https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=251424--- Comment #2 from Jon Eliot Strømme <jon stromme uninett no> 2010-09-17 09:28:34 ---
Google Maps only provides GPX upload and display to a server with a
registered API key, so a client cannot get a track overlay directly. No
obvious simple and robust way to get it via Google, then.
And you do not want to have a facility that only works with one of the
map options. Fair enough. Disappointing, but it is a good point.
One is left to wonder why Google serves client GPX facilities in Google
Earth, but not in Google Maps.
I will applaud it if and when you do find a workable solution.
Rgds, Jon
On 2010-09-16 20:59, Michael G. Hansen wrote:
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=251424>
>
> Michael G. Hansen <
[hidden email]> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |
[hidden email]
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from Michael G. Hansen <mike mghansen de> 2010-09-16 20:59:38 ---
> Hi Jon,
>
> yes, this is a useful feature, which we would very much like to include!
> However, in the next version of digikam, we have switched from plain Marble to
> libkmap, which allows you to display your photos either on Marble or Google
> Maps. For displaying GPX files on Marble, it would probably still be as
> straightforward as you said, but for Google Maps we have yet to figure out a
> simple way to do it, as we would of course like to keep the interface of both
> map views consistent.
>
> Michael
>
>
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Locked
