Digikam 2.0 runs only once before corrupting the DB
Locked
123
123
 
|
Unless I have not seen it, I don't think there has been an answer to
my previous post. As it was impossible to run Digikam 2.0 I had to downgrade to 1.9; I would like very much to run 2.0 but is was impossible as it corrupteded the DB each time. In case it could cause problem, just prior to upgrade Digikam, I had upgraded from Fedora 14 to 15, then switched from Gnome to XFCE. Thanks for helping, Marie-Noëlle 2011/8/15 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>: > Is this the same as > http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/2011-June/052100.html > The traces are similar but I don't know how to solve this problem. > > Any idea? > Thnaks, > Marie-Noëlle > > 2011/8/14 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>: > >> But the big problem is Digikam itself, that I can launch just one >> time; at the second launch, I get the following error message: >> "Failed to update the database schema from version 5 to version 6. >> Please read the error messages printed on the console ..." >> >> I've restored the database from a backup, and restarted Digikam again. >> And again it works at first launch, and I get the error at the 2nd and >> subsequent launches. >> >> "Information sur les composants" is: >> digiKam version 2.0.0 >> Dématriçage parallélisé: Oui >> Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier JP2: Oui >> Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier JPEG: Oui >> Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier PGF: Oui >> Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier PNG: Oui >> Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier TIFF: Oui >> Exiv2 prend en charge les métadonnées XMP: Oui >> LibCImg: 130 >> LibClapack: internal library >> LibExiv2: 0.21.1 >> LibJPEG: 62 >> LibJasper: 1.900.1 >> LibKDE: 4.7.00 (4.7.0) >> LibKExiv2: 2.0.0 >> LibKGeoMap: 2.0.0 >> LibKdcraw: 2.0.0 >> LibLCMS: 119 >> LibPGF: 6.11.24 - internal library >> LibPNG: 1.2.46 >> LibQt: 4.7.3 >> LibRaw: 0.13.5 >> LibTIFF: LIBTIFF, Version 3.9.5 Copyright (c) 1988-1996 Sam Leffler >> Copyright (c) 1991-1996 Silicon Graphics, Inc. >> Marble Widget: 0.11.95 (0.12 RC 2) >> LibGphoto2: 2.4.10.1 >> LibKface: 2.0.0 >> LibKipi: 1.2.0 >> LibOpenCV: 2.2.0 >> Libface: 0.2 >> Moteur de base de données: QSQLITE >> >> >> And if launched from a console, I get this trace: >> libdc1394 error: Failed to initialize libdc1394 >> digikam(30805)/digikam (core) Digikam::AlbumManager::setDatabase: >> DatabaseParameters: [ Type "QSQLITE", Name >> "/home/marie-noelle/Digikam/digikam4.db" (Thumbnails Name >> "/home/marie-noelle/Digikam/thumbnails-digikam.db"); ] >> QSqlDatabasePrivate::removeDatabase: connection 'ConnectionTest' is >> still in use, all queries will cease to work. >> digikam(30805)/digikam (core) >> Digikam::DatabaseConfigElementLoader::readConfig: Loading SQL code >> from config file "/usr/share/kde4/apps/digikam/database/dbconfig.xml" >> digikam(30805)/digikam (core) >> Digikam::DatabaseConfigElementLoader::readConfig: false "1" 1 1 >> digikam(30805)/digikam (core) Digikam::SchemaUpdater::update: >> SchemaUpdater update >> digikam(30805)/digikam (core) Digikam::SchemaUpdater::startUpdates: >> Have a database structure version 5 >> digikam(30805)/digikam (core) Digikam::SchemaUpdater::makeUpdates: >> makeUpdates 5 to 6 >> digikam(30805)/digikam (core) >> Digikam::DatabaseCoreBackendPrivate::debugOutputFailedQuery: Failure >> executing query: >> "" >> Error messages: "Unable to execute statement" "table ImageHistory >> already exists" 1 2 >> Bound values: () >> digikam(30805)/digikam (core) >> Digikam::DatabaseCoreBackend::execDBAction: Error while executing >> DBAction [ "UpdateSchemaFromV5ToV6" ] Statement [ "CREATE TABLE >> ImageHistory >> (imageid INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, >> uuid TEXT, >> history TEXT);" ] >> digikam(30805)/digikam (core): Schema update to V6 failed! >> > > > > > > -- > Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe > > Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles > > Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale > -- Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
How about moving to Ubuntu?
Rinus Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>schreef: >Unless I have not seen it, I don't think there has been an answer to >my previous post. > >As it was impossible to run Digikam 2.0 I had to downgrade to 1.9; I >would like very much to run 2.0 but is was impossible as it >corrupteded the DB each time. >In case it could cause problem, just prior to upgrade Digikam, I had >upgraded from Fedora 14 to 15, then switched from Gnome to XFCE. > >Thanks for helping, >Marie-Noëlle > > >2011/8/15 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>: >> Is this the same as >> http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/2011-June/052100.html >> The traces are similar but I don't know how to solve this problem. >> >> Any idea? >> Thnaks, >> Marie-Noëlle >> >> 2011/8/14 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>: >> >>> But the big problem is Digikam itself, that I can launch just one >>> time; at the second launch, I get the following error message: >>> "Failed to update the database schema from version 5 to version 6. >>> Please read the error messages printed on the console ..." >>> >>> I've restored the database from a backup, and restarted Digikam again. >>> And again it works at first launch, and I get the error at the 2nd and >>> subsequent launches. >>> >>> "Information sur les composants" is: >>> digiKam version 2.0.0 >>> Dématriçage parallélisé: Oui >>> Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier JP2: Oui >>> Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier JPEG: Oui >>> Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier PGF: Oui >>> Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier PNG: Oui >>> Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier TIFF: Oui >>> Exiv2 prend en charge les métadonnées XMP: Oui >>> LibCImg: 130 >>> LibClapack: internal library >>> LibExiv2: 0.21.1 >>> LibJPEG: 62 >>> LibJasper: 1.900.1 >>> LibKDE: 4.7.00 (4.7.0) >>> LibKExiv2: 2.0.0 >>> LibKGeoMap: 2.0.0 >>> LibKdcraw: 2.0.0 >>> LibLCMS: 119 >>> LibPGF: 6.11.24 - internal library >>> LibPNG: 1.2.46 >>> LibQt: 4.7.3 >>> LibRaw: 0.13.5 >>> LibTIFF: LIBTIFF, Version 3.9.5 Copyright (c) 1988-1996 Sam Leffler >>> Copyright (c) 1991-1996 Silicon Graphics, Inc. >>> Marble Widget: 0.11.95 (0.12 RC 2) >>> LibGphoto2: 2.4.10.1 >>> LibKface: 2.0.0 >>> LibKipi: 1.2.0 >>> LibOpenCV: 2.2.0 >>> Libface: 0.2 >>> Moteur de base de données: QSQLITE >>> >>> >>> And if launched from a console, I get this trace: >>> libdc1394 error: Failed to initialize libdc1394 >>> digikam(30805)/digikam (core) Digikam::AlbumManager::setDatabase: >>> DatabaseParameters: [ Type "QSQLITE", Name >>> "/home/marie-noelle/Digikam/digikam4.db" (Thumbnails Name >>> "/home/marie-noelle/Digikam/thumbnails-digikam.db"); ] >>> QSqlDatabasePrivate::removeDatabase: connection 'ConnectionTest' is >>> still in use, all queries will cease to work. >>> digikam(30805)/digikam (core) >>> Digikam::DatabaseConfigElementLoader::readConfig: Loading SQL code >>> from config file "/usr/share/kde4/apps/digikam/database/dbconfig.xml" >>> digikam(30805)/digikam (core) >>> Digikam::DatabaseConfigElementLoader::readConfig: false "1" 1 1 >>> digikam(30805)/digikam (core) Digikam::SchemaUpdater::update: >>> SchemaUpdater update >>> digikam(30805)/digikam (core) Digikam::SchemaUpdater::startUpdates: >>> Have a database structure version 5 >>> digikam(30805)/digikam (core) Digikam::SchemaUpdater::makeUpdates: >>> makeUpdates 5 to 6 >>> digikam(30805)/digikam (core) >>> Digikam::DatabaseCoreBackendPrivate::debugOutputFailedQuery: Failure >>> executing query: >>> "" >>> Error messages: "Unable to execute statement" "table ImageHistory >>> already exists" 1 2 >>> Bound values: () >>> digikam(30805)/digikam (core) >>> Digikam::DatabaseCoreBackend::execDBAction: Error while executing >>> DBAction [ "UpdateSchemaFromV5ToV6" ] Statement [ "CREATE TABLE >>> ImageHistory >>> (imageid INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, >>> uuid TEXT, >>> history TEXT);" ] >>> digikam(30805)/digikam (core): Schema update to V6 failed! >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe >> >> Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles >> >> Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale >> > > > >-- >Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe > >Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles > >Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale >_______________________________________________ >Digikam-users mailing list >[hidden email] >https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
No thanks.
I've left Ubuntu for Fedora and have not once regretted my choice. Marie-Noëlle 2011/8/20 Rinus <[hidden email]>: > How about moving to Ubuntu? > Rinus > -- Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Op 20-08-11 14:29, Marie-Noëlle Augendre schreef: > No thanks. > I've left Ubuntu for Fedora and have not once regretted my choice. > Marie-Noëlle Except for now dk 2.0 won´t run. But I don´t doubt you have good reasons for your point of view, for me it was the other way around, after experimenting with a couple of other distro´s I made a soft landing on Ubuntu, it let me do anything I want, I am very close at the point of slamming the door in windows face, which is my ultimate goal and would give so much joy after all the misery it brought into my life. I hope you will solve your problem soon. Rinus > 2011/8/20 Rinus<[hidden email]>: >> How about moving to Ubuntu? >> Rinus >> > > > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Digikam has run without a problem with Fedora up to now. In fact, I
even choosed Fedora because the new versions of Digikam were available in the official repositories much more quickly than with Ubuntu; the same for other programs, too. As for now, I have upgraded to Fedora 15, changed Gnome to XFCE and upgraded to Digikam 2.0 in a couple of days. Even if there are some glitches that need attention, that cannot justify leaving Fedora; I use Digikam a lot, but it is only one program among many others that I use regularly too. As for solving the problem, there is an error message at the beginning of the trace, that has no meaning for me: libdc1394 error: Failed to initialize libdc1394 Maybe a developer can explain what it means, and in which direction I should look for. Marie-Noëlle 2011/8/20 sleepless <[hidden email]>: > Except for now dk 2.0 won´t run. But I don´t doubt you have good reasons for > your point of view, for me it was the other way around, after experimenting > with a couple of other distro´s I made a soft landing on Ubuntu, it let me > do anything I want, I am very close at the point of slamming the door in > windows face, which is my ultimate goal and would give so much joy after all > the misery it brought into my life. > I hope you will solve your problem soon. > Rinus -- Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: Digikam 2.0 runs only once before corrupting the DB
|
|
2011/8/20 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>:
> Digikam has run without a problem with Fedora up to now. In fact, I > even choosed Fedora because the new versions of Digikam were available > in the official repositories much more quickly than with Ubuntu; the > same for other programs, too. > > As for now, I have upgraded to Fedora 15, changed Gnome to XFCE and > upgraded to Digikam 2.0 in a couple of days. > Even if there are some glitches that need attention, that cannot > justify leaving Fedora; I use Digikam a lot, but it is only one > program among many others that I use regularly too. > > As for solving the problem, there is an error message at the beginning > of the trace, that has no meaning for me: > libdc1394 error: Failed to initialize libdc1394 > Maybe a developer can explain what it means, and in which direction I > should look for. Do you have libdc1394 installed? I have it in openSUSE 11.4 and that's a dependencie for digiKam. Maybe problems with packaging in your repos. /Anders > > Marie-Noëlle > > 2011/8/20 sleepless <[hidden email]>: > >> Except for now dk 2.0 won´t run. But I don´t doubt you have good reasons for >> your point of view, for me it was the other way around, after experimenting >> with a couple of other distro´s I made a soft landing on Ubuntu, it let me >> do anything I want, I am very close at the point of slamming the door in >> windows face, which is my ultimate goal and would give so much joy after all >> the misery it brought into my life. >> I hope you will solve your problem soon. >> Rinus > > -- > Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe > > Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles > > Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by tosca
Op 20-08-11 19:04, Marie-Noëlle Augendre schreef:
> Digikam has run without a problem with Fedora up to now. In fact, I > even choosed Fedora because the new versions of Digikam were available > in the official repositories much more quickly than with Ubuntu; the > same for other programs, too. > > As for now, I have upgraded to Fedora 15, changed Gnome to XFCE and > upgraded to Digikam 2.0 in a couple of days. > Even if there are some glitches that need attention, that cannot > justify leaving Fedora; I use Digikam a lot, but it is only one > program among many others that I use regularly too. > > As for solving the problem, there is an error message at the beginning > of the trace, that has no meaning for me: > libdc1394 error: Failed to initialize libdc1394 > Maybe a developer can explain what it means, and in which direction I > should look for. > Wil this do any good?: http://sourceforge.net/projects/libdc1394/ > Marie-Noëlle > > 2011/8/20 sleepless<[hidden email]>: > >> Except for now dk 2.0 won´t run. But I don´t doubt you have good reasons for >> your point of view, for me it was the other way around, after experimenting >> with a couple of other distro´s I made a soft landing on Ubuntu, it let me >> do anything I want, I am very close at the point of slamming the door in >> windows face, which is my ultimate goal and would give so much joy after all >> the misery it brought into my life. >> I hope you will solve your problem soon. >> Rinus _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Anders Stedtlund
Op 20-08-11 19:17, Anders Stedtlund schreef:
> 2011/8/20 Marie-Noëlle Augendre<[hidden email]>: >> Digikam has run without a problem with Fedora up to now. In fact, I >> even choosed Fedora because the new versions of Digikam were available >> in the official repositories much more quickly than with Ubuntu; the >> same for other programs, too. >> >> As for now, I have upgraded to Fedora 15, changed Gnome to XFCE and >> upgraded to Digikam 2.0 in a couple of days. >> Even if there are some glitches that need attention, that cannot >> justify leaving Fedora; I use Digikam a lot, but it is only one >> program among many others that I use regularly too. >> >> As for solving the problem, there is an error message at the beginning >> of the trace, that has no meaning for me: >> libdc1394 error: Failed to initialize libdc1394 >> Maybe a developer can explain what it means, and in which direction I >> should look for. > Do you have libdc1394 installed? > > I have it in openSUSE 11.4 and that's a dependencie for digiKam. > > Maybe problems with packaging in your repos. > > /Anders Itś in my system too: synaptec shows this info libdc1394-22 high level programming interface for IEEE1394 digital camera installed Rinus > > >> Marie-Noëlle >> >> 2011/8/20 sleepless<[hidden email]>: >> >>> Except for now dk 2.0 won´t run. But I don´t doubt you have good reasons for >>> your point of view, for me it was the other way around, after experimenting >>> with a couple of other distro´s I made a soft landing on Ubuntu, it let me >>> do anything I want, I am very close at the point of slamming the door in >>> windows face, which is my ultimate goal and would give so much joy after all >>> the misery it brought into my life. >>> I hope you will solve your problem soon. >>> Rinus >> -- >> Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe >> >> Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles >> >> Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Rinus
Hi Marie-Noëlle,
I had a look at your trace. Itś for me hard to believe that the missing firewirelib has to do with your problem. For what it´s worth a few thoughts: Has fedora an equivalent to ubuntu´s ¨sudo¨. Than I should try from console ¨sudo digikam¨, maybe there is no access to some file. or I would reinstall and take care that the dbconfig.xml is removed before, maybe that one give´s wrong version info. or I would update libkipi, you have 1.2, I think that´s an old one, although it looks less relevant to me than the forementioned tips Digikam::DatabaseConfigElementLoader::readConfig: Loading SQL code >>> from config file "/usr/share/kde4/apps/digikam/database/dbconfig.xml" Rinus Op 20-08-11 19:21, sleepless schreef: > Op 20-08-11 19:04, Marie-Noëlle