Panorama creation

[Anders Lund]

Hi,

digikam requires an outdated version of panoramatools:
"Information: pto2mk is only available up to Hugin 2014.0. In later versions
it has be replaced by hugin_executor, which provides more features."

(quote from panotools wiki)

Kindly,
Anders
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Gilles Caulier-4]

yes, problem is know and already reported to bugzilla.

Benjamin Girault work on it for 5.0.0 to be compatible with Last Hugin release, This will simplify the rule to compile tool.

Personaly, i waiting last Benjamin update to integrate Pnorama tool directly in digiKam core (not as a plugin)

Gilles Caulier

2016-02-17 11:05 GMT+01:00 Anders Lund <[hidden email]>:

Hi,

digikam requires an outdated version of panoramatools:
"Information: pto2mk is only available up to Hugin 2014.0. In later versions
it has be replaced by hugin_executor, which provides more features."

(quote from panotools wiki)

Kindly,
Anders
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Gilles Caulier-4]

Hi Anders, 

yes, problem is know and already reported to bugzilla.

Benjamin Girault work on it for 5.0.0 to be compatible with Last Hugin release, This will simplify the rule to compile tool.

Personally, i waiting last Benjamin update to integrate Panorama tool directly in digiKam core (not as a plugin)

Gilles Caulier

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Remco Viëtor]

On Wednesday 17 February 2016 11:05:08 Anders Lund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> digikam requires an outdated version of panoramatools:
> "Information: pto2mk is only available up to Hugin 2014.0. In later
versions

> it has be replaced by hugin_executor, which provides more features."
>
> (quote from panotools wiki)
>
> Kindly,
> Anders
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

Drag and drop from Digikam to hugin works very well as a work-around until
the new Digikam version is ready (it's actually my standard way of using
Hugin from Digikam, so I have acces to all options in Hugin)

Remco

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Anders Lund]

onsdag den 17. februar 2016 11.40.22 CET skrev Remco Viëtor:

> On Wednesday 17 February 2016 11:05:08 Anders Lund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > digikam requires an outdated version of panoramatools:
> > "Information: pto2mk is only available up to Hugin 2014.0. In later
>
> versions
>
> > it has be replaced by hugin_executor, which provides more features."
> >
> > (quote from panotools wiki)
> >
> > Kindly,
> > Anders
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
> Drag and drop from Digikam to hugin works very well as a work-around until
> the new Digikam version is ready (it's actually my standard way of using
> Hugin from Digikam, so I have acces to all options in Hugin)

Yes, that is what I did as well, and hugin appearently does offer better
control than digikam. It spawns LOTS of error messages, though. I had to batch
convert my RAWS to tif first.

Kindly,
Anders

> Remco
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users


_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Anders Lund]

onsdag den 17. februar 2016 11.13.54 CET skrev Gilles Caulier:

> Hi Anders,
>
> yes, problem is know and already reported to bugzilla.
>
> Benjamin Girault work on it for 5.0.0 to be compatible with Last Hugin
> release, This will simplify the rule to compile tool.
>
> Personally, i waiting last Benjamin update to integrate Panorama tool
> directly in digiKam core (not as a plugin)
>
> Gilles Caulier

Hi Gilles,

I assume you'd still need  panotools and enfuse/enblend even then?

Anders

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Michael Havens]

use hugin for panorama.

 sudo add-apt-repository ppa:hugin/hugin-builds && sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install hugin

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Anders Lund <[hidden email]> wrote:

onsdag den 17. februar <a href="tel:2016%2011.13.54" value="[phone]">2016 11.13.54 CET skrev Gilles Caulier:
> Hi Anders,
>
> yes, problem is know and already reported to bugzilla.
>
> Benjamin Girault work on it for 5.0.0 to be compatible with Last Hugin
> release, This will simplify the rule to compile tool.
>
> Personally, i waiting last Benjamin update to integrate Panorama tool
> directly in digiKam core (not as a plugin)
>
> Gilles Caulier

Hi Gilles,

I assume you'd still need  panotools and enfuse/enblend even then?

Anders

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

--

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Remco Viëtor]

On Wednesday 17 February 2016 14:25:25 Anders Lund wrote:

> onsdag den 17. februar 2016 11.40.22 CET skrev Remco Viëtor:
> > On Wednesday 17 February 2016 11:05:08 Anders Lund wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > digikam requires an outdated version of panoramatools:
> > > "Information: pto2mk is only available up to Hugin 2014.0. In later
> >
> > versions
> >
> > > it has be replaced by hugin_executor, which provides more features."
> > >
> > > (quote from panotools wiki)
> > >
> >
> > Drag and drop from Digikam to hugin works very well as a work-around

until
> > the new Digikam version is ready (it's actually my standard way of
using
> > Hugin from Digikam, so I have acces to all options in Hugin)
>
> Yes, that is what I did as well, and hugin appearently does offer better
> control than digikam. It spawns LOTS of error messages, though. I had to
batch
> convert my RAWS to tif first.
>
Well, yes, hugin doesn't handle RAW files, only image files (png, tiff,
jpg). But I don't really mind that, I prefer doing raw conversions by hand
anyway. (And I'm not using digikam for that anymore either, but that's
another story).

Remco

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Anders Lund]

onsdag den 17. februar 2016 14.51.03 CET skrev Remco Viëtor:
> On Wednesday 17 February 2016 14:25:25 Anders Lund wrote:
> > onsdag den 17. februar 2016 11.40.22 CET skrev Remco Viëtor:

...

> >
> > Yes, that is what I did as well, and hugin appearently does offer better
> > control than digikam. It spawns LOTS of error messages, though. I had to
>
> batch
>
> > convert my RAWS to tif first.
>
> Well, yes, hugin doesn't handle RAW files, only image files (png, tiff,
> jpg). But I don't really mind that, I prefer doing raw conversions by hand
> anyway. (And I'm not using digikam for that anymore either, but that's
> another story).

I tend to use darktable currently, but to get a similar conversion, I used
digikams batch tool. How are you handling it?

Kindly,
Anders
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Remco Viëtor]

On Wednesday 17 February 2016 14:54:41 Anders Lund wrote:
> onsdag den 17. februar 2016 14.51.03 CET skrev Remco Viëtor:
> > On Wednesday 17 February 2016 14:25:25 Anders Lund wrote:
> > > onsdag den 17. februar 2016 11.40.22 CET skrev Remco Viëtor:
>
> ...
>
> > >
> > > Yes, that is what I did as well, and hugin appearently does offer
better
> > > control than digikam. It spawns LOTS of error messages, though. I had
to
> >
> > batch
> >
> > > convert my RAWS to tif first.
> >
> > Well, yes, hugin doesn't handle RAW files, only image files (png, tiff,
> > jpg). But I don't really mind that, I prefer doing raw conversions by
hand
> > anyway. (And I'm not using digikam for that anymore either, but that's
> > another story).
>
> I tend to use darktable currently, but to get a similar conversion, I
used
> digikams batch tool. How are you handling it?
>
With darktable, I create a style for the first of the series, then apply
that style to all the others in that series. That gives me at least as much
control and is perhaps even faster than the Batch queue in Digikam. The
style can be deleted afterwards, of course.

Remco
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Anders Lund]

onsdag den 17. februar 2016 15.03.43 CET skrev Remco Viëtor:
> With darktable, I create a style for the first of the series, then apply
> that style to all the others in that series. That gives me at least as much
> control and is perhaps even faster than the Batch queue in Digikam. The
> style can be deleted afterwards, of course.

Good idea, I will try that :)

Kindly,
Anders
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Gilles Caulier-4]

yes, it is. The simplification will be introduced at compile time.

Gilles Caulier

2016-02-17 14:27 GMT+01:00 Anders Lund <[hidden email]>:

onsdag den 17. februar 2016 11.13.54 CET skrev Gilles Caulier:
> Hi Anders,
>
> yes, problem is know and already reported to bugzilla.
>
> Benjamin Girault work on it for 5.0.0 to be compatible with Last Hugin
> release, This will simplify the rule to compile tool.
>
> Personally, i waiting last Benjamin update to integrate Panorama tool
> directly in digiKam core (not as a plugin)
>
> Gilles Caulier

Hi Gilles,

I assume you'd still need  panotools and enfuse/enblend even then?

Anders

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

[Gilles Caulier-4]

Done. 

Panorama tool is now in digiKam core and support hugin 2015.0 now. Just tested on my computer.

This is want mean that all will be ready to test for next 5.0.0-beta4

Gilles Caulier

2016-02-17 11:13 GMT+01:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:

Hi Anders, 

yes, problem is know and already reported to bugzilla.

Benjamin Girault work on it for 5.0.0 to be compatible with Last Hugin release, This will simplify the rule to compile tool.

Personally, i waiting last Benjamin update to integrate Panorama tool directly in digiKam core (not as a plugin)

Gilles Caulier

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users