[digikam] [Bug 345220] New: Import ACDSee Categories to hierarchical Tags

[Maik Qualmann]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #92022|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Maik Qualmann]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

--- Comment #17 from Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> ---
Created attachment 92065
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=92065&action=edit
acdseetags3.patch

This new patch fixes the bug from Comment 15. Alan, can you share the complex
example from
https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/2015-March/020770.html?

Maik

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Alan Pater]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

--- Comment #18 from Alan Pater <[hidden email]> ---
Created attachment 92066
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=92066&action=edit
complex example image

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Maik Qualmann]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

--- Comment #19 from Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> ---
Result from Comment 18:

>>> digiKam-Schema <<<

ACDSee/Pro/8,
1 Level,
2 Level,
2 Level/2.2 Level,
3 Level,
3 Level/3.2 Level,
3 Level/3.2 Level/3.3 Level,
4 Level,
4 Level/4.2 Level,
4 Level/4.2 Level/4.3 Level,
4 Level/4.2 Level/4.3 Level/4.4 Level,
5 Level,
5 Level/5.2 Level,
5 Level/5.2 Level/5.3 Level,
5 Level/5.2 Level/5.3 Level/5.4 Level,
5 Level/5.2 Level/5.3 Level/5.4 Level/5.5  Level,
6 Level,
6 Level/6.2 Level,
6 Level/6.2 Level/6.3 Level,
6 Level/6.2 Level/6.3 Level/6.4 Level,
6 Level/6.2 Level/6.3 Level/6.4 Level/6.5 Level,
6 Level/6.2 Level/6.3 Level/6.4 Level/6.5 Level/6.6  Level,

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Alan Pater]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

--- Comment #20 from Alan Pater <[hidden email]> ---
Great Maik, looks correct to my eyes.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Alan Pater]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

--- Comment #21 from Alan Pater <[hidden email]> ---
I'm not 100% sure what to do with the other three acdsee properties.

I think "Xmp.acdsee.caption" should map to "Xmp.dc.title" but could not find in
the code where that mapping should be.

"Xmp.acdsee.author" should map to "Xmp.dc.creator", but again I am not sure
where that goes.

In the samples "Xmp.acdsee.datetime" has the same DateTime as
"Exif.Photo.DateTimeOriginal". I suspect that can be ignored, as all the
samples already have that data in EXIF.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Maik Qualmann]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

--- Comment #22 from Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> ---
Hi Alan,
can you create a test image with "Xmp.acdsee.caption" and "Xmp.acdsee.rating".
The value range of the rating is of interest.

Maik

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Alan Pater]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

--- Comment #23 from Alan Pater <[hidden email]> ---
Created attachment 92085
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=92085&action=edit
Sample with Rating and Caption

In the ACDSee GUI, Rating is a number between 1-5. In the attached sample, I
choose 4.

~$ exiv2 -pa Pictures/tests/acdsee/acdsee18.rating.jpg
Xmp.acdsee.caption                           XmpText    14  ACDSee Caption
Xmp.acdsee.datetime                          XmpText     0  
Xmp.acdsee.author                            XmpText    13  ACDSee Author
Xmp.acdsee.rating                            XmpText     1  4
Xmp.acdsee.notes                             XmpText    12  ACDSee Notes
Xmp.acdsee.tagged                            XmpText     5  False
Xmp.acdsee.categories                        XmpText     0

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Maik Qualmann]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #92065|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Maik Qualmann]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

--- Comment #24 from Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> ---
Created attachment 92088
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=92088&action=edit
acdseetags4.patch

The following fields are now supported when importing images:

Xmp.acdsee.categories
Xmp.acdsee.caption
Xmp.acdsee.author
Xmp.acdsee.rating

The "Xmp.acdsee.caption" field is interpreted as "Xmp.dc.description".

Maik

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Maik Qualmann]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

--- Comment #25 from Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> ---
Or is "Xmp.acdsee.notes" -> "Xmp.dc.description" and "Xmp.acdsee.caption" ->
"Xmp.dc.title"?

Maik

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

--- Comment #26 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> ---
> Or is "Xmp.acdsee.notes" -> "Xmp.dc.description" and "Xmp.acdsee.caption" -> "Xmp.dc.title"?

What's about comments i18n management here, as comment can be in English
(default), in French, in German, etc...

ACDsee mamespace support this feature, as standard XMP namespace ? Exiftool
which have the most advanced list of tags reference as these entries :

http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/XMP.html#acdsee

Note : why application create new namespace for usual tags if no new properties
are not add ? But it's another subject...

Gilles

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Alan Pater]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

--- Comment #27 from Alan Pater <[hidden email]> ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #25)
> Or is "Xmp.acdsee.notes" -> "Xmp.dc.description" and "Xmp.acdsee.caption" ->
> "Xmp.dc.title"?
>
I think it should be that way, not "Xmp.acdsee.caption" ->
"Xmp.dc.description". In the ACDSee documentation, "Caption" is also referred
to to as "Title".

"Notes" appear more like "Description". We have a sample image with the
following:

Xmp.acdsee.notes    XmpText    91  Quebec - Cours de perfectionnement de la
Chambre des notaires du Quebec - Chateau Frontenac

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Maik Qualmann]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #92088|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Maik Qualmann]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

--- Comment #28 from Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> ---
Created attachment 92108
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=92108&action=edit
acdseetags5.patch

Final version of the patch to import ACDSee XMP fields.

Xmp.acdsee.categories
Xmp.acdsee.caption -> Xmp.dc.title
Xmp.acdsee.author
Xmp.acdsee.rating
Xmp.acdsee.notes -> Xmp.dc.description

I think that only a few users want to write the ACDSee Metadata back into the
image.
That should be optional ->
https://community.kde.org/GSoC/2015/Ideas#Project:_Advanced_Metadata_HUB

Maik

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

--- Comment #29 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> ---
>I think that only a few users want to write the ACDSee Metadata back into the image.
>That should be optional -> >https://community.kde.org/GSoC/2015/Ideas#Project:_Advanced_Metadata_HUB

Maik,

Optional, yes, but implemented in DMetadata. This GSoC 2015 project is to route
metadata reading and writing rules.

It will be great to have ACDSee Export code as i do for LR and Microsoft
namespace, for interroperability reasons.

As Alan is able to check if export from digiKam to ACDSee will work, all
conditions to validate this kind of code are here...

Gilles

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Alan Pater]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

--- Comment #30 from Alan Pater <[hidden email]> ---
I've added the acdsee namespace and properties to exiv2.

http://dev.exiv2.org/projects/exiv2/repository/revisions/3715

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

--- Comment #31 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> ---
Alan,

This will help to make code to export from digiKam to ACDSee ?

Maik,

Did you manage this king of feature ?

Gilles

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Alan Pater]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

--- Comment #32 from Alan Pater <[hidden email]> ---
(In reply to Gilles Caulier from comment #31)

> This will help to make code to export from digiKam to ACDSee ?
>
Correct. This makes the acdsee properties writable, assuming that the user has
at least exiv2 rev 3715.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Maik Qualmann]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345220

--- Comment #33 from Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> ---
I can write from digiKam the ACDSee properties without the patch. The export to
ACDSee is in work.

Maik

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel