Doe I realy have to click my 3117 folders to do the job? I hope I'm
missing something. Please respond !!!!! _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
On Monday 21 Mar 2011 10:07:05 sleepless wrote:
> Doe I realy have to click my 3117 folders to do the job? I hope I'm > missing something. Please respond !!!!! I've wondered that too, I was hoping it was going to be a case of you identifying a face and then it would recognise faces that looked similar as being the same person. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Rinus
On Monday 21 Mar 2011 10:07:05 sleepless wrote:
> Doe I realy have to click my 3117 folders to do the job? I hope I'm > missing something. Please respond !!!!! I've wondered that too, I was hoping it was going to be a case of you identifying a face and then it would recognise faces that looked similar as being the same person. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
As for as you are referring to face "detection":
Note that is possible to choose to scan ALL folders, this problem is only there if you want to scan one or more but not ALL albums. Op 24-3-2011 15:12, Mark Fraser schreef: > On Monday 21 Mar 2011 10:07:05 sleepless wrote: >> Doe I realy have to click my 3117 folders to do the job? I hope I'm >> missing something. Please respond !!!!! > I've wondered that too, I was hoping it was going to be a case of you > identifying a face and then it would recognise faces that looked similar as > being the same person. > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > ----- > Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht. > Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com > Versie: 10.0.1204 / Virusdatabase: 1498/3525 - datum van uitgifte: 03/23/11 > > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Mark Fraser
Question to Gilles,
I wonder if you followed this Item. It is strictly spoken not a bug, but it is more than a wish, I think we could speak of a shortcoming, something between a bug and a wish. Do you want me to put it up and if where should I put it up. Rinus Op 24-3-2011 15:12, Mark Fraser schreef: > On Monday 21 Mar 2011 10:07:05 sleepless wrote: >> Doe I realy have to click my 3117 folders to do the job? I hope I'm >> missing something. Please respond !!!!! > I've wondered that too, I was hoping it was going to be a case of you > identifying a face and then it would recognise faces that looked similar as > being the same person. > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > ----- > Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht. > Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com > Versie: 10.0.1204 / Virusdatabase: 1498/3525 - datum van uitgifte: 03/23/11 > > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Rinus
> Note that is possible to choose to scan ALL folders, this problem is > only there if you want to scan one or more but not ALL albums. This is about selecting the albums or tags to scan, if I understand correctly? I see three cases: 1) You want to scan all folders => no click 2) You want to scan n folders, where n is small => n clicks 3) You want to scan n folder, where n is large. => n clicks 2+3 are the same of course, scaling with O(n) - but how do you want to solve the problem of selecting say 1543 of your 3310 folder? _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
The only thing I could think of is to being able to check a complete
tree structure by one click. Op 26-3-2011 14:37, Marcel Wiesweg schreef: >> Note that is possible to choose to scan ALL folders, this problem is >> only there if you want to scan one or more but not ALL albums. > This is about selecting the albums or tags to scan, if I understand correctly? > > I see three cases: > 1) You want to scan all folders => no click > 2) You want to scan n folders, where n is small => n clicks > 3) You want to scan n folder, where n is large. => n clicks > > 2+3 are the same of course, scaling with O(n) - but how do you want to solve > the problem of selecting say 1543 of your 3310 folder? > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > ----- > Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht. > Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com > Versie: 10.0.1204 / Virusdatabase: 1498/3529 - datum van uitgifte: 03/25/11 > > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |