My laptop has both, qt4 and qt5 libraries, I noticed the system finds qt 5.2.1. Is this an issue that would be resolved by
-DQT_QMAKE_EXECUTABLE=/usr/bin/qmake-qt4, found on a net search for the QT_QT_INCLUDE_DIR. Whenre would it go? _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
digiKam is only compatible with Qt4 currently.
Qt5 support is planed. Gilles Caulier 2014-11-23 16:53 GMT+01:00 <[hidden email]>: > My laptop has both, qt4 and qt5 libraries, I noticed the system finds qt > 5.2.1. Is this an issue that would be resolved by > > -DQT_QMAKE_EXECUTABLE=/usr/bin/qmake-qt4, found on a net search for the > QT_QT_INCLUDE_DIR. Whenre would it go? > > Thanks > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by yuquiyu
Does that mean that qt5 libraries have to be removed or is there a way to make cmake find the qt4 libraries? digiKam is only compatible with Qt4 currently. Qt5 support is planed. Gilles Caulier 2014-11-23 16:53 GMT+01:00 <[hidden email]>: > My laptop has both, qt4 and qt5 libraries, I noticed the system finds qt > 5.2.1. Is this an issue that would be resolved by > > -DQT_QMAKE_EXECUTABLE=/usr/bin/qmake-qt4, found on a net search for the > QT_QT_INCLUDE_DIR. Whenre would it go? > > Thanks > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Qt5-devel must be removed. Qt4-devel must be there...
Gilles Caulier 2014-11-25 6:44 GMT+01:00 <[hidden email]>: > Does that mean that qt5 libraries have to be removed or is there a way to > make cmake find the qt4 libraries? > > > On 11/23/14, Gilles Caulier<[hidden email]> wrote: > > digiKam is only compatible with Qt4 currently. > > Qt5 support is planed. > > Gilles Caulier > > 2014-11-23 16:53 GMT+01:00 <[hidden email]>: >> My laptop has both, qt4 and qt5 libraries, I noticed the system finds qt >> 5.2.1. Is this an issue that would be resolved by >> >> -DQT_QMAKE_EXECUTABLE=/usr/bin/qmake-qt4, found on a net search for the >> QT_QT_INCLUDE_DIR. Whenre would it go? >> >> Thanks >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |