https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315271
Bug ID: 315271 Summary: WISH: system-check (libraries, space, limitations) Classification: Unclassified Product: digikam Version: 3.0.0 Platform: Ubuntu Packages OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general Assignee: [hidden email] Reporter: [hidden email] I'd like to have an automated system-check _before_ starting up digiKam. This check should take place in backround, as for example at startup, and/or on request. This check must be able to identify bottlenecks of the systems support, and, therefore, be able to supply recommendations or at least informations to enable the user to react on specific corrections. Reproducible: Always Actual Results: digiKam does not indicate hardware oe software limitations. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315271
Rex Dieter <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter <[hidden email]> --- Did you have any particular "limitations" in mind? Besides freespace(1) , I can't think of anything (1) which I'd argue is out-of-scope for anything digikam-specific. if you're out-of-space, all bets are off anyway, not much of anything will work reliably. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Axel Krebs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315271
--- Comment #2 from Axel Krebs <[hidden email]> --- My intention is, to level didiKam to even more on a proffessional stage. In this context, waste of time, reliability and avoiding of inefficient proceedings is crucial. OK, you are right, one needs to clarify, what is really "crucial". "Space" is an issue: if you do panoramas, you'll need lot of space intermediately. Why not show a warning, _before_ you waste time? I guess, it is possible, to derive a rule of thumb for estimate the needed space ("number x pic size x safety factor", e.g.). Even when servicing your pics database, you need some more space for temp files than under regular working conditions. Why not warn, before loosing time or experiencing crashing progs? "Limitations": I am thinking of progs which check availability of libraries on demand (K3B, e.g.). If installed, the prog itself more features than "standard" installation with restricted abilities. "Limitations" in another sense, too: I'd like to have all pics in statistic, and I'd like to distingish between the ones digiKam can open and the ones, which digiKam can NOT open ("broken ones"?. Background: I have some hundreds of NEF, digiKam can not open at all It would be most helpful to search and find for those, as one might have backups, could be able to reapit questioned files etc. Axel --- Am 16.02.2013 18:52, schrieb Rex Dieter: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315271 > > Rex Dieter <[hidden email]> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |[hidden email] > > --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter <[hidden email]> --- > Did you have any particular "limitations" in mind? > > Besides freespace(1) , I can't think of anything > > (1) which I'd argue is out-of-scope for anything digikam-specific. if you're > out-of-space, all bets are off anyway, not much of anything will work reliably. > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Axel Krebs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315271
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|WISH: system-check |System-check at startup |(libraries, space, |(hardware, disk space) |limitations) | CC| |[hidden email] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Axel Krebs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315271
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |wishlist Summary|System-check at startup |Add disk space checks at |(hardware, disk space) |startup -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Axel Krebs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315271
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|general |Database-Scan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |