Hi everybody,
I can't compile a fresh copy of Digikam (0.9) from svn. I've get this error: digikam/showfoto/setup/Makefile.am: no rule to create target: /home/pcruz/Desarrollo/test/digikam/utilities/setup/libshowfotosetup.la(./digikam/showfoto/setup/libsetup.la) I've a limeted experience with make files, so ... ideas? Thanks in advance. Paco Cruz _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
---- [hidden email] escribió:
> Hi everybody, > > I can't compile a fresh copy of Digikam (0.9) from svn. I've get this error: > > digikam/showfoto/setup/Makefile.am: no rule to create target: /home/pcruz/Desarrollo/test/digikam/utilities/setup/libshowfotosetup.la(./digikam/showfoto/setup/libsetup.la) > > I've a limeted experience with make files, so ... ideas? > I've forgotten to say that at home the app compiles without problems. As far I know, the only difference between home copy and office copy is that at work i use unsermake instead make because when I did the first checkout of kde-admin , this was from "trunk" and not from "branches". I must to say that this has not been any problem until now. Paco Cruz > Thanks in advance. > > Paco Cruz > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-devel mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Le Mardi 24 Janvier 2006 10:22, [hidden email] a écrit :
> ---- [hidden email] escribió: > > Hi everybody, > > > > I can't compile a fresh copy of Digikam (0.9) from svn. I've get this > > error: > > > > digikam/showfoto/setup/Makefile.am: no rule to create target: > > /home/pcruz/Desarrollo/test/digikam/utilities/setup/libshowfotosetup.la(. > >/digikam/showfoto/setup/libsetup.la) > > > > I've a limeted experience with make files, so ... ideas? > > I've forgotten to say that at home the app compiles without problems. As > far I know, the only difference between home copy and office copy is that > at work i use unsermake instead make because when I did the first checkout > of kde-admin , this was from "trunk" and not from "branches". I must to say > that this has not been any problem until now. > Since yesterday morning, this makefile is in svn. You need to do make -f Makefile.cvs to re-check all folders and create all Makefile.in, etc... About usermake, you can do want you want, but i has never used it and i recommend you to use automake/autoconf instead. Because i have no time to manage an another tool like usermake (and debug anymore)... i won't used this tool. In the future, when digikam will be migrated to Qt4/KDE4, we will use 'scons' tool instead automake/autoconf (:=))) Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by F.J.Cruz
---- Caulier Gilles <[hidden email]> escribió:
> Le Mardi 24 Janvier 2006 10:22, [hidden email] a écrit : > ---- [hidden email] escribió: > > Hi everybody, > > > > I can't compile a fresh copy of Digikam (0.9) from svn. I've get this > > error: > > > > digikam/showfoto/setup/Makefile.am: no rule to create target: > > /home/pcruz/Desarrollo/test/digikam/utilities/setup/libshowfotosetup.la(. > >/digikam/showfoto/setup/libsetup.la) > > > > I've a limeted experience with make files, so ... ideas? > > I've forgotten to say that at home the app compiles without problems. As > far I know, the only difference between home copy and office copy is that > at work i use unsermake instead make because when I did the first checkout > of kde-admin , this was from "trunk" and not from "branches". I must to say > that this has not been any problem until now. > -- Since yesterday morning, this makefile is in svn. You need to do make -f -- Makefile.cvs to re-check all folders and create all Makefile.in, etc... I've done all this before send the post, but is not compiled yet. -- About usermake, you can do want you want, but i has never used it and i -- recommend you to use automake/autoconf instead. Because i have no time to -- manage an another tool like usermake (and debug anymore)... i won't used this -- tool. In my post I explain why I'm using unsermake, anyway, unsermake works fine with actuals "makes" files, at least they have worked until now :-). I'm thinking about to rebuild my local copy from scratch. Paco _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |