batchqueuemanager alpha?

[Pau Ruŀlan Ferragut]

  hi!

Is there any way you could release an alpha for the batch queue manager
in order to use it on the 0.10?

For example I only need the rename feature. Not having it in the 0.10 version
is a step back in my workflow.

  cheers!
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

2009/2/9 Pau Ruŀlan Ferragut <[hidden email]>

 hi!

Is there any way you could release an alpha for the batch queue manager
in order to use it on the 0.10?

For example I only need the rename feature. Not having it in the 0.10 version
is a step back in my workflow.

Well no, because the code is not yet finalized, and i need more time to test code indeep.

Ask to [hidden email] mailing list if somebody can port Batch Rename tool. I'm currently too busy to do it.

Best

Gilles Caulier

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

Dnia Monday 09 February 2009, Pau Ru?lan Ferragut napisał:
>   hi!
>
> Is there any way you could release an alpha for the batch queue manager
> in order to use it on the 0.10?
>
> For example I only need the rename feature. Not having it in the 0.10
> version is a step back in my workflow.

You can try krename. Much more powerful tool:

http://www.krename.net/Development.7.0.html

m.
--
People tend to not say anything when they are satisfied, and to say
something when they are not, so you tend to only hear negatives, so
a nice comment is always appreciated. (Shawn Gordon of theKompany)

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Pau Ruŀlan Ferragut]

2009/2/9 Mikolaj Machowski <[hidden email]>:
> Monday 09 February 2009, Pau Ru?lan Ferragut napisał:

>> For example I only need the rename feature. Not having it in the 0.10
>> version is a step back in my workflow.

> You can try krename. Much more powerful tool:

Thank you for the tip. The problem is that using krename drops the
idea of having all together but thanks nonetheless.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

2009/2/9 Mikolaj Machowski <[hidden email]>:
> Dnia Monday 09 February 2009, Pau Ru?lan Ferragut napisał:

>> For example I only need the rename feature. Not having it in the 0.10
>> version is a step back in my workflow.

> You can try krename. Much more powerful tool:

Thank you for the tip. The problem is that using krename drops the
idea of having all together but thanks nonetheless.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

On Monday 09 February 2009 19:33:09 Pau Ruŀlan Ferragut wrote:

>
> Thank you for the tip. The problem is that using krename drops the
> idea of having all together but thanks nonetheless.

By associating image extensions with krename you can "open" files you want to
rename from inside of digiKam. It will be accessible from "Open with..." menu.

m.

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel