|
Hey everybody!
KDE SC 4.9 was released one month ago and yet it seems that its libkipi version is too old to compile digikam 3 beta. 4.7 ok, 4.8 maybe, but 4.9 being too old? Do you expect distros to ship a libkipi more recent than that from KDE SC 4.9 or will digikam 3 take that long that by the time it is released KDE 4.10 is out and hopefully recent enough to suffice digikam's requirements? Sven _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
digiKam 3.0 will require next libkipi 2.0 witch will come with KDE
4.10. digiKam tarball will be published with libkipi as well. Look GoSC 2012 wiki page for details : http://community.kde.org/Digikam/GSoC2012#Repositories_Branching_and_Dates Gilles Caulier 2012/9/3 Sven Burmeister <[hidden email]>: > Hey everybody! > > KDE SC 4.9 was released one month ago and yet it seems that its libkipi > version is too old to compile digikam 3 beta. 4.7 ok, 4.8 maybe, but 4.9 being > too old? > > Do you expect distros to ship a libkipi more recent than that from KDE SC 4.9 > or will digikam 3 take that long that by the time it is released KDE 4.10 is > out and hopefully recent enough to suffice digikam's requirements? > > Sven > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-devel mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
Am Dienstag, 4. September 2012, 06:26:55 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> digiKam 3.0 will require next libkipi 2.0 witch will come with KDE > 4.10. 4.10 is going to be released at the end of January 2013. So until then there is no stable release of libkipi that will work with digikam 3.0. > digiKam tarball will be published with libkipi as well. Look > GoSC 2012 wiki page for details : > > http://community.kde.org/Digikam/GSoC2012#Repositories_Branching_and_Dates This states that digikam 3.0 will be released before KDE SC 4.10 releases the required libkipi. So distros will have to include an unreleased (from KDE SC's point of view) version of libkipi if they want to provide digikam 3.0. Leaving alone providing packages for beta testing. To me it does not sound like a good plan to require an unreleased KDE version for a digikam release. Especially since it's not like digikam was a brand new app in it's 0.1.x versions. Does digikam at least provide a cmake switch to only build libkipi from its private libs and not either everything including libkdcraw etc. or nothing? Sven _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
2012/9/4 Sven Burmeister <[hidden email]>:
> Am Dienstag, 4. September 2012, 06:26:55 schrieb Gilles Caulier: >> digiKam 3.0 will require next libkipi 2.0 witch will come with KDE >> 4.10. > > 4.10 is going to be released at the end of January 2013. So until then there > is no stable release of libkipi that will work with digikam 3.0. > >> digiKam tarball will be published with libkipi as well. Look >> GoSC 2012 wiki page for details : >> >> http://community.kde.org/Digikam/GSoC2012#Repositories_Branching_and_Dates > > This states that digikam 3.0 will be released before KDE SC 4.10 releases the > required libkipi. > > So distros will have to include an unreleased (from KDE SC's point of view) > version of libkipi if they want to provide digikam 3.0. Leaving alone > providing packages for beta testing. No. digiKam will include it as well. It will install only binary file, no headers... We have talk with KDE core developpers about... Gilles Caulier _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
Am Dienstag 04 September 2012, 10:28:58 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> 2012/9/4 Sven Burmeister <[hidden email]>: > > Am Dienstag, 4. September 2012, 06:26:55 schrieb Gilles Caulier: > >> digiKam 3.0 will require next libkipi 2.0 witch will come with KDE > >> 4.10. > > > > 4.10 is going to be released at the end of January 2013. So until then > > there is no stable release of libkipi that will work with digikam 3.0. > > > >> digiKam tarball will be published with libkipi as well. Look > >> GoSC 2012 wiki page for details : > >> > >> http://community.kde.org/Digikam/GSoC2012#Repositories_Branching_and_Dat > >> es > > > > This states that digikam 3.0 will be released before KDE SC 4.10 releases > > the required libkipi. > > > > So distros will have to include an unreleased (from KDE SC's point of > > view) version of libkipi if they want to provide digikam 3.0. Leaving > > alone providing packages for beta testing. > > No. digiKam will include it as well. It will install only binary file, > no headers... We have talk with KDE core developpers about... > distributions happy... however, let's worry about this when the 3.0 release comes closer. "Best case", 3.0 gets delayed anyway and coincides with KDE 4.10. :o) -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer [hidden email] http://www.akhuettel.de/ _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by S. Burmeister
Am Montag, 3. September 2012, 23:18:38 schrieb Sven Burmeister:
> Do you expect distros to ship a libkipi more recent than that from KDE SC > 4.9 or will digikam 3 take that long that by the time it is released KDE > 4.10 is out and hopefully recent enough to suffice digikam's requirements? http://www.herqq.org/news.html "Apr. 17, 2011: The first alpha of HUPnPAv (0.0.1) is out!" No News since then but digikam relies on this lib? Are you sure it's being developed and going to be in a non-alpha state until December? Sven _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
