I've already sent the following message with a screencopy, but it is pending validation as the message body is too big.
Here it is again, without the screencopy. ===================================== Since I have installed the 1.2 version, the renaming option of the batch tool doesn't seem to work properly: the original file name is not pasted in the new name. Thus [file]_resz.[ext] gives the same resulting file name for all the pictures processed: _resz.JPG (see screencopy) Did I miss something? It works perfectly with the previous version. Marie-Noëlle -- Membre de l'équipe Piwigo : http://fr.piwigo.org Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : http://www.cevennes-plurielles.com Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil : http://www.marie-noelle-augendre.com _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
2010/4/7 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>:
> I've already sent the following message with a screencopy, but it is pending > validation as the message body is too big. > > Here it is again, without the screencopy. > > ===================================== > > Since I have installed the 1.2 version, the renaming option of the batch > tool doesn't seem to work properly: the original file name is not pasted in > the new name. Thus [file]_resz.[ext] gives the same resulting file name for > all the pictures processed: _resz.JPG (see screencopy) > > Did I miss something? It works perfectly with the previous version. > > Marie-Noëlle > I have seen something perhaps related. The pictures i have imported from my camera (PTP-mode) with Digikam 1.2.0 with this [date:ISO]-[file] rename options I get filenames like this: 2010-04-03T14:11:08-.JPG (the original filename is stripped). With Digikam 1.1.0 it worked as expected: 2010-04-03T14:11:08-IMG_0226.JPG. Importing files from the harddrive or card reader renames the files right. / Jonas _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
I don't rename the pictures as I import them.
I just want to copy/resize pictures with the batch tool, so I can use them on the web (on my blog or another website). Marie-Noëlle
2010/4/7 Jonas Norlander <[hidden email]> I have seen something perhaps related. -- Membre de l'équipe Piwigo : http://fr.piwigo.org Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : http://www.cevennes-plurielles.com Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil : http://www.marie-noelle-augendre.com _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by tosca
Bonsoir,
De mon coté je n'ai pas de problème de renumérotation par lot voir copie écran jointe. j'utilise le masque [meta:Exif.Photo.DateTimeDigitized]{unique:2} explication:
[meta:Exif.Photo.DateTimeDigitized] la date et heure de creation de la photo AAAA-MM-JJ HH:MM:SS {unique:2} Rajoute un numéro permettant d'identifier les images en particulier celles qui sont tirées en rafale où la seconde est parfois la même pour plusieurs images.
Pierre
Toujours plus loin... 2010/4/7 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]> I've already sent the following message with a screencopy, but it is pending validation as the message body is too big. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users screenshot4.png (107K) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by tosca
I'm still having problem when trying to rename the files with the Queue Manager.
Currently, I have 4 files in the queue. I choose to rename the files as [file]_resz.[ext] and, at first the proposed target seems to be right. Then I select the resizing tool, and it still is OK. But when I add the JPEG conversion, the proposed targets for the 4 files immediately turn to _resz.jpg: the original filename is lost, and all the images are to be processed with the same target filename! I've put a screencopy here: http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/2QEcBMogoMluMYZipFegVgOxbZvKjsaAHhxp3y1uli4?feat=directlink Marie-Noëlle 2010/4/7 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]> I don't rename the pictures as I import them. -- Membre de l'équipe Piwigo : http://fr.piwigo.org Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : http://www.cevennes-plurielles.com Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil : http://www.marie-noelle-augendre.com _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
I'm surprised to get no answer to this message.
Am I doing something wrong? But I did rename the pictures in exactly the same way with the previous version, and it worked like a charm. Shall I report a bug? Thanks for your answer. 2010/4/8 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]> I'm still having problem when trying to rename the files with the Queue Manager. -- Membre de l'équipe Piwigo : http://fr.piwigo.org Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : http://www.cevennes-plurielles.com Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil : http://www.marie-noelle-augendre.com _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Marie-Noëlle Augendre wrote:
> Am I doing something wrong? But I did rename the pictures in exactly the > same way with the previous version, and it worked like a charm. > > Shall I report a bug? I've never renamed any files using digikam so I can't confirm or deny what you are seeing but if you've seen a change in a feature that used to work and doesn't any longer, then yes, enter a bug. Andrew _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by tosca
2010/4/11 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>:
> I'm surprised to get no answer to this message. > > Am I doing something wrong? But I did rename the pictures in exactly the > same way with the previous version, and it worked like a charm. > > Shall I report a bug? > I think it is a bug so yes do that please! Post the link to the bugreport here and I will add comments with my problems to as I think they are related. / Jonas _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Here it is: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234022
2010/4/11 Jonas Norlander <[hidden email]> 2010/4/11 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>: -- Membre de l'équipe Piwigo : http://fr.piwigo.org Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : http://www.cevennes-plurielles.com Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil : http://www.marie-noelle-augendre.com _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Pierre-3
First question is: what version are you using ... because the problem appeared with the 1.2.0; it works perfectly with the previous ones.
Second is: the problem is with the original file name, that I don't want to loose, just append some string at the end so I can differentiate the copy from the original. Could you make a test with the file name, and see if it works for you. Marie-Noëlle 2010/4/7 Pierre <[hidden email]> -- Bonsoir, Membre de l'équipe Piwigo : http://fr.piwigo.org Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : http://www.cevennes-plurielles.com Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil : http://www.marie-noelle-augendre.com _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |