Translation Bug in 0.9.4 rc1

[krienke]

Hello,

I found a small translation bug for german in 0.9.4.  In the right tag sidetab
in the new input filed for entering new tags there initially should appear
the text

"Neues Stichwort eingeben"  

if nothing has been entered yet but at the moment it says

"Neuen Stichwort eingeben".  


Thanks
Rainer
--
Rainer Krienke, Uni Koblenz, Rechenzentrum, A22, Universitaetsstrasse  1
56070 Koblenz, http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~krienke, Tel: [phone]
PGP: http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~krienke/mypgp.html,Fax: [phone]

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Oliver Dörr]

Hi Rainer,

thanks for your report. I  just checked it. The bug is already fixed in SVN. It was fixed
about two weeks ago.

@Gilles: Will the 0.9.4 release use the most updated translations? The one delivered with 0.9.4 rc1 is pretty old at least for German. The complete proof reading is missing and we checked it in, in the beginning of June :-(

Oliver

Rainer Krienke schrieb:

Hello,

I found a small translation bug for german in 0.9.4.  In the right tag sidetab 
in the new input filed for entering new tags there initially should appear 
the text 

"Neues Stichwort eingeben"  

if nothing has been entered yet but at the moment it says 

"Neuen Stichwort eingeben".  


Thanks
Rainer
  

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
  

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

2008/6/20 Oliver Dörr <[hidden email]>:

> Hi Rainer,
>
> thanks for your report. I  just checked it. The bug is already fixed in SVN.
> It was fixed
> about two weeks ago.
>
> @Gilles: Will the 0.9.4 release use the most updated translations? The one
> delivered with 0.9.4 rc1 is pretty old at least for German. The complete
> proof reading is missing and we checked it in, in the beginning of June :-(
>
> Oliver
>

Hi Oliver,

I don't know. I just run the Ruby script set on digiKam svn
reporsitory to checkout all i18n files from translators.

You can try to run it on your computer to look what is wrong.

Gilles
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Oliver Dörr]

Gilles Caulier schrieb:

2008/6/20 Oliver Dörr [hidden email]:
  

Hi Rainer,

thanks for your report. I  just checked it. The bug is already fixed in SVN.
It was fixed
about two weeks ago.

@Gilles: Will the 0.9.4 release use the most updated translations? The one
delivered with 0.9.4 rc1 is pretty old at least for German. The complete
proof reading is missing and we checked it in, in the beginning of June :-(

Oliver

    

Hi Oliver,

I don't know. I just run the Ruby script set on digiKam svn
reporsitory to checkout all i18n files from translators.

You can try to run it on your computer to look what is wrong.
  

Hi Gilles,

I will take a closer look at it, if you tell me where to get and how to use it.


Oliver
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

Look PACKAGING file for details:

http://websvn.kde.org/branches/extragear/kde3/graphics/digikam/PACKAGING?revision=789437&view=markup

The script that i use is this one :

http://websvn.kde.org/branches/extragear/kde3/graphics/digikam/release_digikam.rb?revision=821342&view=markup

Gilles

2008/6/20 Oliver Dörr <[hidden email]>:

>
>
> Gilles Caulier schrieb:
>
> 2008/6/20 Oliver Dörr <[hidden email]>:
>
>
> Hi Rainer,
>
> thanks for your report. I  just checked it. The bug is already fixed in SVN.
> It was fixed
> about two weeks ago.
>
> @Gilles: Will the 0.9.4 release use the most updated translations? The one
> delivered with 0.9.4 rc1 is pretty old at least for German. The complete
> proof reading is missing and we checked it in, in the beginning of June :-(
>
> Oliver
>
>
>
> Hi Oliver,
>
> I don't know. I just run the Ruby script set on digiKam svn
> reporsitory to checkout all i18n files from translators.
>
> You can try to run it on your computer to look what is wrong.
>
>
> Hi Gilles,
>
> I will take a closer look at it, if you tell me where to get and how to use
> it.
>
>
> Oliver
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>
>

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Oliver Dörr]

Hi Gilles,

the script is correct. What seems to be missing is the complete proof-reading of the german team. I even could not find the check-in message in web-svn any more. It looks like somebody has reverted the check-in.

@Thomas: Could you take a closer look what happened there? I'm not so skilled in SVN. All i could see is that your check-in is no longer there...

Thanks
Oliver

Gilles Caulier schrieb:

Look PACKAGING file for details:

http://websvn.kde.org/branches/extragear/kde3/graphics/digikam/PACKAGING?revision=789437&view=markup

The script that i use is this one :

http://websvn.kde.org/branches/extragear/kde3/graphics/digikam/release_digikam.rb?revision=821342&view=markup

Gilles

2008/6/20 Oliver Dörr [hidden email]:
  

Gilles Caulier schrieb:

2008/6/20 Oliver Dörr [hidden email]:


Hi Rainer,

thanks for your report. I  just checked it. The bug is already fixed in SVN.
It was fixed
about two weeks ago.

@Gilles: Will the 0.9.4 release use the most updated translations? The one
delivered with 0.9.4 rc1 is pretty old at least for German. The complete
proof reading is missing and we checked it in, in the beginning of June :-(

Oliver



Hi Oliver,

I don't know. I just run the Ruby script set on digiKam svn
reporsitory to checkout all i18n files from translators.

You can try to run it on your computer to look what is wrong.


Hi Gilles,

I will take a closer look at it, if you tell me where to get and how to use
it.


Oliver
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel


    

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

  

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

As far as I know, you can not delete a whole revision,
so there must be a logentry of what happened.
Even a revert would result in a new commit so this can be clearly seen.

Andi

Oliver Dörr wrote:

> Hi Gilles,
>
> the script is correct. What seems to be missing is the complete
> proof-reading of the german team. I even could not find the check-in
> message in web-svn any more. It looks like somebody has reverted the
> check-in.
>
> *@Thomas: *Could you take a closer look what happened there? I'm not so
> skilled in SVN. All i could see is that your check-in is no longer
> there...
>
> Thanks
> Oliver
>
> Gilles Caulier schrieb:
>> Look PACKAGING file for details:
>>
>>

http://websvn.kde.org/branches/extragear/kde3/graphics/digikam/PACKAGING?revision=789437&view=markup
>>
>> The script that i use is this one :
>>
>>
http://websvn.kde.org/branches/extragear/kde3/graphics/digikam/release_digikam.rb?revision=821342&view=markup

>>
>> Gilles
>>
>> 2008/6/20 Oliver Dörr <[hidden email]>:
>>  
>>> Gilles Caulier schrieb:
>>>
>>> 2008/6/20 Oliver Dörr <[hidden email]>:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Rainer,
>>>
>>> thanks for your report. I  just checked it. The bug is already fixed in
>>> SVN. It was fixed
>>> about two weeks ago.
>>>
>>> @Gilles: Will the 0.9.4 release use the most updated translations? The
>>> one delivered with 0.9.4 rc1 is pretty old at least for German. The
>>> complete proof reading is missing and we checked it in, in the beginning
>>> of June :-(
>>>
>>> Oliver
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Oliver,
>>>
>>> I don't know. I just run the Ruby script set on digiKam svn
>>> reporsitory to checkout all i18n files from translators.
>>>
>>> You can try to run it on your computer to look what is wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Gilles,
>>>
>>> I will take a closer look at it, if you tell me where to get and how to
>>> use it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Oliver
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>    
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>>
>>

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Oliver Dörr]

So why, where is no check in message from Thomas? He has send it to me via mail (I believe using CCMAIL).

The proof-reading checking is missing and I've read it a few week ago with my own eyes...

I hope that Thomas could clarify it. He had done the proof-reading and checked it in. My local copy of the SVN that i checked out before my holidays had also the proof-reading inside. After doing an svn up it was gone and the reported bug was back.

To be honest, I did not know what happened. All I know is that the bug was fixed a few weeks ago and that I could not even see the fix check-in from Thomas in svnlog.


Oliver

Andi Clemens schrieb:

As far as I know, you can not delete a whole revision,
so there must be a logentry of what happened.
Even a revert would result in a new commit so this can be clearly seen.

Andi

Oliver Dörr wrote:

  

Hi Gilles,

the script is correct. What seems to be missing is the complete
proof-reading of the german team. I even could not find the check-in
message in web-svn any more. It looks like somebody has reverted the
check-in.

*@Thomas: *Could you take a closer look what happened there? I'm not so
skilled in SVN. All i could see is that your check-in is no longer
there...

Thanks
Oliver

Gilles Caulier schrieb:
    

Look PACKAGING file for details:


      

http://websvn.kde.org/branches/extragear/kde3/graphics/digikam/PACKAGING?revision=789437&view=markup
  

The script that i use is this one :


      

http://websvn.kde.org/branches/extragear/kde3/graphics/digikam/release_digikam.rb?revision=821342&view=markup
  

Gilles

2008/6/20 Oliver Dörr [hidden email]:
  
      

Gilles Caulier schrieb:

2008/6/20 Oliver Dörr [hidden email]:


Hi Rainer,

thanks for your report. I  just checked it. The bug is already fixed in
SVN. It was fixed
about two weeks ago.

@Gilles: Will the 0.9.4 release use the most updated translations? The
one delivered with 0.9.4 rc1 is pretty old at least for German. The
complete proof reading is missing and we checked it in, in the beginning
of June :-(

Oliver



Hi Oliver,

I don't know. I just run the Ruby script set on digiKam svn
reporsitory to checkout all i18n files from translators.

You can try to run it on your computer to look what is wrong.


Hi Gilles,

I will take a closer look at it, if you tell me where to get and how to
use it.


Oliver
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel


    
        

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel


      

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
  

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

This is really strange. I think you have to wait for Thomas to check what
happened...

Andi

Oliver Dörr wrote:

> So why, where is no check in message from Thomas? He has send it to me
> via mail (I believe using CCMAIL).
>
> The proof-reading checking is missing and I've read it a few week ago
> with my own eyes...
>
> I hope that Thomas could clarify it. He had done the proof-reading and
> checked it in. My local copy of the SVN that i checked out before my
> holidays had also the proof-reading inside. After doing an svn up it was
> gone and the reported bug was back.
>
> To be honest, I did not know what happened. All I know is that the bug
> was fixed a few weeks ago and that I could not even see the fix check-in
> from Thomas in svnlog.
>
>
> Oliver
>
> Andi Clemens schrieb:
>> As far as I know, you can not delete a whole revision,
>> so there must be a logentry of what happened.
>> Even a revert would result in a new commit so this can be clearly seen.
>>
>> Andi
>>
>> Oliver Dörr wrote:
>>
>>  
>>> Hi Gilles,
>>>
>>> the script is correct. What seems to be missing is the complete
>>> proof-reading of the german team. I even could not find the check-in
>>> message in web-svn any more. It looks like somebody has reverted the
>>> check-in.
>>>
>>> *@Thomas: *Could you take a closer look what happened there? I'm not so
>>> skilled in SVN. All i could see is that your check-in is no longer
>>> there...
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Oliver
>>>
>>> Gilles Caulier schrieb:
>>>    
>>>> Look PACKAGING file for details:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      
>>

http://websvn.kde.org/branches/extragear/kde3/graphics/digikam/PACKAGING?revision=789437&view=markup
>>  
>>>> The script that i use is this one :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      
>>
http://websvn.kde.org/branches/extragear/kde3/graphics/digikam/release_digikam.rb?revision=821342&view=markup

>>  
>>>> Gilles
>>>>
>>>> 2008/6/20 Oliver Dörr <[hidden email]>:
>>>>  
>>>>      
>>>>> Gilles Caulier schrieb:
>>>>>
>>>>> 2008/6/20 Oliver Dörr
>>>>> <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Rainer,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for your report. I  just checked it. The bug is already fixed
>>>>> in SVN. It was fixed
>>>>> about two weeks ago.
>>>>>
>>>>> @Gilles: Will the 0.9.4 release use the most updated translations? The
>>>>> one delivered with 0.9.4 rc1 is pretty old at least for German. The
>>>>> complete proof reading is missing and we checked it in, in the
>>>>> beginning of June :-(
>>>>>
>>>>> Oliver
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Oliver,
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know. I just run the Ruby script set on digiKam svn
>>>>> reporsitory to checkout all i18n files from translators.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can try to run it on your computer to look what is wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Gilles,
>>>>>
>>>>> I will take a closer look at it, if you tell me where to get and how
>>>>> to use it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Oliver
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    
>>>>>        
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>>

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Thomas Reitelbach]

On Samstag, 21. Juni 2008, Oliver Dörr wrote:

> So why, where is no check in message from Thomas? He has send it to me
> via mail (I believe using CCMAIL).
>
> The proof-reading checking is missing and I've read it a few week ago
> with my own eyes...
>
> I hope that Thomas could clarify it. He had done the proof-reading and
> checked it in. My local copy of the SVN that i checked out before my
> holidays had also the proof-reading inside. After doing an svn up it was
> gone and the reported bug was back.
>
> To be honest, I did not know what happened. All I know is that the bug
> was fixed a few weeks ago and that I could not even see the fix check-in
> from Thomas in svnlog.

That's because all my work and svn commits took place
in /branches/stable/l10n, but the script takes the i18n release-files
from /trunk/l10n-kde3/.

Obviously I was working on the wrong branch :(
I'll have to merge my proof-read translations from stable into
trunk/l10n-kde3. This will be a huge load of handwork. How much time do I
have until the final tarballs are packed? It'd be really a pitty if all proof
reading would be lost for this release :(

Cheers
Thomas

PS: Please CC me, I'm not on the list.

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Oliver Dörr]

Hi Thomas,

sad to hear that. According to the actual release plan

http://www.digikam.org/drupal/about/releaseplan

the final release will be

2008-07-06: Final release

Oliver

Thomas Reitelbach schrieb:

On Samstag, 21. Juni 2008, Oliver Dörr wrote:
  

So why, where is no check in message from Thomas? He has send it to me
via mail (I believe using CCMAIL).

The proof-reading checking is missing and I've read it a few week ago
with my own eyes...

I hope that Thomas could clarify it. He had done the proof-reading and
checked it in. My local copy of the SVN that i checked out before my
holidays had also the proof-reading inside. After doing an svn up it was
gone and the reported bug was back.

To be honest, I did not know what happened. All I know is that the bug
was fixed a few weeks ago and that I could not even see the fix check-in
from Thomas in svnlog.
    

That's because all my work and svn commits took place 
in /branches/stable/l10n, but the script takes the i18n release-files 
from /trunk/l10n-kde3/.

Obviously I was working on the wrong branch :( 
I'll have to merge my proof-read translations from stable into 
trunk/l10n-kde3. This will be a huge load of handwork. How much time do I 
have until the final tarballs are packed? It'd be really a pitty if all proof 
reading would be lost for this release :(

Cheers
Thomas

PS: Please CC me, I'm not on the list.
  

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Oliver Dörr]

Hi,

it is now fixed and the german proof-reading is integrated in the right place

Oliver

Rainer Krienke schrieb:

Hello,

I found a small translation bug for german in 0.9.4.  In the right tag sidetab 
in the new input filed for entering new tags there initially should appear 
the text 

"Neues Stichwort eingeben"  

if nothing has been entered yet but at the moment it says 

"Neuen Stichwort eingeben".  


Thanks
Rainer
  

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
  

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel