digikam 0.9.2 freshmeat and linuxfr
Locked
 
|
Hi,
Yesterday evening, I posted an a news in linuxfr and freshmeat about the new version. They are now published... http://freshmeat.net/daily/2007/06/26/ http://linuxfr.org/2007/06/26/22665.html -- Fabien _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Re: digikam 0.9.2 freshmeat and linuxfr
|
|
2007/6/27, Fabien <[hidden email]>: GillesHi, Why 0.9.2 is a minor enhancement release ? Light Table is a minor stuff ? http://linuxfr.org/2007/06/26/22665.html The Wiki question from fred is an important and redondant question. All major opensource project has an user wiki. This point has already discuted in this room. a wiki hosted in digikam.org will be the hell to drive. A good alternative is to use kde.org wiki : http://wiki.kde.org/tiki-index.php?page=Digikam I think we most promote this site as well everywhere... Your viepoints ? _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Re: digikam 0.9.2 freshmeat and linuxfr
|
|
In reply to this post by Fabien-5
2007/6/27, Fabien <[hidden email]>: Hi, Fabien, Fred, on linuxfr ask where we can find a good tutorial about color management and RAW workflow. Nicola Vilar has already started it here : http://linux.vilars.com/dotclear/index.php?2007/01/03/6-color-management-workflow-using-digikam http://linux.vilars.com/dotclear/index.php?2007/01/08/8-io-files-settings-advanced-options-how-to-get-the-most-out-of-your-pictures .. of course, since dcraw have been updated to 8.60 in digiKam 0.9.2 these tutorials need to be updated a little. Nota : these pages are already registered in digikam.org : http://www.digikam.org/?q=about/awards Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > 2007/6/27, Fabien <[hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>>: > > Hi, > > Yesterday evening, I posted an a news in linuxfr and freshmeat about the > new version. > > They are now published... > > http://freshmeat.net/daily/2007/06/26/ > <http://freshmeat.net/daily/2007/06/26/> > > > Why 0.9.2 is a minor enhancement release ? Light Table is a minor stuff ? :) There's only major/minor. Major is used for new big version (0.8 => 0.9). It's a pity that we can't choose something more precise. Anyway... > > http://linuxfr.org/2007/06/26/22665.html > > > The Wiki question from fred is an important and redondant question. All > major opensource project has an user wiki. Yes, I agree. And we already spoke about that a few months ago. > > This point has already discuted in this room. a wiki hosted in > digikam.org <http://digikam.org> will be the hell to drive. A good > alternative is to use kde.org <http://kde.org> wiki : > > http://wiki.kde.org/tiki-index.php?page=Digikam > > I think we most promote this site as well everywhere... Your viepoints ? I just check that there's now an anti-bot system. So, we can hope there won't be too much spam on it. So, let's advertise ! -- Fabien _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Re: digikam 0.9.2 freshmeat and linuxfr
|
|
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Fabien wrote: > Gilles Caulier wrote: [...] > > The Wiki question from fred is an important and redondant question. All > > major opensource project has an user wiki. > > Yes, I agree. And we already spoke about that a few months ago. > > > > > This point has already discuted in this room. a wiki hosted in > > digikam.org <http://digikam.org> will be the hell to drive. A good > > alternative is to use kde.org <http://kde.org> wiki : > > > > http://wiki.kde.org/tiki-index.php?page=Digikam > > > > I think we most promote this site as well everywhere... Your viepoints ? > I just check that there's now an anti-bot system. So, we can hope there > won't be too much spam on it. > So, let's advertise ! hmm, shouldn't there be at least a little bit of structure before advertising? Otherwise it seems likely that it will grow wildly, from the start. Maybe one additional level, like General information: - link to documentation - handbook - homepage - etc. Topics in this wiki: - Managing images - Editing images - Geolocalization (GPS) - FAQ - Tips, tricks and scripts And then there is the unsolved question, how/when/if to transfer wiki contents into the the contents at digikam.org and the excellent handbook! Just my 0.5 cent, Arnd _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Re: digikam 0.9.2 freshmeat and linuxfr
|
|
2007/6/27, Arnd Baecker <[hidden email]>: On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Fabien wrote: > Gilles Caulier wrote: [...] > > The Wiki question from fred is an important and redondant question. All > > major opensource project has an user wiki. > > Yes, I agree. And we already spoke about that a few months ago. > > > > > This point has already discuted in this room. a wiki hosted in > > digikam.org <http://digikam.org> will be the hell to drive. A good > > alternative is to use kde.org <http://kde.org> wiki : > > > > http://wiki.kde.org/tiki-index.php?page=Digikam > > > > I think we most promote this site as well everywhere... Your viepoints ? > I just check that there's now an anti-bot system. So, we can hope there > won't be too much spam on it. > So, let's advertise ! hmm, shouldn't there be at least a little bit of structure before advertising? of course... else the wiki will be unreadable... Otherwise it seems likely that it will grow wildly, from the start. Maybe one additional level, like General information: - link to documentation - handbook - homepage - etc. Topics in this wiki: - Managing images - Editing images - Geolocalization (GPS) - FAQ - Tips, tricks and scripts Why not.. And then there is the unsolved question, how/when/if to transfer wiki contents into the the contents at digikam.org and the excellent handbook! Just my 0.5 cent, I recommend to post a message in digikam-user ML and a blog entry about this subject. #digikam IRC channel can be dedicaced for help users who want contribute to wiki contents in live This is not a problem for developpers, because we have another IRC channel for that : #digikam-devel (not yet used, but created a few years ago by Tom) Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Re: digikam 0.9.2 freshmeat and linuxfr
|
|
In reply to this post by Fabien-5
Am Wednesday 27 June 2007 um 10:54:40 schrieb Fabien:
> Hi, Hi, > > Yesterday evening, I posted an a news in linuxfr and freshmeat about the > new version. What about dot.kde.org? I don't read freshmeat or linuxfr.org but dot.kde is for me the major KDE news site(?) The amarok 1.4.6 news can be used as an example for a short release note. Bye Thorsten _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Re: digikam 0.9.2 freshmeat and linuxfr
|
|
2007/6/27, Thorsten Schnebeck <[hidden email]>:
Am Wednesday 27 June 2007 um 10:54:40 schrieb Fabien: AAAAAAhhhhhhh!!!!! the famous dot.kde.org !!! well, since a long time i can said than dot.kde.org do not promote digiKam like it can do with KDE4 features, amarock, K3b, Koffice, etc... Of course, dot.kde.org is really a good place to read new technologies and programs othed by KDE The advantage of dot.kde.org for developpers is than all informations are already present to start thread on commits review. The didgest writer just take a look where there is an high activity in svn... And about digikam, the activity is not NULL ! I have never see a message about the new Light Table for ex. I'm not a very good English writter, but i'm trying to give the essential informations when i commit on svn, especially with url to screenshots hosted by digikam3rdparty.free.fr space. I suspect than dot.kde.org coordinator _ignore_ digiKam as well... Perhaps they don't use or don't care. For me it's a shame. If you is not really convinced, just take a look in commit stats archive : http://commit-digest.org/issues/2007-06-24/statistics/ http://commit-digest.org/issues/2007-06-17/statistics/ http://commit-digest.org/issues/2007-06-10/statistics/ http://commit-digest.org/issues/2007-06-03/statistics/ http://commit-digest.org/issues/2007-05-27/statistics/ ... I'm always on the top list of commiters. This will be enough to ping diggest writter about digiKam activity. No ? ... or perhaps i'm wrong and everybody don't care about digiKam project... Another point : I have tried to write an announce at 0.9.0 and 0.9.1 beta release in the pass. I have recieve a negative response. The reason : you can only post final release announce on dot.kde.org... this is completly STUPID. We need help (test, bug reports, patch, etc) to finalize digiKam before the final release, not after... To resume : do not ask me to write something for dot.kde.org.. . If somebody want do it, well fell free, but personally, i have no time to lost... Gilles (who back to port digiKam under KDE4 (:=)))) _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
|
Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > > 2007/6/27, Thorsten Schnebeck > <[hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>>: > > Am Wednesday 27 June 2007 um 10:54:40 schrieb Fabien: > > Hi, > Hi, > > > > Yesterday evening, I posted an a news in linuxfr and freshmeat > about the > > new version. > > What about dot.kde.org <http://dot.kde.org>? > > > AAAAAAhhhhhhh!!!!! the famous dot.kde.org <http://dot.kde.org> !!! > > well, since a long time i can said than dot.kde.org <http://dot.kde.org> > do not promote digiKam like it can do with KDE4 features, amarock, K3b, > Koffice, etc... Of course, dot.kde.org <http://dot.kde.org> is really a > good place to read new technologies and programs othed by KDE > > The advantage of dot.kde.org <http://dot.kde.org> for developpers is > than all informations are already present to start thread on commits > review. The didgest writer just take a look where there is an high > activity in svn... > [...] > I suspect than dot.kde.org <http://dot.kde.org> coordinator _ignore_ > digiKam as well... Perhaps they don't use or don't care. For me it's a > shame. Well, if the coordinator read this, it won't help :) A few months ago, we started to talk about dot.kde.org announcements, they wanted us to give them some informations, look here : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/2006-December/009301.html We started, but never finish to do it... If somebody want to continue it, help is welcome :) -- Fabien _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Re: digikam 0.9.2 freshmeat and linuxfr
|
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Am Wednesday 27 June 2007 um 16:12:39 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> 2007/6/27, Thorsten Schnebeck <[hidden email]>: > > Am Wednesday 27 June 2007 um 10:54:40 schrieb Fabien: > > > Hi, > > > > Hi, > > > > > Yesterday evening, I posted an a news in linuxfr and freshmeat about > > > the new version. > > > > What about dot.kde.org? > > AAAAAAhhhhhhh!!!!! the famous dot.kde.org !!! > well, since a long time i can said than dot.kde.org do not promote digiKam > like it can do with KDE4 features, amarock, K3b, Koffice, etc... Of course, > dot.kde.org is really a good place to read new technologies and programs > othed by KDE > > The advantage of dot.kde.org for developpers is than all informations are > already present to start thread on commits review. The didgest writer just > take a look where there is an high activity in svn... > > And about digikam, the activity is not NULL ! Ok, but Commit-Digest is not dot. > I have never see a message about the new Light Table for ex. I'm not a very > good English writter, but i'm trying to give the essential informations > when i commit on svn, especially with url to screenshots hosted by > digikam3rdparty.free.fr space. ...or in your yery nice blog on digikam.org that is also linkt via planetkde on the dot > I suspect than dot.kde.org coordinator _ignore_ digiKam as well... Perhaps > they don't use or don't care. For me it's a shame. I don't think so. > If you is not really convinced, just take a look in commit stats archive : > > http://commit-digest.org/issues/2007-06-24/statistics/ > http://commit-digest.org/issues/2007-06-17/statistics/ > http://commit-digest.org/issues/2007-06-10/statistics/ > http://commit-digest.org/issues/2007-06-03/statistics/ > http://commit-digest.org/issues/2007-05-27/statistics/ > > ... I'm always on the top list of commiters. This will be enough to ping > diggest writter about digiKam activity. No ? Allan from Commit-Digest normally only pings on global KDE and now with many new KDE4 stuff you don't see deeper focus on single apps. That you see more new about Amarok is only based on their better promotion capacity compared to digiKam. So, dot is more for link to stories or release messages but dot itself does not promote. > ... or perhaps i'm wrong and everybody don't care about digiKam project... > > Another point : I have tried to write an announce at 0.9.0 and 0.9.1 beta > release in the pass. I have recieve a negative response. The reason : you > can only post final release announce on dot.kde.org... Ok, I can understand this, when every program want to write a dot news. For this we have kde-apps.org. But if a digikam (promotion) team member writes a news "digiKam needs your help - eliminate latest bugs for a solid release" and some nice written words the dot will publish that. Or news that could be published on digikam.org first could be relinked on the dot like (this should be English ;-) : "digikam wins c't Linux photo suite comparing (far ahead) - One of German most important computer magazine c't [http://www.heise.de/ct/] has in issue 14/2007 a longer comparison of Linux photo management suites with a focus on organizing photos and all-day features. Compared to KPhotoalbum, f-spot, picasa and GThumb, digikam was the only program that gets a (++) for searching and image editing function. Further it gets (+) ratings for importing, photo management and presentation. Its interesting to note that that digikam could win this review with its basics as the professional features of digikam 0.9.2 like 16bit/color, advanced raw handling, color management, geo-data handling or the new light table comparison tool were ignored. This review is stimulation for the whole team that is in the process of porting the program to KDE4." You could also ask c't if you can publish the test as scan or pdf on digikams website? > this is completly STUPID. We need help (test, bug reports, patch, etc) to > finalize digiKam before the final release, not after... > > To resume : do not ask me to write something for dot.kde.org... If somebody > want do it, well fell free, but personally, i have no time to lost... Its ok, coders are often not the best promoter ;-) But Fabien seems to like this stuff :-) > Gilles (who back to port digiKam under KDE4 (:=)))) Have Fun :-) Thorsten _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Re: digikam 0.9.2 freshmeat and linuxfr
|
|
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Thorsten Schnebeck wrote:
[...] > Or news that could be published on digikam.org first could be relinked on the > dot like (this should be English ;-) : > > "digikam wins c't Linux photo suite comparing (far ahead) - One of German most > important computer magazine c't [http://www.heise.de/ct/] has in issue > 14/2007 a longer comparison of Linux photo management suites with a focus on > organizing photos and all-day features. > Compared to KPhotoalbum, f-spot, picasa and GThumb, digikam was the only > program that gets a (++) for searching and image editing function. Further it > gets (+) ratings for importing, photo management and presentation. > Its interesting to note that that digikam could win this review with its > basics as the professional features of digikam 0.9.2 like 16bit/color, > advanced raw handling, color management, geo-data handling or the new light > table comparison tool were ignored. > This review is stimulation for the whole team that is in the process of > porting the program to KDE4." I like the text a lot; maybe something like "The digikam team would welcome help in porting and fixing bugs and implementing the various feature wishes made by users in the B.K.O." should be added at the end. > You could also ask c't if you can publish the test as scan or pdf on digikams > website? Might be worth a try ... Best, Arnd _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
digikam wiki [[was: digikam 0.9.2 freshmeat and linuxfr
|
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> 2007/6/27, Arnd Baecker <arnd.baecker at web.de>: > > On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Fabien wrote: > > Gilles Caulier wrote: > [...] > > > The Wiki question from fred is an important and redondant question. > All > > > major opensource project has an user wiki. > > > > Yes, I agree. And we already spoke about that a few months ago. > > > > > > > > This point has already discuted in this room. a wiki hosted in > > > digikam.org <http://digikam.org> will be the hell to drive. A good > > > alternative is to use kde.org <http://kde.org> wiki : > > > > > > http://wiki.kde.org/tiki-index.php?page=Digikam > > > > > > I think we most promote this site as well everywhere... Your > viepoints ? > > I just check that there's now an anti-bot system. So, we can hope > there > > won't be too much spam on it. > > So, let's advertise ! > > hmm, shouldn't there be at least a little bit of structure > before advertising? > > > of course... else the wiki will be unreadable... > > Otherwise it seems likely that it will grow wildly, from the start. > Maybe one additional level, like > > General information: > - link to documentation > - handbook > - homepage > - etc. > > Topics in this wiki: > - Managing images > - Editing images > - Geolocalization (GPS) > - FAQ > - Tips, tricks and scripts > > Why not.. > > And then there is the unsolved question, > how/when/if to transfer wiki contents into the the contents > at digikam.org and the excellent handbook! > > Just my 0.5 cent, > > > I recommend to post a message in digikam-user ML and a blog entry about this > subject. > > #digikam IRC channel can be dedicaced for help users who want contribute to > wiki contents in live > > This is not a problem for developpers, because we have another IRC channel > for that : #digikam-devel (not yet used, but created a few years ago by Tom) OK, I defaced the digikam wiki, ;-) http://wiki.kde.org/tiki-index.php?page=Digikam please add whatever you think is necessary before we make the announcement and then see how it develops. ((Presently it does not look fancy, but that's ok for me, only the main digikam page should look cool ;-)) Best, Arnd _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Re: digikam 0.9.2 freshmeat and linuxfr
|
|
In reply to this post by Arnd Baecker
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Arnd Baecker wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Thorsten Schnebeck wrote: > > [...] > > > Or news that could be published on digikam.org first could be relinked on the > > dot like (this should be English ;-) : > > > > "digikam wins c't Linux photo suite comparing (far ahead) - One of German most > > important computer magazine c't [http://www.heise.de/ct/] has in issue > > 14/2007 a longer comparison of Linux photo management suites with a focus on > > organizing photos and all-day features. > > Compared to KPhotoalbum, f-spot, picasa and GThumb, digikam was the only > > program that gets a (++) for searching and image editing function. Further it > > gets (+) ratings for importing, photo management and presentation. > > Its interesting to note that that digikam could win this review with its > > basics as the professional features of digikam 0.9.2 like 16bit/color, > > advanced raw handling, color management, geo-data handling or the new light > > table comparison tool were ignored. > --> "were not taken into account" > > This review is stimulation for the whole team that is in the process of > > porting the program to KDE4." > > I like the text a lot; maybe something like > "The digikam team would welcome help in porting and fixing bugs > and implementing the various feature wishes made by users > in the B.K.O." > should be added at the end. Thorsten, should I put this on digikam.org (which would mean, I think, to put it in my blog, and then make it appear on the front-page?) Somehow I would feel better if you would do that (because it is *your* text!). > > You could also ask c't if you can publish the test as scan or pdf on digikams > > website? > > Might be worth a try ... > > Best, Arnd > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-devel mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel > > Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Re: digikam 0.9.2 freshmeat and linuxfr
|
|
Am Friday 13 July 2007 um 10:18:13 schrieb Arnd Baecker:
> Thorsten, > should I put this on digikam.org (which would mean, I think, > to put it in my blog, and then make it appear on the front-page?) > Somehow I would feel better if you would do that > (because it is *your* text!). No problem, you can use the text, no credits needed ;-) Bye Thorsten _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Re: digikam 0.9.2 freshmeat and linuxfr
|
|
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Thorsten Schnebeck wrote: > Am Friday 13 July 2007 um 10:18:13 schrieb Arnd Baecker: > > Thorsten, > > should I put this on digikam.org (which would mean, I think, > > to put it in my blog, and then make it appear on the front-page?) > > Somehow I would feel better if you would do that > > (because it is *your* text!). > > No problem, you can use the text, no credits needed ;-) OK, it is for a good purpose ;-) http://www.digikam.org/?q=node/239 Thanks a lot, Arnd _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Re: digikam 0.9.2 freshmeat and linuxfr
|
|
Am Saturday 14 July 2007 schrieb Arnd Baecker:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Thorsten Schnebeck wrote: > > Am Friday 13 July 2007 um 10:18:13 schrieb Arnd Baecker: > > > Thorsten, > > > should I put this on digikam.org (which would mean, I think, > > > to put it in my blog, and then make it appear on the front-page?) > > > Somehow I would feel better if you would do that > > > (because it is *your* text!). > > > > No problem, you can use the text, no credits needed ;-) > > OK, it is for a good purpose ;-) > http://www.digikam.org/?q=node/239 Gerhard > Thanks a lot, Arnd > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-devel mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel -- Hakuna matata http://www.gerhard.fr _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
signature.asc (196 bytes)
«
Return to digikam-devel
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |