https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359431
Bug ID: 359431 Summary: When importing images if they are available in pairs with same name/different format consider pairing them as 2 versions of same image Product: digikam Version: 5.0.0 Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: Versioning Assignee: [hidden email] Reporter: [hidden email] Most of the time I'm happy with my camera's JPEGs, however occasionally I like to fall back to RAW for some fine tuning. To facilitate this I tend to shoot photos in camera's RAW + JPEG mode, resulting in 2 files per show. The downside is I have to manually work my way through to duplicates. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Set camera to RAW + JPEG mode to record 2 copies of each shot (one in RAW, one in JPEG) 2. Import into Digikam Actual Results: All images are duplicated Expected Results: Best case for me would be to have Digikam show just one image in album, with 2 versions: the RAW image as original one, and the JPEG as current version after camera's processing. This may be very specific to my workflow, I'm not sure how useful it would be for other users. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359431
Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #1 from Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> --- You can select all the images from an album and choose the entry "Group Selected By Type" from the context menu. JPG file is displayed and RAW file is hidden in the album. When you delete the JPG file of the closed group, the RAW file also is deleted. Maik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359431
--- Comment #2 from Michal Sylwester <[hidden email]> --- Nice. I've never used grouping before, I'll see how it works for me. Michal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359431
Peter <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #3 from Peter <[hidden email]> --- I don't think grouping is the answer. Also, that means manually selecting every two images and grouping them. You can add metadata to both files outside of digikam to link them. I wrote a script in a few minutes to find a same-named match and link them if it exists. Maybe this is a problem for a plugin. raw: ImageUniqueID processed: ImageHistory pointing to the version 1 ID -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |