------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126149 Summary: Camera stores both jpeg and raw (nef), handle both as one Product: digikam Version: 0.8.0 Platform: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: digikam-devel kde org ReportedBy: roger.larsson norran net Version: 0.8.0 (using KDE 3.4.2 Level "b" , SUSE 10.0) Compiler: Target: i586-suse-linux OS: Linux (i686) release 2.6.13-15.8-default My camera can be configured to store both jpeg and raw (nef) at the same time. Like this rln_0220.jpg rln_0220.nef So for every picture I have both an JPEG and a raw. (The raw does not show properly but that is another issue) Anyway my wish is to be able to configure digikam to view only the jpeg, but let some operations work on both. (NEF should be viewed as a negative and jpg as the processed image.) _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
---- Roger Larsson <[hidden email]> escribió: > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. > > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126149 > Summary: Camera stores both jpeg and raw (nef), handle both as > one > Product: digikam > Version: 0.8.0 > Platform: unspecified > OS/Version: Linux > Status: NEW > Severity: wishlist > Priority: NOR > Component: general > AssignedTo: digikam-devel kde org > ReportedBy: roger.larsson norran net > > > Version: 0.8.0 (using KDE 3.4.2 Level "b" , SUSE 10.0) > Compiler: Target: i586-suse-linux > OS: Linux (i686) release 2.6.13-15.8-default > > My camera can be configured to store both > jpeg and raw (nef) at the same time. Like this > rln_0220.jpg > rln_0220.nef > > So for every picture I have both an JPEG > and a raw. (The raw does not show properly > but that is another issue) > > Anyway my wish is to be able to configure > digikam to view only the jpeg, but let some > operations work on both. > (NEF should be viewed as a negative and jpg as > the processed image.) > _______________________________________________ - The jpeg file is a low resolution/low quality pictrue. On the other hand, this file has suffered some adjusts that the camera makes on all the images that have been captured in other formats that are not RAW one. Moreover this file is a 8-bits image. - The RAW file is the image as is capured by the camera sensor, this is, without any type of transform or adjust. This file is a 16-bits picture (well, really, it has 12-bits per pixel). - In short, we have two differents files: one of them is a low quality and transformed image (jpeg) and the other one is a high quality and without any adjust picture (nef), this is, the file contents the raw data of the subject as is caputred by the camera sensor, so, the changes you make to one of them don't produce the same results on the other. PS: excuse my poor english. Paco Cruz. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from roger.larsson@norran.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126149 ------- Additional Comments From fj.cruz supercable es 2006-04-24 11:48 ------- ---- Roger Larsson <roger.larsson norran net> escribió: [bugs.kde.org quoted mail] I don't know wich model your camera is , but thinking it works in the same way that Nikon D50 does, I think that you said, maybe make no sense. These are my reasons: - The jpeg file is a low resolution/low quality pictrue. On the other hand, this file has suffered some adjusts that the camera makes on all the images that have been captured in other formats that are not RAW one. Moreover this file is a 8-bits image. - The RAW file is the image as is capured by the camera sensor, this is, without any type of transform or adjust. This file is a 16-bits picture (well, really, it has 12-bits per pixel). - In short, we have two differents files: one of them is a low quality and transformed image (jpeg) and the other one is a high quality and without any adjust picture (nef), this is, the file contents the raw data of the subject as is caputred by the camera sensor, so, the changes you make to one of them don't produce the same results on the other. PS: excuse my poor english. Paco Cruz. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from roger.larsson@norran.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126149 ------- Additional Comments From roger.larsson norran net 2006-04-24 13:53 ------- I was not specific enough. You never modify the image data contents of the NEF! But tags and possibly even EXIF information. I do not like to have to select twice as many files before each tag assign. Nor do I like to have to enter the same note twice. The same for rename, move, delete, and possibly even copy. Maybe a toggle in the toolbar to select if RAW+JPEG should be viewed as "one". Any image modifications of the JPEG can be viewed as a fresh processing from the raw (NEF). (Convert to black and white can probably some time in the future use the raw as source.) _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from roger.larsson@norran.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126149 ------- Additional Comments From glaurent telegraph-road org 2006-04-24 14:28 ------- I think the user is asking for something like Photoshop Element's "image stacks", in which you can put several similar images together (like different shoots of a same object, or different attemps at retouching it, or indeed, a raw image and its jpeg version). See here for a more thorough description : http://oceania.digitalmedianet.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=29049 (I'd find such a feature very useful too) _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from roger.larsson@norran.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126149 ------- Additional Comments From bluedrago web de 2006-04-24 17:16 ------- This feature could be really useful in this way: If you want to edit it, the raw is always opened and settings changed so it looks the same as the jpeg. With "looks the same" I mean in applied color curve, gamma etc. Not pixel-wise, as the interpolation done by the pc is better, but all other settings like white balance, curve, profile etc. should be read out of the raw file, if possible, so we can produce images that look like on the preview of the tft on your camera. Then, if you want to edit it again, it opens the raw file with the settings you (or the camera) used for the jpeg.. If this would work, it would be really great. Unfortunately, at least nikon's *.nef format isn't fully known yet, and how to read all options from it correctly. There is at least no opensource program doing it that the raw converted picture looks like raw converted with nikon's software, or the jpeg the camera would produce... If we(or rather the people coding, as I'm too stupid) would come to that point, it would be very useful to stack pictures, and save each jpegs/pngs/etc. settings and then reopen the raw with that settings to further edit it, without loosing quality. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from roger.larsson@norran.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126149 ------- Additional Comments From roger.larsson norran net 2006-04-24 21:20 ------- Re: Nikon EXIF format: EXIF.py from http://home.cfl.rr.com/genecash/digital_camera.html Works quite well. I do have an patch that adds - EXIF 2.2 tags - no crash on NEF files (uninitialized variable) - AFFocusPosition (D200 11 points + 7 points) I have also recognized a tag that I think is a the look up table (LUT, curve) Problem is that the author of EXIF.py does not read mail now due to spam... _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from roger.larsson@norran.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126149 ------- Additional Comments From roger.larsson norran net 2006-04-26 12:33 ------- Some additional comments. One problem is probably the fact that NEFs from Nikon are identified as TIFF files, i.e. images in their own right... Found another even better EXIF reader (made in Perl) http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/ This tool reports the MIME type as MIME Type : image/x-raw Modifying the association helps gwenview a lot. And could also help digikam. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from roger.larsson@norran.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126149 ------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles free fr 2006-04-26 19:08 ------- In digiKam implementation from svn trunk branch, i have fixed this RAW mime type problem. All work fine now. About metadata, We using Exiv2 library now, not libexif. Using current Exiv2 implementation (not the last 0.9.1 release), a new TIFF/EP file parser can handle EXIF/MARKERNOTE/IPTC from TIFF, DNG, CRW, CR2, NEF, PAF, etc. RAW file formats based on TIFF/EP. The parser need to be improved, but the results are impressive. http://www.digikam.org/?q=node/81 Gilles Caulier _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from roger.larsson@norran.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126149 caulier.gilles free fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|general |Albums GUI _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from roger.larsson@norran.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126149 arnd.baecker web de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rene colorcube de ------- Additional Comments From arnd.baecker web de 2007-07-15 10:53 ------- *** Bug 147886 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from roger.larsson@norran.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126149 mikmach wp pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cnamster gmail com ------- Additional Comments From mikmach wp pl 2007-07-16 22:05 ------- *** Bug 147933 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from roger.larsson@norran.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126149 ------- Additional Comments From david dlevitan com 2007-09-08 20:33 ------- Would it be possible to at least have the option to enable this kind of logic: If there are two files called something.jpg and something.raw (where something is a name and raw is a raw extension), do one of: - Show only raw - Show only JPEG - Show both depending on an option selection. I don't even really care if the JPEGs don't get displayed or tagged or whatnot. I mostly save them because they take up very little space and are good for previews on computers that don't have a fast RAW viewer (like digikam) installed. I never use the JPEGs for actual prints (I always convert the RAW into JPEG for that purpose). But this options would really, really help me (and probably a lot of others who have the same problem). _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |