Happy new year with Digikam ;)
I use Digikam 1.7 on Kubuntu 10.10 with Kde 4.5.4 Is it normal that it uses so much memory ? I had also found in version 1.2 and 1.3 See the screenshot below http://img411.imageshack.us/i/sz6k.jpg/ _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
> I use Digikam 1.7 on Kubuntu 10.10 with Kde 4.5.4 > > Is it normal that it uses so much memory ? > > I had also found in version 1.2 and 1.3 Could be better answered with a bit more context of the current use pattern. Which one is the effective memory usage? The KDE system monitor is afaik pretty accurate to calculate that number. Consider that an image e.g. loaded from a RAW, 14Mpx camera, 16bit, takes more than 100 MB of memory. Marcel _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Sylvain ZUCCA
Salut Sylvain,
You wouldn't happen to be using a Nikon camera, would you? If so, there is good news for you: You'll be able to experience a vast performance improvement if you presently run with exiv2 .19 ... Upgrade to the newer version and things will be much better! On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 13:48 +0100, Sylvain ZUCCA wrote: Happy new year with Digikam ;) _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Marcel Wiesweg
I inserted an SD card and asked Digikam to import almost twenty photos
Then I started to put some tags and made some improvements after this, I watched the memory usage with htop, that's all 2011/1/1 Marcel Wiesweg <[hidden email]>
-- Sylvain _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Marcel Wiesweg
Marcel Wiesweg wrote:
> > I use Digikam 1.7 on Kubuntu 10.10 with Kde 4.5.4 > > > > Is it normal that it uses so much memory ? > > > > I had also found in version 1.2 and 1.3 > > Could be better answered with a bit more context of the current use > pattern. Which one is the effective memory usage? The KDE system monitor is > afaik pretty accurate to calculate that number. I have also just recently had a bad experience with the DK memory usage. I'm running DK 1.7.0 under openSUSE 11.2 x64, KDE 4.5.4 on a machine with 6 GB RAM. There are about 158000 photos in about 7000 albums in my collection, and I'm using mysql as database, if that matters. If I have some applications running then e.g. a total of 1.9 GB of RAM is being used. Normally, if I then start DK, the total memory usage increases to about 2.5 GB, which I find OK. Recently I've tried to let DK find all duplicates in my collection. First generated the fingerprints of all photos, and then ran "search duplicates". As expected, this took quite some time, but the bad thing was that this started to eat up all available memory, plus all my swap space. When I killed DK ('killall digikam') the memory was freed immediately. However, when I re-started DK then it obviously started to eat up all my memory again while the info message at the top of the startup logo said "Reading database ...". Unfortunately I did not find a way to stop this except killing DK again. The only I found to get this fixed was to delete all tables in the database and let DK build the database from scratch. Fortunately I have all attributes stored in the photos so it didn't hurt too much to rebuild the database. Anyway, this is an ugly behaviour. Maybe searches should only be remembered when they are explicitely saved. Beside this, DK is a really great piece of software which I really like to work with. Martin _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |