digiKam 0.10.0-rc1 and kipi-plugins 0.2.0-rc1 tarballs tomorow morning...

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

digiKam 0.10.0-rc1 and kipi-plugins 0.2.0-rc1 tarballs tomorow morning...

Gilles Caulier-4
Hi all,

I plan to build tarballs tomorow morning. It's fine for all ?

Also, after this release, we plan freeze i18n. It's fine or you need to delay a little bit ?

Best

Gilles Caulier

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: digiKam 0.10.0-rc1 and kipi-plugins 0.2.0-rc1 tarballs tomorow morning...

Gilles Caulier-4


2009/1/20 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>
Hi all,

I plan to build tarballs tomorow morning. It's fine for all ?

Also, after this release, we plan freeze i18n. It's fine or you need to delay a little bit ?

Best

Gilles Caulier

I forget rlease plan :

http://www.digikam.org/about/releaseplan

Gilles

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Kde-imaging] digiKam 0.10.0-rc1 and kipi-plugins 0.2.0-rc1 tarballs tomorow morning...

Bugzilla from lure@kubuntu.org
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4

On Tuesday 20 January 2009 19:25:09 Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I plan to build tarballs tomorow morning. It's fine for all ?



This is not completely related to thie release, but there is real concern with Adobe SDK license that is included as part of DNG Converter in KIPI-Plugins:
https://launchpad.net/bugs/319230



How should this be handled properly?
I am currently considering of changing kipi-plugins to not include DNG Converter and ship DNG Converter as separate source package as into Ubuntu multiverse (restricted licenses).





Regards,
Luka


_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Kde-imaging] digiKam 0.10.0-rc1 and kipi-plugins 0.2.0-rc1 tarballs tomorow morning...

Marcel Wiesweg

> > Hi all,

> >

> > I plan to build tarballs tomorow morning. It's fine for all ?

>

> This is not completely related to thie release, but there is real concern

> with Adobe SDK license that is included as part of DNG Converter in

> KIPI-Plugins: https://launchpad.net/bugs/319230

>

> How should this be handled properly?

> I am currently considering of changing kipi-plugins to not include DNG

> Converter and ship DNG Converter as separate source package as into Ubuntu

> multiverse (restricted licenses).

One problem seems to be including a file with the SDK license agreement. That should be easy to fix.

The SDK is as it is; XMP is released under a proper free software license, DNG is not.

When I read the agreement it allows me to "prepare derivative works" from it and "distribute and sublicense it for any purpose". The only restriction seems to be to "not remove any copyright or other notice ".

This seems all right to me, no restrictions for us developers.

I dont know what lawyers say to this. I hope my practical interpretation from above (I can use it and distribute it with GPL software) is correct.

In which package repository this belongs is distribution specific, that's too complicated for me.

Marcel


_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel