digiKam & co for Windows ? Did you use MXE ?

Gilles Caulier

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366109

--- Comment #4 from Alexander Schlarb <[hidden email]> ---
Yes, I compiled digiKam for the `win32` target based on the instructions in
`project/mxe/README`.

My main wish for improvements would probably be to be able to use the
precompiled MXE dependencies from their repos instead of having to compile
QtWebkit (and everything else) myself. I needed 4 tries to compile it, since
the compilation kept causing OOMs.
Other than that it was surprisingly smooth sailing.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366109

--- Comment #5 from [hidden email] ---
>to use the precompiled MXE dependencies from their repos

There are precompiled binaries repositories in MXE project ? Where are the
details about on the web ?

Yes, MXE is really a great improvement to compile open source project for
Windows, without to have M$ OS + M$ compiler...

Gilles Caulier

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366109

[hidden email] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |FIXED
   Version Fixed In|                            |5.1.0

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366109

--- Comment #6 from Alexander Schlarb <[hidden email]> ---
Sorry for ignoring you…

> There are precompiled binary repositories in MXE project ? Where are the details about on the web ?

I don't know whether this is documented anywhere, but the Debian repository
definitely has a lot of useful stuff (I think it's everything digiKam uses MXE
for):
http://pkg.mxe.cc/repos/apt/debian/pool/main/m/

[A few minutes later] Actually http://pkg.mxe.cc documents the MXE binary
distribution reasonably well. There is also a distribution with `.tar.xz`
archives (http://pkg.mxe.cc/repos/tar/) available; no rpm through.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.