A beautyull program but so hard to find info. In one place there is
outdated info, another place there is an empty Digikam.pdf, another place ther is a downloadable document promised and than it turns out you have to make a flickr account (why should I want to do that) another document I have to pay for but whats worse I need to buy an e-reader for it. This is really frustrating, even more so because I'm not so much online. I love Digikam so much that I still keep trying, but I really think most people turn eventualy there backs to Digikam because of this. Is ther anybody who can change this situation? Is there anybody out there anyway? _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
on Monday 21 March 2011, sleepless wrote:
> A beautyull program but so hard to find info. In one place there is > outdated info, another place there is an empty Digikam.pdf, another > place ther is a downloadable document promised and than it turns out you > have to make a flickr account (why should I want to do that) another > document I have to pay for but whats worse I need to buy an e-reader for > it. This is really frustrating, even more so because I'm not so much > online. I love Digikam so much that I still keep trying, but I really > think most people turn eventualy there backs to Digikam because of this. > Is ther anybody who can change this situation? Is there anybody out > there anyway? > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Enough of us out here.... But.. Till now I got 7 messages from 'sleepless', from Friday and today. Friday, there was 1 with a question, which was incomprehensible (for me at least), the others are information only, so no answer required. Today you fired of 4 in less than 1h30, ending with a rant.... You might want to make sure your questions are clear and give people time to answer before complaining. In addition, your questions concern topics in Digikam 2.0.0.4, which is a _beta_ version. And beta versions are normally not ment for and not suited for production use, as there are likely to be bugs and documentation isn't necessarily available. In simple terms: use a beta at your own risk. As for the rant about open source in your latest post, how much did you pay for your copy of Digikam? The developers receive nothing for their work, and still manage to deliver a good product. Another option: work on what you want changed (preferably in collaboration with the developers...). Fyi: - the e-book you have to pay for isn't a manual for Digikam, but a collection of tips and tricks, which are in part available on the author's blog. - I don't know about console scripting in 2.0beta, but 1.9 has a batch queue manager that allows most of the common operations on a group of images, in a user defined order and with user-defined parameters. Remco _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Thanks a lot for investing so much time in me. I checked my send Items
but could not figure out to wich "incomprehensible question you reffered to". Your remarks on the beta version of Digikam makes perfectly sense to me, but I am not complaining (at least not in the sense of blaming anybody) I try to make a point not for me but for the project Digikam, I have one, don't I. I just hope someone picks it up. Just turning back to our lightrooms etc and not making clear where the problems are is not very helpfull. It's not clear to me what your remark on developers receiving nothing for there effort have to do with me. I already expressed my admiration and thankfullness for the people behind this project publicly and try to be as helpfull ass possible for others (succeeded in that one already) and to find some help for myself (not so succesfull till now) Kind regards Rinus Op 21-3-2011 12:41, Remco Viëtor schreef: > on Monday 21 March 2011, sleepless wrote: >> A beautyull program but so hard to find info. In one place there is >> outdated info, another place there is an empty Digikam.pdf, another >> place ther is a downloadable document promised and than it turns out you >> have to make a flickr account (why should I want to do that) another >> document I have to pay for but whats worse I need to buy an e-reader for >> it. This is really frustrating, even more so because I'm not so much >> online. I love Digikam so much that I still keep trying, but I really >> think most people turn eventualy there backs to Digikam because of this. >> Is ther anybody who can change this situation? Is there anybody out >> there anyway? >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > Enough of us out here.... > But.. > > Till now I got 7 messages from 'sleepless', from Friday and today. > Friday, there was 1 with a question, which was incomprehensible (for me at > least), the others are information only, so no answer required. > > Today you fired of 4 in less than 1h30, ending with a rant.... You might want > to make sure your questions are clear and give people time to answer before > complaining. > > In addition, your questions concern topics in Digikam 2.0.0.4, which is a > _beta_ version. > And beta versions are normally not ment for and not suited for production use, > as there are likely to be bugs and documentation isn't necessarily available. > In simple terms: use a beta at your own risk. > > As for the rant about open source in your latest post, how much did you pay > for your copy of Digikam? The developers receive nothing for their work, and > still manage to deliver a good product. Another option: work on what you want > changed (preferably in collaboration with the developers...). > > Fyi: > - the e-book you have to pay for isn't a manual for Digikam, but a collection > of tips and tricks, which are in part available on the author's blog. > - I don't know about console scripting in 2.0beta, but 1.9 has a batch queue > manager that allows most of the common operations on a group of images, in a > user defined order and with user-defined parameters. > > Remco > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > ----- > Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht. > Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com > Versie: 10.0.1204 / Virusdatabase: 1498/3519 - datum van uitgifte: 03/20/11 > > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
I believe You should be more specific where is outdated information
and where is empty pdf file. As to note do digikam team, http://docs.kde.org/development/en/extragear-graphics/digikam/digikam.pdf is indeed missing To rinus, it should same thing as in http://docs.kde.org/development/en/extragear-graphics/digikam/index.html , just in pdf format. Gert On 21 March 2011 15:43, sleepless <[hidden email]> wrote: > Thanks a lot for investing so much time in me. I checked my send Items > but could not figure out to wich "incomprehensible question you reffered > to". Your remarks on the beta version of Digikam makes perfectly sense _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
2011/3/22 Gert Kello <[hidden email]>:
> I believe You should be more specific where is outdated information > and where is empty pdf file. > > As to note do digikam team, > http://docs.kde.org/development/en/extragear-graphics/digikam/digikam.pdf > is indeed missing PDF file is computed automatically by KDE server. Sound like script is broken. KDE system admin must contacted to solve this problem... Gilles Caulier _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from gert.kello@gmail.com
The html is online which is very inconveniant to me. Thanks for your respons anyway. Rinus Op 22-3-2011 7:51, Gert Kello schreef: > I believe You should be more specific where is outdated information > and where is empty pdf file. > > As to note do digikam team, > http://docs.kde.org/development/en/extragear-graphics/digikam/digikam.pdf > is indeed missing > To rinus, it should same thing as in > http://docs.kde.org/development/en/extragear-graphics/digikam/index.html > , just in pdf format. > > Gert > > > On 21 March 2011 15:43, sleepless<[hidden email]> wrote: >> Thanks a lot for investing so much time in me. I checked my send Items >> but could not figure out to wich "incomprehensible question you reffered >> to". Your remarks on the beta version of Digikam makes perfectly sense > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > ----- > Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht. > Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com > Versie: 10.0.1204 / Virusdatabase: 1498/3520 - datum van uitgifte: 03/21/11 > > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
> The html is online which is very inconveniant to me.
There are some tools to make a copy of online web pages... Like http://www.httrack.com/ Gert _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Very helpfull, thank you Gert,
Rinus Op 22-3-2011 10:00, Gert Kello schreef: >> vThe html is online which is very inconveniant to me. > There are some tools to make a copy of online web pages... Like > http://www.httrack.com/ > > Gert > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > ----- > Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht. > Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com > Versie: 10.0.1204 / Virusdatabase: 1498/3521 - datum van uitgifte: 03/21/11 > > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Rinus
By another document,do you mean 'digiKamTricks.epub'? I have purchased that as 50% amount goes to digikam developers and all the future versions of it will be without additional cost. You need not purchase ebook reader to read it. "Calibre'' a cross platform free software is recommended to read it on PCs. Moreover ,as already mentioned; these are only 'tips & tricks'--especilly for those who don't want to go through complete help file which is much compressive compared to this ebook.
Jagdeesh Deshpande.
Registered Linux user #492893 |
Thank you! If I manage to overcome the difficulties I came about using
digikam and I stick to it, as I realy intent to, and the book is readable using a pc as you told me, I will definitly buy the book and even donate! Rinus Op 22-3-2011 11:26, jag59 schreef: > sleepless wrote: >> another document I have to pay for but whats worse I need to buy an >> e-reader for >> it. This is really frustrating, >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > By another document,do you mean 'digiKamTricks.epub'? > I have purchased that as 50% amount goes to digikam developers and all the > future versions of it will be without additional cost. You need not purchase > ebook reader to read it. "Calibre'' a cross platform free software is > recommended to read it on PCs. Moreover ,as already mentioned; these are > only 'tips& tricks'--especilly for those who don't want to go through > complete help file which is much compressive compared to this ebook. > > > ----- > Jagdeesh Deshpande. > Registered Linux user #492893 > > -- > View this message in context: http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/Digikam-Tutorial-hard-to-find-tp3393248p3395982.html > Sent from the digikam-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > ----- > Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht. > Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com > Versie: 10.0.1204 / Virusdatabase: 1498/3521 - datum van uitgifte: 03/21/11 > > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
@sleepless
pl read as 'comprehensive' instead of 'compressive' in my post. You can read .epub files with 'okular'-the default document viewer of KDE 4.x,it will fetch only a few dependencies as already you have installed digikam in gnome. But 'calibre' has more to offer and is a very nice experience indeed! Regards. On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:24 PM, sleepless [via digiKam] <[hidden email]> wrote: Thank you! If I manage to overcome the difficulties I came about using -- J.L.Deshpande Registered Linux user #492893 Help yourselves by using Linux. See details at http://www.whylinuxisbetter.net/
Jagdeesh Deshpande.
Registered Linux user #492893 |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |