[Bug 215458] New: Also on Suse 11.2, the error occurs. Can you please give me a hint what to do?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 215458] New: Also on Suse 11.2, the error occurs. Can you please give me a hint what to do?

Bugzilla from presse.wissen@t-online.de
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215458

           Summary: Also on Suse 11.2, the error occurs.  Can you please
                    give me a hint what to do?
           Product: digikam
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Unlisted Binaries
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: crash
          Priority: NOR
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: [hidden email]
        ReportedBy: [hidden email]


Application that crashed: digikam
Version of the application: 0.10.0
KDE Version: 4.3.3 (KDE 4.3.3) "release 2"
Qt Version: 4.5.3
Operating System: Linux 2.6.31.5-0.1-default x86_64
Distribution: "openSUSE 11.2 (x86_64)"

 -- Backtrace:
Application: digiKam (digikam), signal: Aborted
[Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7f9154583750 (LWP 9367))]

Thread 2 (Thread 0x7f9143cfe910 (LWP 9368)):
[KCrash Handler]
#5  0x00007f914e2144e5 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#6  0x00007f914e2159b0 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#7  0x00007f914e20d24a in __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#8  0x00007f914c188e50 in jpc_dec_tiledecode (dec=<value optimized out>,
tile=<value optimized out>) at jpc_dec.c:1077
#9  0x00007f914c189fcd in jpc_dec_process_sod (dec=<value optimized out>,
ms=<value optimized out>) at jpc_dec.c:620
#10 0x00007f914c18af52 in jpc_dec_decode (dec=<value optimized out>) at
jpc_dec.c:390
#11 jpc_decode (dec=<value optimized out>) at jpc_dec.c:254
#12 0x00007f914c178e5d in jas_image_decode (in=0xa6af40, fmt=<value optimized
out>, optstr=0x0) at jas_image.c:372
#13 0x00007f9151a9ca5d in Digikam::JP2KLoader::load(QString const&,
Digikam::DImgLoaderObserver*) () from /usr/lib64/libdigikamcore.so.1
#14 0x00007f9151a8156c in Digikam::DImg::load(QString const&, int,
Digikam::DImgLoaderObserver*, Digikam::DRawDecoding) () from
/usr/lib64/libdigikamcore.so.1
#15 0x00007f9151a83246 in Digikam::DImg::loadImageInfo(QString const&, bool,
bool, bool) () from /usr/lib64/libdigikamcore.so.1
#16 0x00007f91517111c3 in Digikam::ImageScanner::loadFromDisk
(this=0x7f9143cfcac0) at
/usr/src/debug/digikam-0.10.0/libs/database/imagescanner.cpp:603
#17 0x00007f9151717058 in Digikam::ImageScanner::newFile (this=0x2497,
albumId=9368) at
/usr/src/debug/digikam-0.10.0/libs/database/imagescanner.cpp:89
#18 0x00007f9151709f2b in Digikam::CollectionScanner::scanNewFile
(this=0x7f9143cfe000, info=..., albumId=3442) at
/usr/src/debug/digikam-0.10.0/libs/database/collectionscanner.cpp:592
#19 0x00007f915170b2ba in Digikam::CollectionScanner::scanAlbum (this=<value
optimized out>, location=<value optimized out>, album=<value optimized out>)
    at /usr/src/debug/digikam-0.10.0/libs/database/collectionscanner.cpp:545
#20 0x00007f915170b1db in Digikam::CollectionScanner::scanAlbum (this=<value
optimized out>, location=<value optimized out>, album=<value optimized out>)
    at /usr/src/debug/digikam-0.10.0/libs/database/collectionscanner.cpp:556
#21 0x00007f915170b1db in Digikam::CollectionScanner::scanAlbum (this=<value
optimized out>, location=<value optimized out>, album=<value optimized out>)
    at /usr/src/debug/digikam-0.10.0/libs/database/collectionscanner.cpp:556
#22 0x00007f915170b1db in Digikam::CollectionScanner::scanAlbum (this=<value
optimized out>, location=<value optimized out>, album=<value optimized out>)
    at /usr/src/debug/digikam-0.10.0/libs/database/collectionscanner.cpp:556
#23 0x00007f915170b1db in Digikam::CollectionScanner::scanAlbum (this=<value
optimized out>, location=<value optimized out>, album=<value optimized out>)
    at /usr/src/debug/digikam-0.10.0/libs/database/collectionscanner.cpp:556
#24 0x00007f915170b1db in Digikam::CollectionScanner::scanAlbum (this=<value
optimized out>, location=<value optimized out>, album=<value optimized out>)
    at /usr/src/debug/digikam-0.10.0/libs/database/collectionscanner.cpp:556
#25 0x00007f915170bcb7 in Digikam::CollectionScanner::scanAlbumRoot
(this=0x7f9143cfe000, location=...) at
/usr/src/debug/digikam-0.10.0/libs/database/collectionscanner.cpp:345
#26 0x00007f915170bf87 in Digikam::CollectionScanner::completeScan
(this=0x7f9143cfe000) at
/usr/src/debug/digikam-0.10.0/libs/database/collectionscanner.cpp:192
#27 0x00000000006438b3 in ?? ()
#28 0x00007f914ed15485 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4
#29 0x00007f914dfcc65d in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#30 0x00007f914e2b314d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#31 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()

Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f9154583750 (LWP 9367)):
#0  0x00007f914dfd1049 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from
/lib64/libpthread.so.0
#1  0x00007f914ed1653b in QWaitCondition::wait(QMutex*, unsigned long) () from
/usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4
#2  0x00007f914ed15524 in QThread::wait(unsigned long) () from
/usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4
#3  0x0000000000643617 in ?? ()
#4  0x000000000064708b in ?? ()
#5  0x0000000000647227 in ?? ()
#6  0x00007f914e217065 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#7  0x00007f914e2170b5 in exit () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#8  0x00007f914f9d0628 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4
#9  0x00007f91507b6908 in KApplication::xioErrhandler(_XDisplay*) () from
/usr/lib64/libkdeui.so.5
#10 0x00007f914d1782be in _XIOError () from /usr/lib64/libX11.so.6
#11 0x00007f914d17fc95 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libX11.so.6
#12 0x00007f914d180547 in _XEventsQueued () from /usr/lib64/libX11.so.6
#13 0x00007f914d16924b in XEventsQueued () from /usr/lib64/libX11.so.6
#14 0x00007f914fa084dc in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4
#15 0x00007f9148bfbcba in g_main_context_check () from
/usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#16 0x00007f9148bfc4a0 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#17 0x00007f9148bfc8d0 in g_main_context_iteration () from
/usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#18 0x00007f914ee233a3 in
QEventDispatcherGlib::processEvents(QFlags<QEventLoop::ProcessEventsFlag>) ()
from /usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4
#19 0x00007f914fa0831e in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4
#20 0x00007f914edf9712 in
QEventLoop::processEvents(QFlags<QEventLoop::ProcessEventsFlag>) () from
/usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4
#21 0x00007f914edf9ae4 in
QEventLoop::exec(QFlags<QEventLoop::ProcessEventsFlag>) () from
/usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4
#22 0x0000000000644ae2 in ?? ()
#23 0x0000000000608cb3 in ?? ()
#24 0x00000000006690ea in ?? ()
#25 0x00007f914e200a7d in __libc_start_main () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#26 0x0000000000458849 in _start ()

This bug may be a duplicate of or related to bug 210779

Reported using DrKonqi

--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 215458] Also on Suse 11.2, the error occurs. Can you please give me a hint what to do?

nlecureuil
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215458


Nicolas Lécureuil <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[hidden email]




--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Lécureuil <nlecureuil mandriva com>  2009-11-20 18:33:55 ---
please install the debug packges and paste the new crash log

--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 215458] Also on Suse 11.2, the error occurs. Can you please give me a hint what to do?

Gilles Caulier-4
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from presse.wissen@t-online.de
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215458


Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|unspecified                 |0.10.0




--- Comment #2 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com>  2009-11-20 18:44:45 ---
This is JPEG2000 stuff. It sound like you have a JP2 file on your computer and
libjasper go out violently. There is nothing to do in digiKam core. libjasper
do not generate an exception. It's a shame.

Gilles Caulier

--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 215458] Also on Suse 11.2, the error occurs. Can you please give me a hint what to do?

Marcel Wiesweg
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from presse.wissen@t-online.de
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215458


Marcel Wiesweg <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[hidden email]




--- Comment #3 from Marcel Wiesweg <marcel wiesweg gmx de>  2009-11-27 18:16:08 ---
Gilles, part of the problem is that we load the full JPEG200 image when
scanning, because libjasper does not support just reading the header. My
proposed short-term solution is to _not_ load the whole image, instead do not
scan color format and rely on exiv2 to retrieve width and height for JPEG2k
images.

Long term we should evaluate OpenJPEG, I dont know about the status of this
project, but I read Krita's Cyrille Berger is developing a loader based on this
library.

--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 215458] Also on Suse 11.2, the error occurs. Can you please give me a hint what to do?

Gilles Caulier-4
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from presse.wissen@t-online.de
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215458





--- Comment #4 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com>  2009-11-27 18:22:34 ---
I'm agree to not load full JP2 image during scanning.

OpenJPEG is not the only way to solve this problem. In Exiv2 a future new image
info container will be created to get physical informations about the image

JP2 is already supported by Exiv2. I know... I have writen this image format
support (:=)))

Another very important information about Exiv2 is the availablity of image
width and height info. These properties can be already extracted using Exiv2
(look Exiv2::Image method). Libkexiv2 must be adapted as well. It's simple to
do...

About OpenJPEG, i know that libray is lesser fast than Jasper, but tlike this
last one sound like unmainted, OpenJPEG must be the right way to use for the
far future...

Gilles

Gilles

--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 215458] Also on Suse 11.2, the error occurs. Can you please give me a hint what to do?

Marcel Wiesweg
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from presse.wissen@t-online.de
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215458





--- Comment #5 from Marcel Wiesweg <marcel wiesweg gmx de>  2009-12-07 19:16:06 ---
SVN commit 1059937 by mwiesweg:

Disable scanning of images with libjasper.
This means that width, height, and color format will not be available.
At least width and height are available from exiv2, but Image::pixelWidth()
and pixelHeight() are not used in libkexiv2.
So for now, the dimensions are only avaiable for when there is Exif
information.

CCBUG: 215458
CCBUG: 195583

 M  +17 -0     jp2kloader.cpp  


WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=1059937

--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 215458] Also on Suse 11.2, the error occurs. Can you please give me a hint what to do?

Marcel Wiesweg
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from presse.wissen@t-online.de
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215458


Marcel Wiesweg <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE




--- Comment #6 from Marcel Wiesweg <marcel wiesweg gmx de>  2009-12-07 19:19:10 ---
The crash should no longer happen now. Newly created is the bug that scanning
image information from JPEG2000 images is disabled. Merging with 195583.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 195583 ***

--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[digikam] [Bug 215458] Also on Suse 11.2, the error occurs. Can you please give me a hint what to do?

bugzilla_noreply
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from presse.wissen@t-online.de
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215458

[hidden email] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[hidden email]
          Component|general                     |ImageEditor-FileIO

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.