https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=256789
Summary: Bad calculated album mean date when pictures before 1964 Product: digikam Version: 1.5.0 Platform: Mandriva RPMs OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: [hidden email] ReportedBy: [hidden email] Version: 1.5.0 (using Devel) OS: Linux When I open an album property and try to set the album date to a mean date of all picture inside and picture are before 1970 I always obtain the date: 07/02/2106 If I try to set the album date by clicking on the most recent or the older, the date is setted right If I try to set the date by clicking on the mean date and picture inside is from 1970 and above, the date is set roght Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1 create an album 2 put a picture with date before 1970 (ie 01/01/1969) 3 open the album property 4 set the date by clicking on the mean date 5 look at the 07/02/2106 date obtained Actual Results: 07/02/2106 is obtained Expected Results: 01/01/1969 should be obtained -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=256789
Stéphane Pontier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Bad calculated album mean |Bad calculated album mean |date when pictures before |date when pictures before |1964 |1970 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from shadow.walker@free.fr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=256789
--- Comment #1 from Marcel Wiesweg <marcel wiesweg gmx de> 2010-11-13 14:14:43 --- Interesting problem. Obviously, the Unix Epoch does have its weaknesses ;-) Can you provide such a picture for testing? I would like to see where it works and where things break. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from shadow.walker@free.fr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=256789
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #2 from <KaiUweBroulik2 hotmail com> 2010-11-14 01:49:18 --- Seems to be an variable overflow/negative sign fault -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from shadow.walker@free.fr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=256789
--- Comment #3 from Stéphane Pontier <shadow walker free fr> 2010-11-15 11:49:12 --- Created an attachment (id=53430) --> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=53430) Picture tagged from 1910-05-28 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from shadow.walker@free.fr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=256789
Marcel Wiesweg <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Marcel Wiesweg <marcel wiesweg gmx de> 2011-01-28 11:34:44 --- SVN commit 1217733 by mwiesweg: Do not use time_t when calculating average date, that works only on a limited scale. Use QDate's Julian Day to get a much wider range. BUG: 256789 M +2 -1 NEWS M +10 -21 libs/database/albumdb.cpp WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=1217733 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from shadow.walker@free.fr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=256789
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version Fixed In| |2.0.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from shadow.walker@free.fr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=256789
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] Component|general |Metadata-Engine -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |