Bug#430380: digikam: REALLY slow on big albums

[Mark Purcell]

tags 430380 moreinfo
tags 430380 unreproducible
thanks

On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, John Goerzen wrote:
> I am rather hesitant to upgrade my installation due to #430380.  But you
> should be able to test this with really any JPEG and see if it looks better.

John,

Have you confirmed that #430380 is present with the 0.9.2 final that is now available via unstable?

I can't reproduce and my album size is 11G and digikam takes about 6 seconds to startup.

How would you characterise your albums?

How many G, how many files, all JPEG, mixtures of JPEG, TIFF??

Thanks,
Mark

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [hidden email]:

> tags 430380 moreinfo
Bug#430380: digikam: REALLY slow on big albums
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> tags 430380 unreproducible
Bug#430380: digikam: REALLY slow on big albums
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: unreproducible

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[John Goerzen]

On Tue July 10 2007 12:28:03 pm Mark Purcell wrote:

> tags 430380 moreinfo
> tags 430380 unreproducible
> thanks
>
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, John Goerzen wrote:
> > I am rather hesitant to upgrade my installation due to #430380.  But you
> > should be able to test this with really any JPEG and see if it looks
> > better.
>
> John,
>
> Have you confirmed that #430380 is present with the 0.9.2 final that is
> now available via unstable?

OK, I will test both in the next 1 to 2 days.

>
> How many G, how many files, all JPEG, mixtures of JPEG, TIFF??

Total album size is probably in the neighborhood of 30G.  Total file count
probably 5,000 to 10,000.  Mostly JPEG.  Most folders would have between 10
and 300 images, probably averaging around 100.

-- John


_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[John Goerzen]

found 430380 2:0.9.2-3
thanks

On Tuesday 10 July 2007 12:28:03 pm Mark Purcell wrote:

> tags 430380 moreinfo
> tags 430380 unreproducible
> thanks
>
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, John Goerzen wrote:
> > I am rather hesitant to upgrade my installation due to #430380.  But you
> > should be able to test this with really any JPEG and see if it looks
> > better.
>
> John,
>
> Have you confirmed that #430380 is present with the 0.9.2 final that is
> now available via unstable?

Yes.  Just verified it in 0.9.2-3.

> I can't reproduce and my album size is 11G and digikam takes about 6
> seconds to startup.

Startup time is not the issue for me.  It's when I select an album or a tag
that I get the problem.

-- John


_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [hidden email]:

> found 430380 2:0.9.2-3
Bug#430380: digikam: REALLY slow on big albums
Bug marked as found in version 2:0.9.2-3.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel