[digikam] [Bug 336253] New: Create a New tag, Unconfirmed Faces

[Henrique Santos Fernandes]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

            Bug ID: 336253
           Summary: Create a New tag, Unconfirmed Faces
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: digikam
           Version: 4.0.0
          Platform: unspecified
                OS: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: wishlist
          Priority: NOR
         Component: libkface
          Assignee: [hidden email]
          Reporter: [hidden email]

When detecting faces, there is a tag called Unknow People.

But after trying to Recognize. Sometimes there is faces that became
"unconfirmed"

I would like to filter this uncofirmed faces, so i can only see the new "not
confirmed" faces.

If i have 1000 Jonh's photos,  when i try to recognize faces, if now i have
1002 Jonhs photos, i simple can't know wich one is unconfirmed.  I would lke to
be able to see this results.

Other litle thing to ask, the tag "Unknow people" is no writen to the file
metadata, even if i tried to syncrozine the files.

Because would be nice to filter like an Event and Unconfirmed faces, so i can
confirm all faces of that Event etc.

Reproducible: Didn't try

Steps to Reproduce:
Import photos.
Run Faces Recognize.

Actual Results:  
Import photos
Run Faces Recognize.
Filter for some pople tags
Look for every single people (passing the mouse in the picture) and see if that
faces is confirmed or not.

Expected Results:  
Import photos.
Run Faces Recognize.
Filter for unconfirmed faces and some others tags.
Confirm new detected faces.
Done

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[hidden email]
          Component|libkface                    |Face Management

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Henrique Santos Fernandes]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

Henrique Santos Fernandes <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|4.0.0                       |4.1.0

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

--- Comment #1 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> ---
Why not to use Color Labels for this task. With 4.2.0, it's now possible to
show all items with a specific label assigned.

Gilles Caulier

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |devoutlytobewished@googlema
                   |                            |il.com

--- Comment #2 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> ---
*** Bug 263400 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Henrique Santos Fernandes]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

--- Comment #3 from Henrique Santos Fernandes <[hidden email]> ---
(In reply to Gilles Caulier from comment #1)
> Why not to use Color Labels for this task. With 4.2.0, it's now possible to
> show all items with a specific label assigned.
>
> Gilles Caulier

Sorry, did not understand, how would i use this to find out with images are not
confirmed yet?

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

--- Comment #4 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> ---
Example : Select all unconfirmed faces after a detection process and assign Red
color label. In Labels view you can find quickly this set of images. When face
are assigned to one Red labeled image, remove Red from it.

Gilles Caulier

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Henrique Santos Fernandes]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

--- Comment #5 from Henrique Santos Fernandes <[hidden email]> ---
(In reply to Gilles Caulier from comment #4)
> Example : Select all unconfirmed faces after a detection process and assign
> Red color label. In Labels view you can find quickly this set of images.
> When face are assigned to one Red labeled image, remove Red from it.
>
> Gilles Caulier

I could also do this with a simple tag. I will do something like this.. i might
just add a new tag to all my images, once i confirm a face a will have to untag
it.

It does not seen pretty, but does the job.

I still think it could be shown somehow, as this information is already saved
somewhere.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[greenleaf123]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

[hidden email] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |CONFIRMED

--- Comment #6 from [hidden email] ---
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[greenleaf123]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

[hidden email] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[hidden email]

--- Comment #7 from [hidden email] ---
I second this feature request: It is very unwieldy to manually filter all
images with unconfirmed faces.
When I select people and then a person I see pictures but can't select which
ones need to be confirmed. Even if I had tagged them before "unconfirmed" there
would be no way to know if the picture had other - potentially unconfirmed -
faces on but to start preview mode.
It would be great if these steps could be avoided by having digikam keeping
track of unconfirmed faces in a way easily selectable / filterable.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Alejandro]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

Alejandro <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |alejandro.perez.mendez@gmai
                   |                            |l.com

--- Comment #8 from Alejandro <[hidden email]> ---
I also second this feature. CUrrently, I need to move the cursor over each one
of the 1500 photos of my wife to see which ones of them are "new"

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Christoph Huckle]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

Christoph Huckle <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[hidden email]

--- Comment #9 from Christoph Huckle <[hidden email]> ---
I also second this request.

It is unpractical for me to introduce a manual color selection, as when I want
to check the unconfirmed for my wife I only want to see these, and not all
unconfirmed for every other person.

I'd even work on this myself, but so far I'm lacking the insight in the digikam
source. Any developers close to Baden, Switzerland?

BR,
Chris.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Christoph Huckle]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

--- Comment #10 from Christoph Huckle <[hidden email]> ---
Created attachment 92592
  --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=92592&action=edit
Gives the option to inverse the normal filtering

Hi all,

I created a solution for myself which works quite well so far. I changed the
normal filtering in a way, so that the selected tag is filtered out, instead of
filtered for.
So I open the faceview which shows all confirmed and unconfirmed pictures of my
wife, then I select her name in the tag filter on the right and all the
confirmed pictures are filtered out and only the unconfirmed are left.

The inversion is done via a checkbox, so the normal way of filtering is not
lost.

Let me know what you think.

BR,
Chris

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Liz]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

--- Comment #11 from Liz <[hidden email]> ---
(In reply to Christoph Huckle from comment #10)
> Created attachment 92592 [details]
> Gives the option to inverse the normal filtering

Yes, perfect!

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Create a New tag,           |Create a New tag,
                   |Unconfirmed Faces           |Unconfirmed Faces [patch]

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|4.1.0                       |4.10.0

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Maik Qualmann]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[hidden email]

--- Comment #12 from Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> ---
The inversed tags filter mode is already included in digiKam. Right-click on
the tag in the filter->Tag Filter Mode-> Must Not Have This Tag

Maik

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Christoph Huckle]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

--- Comment #13 from Christoph Huckle <[hidden email]> ---
Thanks Maik. Should have read the manual, I guess.

WIth the option explained by Maik, for me any other feature is not needed.

BR
Chris.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Maik Qualmann]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

--- Comment #14 from Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> ---
Note: The inversed selection of tags is also possible with the middle mouse
button.

Maik

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Liz]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253

--- Comment #15 from Liz <[hidden email]> ---
(In reply to Christoph Huckle from comment #13)
> WIth the option explained by Maik, for me any other feature is not needed.

Same here, the existing feature addresses my needs perfectly.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel