digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
33 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: DigiKam compilation instructions

J Albrecht
I've just pulled the package from Phillip's PPA and installed it. Happily, exiv2 v.20 is being used!

Since this seems to be a rather unique situation, I can't help but emphasize that a "cook-book" would be immensely helpful. Not only would it help people compile everything that's required to get dK to operate as intended but, it would also be a great learning tool. Thus, perhaps we code-challenged folks out here won't have to bother the experts as much ;-)



On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 21:00 +0100, Photonoxx wrote:
Hi Hevï,

I just make the upgrade, and if I uncheck the libkexiv2-8 packet, Digikam  
seems to use exiv 0.20.

The only ugly think (but not linked to DK 1.8 upgrade), is that update  
manager want to update my libkexiv2 packet with the official repository  
packet but with the exactly same version number.


So always think to uncheck libkexiv2-8 in "to update list" and you shoul  
keep the use of exiv2 0.20

Nicolas

Le Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:03:51 +0100, Hevï Guy <[hidden email]> a écrit:

>
>
> On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 15:37 -0300, Erick Moreno wrote:
>
>> Hevï,
>>
>> In my system, I have exiv2 0.19 installed.
>> But I think that this ppa repository will not change your exiv2
>> installed version, since it is grater than the one shipped in the
>> repository.
>
>
> This is what I was afraid of!
>
>
>>
>> Try update the Digikam, I don't believe that this will downgrade your
>> exiv2. If this happens, you can always upgrade your exiv2 again =/
>
>
> Oh no!! Can anybody confirm that if I upgrade to dK 1.8, it will use my
> current version of exiv .20?



_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: DigiKam compilation instructions

pshute
Would it be possible to create a "cookbook" that covers every unique situation like this? Perhaps what might be more useful would be some general instructions that should work in an ideal world, but have a series of "compilation alerts". These would be like a blog of problems that people have come across when they have tried to compile and had to take corrective action.
 
It would be up to the experts to post these, of course. The rest of us would just try try to follow the general instructions, then check the latest alerts when we have problems.


From: Hevï Guy [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 9:27 AM
To: [hidden email]
Cc: [hidden email]; of open source
Subject: [Digikam-users] Re: DigiKam compilation instructions

I've just pulled the package from Phillip's PPA and installed it. Happily, exiv2 v.20 is being used!

Since this seems to be a rather unique situation, I can't help but emphasize that a "cook-book" would be immensely helpful. Not only would it help people compile everything that's required to get dK to operate as intended but, it would also be a great learning tool. Thus, perhaps we code-challenged folks out here won't have to bother the experts as much ;-)



On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 21:00 +0100, Photonoxx wrote:
Hi Hevï,

I just make the upgrade, and if I uncheck the libkexiv2-8 packet, Digikam  
seems to use exiv 0.20.

The only ugly think (but not linked to DK 1.8 upgrade), is that update  
manager want to update my libkexiv2 packet with the official repository  
packet but with the exactly same version number.


So always think to uncheck libkexiv2-8 in "to update list" and you shoul  
keep the use of exiv2 0.20

Nicolas

Le Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:03:51 +0100, Hevï Guy <[hidden email]> a écrit:

>
>
> On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 15:37 -0300, Erick Moreno wrote:
>
>> Hevï,
>>
>> In my system, I have exiv2 0.19 installed.
>> But I think that this ppa repository will not change your exiv2
>> installed version, since it is grater than the one shipped in the
>> repository.
>
>
> This is what I was afraid of!
>
>
>>
>> Try update the Digikam, I don't believe that this will downgrade your
>> exiv2. If this happens, you can always upgrade your exiv2 again =/
>
>
> Oh no!! Can anybody confirm that if I upgrade to dK 1.8, it will use my
> current version of exiv .20?



_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...

Gilles Caulier-4
In reply to this post by Anders Stedtlund
Between 1.7.0 and 1.8.0, which lbkdcraw and libraw version you use ?
Go to help/component info for details

Gilles

2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:

> Hi,
>
> Tested with a new config for a different user. Still same problem.
>
> /Anders
>
> 2011/1/26 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:
>> Check if problem is not in digiKam rc config file. rename it to .old
>> and try again (you need to reconfigure digiKam of course)
>>
>> Gilles Caulier
>>
>> 2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Reinstalled kipi-plugins 1.7.0, still problems. Then resinstalled
>>> digiKam 1.7.0, all back to normal again.
>>>
>>> /Anders
>>>
>>> 2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I just dicovered the same behaviour here. digiKam 1.8.0 and kipi-plugins 1.8.0.
>>>>
>>>> Just tested with a crw-file. It's not just the EV correction, e.g.
>>>> brightness is broken  the same way.
>>>>
>>>> /Anders
>>>>
>>>> 2011/1/26 Remco Viëtor <[hidden email]>:
>>>>> on Tuesday 25 January 2011, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>>>>> Dear all digiKam fans and users!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The digiKam development team is happy to release 1.8.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For more details, see announcement on digikam.org:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/567
>>>>>> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/568
>>>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you :)
>>>>> Metadata get read again in raw development, and I like having my Sony
>>>>> makernotes visible :)
>>>>>
>>>>> However, I hit another snag when developing RAW files (Sony ARW in my case):
>>>>> it usedd to be that if I added an EV correction, and then decided it was too
>>>>> much, the new (lower) correction was applied to the original RAW output (i.e.
>>>>> an image update after having lowered an EV correction was less luminous);
>>>>> with the 1.8.0 version, the second lower correction is applied to the already
>>>>> corrected image => severe over correction and no way to get back, except
>>>>> through an update in the RAW tab
>>>>> (say I start with a correction of +.3, then decide +.2 would have been better:
>>>>> in <=1.7.0 I ended up with a correction of +.2,
>>>>> in 1.8.0 I end up with a correction of +.5...)
>>>>>
>>>>> Any suggestion about where the bug is (Kipi, Digikam, elsewhere)?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Remco
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...

Anders Stedtlund
LibKdcraw: 1.1.0
Libraw: 0.11.3

I haven't changed these.

/Anders


2011/1/28 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:

> Between 1.7.0 and 1.8.0, which lbkdcraw and libraw version you use ?
> Go to help/component info for details
>
> Gilles
>
> 2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Tested with a new config for a different user. Still same problem.
>>
>> /Anders
>>
>> 2011/1/26 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:
>>> Check if problem is not in digiKam rc config file. rename it to .old
>>> and try again (you need to reconfigure digiKam of course)
>>>
>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>
>>> 2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Reinstalled kipi-plugins 1.7.0, still problems. Then resinstalled
>>>> digiKam 1.7.0, all back to normal again.
>>>>
>>>> /Anders
>>>>
>>>> 2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I just dicovered the same behaviour here. digiKam 1.8.0 and kipi-plugins 1.8.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just tested with a crw-file. It's not just the EV correction, e.g.
>>>>> brightness is broken  the same way.
>>>>>
>>>>> /Anders
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/1/26 Remco Viëtor <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>> on Tuesday 25 January 2011, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>>>>>> Dear all digiKam fans and users!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The digiKam development team is happy to release 1.8.0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For more details, see announcement on digikam.org:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/567
>>>>>>> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/568
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you :)
>>>>>> Metadata get read again in raw development, and I like having my Sony
>>>>>> makernotes visible :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, I hit another snag when developing RAW files (Sony ARW in my case):
>>>>>> it usedd to be that if I added an EV correction, and then decided it was too
>>>>>> much, the new (lower) correction was applied to the original RAW output (i.e.
>>>>>> an image update after having lowered an EV correction was less luminous);
>>>>>> with the 1.8.0 version, the second lower correction is applied to the already
>>>>>> corrected image => severe over correction and no way to get back, except
>>>>>> through an update in the RAW tab
>>>>>> (say I start with a correction of +.3, then decide +.2 would have been better:
>>>>>> in <=1.7.0 I ended up with a correction of +.2,
>>>>>> in 1.8.0 I end up with a correction of +.5...)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any suggestion about where the bug is (Kipi, Digikam, elsewhere)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Remco
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...

Gilles Caulier-4
Ok. I have no idea. For the moment. please opena new file in KDE
bugzilla, to digiKam/libkdcraw section. I will set libraw author in CC
to this bugzilla entry.

Also comment this file with all information provided in this thread.

If you can provide RAW files samples to test, and take some
screenshots of the problem, it will be great.

Best

Gilles Caulier

2011/1/28 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:

> LibKdcraw: 1.1.0
> Libraw: 0.11.3
>
> I haven't changed these.
>
> /Anders
>
>
> 2011/1/28 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:
>> Between 1.7.0 and 1.8.0, which lbkdcraw and libraw version you use ?
>> Go to help/component info for details
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>> 2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Tested with a new config for a different user. Still same problem.
>>>
>>> /Anders
>>>
>>> 2011/1/26 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:
>>>> Check if problem is not in digiKam rc config file. rename it to .old
>>>> and try again (you need to reconfigure digiKam of course)
>>>>
>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>
>>>> 2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Reinstalled kipi-plugins 1.7.0, still problems. Then resinstalled
>>>>> digiKam 1.7.0, all back to normal again.
>>>>>
>>>>> /Anders
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just dicovered the same behaviour here. digiKam 1.8.0 and kipi-plugins 1.8.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just tested with a crw-file. It's not just the EV correction, e.g.
>>>>>> brightness is broken  the same way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Anders
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2011/1/26 Remco Viëtor <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>> on Tuesday 25 January 2011, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>>>>>>> Dear all digiKam fans and users!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The digiKam development team is happy to release 1.8.0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For more details, see announcement on digikam.org:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/567
>>>>>>>> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/568
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you :)
>>>>>>> Metadata get read again in raw development, and I like having my Sony
>>>>>>> makernotes visible :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, I hit another snag when developing RAW files (Sony ARW in my case):
>>>>>>> it usedd to be that if I added an EV correction, and then decided it was too
>>>>>>> much, the new (lower) correction was applied to the original RAW output (i.e.
>>>>>>> an image update after having lowered an EV correction was less luminous);
>>>>>>> with the 1.8.0 version, the second lower correction is applied to the already
>>>>>>> corrected image => severe over correction and no way to get back, except
>>>>>>> through an update in the RAW tab
>>>>>>> (say I start with a correction of +.3, then decide +.2 would have been better:
>>>>>>> in <=1.7.0 I ended up with a correction of +.2,
>>>>>>> in 1.8.0 I end up with a correction of +.5...)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any suggestion about where the bug is (Kipi, Digikam, elsewhere)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Remco
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...

Linuxguy123
In reply to this post by J Albrecht
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 17:01 -0600, Hevï Guy wrote:
> Fantastic work! Thank you very much for your tremendous effort :-)
>
> Now, moving on... Is anything progressing on the front to provide an
> all-encompassing set of FULL instructions for the many Newbs out here
> who still have trouble compiling the program and all of its various
> dependencies? It truly is a shame not to be able to enjoy the updated
> features of this terrific program because we're simple photographers
> but not coding wizards :-(

What platform are you running on ?

I'm on Fedora 14 and yum update works great.   It generally takes them
(the fedora kde team) less than a week to push a new digiKam release to
fedora-kde-testing.  And as soon as its good there it goes to -stable.


_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...

Linuxguy123
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 22:34 +0100, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Dear all digiKam fans and users!
>
> The digiKam development team is happy to release 1.8.0.

Good work, people.  Its much appreciated.

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...

J Albrecht
In reply to this post by Linuxguy123


On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 10:21 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote:


What platform are you running on ?
Ubuntu (Maverick). I keep hearing good things about Fedora. However, as a recent Windoze immigrant, I still need something with lots of easy GUI formats. I've been led to believe that Ubuntu, in spite of its worrisome and ever-increasing resemblance to MS in terms of how it conducts its business, is the best option under these circumstances.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...

Linuxguy123
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 12:06 -0600, Hevï Guy wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 10:21 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote:
>
> >
> > What platform are you running on ?
> Ubuntu (Maverick). I keep hearing good things about Fedora. However,
> as a recent Windoze immigrant, I still need something with lots of
> easy GUI formats. I've been led to believe that Ubuntu, in spite of
> its worrisome and ever-increasing resemblance to MS in terms of how it
> conducts its business, is the best option under these circumstances.

Ubuntu is good about keeping current with recent releases.   I'd wait
until its in their repository and upgrade via the tools they provide
versus building from source.

Its an interesting exercise to build from source, but for a one or two
time activity as a newbie, it can be a lot of work.

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...

J Albrecht


On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 11:22 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote:
Ubuntu is good about keeping current with recent releases.  
Ahh, hah, ha, ha (howling out-loud laughing), ha, ha!!!


I'd wait
until its in their repository and upgrade via the tools they provide
versus building from source.
Well, if I wait long enough for Ubuntu to place dK 1.8 in their repository, Gilles and the gang will have made dK v 4.2 available by then


Its an interesting exercise to build from source, but for a one or two
time activity as a newbie, it can be a lot of work.
I don't mind the work at all. It's actually very interesting. The false starts and dead ends are just very frustrating. For an old codger such as me, this hinders rather than helps the learning process!
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...

Linuxguy123
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 13:49 -0600, Hevï Guy wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 11:22 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> > Ubuntu is good about keeping current with recent releases.  
> Ahh, hah, ha, ha (howling out-loud laughing), ha, ha!!!

It appears that Natty is running 1.8.0.  
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=digikam&searchon=names&suite=all&section=all

I'm only running 1.7.0 in F14 right now.

In ubuntu if you want the latest (stable) releases, you pretty much have
to run the latest ubuntu release.   They aren't great about backporting
and given their user base, I can't say that I blame them.

> > I'd wait
> > until its in their repository and upgrade via the tools they provide
> > versus building from source.
> Well, if I wait long enough for Ubuntu to place dK 1.8 in their
> repository, Gilles and the gang will have made dK v 4.2 available by
> then

See above.

> > Its an interesting exercise to build from source, but for a one or two
> > time activity as a newbie, it can be a lot of work.
> I don't mind the work at all. It's actually very interesting. The
> false starts and dead ends are just very frustrating. For an old
> codger such as me, this hinders rather than helps the learning
> process!

If you enjoy that sort of thing, you should be running Fedora.  At least
in Fedora you have access to -unstable and -testing, which gets you most
of what you get when you build without the building process and with
community support.

When it comes to libraries and dependencies, I find yum (in Fedora) a
lot easier to work with than apt and its variants.  I'm an rpm guy.
<Ducks and runs away>

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...

Anders Stedtlund
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
So do you mean that something happened in software that I didn't update?

I'm back in 1.7.0 now and it is working, so I think I stay there for the moment.

I have built 1.8.0 and 1.7.0 by myself.

I'm on opneSUSE 11.3 with KDE 4.5.5.

/Anders

2011/1/28 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:

> Ok. I have no idea. For the moment. please opena new file in KDE
> bugzilla, to digiKam/libkdcraw section. I will set libraw author in CC
> to this bugzilla entry.
>
> Also comment this file with all information provided in this thread.
>
> If you can provide RAW files samples to test, and take some
> screenshots of the problem, it will be great.
>
> Best
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2011/1/28 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:
>> LibKdcraw: 1.1.0
>> Libraw: 0.11.3
>>
>> I haven't changed these.
>>
>> /Anders
>>
>>
>> 2011/1/28 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:
>>> Between 1.7.0 and 1.8.0, which lbkdcraw and libraw version you use ?
>>> Go to help/component info for details
>>>
>>> Gilles
>>>
>>> 2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Tested with a new config for a different user. Still same problem.
>>>>
>>>> /Anders
>>>>
>>>> 2011/1/26 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:
>>>>> Check if problem is not in digiKam rc config file. rename it to .old
>>>>> and try again (you need to reconfigure digiKam of course)
>>>>>
>>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reinstalled kipi-plugins 1.7.0, still problems. Then resinstalled
>>>>>> digiKam 1.7.0, all back to normal again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Anders
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just dicovered the same behaviour here. digiKam 1.8.0 and kipi-plugins 1.8.0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just tested with a crw-file. It's not just the EV correction, e.g.
>>>>>>> brightness is broken  the same way.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /Anders
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2011/1/26 Remco Viëtor <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>> on Tuesday 25 January 2011, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Dear all digiKam fans and users!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The digiKam development team is happy to release 1.8.0.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For more details, see announcement on digikam.org:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/567
>>>>>>>>> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/568
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you :)
>>>>>>>> Metadata get read again in raw development, and I like having my Sony
>>>>>>>> makernotes visible :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> However, I hit another snag when developing RAW files (Sony ARW in my case):
>>>>>>>> it usedd to be that if I added an EV correction, and then decided it was too
>>>>>>>> much, the new (lower) correction was applied to the original RAW output (i.e.
>>>>>>>> an image update after having lowered an EV correction was less luminous);
>>>>>>>> with the 1.8.0 version, the second lower correction is applied to the already
>>>>>>>> corrected image => severe over correction and no way to get back, except
>>>>>>>> through an update in the RAW tab
>>>>>>>> (say I start with a correction of +.3, then decide +.2 would have been better:
>>>>>>>> in <=1.7.0 I ended up with a correction of +.2,
>>>>>>>> in 1.8.0 I end up with a correction of +.5...)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any suggestion about where the bug is (Kipi, Digikam, elsewhere)?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Remco
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: digiKam and Kipi-plugins 1.8.0 released...

Anders Stedtlund
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Hi,

I have now filed a bug for this:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264830

/Anders

2011/1/28 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:

> Ok. I have no idea. For the moment. please opena new file in KDE
> bugzilla, to digiKam/libkdcraw section. I will set libraw author in CC
> to this bugzilla entry.
>
> Also comment this file with all information provided in this thread.
>
> If you can provide RAW files samples to test, and take some
> screenshots of the problem, it will be great.
>
> Best
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2011/1/28 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:
>> LibKdcraw: 1.1.0
>> Libraw: 0.11.3
>>
>> I haven't changed these.
>>
>> /Anders
>>
>>
>> 2011/1/28 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:
>>> Between 1.7.0 and 1.8.0, which lbkdcraw and libraw version you use ?
>>> Go to help/component info for details
>>>
>>> Gilles
>>>
>>> 2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Tested with a new config for a different user. Still same problem.
>>>>
>>>> /Anders
>>>>
>>>> 2011/1/26 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:
>>>>> Check if problem is not in digiKam rc config file. rename it to .old
>>>>> and try again (you need to reconfigure digiKam of course)
>>>>>
>>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reinstalled kipi-plugins 1.7.0, still problems. Then resinstalled
>>>>>> digiKam 1.7.0, all back to normal again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Anders
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2011/1/26 Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just dicovered the same behaviour here. digiKam 1.8.0 and kipi-plugins 1.8.0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just tested with a crw-file. It's not just the EV correction, e.g.
>>>>>>> brightness is broken  the same way.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /Anders
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2011/1/26 Remco Viëtor <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>> on Tuesday 25 January 2011, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Dear all digiKam fans and users!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The digiKam development team is happy to release 1.8.0.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For more details, see announcement on digikam.org:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/567
>>>>>>>>> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/568
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you :)
>>>>>>>> Metadata get read again in raw development, and I like having my Sony
>>>>>>>> makernotes visible :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> However, I hit another snag when developing RAW files (Sony ARW in my case):
>>>>>>>> it usedd to be that if I added an EV correction, and then decided it was too
>>>>>>>> much, the new (lower) correction was applied to the original RAW output (i.e.
>>>>>>>> an image update after having lowered an EV correction was less luminous);
>>>>>>>> with the 1.8.0 version, the second lower correction is applied to the already
>>>>>>>> corrected image => severe over correction and no way to get back, except
>>>>>>>> through an update in the RAW tab
>>>>>>>> (say I start with a correction of +.3, then decide +.2 would have been better:
>>>>>>>> in <=1.7.0 I ended up with a correction of +.2,
>>>>>>>> in 1.8.0 I end up with a correction of +.5...)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any suggestion about where the bug is (Kipi, Digikam, elsewhere)?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Remco
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
12