Gilles,
After svn up to 518455 and make clean I still get the same error at libdigikam.la compilation. Gerhard _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:53 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote:
> Gilles, > After svn up to 518455 and make clean I still get the same error at > libdigikam.la compilation. > This is want mean that the problem have been moved to libdigikam.la linking. Before the problem appears in libdmetaloader.la linking. Right ? Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:56 am, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:53 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > Gilles, > > After svn up to 518455 and make clean I still get the same error at > > libdigikam.la compilation. > > This is want mean that the problem have been moved to libdigikam.la > linking. Before the problem appears in libdmetaloader.la linking. Right ? > > Gilles in digikam/digikam/Makefile.am, if you add this instructions : $(LIBJPEG) $(LIB_TIFF) $(LIB_PNG) .. into libdigikam_la_LIBADD rules (line 51), solves the problem ? Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:02, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:56 am, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:53 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > Gilles, > > > After svn up to 518455 and make clean I still get the same error at > > > libdigikam.la compilation. > > > > This is want mean that the problem have been moved to libdigikam.la > > linking. Before the problem appears in libdmetaloader.la linking. Right ? > > > > Gilles > > in digikam/digikam/Makefile.am, if you add this instructions : > > $(LIBJPEG) $(LIB_TIFF) $(LIB_PNG) > > .. into libdigikam_la_LIBADD rules (line 51), solves the problem ? > Gerhard _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:29 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:02, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:56 am, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:53 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > Gilles, > > > > After svn up to 518455 and make clean I still get the same error at > > > > libdigikam.la compilation. > > > > > > This is want mean that the problem have been moved to libdigikam.la > > > linking. Before the problem appears in libdmetaloader.la linking. Right > > > ? > > > > > > Gilles > > > > in digikam/digikam/Makefile.am, if you add this instructions : > > > > $(LIBJPEG) $(LIB_TIFF) $(LIB_PNG) > > > > .. into libdigikam_la_LIBADD rules (line 51), solves the problem ? > > no Gilles, unfortunately not. Error message is identical to the previous. after to have fixe Makefile.am, have you cleanup digikam/digikam before to recompile else the result is the same ? Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:32, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:29 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:02, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:56 am, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:53 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > > Gilles, > > > > > After svn up to 518455 and make clean I still get the same error at > > > > > libdigikam.la compilation. > > > > > > > > This is want mean that the problem have been moved to libdigikam.la > > > > linking. Before the problem appears in libdmetaloader.la linking. > > > > Right ? > > > > > > > > Gilles > > > > > > in digikam/digikam/Makefile.am, if you add this instructions : > > > > > > $(LIBJPEG) $(LIB_TIFF) $(LIB_PNG) > > > > > > .. into libdigikam_la_LIBADD rules (line 51), solves the problem ? > > > > no Gilles, unfortunately not. Error message is identical to the previous. > > after to have fixe Makefile.am, have you cleanup digikam/digikam before to > recompile else the result is the same ? > on digikam/digikam and graphics/ level, the make -f Makefile.cvs, make Gerhard _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:49 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:32, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:29 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:02, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:56 am, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:53 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > > > Gilles, > > > > > > After svn up to 518455 and make clean I still get the same error > > > > > > at libdigikam.la compilation. > > > > > > > > > > This is want mean that the problem have been moved to libdigikam.la > > > > > linking. Before the problem appears in libdmetaloader.la linking. > > > > > Right ? > > > > > > > > > > Gilles > > > > > > > > in digikam/digikam/Makefile.am, if you add this instructions : > > > > > > > > $(LIBJPEG) $(LIB_TIFF) $(LIB_PNG) > > > > > > > > .. into libdigikam_la_LIBADD rules (line 51), solves the problem ? > > > > > > no Gilles, unfortunately not. Error message is identical to the > > > previous. > > > > after to have fixe Makefile.am, have you cleanup digikam/digikam before > > to recompile else the result is the same ? > > Yes, I did that, but to my surprise the problem remains. (I run 'make > clean' on digikam/digikam and graphics/ level, the make -f Makefile.cvs, > make > > Gerhard Please give me a complete backtrace of compilation after a make distclean Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:51, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:49 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:32, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:29 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:02, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:56 am, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:53 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > > > > Gilles, > > > > > > > After svn up to 518455 and make clean I still get the same > > > > > > > error at libdigikam.la compilation. > > > > > > > > > > > > This is want mean that the problem have been moved to > > > > > > libdigikam.la linking. Before the problem appears in > > > > > > libdmetaloader.la linking. Right ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Gilles > > > > > > > > > > in digikam/digikam/Makefile.am, if you add this instructions : > > > > > > > > > > $(LIBJPEG) $(LIB_TIFF) $(LIB_PNG) > > > > > > > > > > .. into libdigikam_la_LIBADD rules (line 51), solves the problem ? > > > > > > > > no Gilles, unfortunately not. Error message is identical to the > > > > previous. > > > > > > after to have fixe Makefile.am, have you cleanup digikam/digikam before > > > to recompile else the result is the same ? > > > > Yes, I did that, but to my surprise the problem remains. (I run 'make > > clean' on digikam/digikam and graphics/ level, the make -f Makefile.cvs, > > make > > > > Gerhard > > Please give me a complete backtrace of compilation after a make distclean > > Gilles error (59K) Download Attachment |
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 12:17 pm, Gerhard Kulzer wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:51, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:49 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:32, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:29 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:02, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:56 am, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:53 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > > > > > Gilles, > > > > > > > > After svn up to 518455 and make clean I still get the same > > > > > > > > error at libdigikam.la compilation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is want mean that the problem have been moved to > > > > > > > libdigikam.la linking. Before the problem appears in > > > > > > > libdmetaloader.la linking. Right ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gilles > > > > > > > > > > > > in digikam/digikam/Makefile.am, if you add this instructions : > > > > > > > > > > > > $(LIBJPEG) $(LIB_TIFF) $(LIB_PNG) > > > > > > > > > > > > .. into libdigikam_la_LIBADD rules (line 51), solves the problem > > > > > > ? > > > > > > > > > > no Gilles, unfortunately not. Error message is identical to the > > > > > previous. > > > > > > > > after to have fixe Makefile.am, have you cleanup digikam/digikam > > > > before to recompile else the result is the same ? > > > > > > Yes, I did that, but to my surprise the problem remains. (I run 'make > > > clean' on digikam/digikam and graphics/ level, the make -f > > > Makefile.cvs, make > > > > > > Gerhard > > > > Please give me a complete backtrace of compilation after a make distclean > > > > Gilles > > Ok, this is it: attachment Strange. Sound like a broken installation of libpng on your system : where is your files : # locate png.so and #locate png.h and what your PATH variable ? This is the result on Mandriva 2006 : /usr/include/png.h /usr/include/libpng12/png.h /usr/lib/libpng.so /usr/lib/libpng.so.3 /usr/lib/libpng.so.3.1.2.8 Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 13:57, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 12:17 pm, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:51, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:49 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:32, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:29 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:02, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:56 am, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:53 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > > > > > > Gilles, > > > > > > > > > After svn up to 518455 and make clean I still get the same > > > > > > > > > error at libdigikam.la compilation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is want mean that the problem have been moved to > > > > > > > > libdigikam.la linking. Before the problem appears in > > > > > > > > libdmetaloader.la linking. Right ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gilles > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in digikam/digikam/Makefile.am, if you add this instructions : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > $(LIBJPEG) $(LIB_TIFF) $(LIB_PNG) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .. into libdigikam_la_LIBADD rules (line 51), solves the > > > > > > > problem ? > > > > > > > > > > > > no Gilles, unfortunately not. Error message is identical to the > > > > > > previous. > > > > > > > > > > after to have fixe Makefile.am, have you cleanup digikam/digikam > > > > > before to recompile else the result is the same ? > > > > > > > > Yes, I did that, but to my surprise the problem remains. (I run 'make > > > > clean' on digikam/digikam and graphics/ level, the make -f > > > > Makefile.cvs, make > > > > > > > > Gerhard > > > > > > Please give me a complete backtrace of compilation after a make > > > distclean > > > > > > Gilles > > > > Ok, this is it: attachment > > Strange. Sound like a broken installation of libpng on your system : where > is your files : > > # locate png.so > and > #locate png.h > > and what your PATH variable ? > > This is the result on Mandriva 2006 : > > /usr/include/png.h > /usr/include/libpng12/png.h > /usr/lib/libpng.so > /usr/lib/libpng.so.3 > /usr/lib/libpng.so.3.1.2.8 > > Gilles > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-devel mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel /usr/include/libpng12/png.h /usr/include/png.h ls /usr/lib/libpng /usr/lib/libpng.so which is a link to libpng12.so.0, which is a link to libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 Gerhard _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-2
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 13:57, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 12:17 pm, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:51, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:49 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:32, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:29 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:02, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:56 am, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:53 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > > > > > > Gilles, > > > > > > > > > After svn up to 518455 and make clean I still get the same > > > > > > > > > error at libdigikam.la compilation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is want mean that the problem have been moved to > > > > > > > > libdigikam.la linking. Before the problem appears in > > > > > > > > libdmetaloader.la linking. Right ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gilles > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in digikam/digikam/Makefile.am, if you add this instructions : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > $(LIBJPEG) $(LIB_TIFF) $(LIB_PNG) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .. into libdigikam_la_LIBADD rules (line 51), solves the > > > > > > > problem ? > > > > > > > > > > > > no Gilles, unfortunately not. Error message is identical to the > > > > > > previous. > > > > > > > > > > after to have fixe Makefile.am, have you cleanup digikam/digikam > > > > > before to recompile else the result is the same ? > > > > > > > > Yes, I did that, but to my surprise the problem remains. (I run 'make > > > > clean' on digikam/digikam and graphics/ level, the make -f > > > > Makefile.cvs, make > > > > > > > > Gerhard > > > > > > Please give me a complete backtrace of compilation after a make > > > distclean > > > > > > Gilles > > > > Ok, this is it: attachment > > Strange. Sound like a broken installation of libpng on your system : where > is your files : > > # locate png.so > and > #locate png.h > > and what your PATH variable ? > > This is the result on Mandriva 2006 : > > /usr/include/png.h > /usr/include/libpng12/png.h > /usr/lib/libpng.so > /usr/lib/libpng.so.3 > /usr/lib/libpng.so.3.1.2.8 echo $PATH /usr/lib/ccache:/usr/lib/java/jre1.5.0_01/bin:/usr/lib/nx/:/sbin/:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11 _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Gerhard,
I have no idea about your libpng problem. I recommend you to try to re-install the last version properly in your system. Gilles Le Mardi 14 Mars 2006 14:36, Gerhard Kulzer a écrit : > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 13:57, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 12:17 pm, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:51, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:49 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:32, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:29 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:02, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:56 am, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:53 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Gilles, > > > > > > > > > > After svn up to 518455 and make clean I still get the > > > > > > > > > > same error at libdigikam.la compilation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is want mean that the problem have been moved to > > > > > > > > > libdigikam.la linking. Before the problem appears in > > > > > > > > > libdmetaloader.la linking. Right ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gilles > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in digikam/digikam/Makefile.am, if you add this instructions > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > $(LIBJPEG) $(LIB_TIFF) $(LIB_PNG) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .. into libdigikam_la_LIBADD rules (line 51), solves the > > > > > > > > problem ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no Gilles, unfortunately not. Error message is identical to the > > > > > > > previous. > > > > > > > > > > > > after to have fixe Makefile.am, have you cleanup digikam/digikam > > > > > > before to recompile else the result is the same ? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I did that, but to my surprise the problem remains. (I run > > > > > 'make clean' on digikam/digikam and graphics/ level, the make -f > > > > > Makefile.cvs, make > > > > > > > > > > Gerhard > > > > > > > > Please give me a complete backtrace of compilation after a make > > > > distclean > > > > > > > > Gilles > > > > > > Ok, this is it: attachment > > > > Strange. Sound like a broken installation of libpng on your system : > > where is your files : > > > > # locate png.so > > and > > #locate png.h > > > > and what your PATH variable ? > > > > This is the result on Mandriva 2006 : > > > > /usr/include/png.h > > /usr/include/libpng12/png.h > > /usr/lib/libpng.so > > /usr/lib/libpng.so.3 > > /usr/lib/libpng.so.3.1.2.8 > > sorry, I forgot the path: > > echo $PATH > /usr/lib/ccache:/usr/lib/java/jre1.5.0_01/bin:/usr/lib/nx/:/sbin/:/usr/loca >l/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11 > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-devel mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Gilles,
I tried everything, I removed, purged and reinstalled the whole -dev of KDE and libpng. I tried to add $(LIB_PNG) at various places where I thought it could help. No chance! Gives me consistantly the same error. So I'm blocked with the 0.9 and its plugins. You said you had the library path configured with your ldd, maybe that helps? Gerhard On Tuesday 14 March 2006 21:34, Gilles Caulier wrote: > Gerhard, > > I have no idea about your libpng problem. I recommend you to try to > re-install the last version properly in your system. > > Gilles > > Le Mardi 14 Mars 2006 14:36, Gerhard Kulzer a écrit : > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 13:57, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 12:17 pm, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:51, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:49 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:32, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:29 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:02, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:56 am, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 10:53 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Gilles, > > > > > > > > > > > After svn up to 518455 and make clean I still get the > > > > > > > > > > > same error at libdigikam.la compilation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is want mean that the problem have been moved to > > > > > > > > > > libdigikam.la linking. Before the problem appears in > > > > > > > > > > libdmetaloader.la linking. Right ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gilles > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in digikam/digikam/Makefile.am, if you add this > > > > > > > > > instructions > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > $(LIBJPEG) $(LIB_TIFF) $(LIB_PNG) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .. into libdigikam_la_LIBADD rules (line 51), solves the > > > > > > > > > problem ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no Gilles, unfortunately not. Error message is identical to > > > > > > > > the previous. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > after to have fixe Makefile.am, have you cleanup > > > > > > > digikam/digikam before to recompile else the result is the same > > > > > > > ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I did that, but to my surprise the problem remains. (I run > > > > > > 'make clean' on digikam/digikam and graphics/ level, the make -f > > > > > > Makefile.cvs, make > > > > > > > > > > > > Gerhard > > > > > > > > > > Please give me a complete backtrace of compilation after a make > > > > > distclean > > > > > > > > > > Gilles > > > > > > > > Ok, this is it: attachment > > > > > > Strange. Sound like a broken installation of libpng on your system : > > > where is your files : > > > > > > # locate png.so > > > and > > > #locate png.h > > > > > > and what your PATH variable ? > > > > > > This is the result on Mandriva 2006 : > > > > > > /usr/include/png.h > > > /usr/include/libpng12/png.h > > > /usr/lib/libpng.so > > > /usr/lib/libpng.so.3 > > > /usr/lib/libpng.so.3.1.2.8 > > > > sorry, I forgot the path: > > > > echo $PATH > > /usr/lib/ccache:/usr/lib/java/jre1.5.0_01/bin:/usr/lib/nx/:/sbin/:/usr/lo > >ca l/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11 > > _______________________________________________ > > Digikam-devel mailing list > > [hidden email] > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-devel mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
On Thursday 16 March 2006 09:03 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote:
> Gilles, > I tried everything, I removed, purged and reinstalled the whole -dev of KDE > and libpng. I tried to add $(LIB_PNG) at various places where I thought it > could help. No chance! Gives me consistantly the same error. So I'm blocked > with the 0.9 and its plugins. > You said you had the library path configured with your ldd, maybe that > helps? not sure. I have never touch ldd config... All work fine using base system configuration (Mandriva) Have you seen this meassge from your configure : ... checking whether g++ supports -O0... yes checking whether g++ supports -Wl,--no-undefined... yes checking whether g++ supports -Wl,--allow-shlib-undefined... yes not using lib directory suffix <================================ checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /bin/sed checking for egrep... grep -E checking for ld used by gcc... /usr/bin/ld ... I don't have this message here. Have you tried to update the admin folder from extragear repository ? and what give this command : [root@lserv3 gilles]# ldconfig -p | grep png libpng12.so.0 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 libpng12.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpng12.so libpng.so.3 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpng.so.3 libpng.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpng.so libimlib-png.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/libimlib-png.so [root@lserv3 gilles]# Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
On Thursday 16 March 2006 09:39, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> On Thursday 16 March 2006 09:03 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote: > > Gilles, > > I tried everything, I removed, purged and reinstalled the whole -dev of > > KDE and libpng. I tried to add $(LIB_PNG) at various places where I > > thought it could help. No chance! Gives me consistantly the same error. > > So I'm blocked with the 0.9 and its plugins. > > You said you had the library path configured with your ldd, maybe that > > helps? > > not sure. I have never touch ldd config... All work fine using base system > configuration (Mandriva) > > Have you seen this meassge from your configure : > > ... > checking whether g++ supports -O0... yes > checking whether g++ supports -Wl,--no-undefined... yes > checking whether g++ supports -Wl,--allow-shlib-undefined... yes > not using lib directory suffix <================================ > checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /bin/sed > checking for egrep... grep -E > checking for ld used by gcc... /usr/bin/ld > ... > > I don't have this message here. > > Have you tried to update the admin folder from extragear repository ? Yes > > and what give this command : > > [root@lserv3 gilles]# ldconfig -p | grep png > libpng12.so.0 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 > libpng12.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpng12.so > libpng.so.3 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpng.so.3 > libpng.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpng.so > libimlib-png.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/libimlib-png.so > [root@lserv3 gilles]# ldconfig -p | grep png libpng12.so.0 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 libpng12.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpng12.so There is maybe a backwards compatibility problem with Debian, I'll try to find out. Gerhard _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Gerhard Kulzer
Hi Gilles and Aschwin,
I'm still struggling with the png lib. In the png-mng-implementation ML I found a discussion string about how Debian goes about the png implementation. But having analyzed a bit the differences between Debian source and sourceforge.net I don't think it's the Debian implementation. It seems to me (with my restricted understanding of things) that the missing functions are private now: png_read_data png_crc_finish png_get_uint_32 png_reset_crc png_crc_read png_read_transform_info png_write_data They are not exported into the symfile anymore. I don't know when this change happened, but somewhere along 1.2.8 version. Gilles, what version exactly do you have on your Mandriva? I have 1.2.8-rel5 Gerhard On Friday 17 March 2006 15:56, you wrote: > Hi again! > A few minutes later, I found out that the symbols are present in the > static library (/usr/lib/libpng12.a), but many of them are not in the > dynamic library (/usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.8). > > I consider this to be a bug in the debian vesion of libpng and I am > considering to report this to the debian bug tracker. Tonight, I will > try to compile a version of libpng on myself, to check for that. > > Greetings, > > Aschwin > > Gerhard Kulzer schrieb: > > On Friday 17 March 2006 12:21, you wrote: > >>Hi Gerhard, > >>I read your posts in the digkam devel mailing list regarding your > >>compile problems with recent svn on debian. I have the same problem and > >>I am somewhat lost (which is strange). Did you find the cause of the > >>problem? It seems the libpng in debian is not correct, but it looks > >> good... > >> > >>Strange... > >> > >>Regards > >> > >>Aschwin > >> > >>Aschwin Gopalan > > > > No, unfortunately I didn't find any solution yet and I'm more or less at > > the end of my wits. I changed all Makefiles to link with -lpng -lz -lm > > and with -lpng12 as requested by libpng12-config (but I don't believe the > > -lpng12 is necessary, libpng it probably backwards comptible). > > I also created a link libpng.so.3 -> libpng12.so.0 to no avail. What is > > stange so is the fact that this link is not taken into account by > > ldconfig, ldconfig -p doesn't show it. > > ldconfig -p|grep png > > libpng12.so.0 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 > > libpng12.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpng12.so > > > > ls -la /usr/lib/libpng* > > -rw-r--r-- 1 187938 2005-10-03 20:46 /usr/lib/libpng12.a > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 13 /usr/lib/libpng12.so -> libpng12.so.0 > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 19 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 -> libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 > > -rw-r--r-- 1 148320 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 /usr/lib/libpng.a -> libpng12.a > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 /usr/lib/libpng.so -> libpng12.so > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 /usr/lib/libpng.so.3 -> libpng12.so.0 > > > > You've any further idea? Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
On Monday 20 March 2006 07:20 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote:
> Hi Gilles and Aschwin, > I'm still struggling with the png lib. In the png-mng-implementation ML I > found a discussion string about how Debian goes about the png > implementation. But having analyzed a bit the differences between Debian > source and sourceforge.net I don't think it's the Debian implementation. It > seems to me (with my restricted understanding of things) that the missing > functions are private now: > png_read_data > png_crc_finish > png_get_uint_32 > png_reset_crc > png_crc_read > png_read_transform_info > png_write_data > > They are not exported into the symfile anymore. I don't know when this > change happened, but somewhere along 1.2.8 version. libPNG team are crazy. Are you sure of that. Have you any links about ? > Gilles, what version exactly do you have on your Mandriva? I have > 1.2.8-rel5 > Under Mandriva 2006, i have this package : [root@pc-caulier gilles]# urpmf libpng --name libpng3:libpng3-1.2.8-1mdk.i586.rpm libpng3-devel:libpng3-devel-1.2.8-1mdk.i586.rpm libpng3-static-devel:libpng3-static-devel-1.2.8-1mdk.i586.rpm libpng3:libpng3-1.2.8-1mdk.i586.rpm libpng3-devel:libpng3-devel-1.2.8-1mdk.i586.rpm libpng3-static-devel:libpng3-static-devel-1.2.8-1mdk.i586.rpm [root@pc-caulier gilles]# Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Gerhard Kulzer
ok PngMetaLoader can be normally compiled into debian now. raw Exif/IPTC
profiles extraction is broken temporally. I will use a new method to do it... Gerhard, please checkout svn and let's me hear if you can compile digiKam... Gilles Le Lundi 20 Mars 2006 07:20, Gerhard Kulzer a écrit : > Hi Gilles and Aschwin, > I'm still struggling with the png lib. In the png-mng-implementation ML I > found a discussion string about how Debian goes about the png > implementation. But having analyzed a bit the differences between Debian > source and sourceforge.net I don't think it's the Debian implementation. It > seems to me (with my restricted understanding of things) that the missing > functions are private now: > png_read_data > png_crc_finish > png_get_uint_32 > png_reset_crc > png_crc_read > png_read_transform_info > png_write_data > > They are not exported into the symfile anymore. I don't know when this > change happened, but somewhere along 1.2.8 version. > Gilles, what version exactly do you have on your Mandriva? I have > 1.2.8-rel5 > > Gerhard > > On Friday 17 March 2006 15:56, you wrote: > > Hi again! > > A few minutes later, I found out that the symbols are present in the > > static library (/usr/lib/libpng12.a), but many of them are not in the > > dynamic library (/usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.8). > > > > I consider this to be a bug in the debian vesion of libpng and I am > > considering to report this to the debian bug tracker. Tonight, I will > > try to compile a version of libpng on myself, to check for that. > > > > Greetings, > > > > Aschwin > > > > Gerhard Kulzer schrieb: > > > On Friday 17 March 2006 12:21, you wrote: > > >>Hi Gerhard, > > >>I read your posts in the digkam devel mailing list regarding your > > >>compile problems with recent svn on debian. I have the same problem and > > >>I am somewhat lost (which is strange). Did you find the cause of the > > >>problem? It seems the libpng in debian is not correct, but it looks > > >> good... > > >> > > >>Strange... > > >> > > >>Regards > > >> > > >>Aschwin > > >> > > >>Aschwin Gopalan > > > > > > No, unfortunately I didn't find any solution yet and I'm more or less > > > at the end of my wits. I changed all Makefiles to link with -lpng -lz > > > -lm and with -lpng12 as requested by libpng12-config (but I don't > > > believe the -lpng12 is necessary, libpng it probably backwards > > > comptible). I also created a link libpng.so.3 -> libpng12.so.0 to no > > > avail. What is stange so is the fact that this link is not taken into > > > account by ldconfig, ldconfig -p doesn't show it. > > > ldconfig -p|grep png > > > libpng12.so.0 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 > > > libpng12.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpng12.so > > > > > > ls -la /usr/lib/libpng* > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 187938 2005-10-03 20:46 /usr/lib/libpng12.a > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 13 /usr/lib/libpng12.so -> libpng12.so.0 > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 19 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 -> libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 148320 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 /usr/lib/libpng.a -> libpng12.a > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 /usr/lib/libpng.so -> libpng12.so > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 /usr/lib/libpng.so.3 -> libpng12.so.0 > > > > > > You've any further idea? Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Gerhard Kulzer
On Monday 20 March 2006 07:20 am, Gerhard Kulzer wrote:
> Hi Gilles and Aschwin, > I'm still struggling with the png lib. In the png-mng-implementation ML I > found a discussion string about how Debian goes about the png > implementation. But having analyzed a bit the differences between Debian > source and sourceforge.net I don't think it's the Debian implementation. It > seems to me (with my restricted understanding of things) that the missing > functions are private now: > png_read_data > png_crc_finish > png_get_uint_32 > png_reset_crc > png_crc_read > png_read_transform_info > png_write_data > > They are not exported into the symfile anymore. I don't know when this > change happened, but somewhere along 1.2.8 version. > Gilles, what version exactly do you have on your Mandriva? I have > 1.2.8-rel5 > > Gerhard Gerhard, All private PNG depencies from PNGMetaLoader have been removed from svn. The implmentation have been fixed (I use KFileMetaInfo to grep all embedded text insided PNG file). Raw EXIF/IPTC profiles (from ImageMagick) extraction have been restaured (you can see EXIF and IPTC metadata from PNG file into metadata viewer). Please checkout svn trunk and give me a feedback... Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |