_______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
- Stephen On January 24th, 2013, 3 p.m. UTC, Stephen Toothman wrote:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from stoothman@yahoo.com
_______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Stephen, Your patch is against digiKam 2.5.0. It must be done against git/master code (future 3.0.0). A lots of code have changed since 2.5.0, and your patch cannot be applied to current implementation and tested. Please, make a new patch against git/master... Gilles Caulier - Gilles On January 24th, 2013, 3:04 p.m. UTC, Stephen Toothman wrote:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from stoothman@yahoo.com
The diff seems to include all affected files as complete new files, instead of displaying only changes? - Marcel On January 24th, 2013, 3:04 p.m. UTC, Stephen Toothman wrote:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from stoothman@yahoo.com
The diff seems to include all affected files as complete new files, instead of displaying only changes? - Marcel On January 24th, 2013, 3:04 p.m. UTC, Stephen Toothman wrote:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from stoothman@yahoo.com
The diff seems to include all affected files as complete new files, instead of displaying only changes? - Marcel On January 24th, 2013, 3:04 p.m. UTC, Stephen Toothman wrote:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from stoothman@yahoo.com
The diff seems to include all affected files as complete new files, instead of displaying only changes? - Marcel On January 24th, 2013, 3:04 p.m. UTC, Stephen Toothman wrote:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from stoothman@yahoo.com
Right Marcel, the diff is wrong... Stephen, please checkout digiKam from git/master and make a patch against current implmentation. It's important for us to review and validate your code... Thanks in advance Gilles Caulier - Gilles On January 24th, 2013, 3:04 p.m. UTC, Stephen Toothman wrote:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from stoothman@yahoo.com
_______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
I will try to create the diff again. It is created against the latest version, 3.0.0-rc. I tried attaching just the local diff I made to port the changes over to the the git branch, but it did not like that. - Stephen On January 25th, 2013, 5:30 p.m. UTC, Stephen Toothman wrote:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from stoothman@yahoo.com
_______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Stephen, I review your patch, apply it to current git/master implementation, and tested. Where options are available in Setup to show aspect ratio properly on thumbnails view and tool-tips, i cannot see any option in Filters tab from Right side-bar to sort items by aspect ratio. As you said in this entry description, this patch much add this feature... Or i forget something ? http://www.flickr.com/photos/digikam/8425632063/sizes/o/in/photostream/ Note : if you use text Filter to sort items from icon view by aspect ratio, well where is the option in drop-down list available on the right of search text field ? Another important point, the capability to find items by aspect ratio in Advanced Search dialog, through "Picture Properties" section. Here, again, no option are available. To be homogeneous, search by aspect ratio must be available too... In all case, these entries from bugzilla must be closed when your patch will be ap^plied to git/master (after 3.0.0 release planed on 6 February): https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121313 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=224549 Gilles Caulier - Gilles On January 28th, 2013, 3:46 p.m. UTC, Stephen Toothman wrote:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from stoothman@yahoo.com
I see also that you have add View/Sort Images/By Aspect Ratio, which is a good point... Gilles Caulier - Gilles On January 28th, 2013, 3:46 p.m. UTC, Stephen Toothman wrote:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
I will look at these two items later this week. I should have something by Friday. Basically I searched through the code following the sort and tool tips. Hehehe, bug 224549 is actually mine. I finally found time to look at it myself and code a fix. :-) - Stephen On January 28th, 2013, 3:46 p.m. UTC, Stephen Toothman wrote:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from stoothman@yahoo.com
Thanks Stephen to contribute. I waiting your new patch for future integration into 3.1.0 release. Gilles Caulier - Gilles On January 28th, 2013, 3:46 p.m. UTC, Stephen Toothman wrote:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from stoothman@yahoo.com
Stephen, Any progress here ? Gilles Caulier - Gilles On January 28th, 2013, 3:46 p.m. UTC, Stephen Toothman wrote:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
I looked at the right hand side text filter and did not see any place for sorting options. I also looked through the code for it and did not find it. I am still working on the search part. It has me at a bit of a loss trying to find how it fits together. But as near as I can tell it does a search through the database using sql. Since this is not a field in the DB I have to think about how to query it and get what I want. And that is the part that has me confused because I can not find where the search query is stored. Steve - Stephen On January 28th, 2013, 3:46 p.m. UTC, Stephen Toothman wrote:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
Am Montag, 4. Februar 2013, 18:38:53 schrieb Stephen Toothman:
> > On Feb. 4, 2013, 5:29 p.m., Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > Stephen, > > > > > > Any progress here ? > > > > > > Gilles Caulier > > I looked at the right hand side text filter and did not see any place for > sorting options. I also looked through the code for it and did not find > it. I am still working on the search part. It has me at a bit of a loss > trying to find how it fits together. But as near as I can tell it does a > search through the database using sql. Since this is not a field in the DB > I have to think about how to query it and get what I want. And that is the > part that has me confused because I can not find where the search query is > stored. Regarding the backend, have a look at libs/database/imagequerybuilder.cpp There is already "pageorientation" and "pixels" implemented which provide similar queries. For the UI, you need to build the basic UI in utilities/searchwindow/searchfields.cpp. There is already something for pageorientation, nothing for pixels. If you want the UI to appear in the search window, you need to add in in searchgroup.cpp. Marcel _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from stoothman@yahoo.com
- Yiou On January 28th, 2013, 3:46 p.m. UTC, Stephen Toothman wrote:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