Augendre schreef: >> Digikam has run without a problem with Fedora up to now. In fact, I >> even choosed Fedora because the new versions of Digikam were available >> in the official repositories much more quickly than with Ubuntu; the >> same for other programs, too. >> >> As for now, I have upgraded to Fedora 15, changed Gnome to XFCE and >> upgraded to Digikam 2.0 in a couple of days. >> Even if there are some glitches that need attention, that cannot >> justify leaving Fedora; I use Digikam a lot, but it is only one >> program among many others that I use regularly too. >> >> As for solving the problem, there is an error message at the beginning >> of the trace, that has no meaning for me: >> libdc1394 error: Failed to initialize libdc1394 >> Maybe a developer can explain what it means, and in which direction I >> should look for. >> > That sounds pritty much like missing some stuff related to firewire > Wil this do any good?: http://sourceforge.net/projects/libdc1394/ >> Marie-Noëlle >> >> 2011/8/20 sleepless<[hidden email]>: >> >>> Except for now dk 2.0 won´t run. But I don´t doubt you have good >>> reasons for >>> your point of view, for me it was the other way around, after >>> experimenting >>> with a couple of other distro´s I made a soft landing on Ubuntu, it >>> let me >>> do anything I want, I am very close at the point of slamming the >>> door in >>> windows face, which is my ultimate goal and would give so much joy >>> after all >>> the misery it brought into my life. >>> I hope you will solve your problem soon. >>> Rinus > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
If my forementioned tips refuse to pay off, I would certainly have a
look at this page, sounds very much like your problem: http://ymartin59.free.fr/wordpress/ Rinus Op 20-08-11 19:44, sleepless schreef: > Hi Marie-Noëlle, > > I had a look at your trace. Itś for me hard to believe that the > missing firewirelib has to do with your problem. > > For what it´s worth a few thoughts: > > Has fedora an equivalent to ubuntu´s ¨sudo¨. Than I should try from > console ¨sudo digikam¨, maybe there is no access to some file. > > or I would reinstall and take care that the dbconfig.xml is removed > before, maybe that one give´s wrong version info. > > or I would update libkipi, you have 1.2, I think that´s an old one, > although it looks less relevant to me than the forementioned tips > > Digikam::DatabaseConfigElementLoader::readConfig: Loading SQL code >>>> from config file "/usr/share/kde4/apps/digikam/database/dbconfig.xml" > > > Rinus > > > > > Op 20-08-11 19:21, sleepless schreef: >> Op 20-08-11 19:04, Marie-Noëlle Augendre schreef: >>> Digikam has run without a problem with Fedora up to now. In fact, I >>> even choosed Fedora because the new versions of Digikam were available >>> in the official repositories much more quickly than with Ubuntu; the >>> same for other programs, too. >>> >>> As for now, I have upgraded to Fedora 15, changed Gnome to XFCE and >>> upgraded to Digikam 2.0 in a couple of days. >>> Even if there are some glitches that need attention, that cannot >>> justify leaving Fedora; I use Digikam a lot, but it is only one >>> program among many others that I use regularly too. >>> >>> As for solving the problem, there is an error message at the beginning >>> of the trace, that has no meaning for me: >>> libdc1394 error: Failed to initialize libdc1394 >>> Maybe a developer can explain what it means, and in which direction I >>> should look for. >>> >> That sounds pritty much like missing some stuff related to firewire >> Wil this do any good?: http://sourceforge.net/projects/libdc1394/ >>> Marie-Noëlle >>> >>> 2011/8/20 sleepless<[hidden email]>: >>> >>>> Except for now dk 2.0 won´t run. But I don´t doubt you have good >>>> reasons for >>>> your point of view, for me it was the other way around, after >>>> experimenting >>>> with a couple of other distro´s I made a soft landing on Ubuntu, it >>>> let me >>>> do anything I want, I am very close at the point of slamming the >>>> door in >>>> windows face, which is my ultimate goal and would give so much joy >>>> after all >>>> the misery it brought into my life. >>>> I hope you will solve your problem soon. >>>> Rinus >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Anders Stedtlund
2011/8/20 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:
>> should look for. > > Do you have libdc1394 installed? > > I have it in openSUSE 11.4 and that's a dependencie for digiKam. > > Maybe problems with packaging in your repos. > > /Anders > That's strange: when I do a ldd /usr/bin/digikam I find no libdc-something. Does it mean: - that the library is missing, - or that Digikam doesn't require it? 2011/8/20 sleepless <[hidden email]>: > That sounds pritty much like missing some stuff related to firewire > Wil this do any good?: http://sourceforge.net/projects/libdc1394/ Why do you refer to firewire? I never had to install/download a library; they usually come with ready-made packages, don't they? Marie-Noëlle -- Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Op 20-08-11 19:55, Marie-Noëlle Augendre schreef:
> 2011/8/20 Anders Stedtlund<[hidden email]>: > >>> should look for. >> Do you have libdc1394 installed? >> >> I have it in openSUSE 11.4 and that's a dependencie for digiKam. >> >> Maybe problems with packaging in your repos. >> >> /Anders >> > That's strange: when I do a ldd /usr/bin/digikam I find no > libdc-something. Does it mean: > - that the library is missing, > - or that Digikam doesn't require it? > > 2011/8/20 sleepless<[hidden email]>: > >> That sounds pritty much like missing some stuff related to firewire >> Wil this do any good?: http://sourceforge.net/projects/libdc1394/ > Why do you refer to firewire? that is what 1394 stands for > I never had to install/download a library; they usually come with > ready-made packages, don't they? there is always the possibillity of a bad pakkage or an installation failure. installing it will not do much harm anyway, but it is almost for sure not related to your problem with the db. > Marie-Noëlle > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
2011/8/20 sleepless <[hidden email]>:
>> That's strange: when I do a ldd /usr/bin/digikam I find no >> libdc-something. Does it mean: >> - that the library is missing, >> - or that Digikam doesn't require it? > > it'is missing, your traces show that dk looks for it This specific message might relay another kind of error; see there http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/2011-June/052100.html >> I never had to install/download a library; they usually come with >> ready-made packages, don't they? > > there is always the possibillity of a bad pakkage or an installation > failure. If that's the case, I will have to report a bug to the packagers. But I still don't know for sure if/what something is missing. Here is the whole detail of the upgrade: Ligne de commande : update --enablerepo=kde-unstable digikam Transaction effectuée avec : Installé rpm-4.9.0-9.fc15.x86_64 Installé yum-3.2.29-8.fc15.noarch Mis à jour yum-plugin-auto-update-debug-info-1.1.30-3.fc15.noarch Installé yum-presto-0.6.2-3.fc15.noarch Paquets modifiés : Mis à jour dbusmenu-qt-0.6.3-3.fc15.x86_64 Mise à jour 0.8.2-0.2.fc15.x86_64 Mis à jour digikam-1.9.0-2.fc15.x86_64 Mise à jour 2.0.0-2.fc15.x86_64 Mis à jour digikam-libs-1.9.0-2.fc15.x86_64 Mise à jour 2.0.0-2.fc15.x86_64 Installation déps. herqq-1.0.0-1.fc15.x86_64 Mis à jour kdebase-runtime-4.6.5-1.fc15.x86_64 Mise à jour 4.7.0-3.fc15.x86_64 Mis à jour kdebase-runtime-flags-4.6.5-1.fc15.noarch Mise à jour 4.7.0-3.fc15.noarch Mis à jour kdebase-runtime-libs-4.6.5-1.fc15.x86_64 Mise à jour 4.7.0-3.fc15.x86_64 Mis à jour kdeedu-marble-4.6.5-1.fc15.x86_64 Mise à jour 4.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 Mis à jour kdeedu-marble-libs-4.6.5-1.fc15.x86_64 Mise à jour 4.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 Mis à jour kdegraphics-libs-7:4.6.5-3.fc15.x86_64 Mise à jour 7:4.7.0-1.fc15.noarch Mis à jour kdelibs-6:4.6.5-2.fc15.x86_64 Mise à jour 6:4.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 Mis à jour kdelibs-common-6:4.6.5-2.fc15.x86_64 Mise à jour 6:4.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 Mis à jour kdepimlibs-4.6.5-1.fc15.x86_64 Mise à jour 4.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 Mis à jour kipi-plugins-1.9.0-1.fc15.x86_64 Mise à jour 2.0.0-2.fc15.x86_64 Mis à jour kipi-plugins-libs-1.9.0-1.fc15.x86_64 Mise à jour 2.0.0-2.fc15.x86_64 Installation déps. libkdcraw-4.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 Installation déps. libkexiv2-4.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 Installation déps. libkface-2.0.0-2.fc15.x86_64 Installation déps. libkgeomap-2.0.0-2.fc15.x86_64 Installation déps. libkipi-4.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 Installation déps. libksane-4.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 Installation déps. libqzeitgeist-0.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 Mis à jour oxygen-icon-theme-4.6.5-1.fc15.noarch Mise à jour 4.7.0-1.fc16.noarch Installation déps. qtsoap-2.7-2.fc15.x86_64 Mis à jour raptor-1.4.21-2.fc15.x86_64 Mise à jour 1.4.21-10.fc15.x86_64 Installation déps. raptor2-2.0.4-2.fc15.x86_64 Mis à jour shared-desktop-ontologies-0.6.0-1.fc15.noarch Mise à jour 0.7.1-0.2.fc15.noarch Mis à jour soprano-2.6.0-2.fc15.x86_64 Mise à jour 2.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 Installation déps. yajl-1.0.11-1.fc15.x86_64 history info Marie-Noëlle -- Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Op 20-08-11 21:10, Marie-Noëlle Augendre schreef:
> 2011/8/20 sleepless<[hidden email]>: > >>> That's strange: when I do a ldd /usr/bin/digikam I find no >>> libdc-something. Does it mean: >>> - that the library is missing, >>> - or that Digikam doesn't require it? >> it'is missing, your traces show that dk looks for it > This specific message might relay another kind of error; see there > http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/2011-June/052100.html could be, no idea > >>> I never had to install/download a library; they usually come with >>> ready-made packages, don't they? >> there is always the possibillity of a bad pakkage or an installation >> failure. > If that's the case, I will have to report a bug to the packagers. But > I still don't know for sure if/what something is missing. if I type in synaptec package manager ¨libdc1394¨ I will see if it is installed or not. is there no such thing in fedora? or fedoras equivalent to: sudo apt-get install libdc1394-22 you should see if it´s already installed or else it will be installed. > Here is the whole detail of the upgrade: > > Ligne de commande : update --enablerepo=kde-unstable digikam > Transaction effectuée avec : > Installé rpm-4.9.0-9.fc15.x86_64 > Installé yum-3.2.29-8.fc15.noarch > Mis à jour yum-plugin-auto-update-debug-info-1.1.30-3.fc15.noarch > Installé yum-presto-0.6.2-3.fc15.noarch > Paquets modifiés : > Mis à jour dbusmenu-qt-0.6.3-3.fc15.x86_64 > Mise à jour 0.8.2-0.2.fc15.x86_64 > Mis à jour digikam-1.9.0-2.fc15.x86_64 > Mise à jour 2.0.0-2.fc15.x86_64 > Mis à jour digikam-libs-1.9.0-2.fc15.x86_64 > Mise à jour 2.0.0-2.fc15.x86_64 > Installation déps. herqq-1.0.0-1.fc15.x86_64 > Mis à jour kdebase-runtime-4.6.5-1.fc15.x86_64 > Mise à jour 4.7.0-3.fc15.x86_64 > Mis à jour kdebase-runtime-flags-4.6.5-1.fc15.noarch > Mise à jour 4.7.0-3.fc15.noarch > Mis à jour kdebase-runtime-libs-4.6.5-1.fc15.x86_64 > Mise à jour 4.7.0-3.fc15.x86_64 > Mis à jour kdeedu-marble-4.6.5-1.fc15.x86_64 > Mise à jour 4.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 > Mis à jour kdeedu-marble-libs-4.6.5-1.fc15.x86_64 > Mise à jour 4.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 > Mis à jour kdegraphics-libs-7:4.6.5-3.fc15.x86_64 > Mise à jour 7:4.7.0-1.fc15.noarch > Mis à jour kdelibs-6:4.6.5-2.fc15.x86_64 > Mise à jour 6:4.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 > Mis à jour kdelibs-common-6:4.6.5-2.fc15.x86_64 > Mise à jour 6:4.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 > Mis à jour kdepimlibs-4.6.5-1.fc15.x86_64 > Mise à jour 4.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 > Mis à jour kipi-plugins-1.9.0-1.fc15.x86_64 > Mise à jour 2.0.0-2.fc15.x86_64 > Mis à jour kipi-plugins-libs-1.9.0-1.fc15.x86_64 > Mise à jour 2.0.0-2.fc15.x86_64 > Installation déps. libkdcraw-4.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 > Installation déps. libkexiv2-4.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 > Installation déps. libkface-2.0.0-2.fc15.x86_64 > Installation déps. libkgeomap-2.0.0-2.fc15.x86_64 > Installation déps. libkipi-4.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 > Installation déps. libksane-4.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 > Installation déps. libqzeitgeist-0.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 > Mis à jour oxygen-icon-theme-4.6.5-1.fc15.noarch > Mise à jour 4.7.0-1.fc16.noarch > Installation déps. qtsoap-2.7-2.fc15.x86_64 > Mis à jour raptor-1.4.21-2.fc15.x86_64 > Mise à jour 1.4.21-10.fc15.x86_64 > Installation déps. raptor2-2.0.4-2.fc15.x86_64 > Mis à jour shared-desktop-ontologies-0.6.0-1.fc15.noarch > Mise à jour 0.7.1-0.2.fc15.noarch > Mis à jour soprano-2.6.0-2.fc15.x86_64 > Mise à jour 2.7.0-1.fc15.x86_64 > Installation déps. yajl-1.0.11-1.fc15.x86_64 > history info > > Marie-Noëlle > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
2011/8/20 sleepless <[hidden email]>:
> > if I type in synaptec package manager ¨libdc1394¨ I will see if it is > installed or not. > is there no such thing in fedora? > or fedoras equivalent to: sudo apt-get install libdc1394-22 > you should see if it´s already installed or else it will be installed. OK, thanks for the hint. I've always used yum for packages or groups of packages; I didn't know it could 'speak' also for single programs or libraries. At the moment, libdc1394 is not installed, but it might be OK as I have downgraded to Digikam 1.9. I'll try to reinstall Digikam 2.0 tomorrow and see what happens ... will check libdc1394 also. Marie-Noëlle -- Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: Digikam 2.0 runs only once before corrupting the DB
|
|
Marie Noëlle,
The problem with libdc1394 is an in-deep problem (solved in my computer running Mageia). The story is there : Before to close this entry, i have been able to reproduce the crash. Now i cannot... Read all the story in bugzilla, It's explained. A lots of people report that the crash still exist. So more investiguations need to be done.
Gilles Caulier
_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: Digikam 2.0 runs only once before corrupting the DB
|
|
In reply to this post by tosca
Have you take a look here :
2011/8/19 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]> Unless I have not seen it, I don't think there has been an answer to _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Well, I did have this problem a couple of times in 1.9 version, and have been able to solve it with this solution: http://ymartin59.free.fr/wordpress/index.php/2011/04/29/digikam-does-not-start-do-not-drop-your-database-yet-it-may-be-fixed/
But this time, the Settings table is really a mess: it comprises many more rows than the usual 20 records I saw in previous version, the DBVersion row is multiplied by I don't how many ... I did try to fix it using Sqliteman, but it was impossible. And anyway, the mess is back each time I launch/close Digikam! As for now, I'm trying to compile from git but: - it's almost my first try at compiling - I don't know anything about git so things are quite complicate ... Marie-Noëlle
2011/8/23 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> Have you take a look here : -- Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Well, I did have this problem a couple of times in 1.9 version, and have been able to solve it with this solution: http://ymartin59.free.fr/wordpress/index.php/2011/04/29/digikam-does-not-start-do-not-drop-your-database-yet-it-may-be-fixed/I can confirm that. I am still in the process. Mainly because I ran into trouble with updating stuff from synaptec. I did it successful a couple of times before, never sure if I can be of any help, but don´t hesitate to ask. Rinus
_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
2011/8/23 sleepless <[hidden email]>
Thanks. Actually, I'm following the procedure you wrote a while ago http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.digikam.user/15433/match=compile+git and translating it for Fedora at the same time. Marie-Noëlle -- Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
«
Return to digikam-users
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |