digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...
Locked
12
12
digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...
 
|
Dear all digiKam fans and users!
The digiKam development team is happy to release 1.8.0. For more details, see announcement on digikam.org: http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/567 http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/568 Best Regards... Gilles Caulier digiKam project http://www.digikam.org _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...
|
|
thumbs up Gilles - next time I'm in France I'll buy you a beer or
favorite beverage. /jd On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: > Dear all digiKam fans and users! > > The digiKam development team is happy to release 1.8.0. > > For more details, see announcement on digikam.org: > > http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/567 > http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/568 > > Best Regards... > > Gilles Caulier > digiKam project > http://www.digikam.org > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...
|
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Fantastic work! Thank you very much for your tremendous effort :-)
Now, moving on... Is anything progressing on the front to provide an all-encompassing set of FULL instructions for the many Newbs out here who still have trouble compiling the program and all of its various dependencies? It truly is a shame not to be able to enjoy the updated features of this terrific program because we're simple photographers but not coding wizards :-( On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 22:34 +0100, Gilles Caulier wrote: Dear all digiKam fans and users! The digiKam development team is happy to release 1.8.0. For more details, see announcement on digikam.org: http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/567 http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/568 Best Regards... Gilles Caulier digiKam project http://www.digikam.org _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 15:12 +0100, Angelo Naselli wrote: The Ubuntu maintainers aren't known for their ability (or willingness?!) to update packages. For example, the current version of DigiKam within the Ubuntu repositories is 1.4! Therefore, unless we wish to use an ancient version, we're forced to compile our own.Well the right way should be to ask for it to your distro digikam/kipi-plugins maintainer. Most distros backport or update these packages. No kidding!I see the problem in building source though... This is the crux: Many of us are mere photographers rather than programming experts. I'm sure that I speak for most people in my situation when I say that I am very appreciative of the effort that's put into developing this great program. However, we're also very frustrated that in order to use it, we have to compile not only the core program but also its dependencies. Granted, there are instructions available on the DigiKam site but, they are somewhat disjointed and incomplete. They take for granted that the non-coders will know what is missing and are thus able to fill-in the blanks. I'm not asking to be given something that we can install by the click of one button (although it would be nice!). All I'm asking for is that if we have to compile a bunch of stuff, a road map (a detailed road map) is provided. If anybody is willing to do this, pretend that you're writing it for a two year-old child. Then the instructions should be easy enough for us to follow. No wait: I'm sure that any two year-old living with a serious coder would be more capable than me. A better idea would be to write the instructions as if your hamster is to read it. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: DigiKam compilation instructions
|
|
Hi Hevï,
You can just add the Phillip Johnsson's ppa repository: sudo apt-add-repository ppa:philip5/extra This repository is constantly updated with release versions packed to Ubuntu. After run the above command you can just run: sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install digikam And be updated. I'm running 1.8.0 under Ubuntu 10.10 as a charm. Cheers Erick Moreno On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Hevï Guy <[hidden email]> wrote:
-- Erick Moreno http://flavors.me/erickmoreno _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: DigiKam compilation instructions
|
|
In reply to this post by J Albrecht
Keep in mind that it depends on what distribution of linux you are
working with. On my system, I could easily create a button that installs Digikam. All it would have to say is "emerge digikam" and I would have the latest stable release and all dependencies - no worries. And it builds from source. Point is that I don't see how the developers of Digikam can be held responsible for the lousy package systems of all distributions. (Lousy in this sense anyway). One caveat is the latest stable release on my distro is still at 1.7, but I expect today or next day or two it will be bumped up to 1.8. They are usually on it within a day or two. I've also built from SVN using the very thorough cook-book-like instructions given by Gilles or a partner on the website when I needed functionality of that latest development release. I can see that a newb could have trouble there though. cheers, JD On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Hevï Guy <[hidden email]> wrote: > > This is the crux: Many of us are mere photographers rather than programming > experts. I'm sure that I speak for most people in my situation when I say > that I am very appreciative of the effort that's put into developing this > great program. However, we're also very frustrated that in order to use it, > we have to compile not only the core program but also its dependencies. > Granted, there are instructions available on the DigiKam site but, they are > somewhat disjointed and incomplete. They take for granted that the > non-coders will know what is missing and are thus able to fill-in the > blanks. > > I'm not asking to be given something that we can install by the click of one > button (although it would be nice!). All I'm asking for is that if we have > to compile a bunch of stuff, a road map (a detailed road map) is provided. > If anybody is willing to do this, pretend that you're writing it for a two > year-old child. Then the instructions should be easy enough for us to > follow. No wait: I'm sure that any two year-old living with a serious coder > would be more capable than me. A better idea would be to write the > instructions as if your hamster is to read it. Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: DigiKam compilation instructions
|
|
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 08:23 -0900, Jim Dory wrote: Oops. Sorry if somehow that is what I had implied. On the contrary, I applaud dK's developers for their great work. Specifically, for me and those in my situation, it's the Ubuntu packagers who are making things difficult.Point is that I don't see how the developers of Digikam can be held responsible for the lousy package systems of all distributions. Well, that's just the point: It is indeed something that presents us with trouble. Hence the requirement for a hamster-readable cook-book ;-)I've also built from SVN using the very thorough cook-book-like instructions given by Gilles or a partner on the website when I needed functionality of that latest development release. I can see that a newb could have trouble there though. On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Hevï Guy <[hidden email]> wrote: > > This is the crux: Many of us are mere photographers rather than programming > experts. I'm sure that I speak for most people in my situation when I say > that I am very appreciative of the effort that's put into developing this > great program. However, we're also very frustrated that in order to use it, > we have to compile not only the core program but also its dependencies. > Granted, there are instructions available on the DigiKam site but, they are > somewhat disjointed and incomplete. They take for granted that the > non-coders will know what is missing and are thus able to fill-in the > blanks. > > I'm not asking to be given something that we can install by the click of one > button (although it would be nice!). All I'm asking for is that if we have > to compile a bunch of stuff, a road map (a detailed road map) is provided. > If anybody is willing to do this, pretend that you're writing it for a two > year-old child. Then the instructions should be easy enough for us to > follow. No wait: I'm sure that any two year-old living with a serious coder > would be more capable than me. A better idea would be to write the > instructions as if your hamster is to read it. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...
|
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
on Tuesday 25 January 2011, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Dear all digiKam fans and users! > > The digiKam development team is happy to release 1.8.0. > > For more details, see announcement on digikam.org: > > http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/567 > http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/568 > ... Thank you :) Metadata get read again in raw development, and I like having my Sony makernotes visible :) However, I hit another snag when developing RAW files (Sony ARW in my case): it usedd to be that if I added an EV correction, and then decided it was too much, the new (lower) correction was applied to the original RAW output (i.e. an image update after having lowered an EV correction was less luminous); with the 1.8.0 version, the second lower correction is applied to the already corrected image => severe over correction and no way to get back, except through an update in the RAW tab (say I start with a correction of +.3, then decide +.2 would have been better: in <=1.7.0 I ended up with a correction of +.2, in 1.8.0 I end up with a correction of +.5...) Any suggestion about where the bug is (Kipi, Digikam, elsewhere)? Regards Remco _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: DigiKam compilation instructions
|
|
In reply to this post by Erick Moreno
Following these very simple instructions, I have now installed Digikam 1.8.0 on my Kubuntu 10.10 Linux. NOW, I strongly suggest that the Digikam website be updated to inform others of this resource and installation option. More people should be able to quickly enjoy the latest stable version. The website should say something about this version's being compiled for the Ubuntu family of Linux (which I assume is the right way to describe it). Do that and we're really cookin', as they say! Tom On 01/26/2011 10:19 AM, Erick Moreno wrote: Hi Hevï, -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Sow a thought and you reap an action; sow an act and you reap a habit; sow a habit and you reap a character; sow a character and you reap a destiny." ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803 - 1882) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Tom Cloyd, MS MA Private practice Psychotherapist St. George, Utah, U.S.A: (435) 272-3332 << [hidden email] >> (email) << TomCloyd.com >> (website) << sleightmind.wordpress.com >> (mental health issues weblog) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: DigiKam compilation instructions
|
|
In reply to this post by Erick Moreno
Thanks Erick! However, am I going to run into the same issues as I had encountered earlier with the older version of exiv2 being used? Could you please have a look on your dK 1.8.0 to see which version is installed? exiv2 0.19 is unadulterated evil for Nikon shooters!
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 14:19 -0300, Erick Moreno wrote: Hi Hevï, _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: DigiKam compilation instructions
|
|
In reply to this post by J Albrecht
on Wednesday 26 January 2011, Hevï Guy wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 15:12 +0100, Angelo Naselli wrote: > > > > Well the right way should be to ask for it to your distro digikam/kipi- plugins > > maintainer. > > Most distros backport or update these packages. > > > > The Ubuntu maintainers aren't known for their ability (or willingness?!) > to update packages. For example, the current version of DigiKam within > the Ubuntu repositories is 1.4! Therefore, unless we wish to use an > ancient version, we're forced to compile our own. > > To their defense (and not only Ubuntu's), updating to a newer Digikam version might imply upgrading a large part of the KDE packages: OpenSuse has Digikam 1.2.0 in the default installation, with the corresponding KDE version. I can get the newer versions of Digikam, by using other, potientially less stable repositories (KDE 4.5 for Digikam 1.7.0, and KDE 4.6 for DK 1.8.0). That's not really a fault of OpenSuse, nor of Digikam/KDE. So for us it's easy to say "Lousy distributors, can't even upgrade my favourite program straight away". BUT, they have the obligation to make sure that such an upgrade doesn't break someone else's favourite program.... Remco _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...
|
|
In reply to this post by Remco Viëtor
Hi,
I just dicovered the same behaviour here. digiKam 1.8.0 and kipi-plugins 1.8.0. Just tested with a crw-file. It's not just the EV correction, e.g. brightness is broken the same way. /Anders 2011/1/26 Remco Viëtor <[hidden email]>: > on Tuesday 25 January 2011, Gilles Caulier wrote: >> Dear all digiKam fans and users! >> >> The digiKam development team is happy to release 1.8.0. >> >> For more details, see announcement on digikam.org: >> >> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/567 >> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/568 >> > ... > > Thank you :) > Metadata get read again in raw development, and I like having my Sony > makernotes visible :) > > However, I hit another snag when developing RAW files (Sony ARW in my case): > it usedd to be that if I added an EV correction, and then decided it was too > much, the new (lower) correction was applied to the original RAW output (i.e. > an image update after having lowered an EV correction was less luminous); > with the 1.8.0 version, the second lower correction is applied to the already > corrected image => severe over correction and no way to get back, except > through an update in the RAW tab > (say I start with a correction of +.3, then decide +.2 would have been better: > in <=1.7.0 I ended up with a correction of +.2, > in 1.8.0 I end up with a correction of +.5...) > > Any suggestion about where the bug is (Kipi, Digikam, elsewhere)? > > Regards > > Remco > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...
|
|
In reply to this post by Remco Viëtor
2011/1/26 Remco Viëtor <[hidden email]>:
> on Tuesday 25 January 2011, Gilles Caulier wrote: >> Dear all digiKam fans and users! >> >> The digiKam development team is happy to release 1.8.0. >> >> For more details, see announcement on digikam.org: >> >> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/567 >> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/568 >> > ... > > Thank you :) > Metadata get read again in raw development, and I like having my Sony > makernotes visible :) > > However, I hit another snag when developing RAW files (Sony ARW in my case): > it usedd to be that if I added an EV correction, and then decided it was too > much, the new (lower) correction was applied to the original RAW output (i.e. > an image update after having lowered an EV correction was less luminous); > with the 1.8.0 version, the second lower correction is applied to the already > corrected image => severe over correction and no way to get back, except > through an update in the RAW tab > (say I start with a correction of +.3, then decide +.2 would have been better: > in <=1.7.0 I ended up with a correction of +.2, > in 1.8.0 I end up with a correction of +.5...) > > Any suggestion about where the bug is (Kipi, Digikam, elsewhere)? Report this problem in Libraw (www.libraw.org), used in background by digiKam. Gilles Caulier _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: DigiKam compilation instructions
|
|
In reply to this post by Remco Viëtor
Hevï,
In my system, I have exiv2 0.19 installed. But I think that this ppa repository will not change your exiv2 installed version, since it is grater than the one shipped in the repository. Try update the Digikam, I don't believe that this will downgrade your exiv2. If this happens, you can always upgrade your exiv2 again =/ Cheers Erick Moreno On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Remco Viëtor <[hidden email]> wrote:
-- Erick Moreno http://flavors.me/erickmoreno _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...
|
|
In reply to this post by Anders Stedtlund
Hi,
Reinstalled kipi-plugins 1.7.0, still problems. Then resinstalled digiKam 1.7.0, all back to normal again. /Anders 2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: > Hi, > > I just dicovered the same behaviour here. digiKam 1.8.0 and kipi-plugins 1.8.0. > > Just tested with a crw-file. It's not just the EV correction, e.g. > brightness is broken the same way. > > /Anders > > 2011/1/26 Remco Viëtor <[hidden email]>: >> on Tuesday 25 January 2011, Gilles Caulier wrote: >>> Dear all digiKam fans and users! >>> >>> The digiKam development team is happy to release 1.8.0. >>> >>> For more details, see announcement on digikam.org: >>> >>> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/567 >>> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/568 >>> >> ... >> >> Thank you :) >> Metadata get read again in raw development, and I like having my Sony >> makernotes visible :) >> >> However, I hit another snag when developing RAW files (Sony ARW in my case): >> it usedd to be that if I added an EV correction, and then decided it was too >> much, the new (lower) correction was applied to the original RAW output (i.e. >> an image update after having lowered an EV correction was less luminous); >> with the 1.8.0 version, the second lower correction is applied to the already >> corrected image => severe over correction and no way to get back, except >> through an update in the RAW tab >> (say I start with a correction of +.3, then decide +.2 would have been better: >> in <=1.7.0 I ended up with a correction of +.2, >> in 1.8.0 I end up with a correction of +.5...) >> >> Any suggestion about where the bug is (Kipi, Digikam, elsewhere)? >> >> Regards >> >> Remco >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...
|
|
Check if problem is not in digiKam rc config file. rename it to .old
and try again (you need to reconfigure digiKam of course) Gilles Caulier 2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: > Hi, > > Reinstalled kipi-plugins 1.7.0, still problems. Then resinstalled > digiKam 1.7.0, all back to normal again. > > /Anders > > 2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >> Hi, >> >> I just dicovered the same behaviour here. digiKam 1.8.0 and kipi-plugins 1.8.0. >> >> Just tested with a crw-file. It's not just the EV correction, e.g. >> brightness is broken the same way. >> >> /Anders >> >> 2011/1/26 Remco Viëtor <[hidden email]>: >>> on Tuesday 25 January 2011, Gilles Caulier wrote: >>>> Dear all digiKam fans and users! >>>> >>>> The digiKam development team is happy to release 1.8.0. >>>> >>>> For more details, see announcement on digikam.org: >>>> >>>> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/567 >>>> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/568 >>>> >>> ... >>> >>> Thank you :) >>> Metadata get read again in raw development, and I like having my Sony >>> makernotes visible :) >>> >>> However, I hit another snag when developing RAW files (Sony ARW in my case): >>> it usedd to be that if I added an EV correction, and then decided it was too >>> much, the new (lower) correction was applied to the original RAW output (i.e. >>> an image update after having lowered an EV correction was less luminous); >>> with the 1.8.0 version, the second lower correction is applied to the already >>> corrected image => severe over correction and no way to get back, except >>> through an update in the RAW tab >>> (say I start with a correction of +.3, then decide +.2 would have been better: >>> in <=1.7.0 I ended up with a correction of +.2, >>> in 1.8.0 I end up with a correction of +.5...) >>> >>> Any suggestion about where the bug is (Kipi, Digikam, elsewhere)? >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Remco >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: DigiKam compilation instructions
|
|
In reply to this post by Erick Moreno
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 15:37 -0300, Erick Moreno wrote: Hevï, This is what I was afraid of!
Oh no!! Can anybody confirm that if I upgrade to dK 1.8, it will use my current version of exiv .20? _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by J Albrecht
Like the last time, it's libkexiv2 which is involved in which version of
exiv2 is used by Digikam. Digikam will call default libkexiv2 version, so if you re-compile libkexiv2 default version with exiv2 0.20, I think if you update Digikam, it should kept in use the right exiv2 version. So, I think if you've kept your compiled libkexiv2, Digikam 1.8 should use exiv2 0.20... But it has to be verified... Nicolas Le Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:59:27 +0100, Hevï Guy <[hidden email]> a écrit: > Thanks Erick! However, am I going to run into the same issues as I had > encountered earlier with the older version of exiv2 being used? Could > you please have a look on your dK 1.8.0 to see which version is > installed? exiv2 0.19 is unadulterated evil for Nikon shooters! > > On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 14:19 -0300, Erick Moreno wrote: > >> Hi Hevï, >> >> You can just add the Phillip Johnsson's ppa repository: >> >> sudo apt-add-repository ppa:philip5/extra >> >> This repository is constantly updated with release versions packed to >> Ubuntu. After run the above command you can just run: >> >> sudo apt-get update >> sudo apt-get install digikam >> >> And be updated. >> I'm running 1.8.0 under Ubuntu 10.10 as a charm. >> >> Cheers >> Erick Moreno >> >> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Hevï Guy <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 15:12 +0100, Angelo Naselli wrote: >> >> >> > Well the right way should be to ask for it to your distro >> digikam/kipi-plugins >> > maintainer. >> > Most distros backport or update these packages. >> > >> >> The Ubuntu maintainers aren't known for their ability (or >> willingness?!) to update packages. For example, the current >> version of DigiKam within the Ubuntu repositories is 1.4! >> Therefore, unless we wish to use an ancient version, we're >> forced to compile our own. >> >> >> > I see the problem in building source though... >> >> No kidding! >> >> This is the crux: Many of us are mere photographers rather >> than programming experts. I'm sure that I speak for most >> people in my situation when I say that I am very appreciative >> of the effort that's put into developing this great program. >> However, we're also very frustrated that in order to use it, >> we have to compile not only the core program but also its >> dependencies. Granted, there are instructions available on the >> DigiKam site but, they are somewhat disjointed and incomplete. >> They take for granted that the non-coders will know what is >> missing and are thus able to fill-in the blanks. >> >> I'm not asking to be given something that we can install by >> the click of one button (although it would be nice!). All I'm >> asking for is that if we have to compile a bunch of stuff, a >> road map (a detailed road map) is provided. If anybody is >> willing to do this, pretend that you're writing it for a two >> year-old child. Then the instructions should be easy enough >> for us to follow. No wait: I'm sure that any two year-old >> living with a serious coder would be more capable than me. A >> better idea would be to write the instructions as if your >> hamster is to read it. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Erick Moreno >> http://flavors.me/erickmoreno >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users -- -- Nicolas Boulesteix Photographe chasseur de lueurs http://www.photonoxx.fr _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by J Albrecht
Hi Hevï,
I just make the upgrade, and if I uncheck the libkexiv2-8 packet, Digikam seems to use exiv 0.20. The only ugly think (but not linked to DK 1.8 upgrade), is that update manager want to update my libkexiv2 packet with the official repository packet but with the exactly same version number. So always think to uncheck libkexiv2-8 in "to update list" and you shoul keep the use of exiv2 0.20 Nicolas Le Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:03:51 +0100, Hevï Guy <[hidden email]> a écrit: > > > On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 15:37 -0300, Erick Moreno wrote: > >> Hevï, >> >> In my system, I have exiv2 0.19 installed. >> But I think that this ppa repository will not change your exiv2 >> installed version, since it is grater than the one shipped in the >> repository. > > > This is what I was afraid of! > > >> >> Try update the Digikam, I don't believe that this will downgrade your >> exiv2. If this happens, you can always upgrade your exiv2 again =/ > > > Oh no!! Can anybody confirm that if I upgrade to dK 1.8, it will use my > current version of exiv .20? -- -- Nicolas Boulesteix Photographe chasseur de lueurs http://www.photonoxx.fr _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...
|
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Hi,
Tested with a new config for a different user. Still same problem. /Anders 2011/1/26 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: > Check if problem is not in digiKam rc config file. rename it to .old > and try again (you need to reconfigure digiKam of course) > > Gilles Caulier > > 2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >> Hi, >> >> Reinstalled kipi-plugins 1.7.0, still problems. Then resinstalled >> digiKam 1.7.0, all back to normal again. >> >> /Anders >> >> 2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I just dicovered the same behaviour here. digiKam 1.8.0 and kipi-plugins 1.8.0. >>> >>> Just tested with a crw-file. It's not just the EV correction, e.g. >>> brightness is broken the same way. >>> >>> /Anders >>> >>> 2011/1/26 Remco Viëtor <[hidden email]>: >>>> on Tuesday 25 January 2011, Gilles Caulier wrote: >>>>> Dear all digiKam fans and users! >>>>> >>>>> The digiKam development team is happy to release 1.8.0. >>>>> >>>>> For more details, see announcement on digikam.org: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/567 >>>>> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/568 >>>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>> Thank you :) >>>> Metadata get read again in raw development, and I like having my Sony >>>> makernotes visible :) >>>> >>>> However, I hit another snag when developing RAW files (Sony ARW in my case): >>>> it usedd to be that if I added an EV correction, and then decided it was too >>>> much, the new (lower) correction was applied to the original RAW output (i.e. >>>> an image update after having lowered an EV correction was less luminous); >>>> with the 1.8.0 version, the second lower correction is applied to the already >>>> corrected image => severe over correction and no way to get back, except >>>> through an update in the RAW tab >>>> (say I start with a correction of +.3, then decide +.2 would have been better: >>>> in <=1.7.0 I ended up with a correction of +.2, >>>> in 1.8.0 I end up with a correction of +.5...) >>>> >>>> Any suggestion about where the bug is (Kipi, Digikam, elsewhere)? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Remco >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
«
Return to digikam-users
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |