https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187751
Summary: raw developer gives strange colours when using camera profiles Product: digikam Version: unspecified Platform: SuSE RPMs OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: [hidden email] ReportedBy: [hidden email] Version: (using KDE 3.5.10) OS: Linux Installed from: SuSE RPMs I have colour profiles for my Pentax K10D. One is "borrowed" from a past Bibble trial, the other is one I made from a colour target, developed in ufraw and profiled using lprof. Using digikam (0.9.5 stable from Suse builds, Suse 11.0 KDE 3.5.10) I get weird colours from the raw developer tool when using my own profile. The bibble profile works OK. My own profile works correctly in ufraw and in rawtherapee. I will provide a sample PEF with the two profiles on request. Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187751
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|general |Color Management Version|unspecified |0.9.5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from prhunt@comcen.com.au
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187751
--- Comment #1 from Paul Hunt <prhunt comcen com au> 2009-03-28 02:44:41 --- It seems that no profiles are working correctly - I am getting colour artefacts eg patches of red where there should be dark shadow. Is the dcraw colour matrix being used in addition to the colour profiles? When this was allowed in ufraw, I recall that the combination did not work well. Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from prhunt@comcen.com.au
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187751
Marcel Wiesweg <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #2 from Marcel Wiesweg <marcel wiesweg gmx de> 2009-08-20 23:23:27 --- Can you provide me a testcase? It should be clearly visible what is right and what is wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from prhunt@comcen.com.au
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187751
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #3 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> 2011-12-12 18:35:40 --- Paul, It still valid, with 2.x release ? Gilles Caulier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from prhunt@comcen.com.au
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187751
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO --- Comment #4 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- Paul, This entry still valid using digiKam 3.5.0 ? Do you read Marcel comment #2 ? Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from prhunt@comcen.com.au
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187751
--- Comment #5 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- New digiKam 4.11.0 is available : https://www.digikam.org/node/740 Can you reproduce the problem with this release ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from prhunt@comcen.com.au
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187751
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version Fixed In| |5.1.0 Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |FIXED --- Comment #6 from [hidden email] --- With digiKam 5.0.0, this problem is not reproducible. I close this file now. Don't hesitate to re-open if necessary. Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |