http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171778
Summary: digikam does not load photos in its database Product: digikam Version: 0.10.0-beta2 Platform: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: [hidden email] ReportedBy: [hidden email] Version: 0.10.0-beta2 (using 4.1.1 (KDE 4.1.1), 4.1.1-12.fc9 Fedora) Compiler: gcc OS: Linux (x86_64) release 2.6.26 When loading Digikam for the first time, and therefore building the database, Digikam simply does not show any pictures. Console output, immediately after clicking one of the albums in the side pane, says: digikam(8704): Failed to list url: "El proceso para el protocolo digikamalbums terminó inesperadamente." "The process for digikamalbums protocol finished unexpectedly." Why? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171778
Gilles Caulier caulier gilles gmail com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|general |Database -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from rudd-o@rudd-o.com
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171778
--- Comment #1 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> 2008-09-28 10:22:47 --- Your image are properly backported to database. The failure come from kioslave which have been baddly installed on your system (not in KDE4 dir) If you have compiled digiKam yourself, try to use one of bootstrap script from digikam/project subfolder of source code tarball. These script tune env. variables before compilation. Gilles Caulier -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from rudd-o@rudd-o.com
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171778
--- Comment #2 from Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) <rudd-o rudd-o com> 2008-09-28 10:31:24 --- I'm sorry but the files were installed correctly in /usr/lib64/kde4 as all other kioslaves, this is from the kde-unstable Fedora kde-redhat repo. I have neither the machine nor the desire nor the time to compile digikam from source, it will take more than a day and render the machine unusable for anything else while compiling, so I just downgraded to the 0.9.x series. You should consider handling this type of error better (it's very likely you're happily ignoring an error return value somewhere) and presenting the user with an error dialog, or at least an assert() so we gdb users can identify the problem quickly. Not everyone runs their stuff from a console to be able to identify what's wrong. I know that you'd rather debug with me a source-built version of digikam, but that's just unrealistic to ask from every user. I also know that you haven't packaged the package and that it's likely (but by no means definitively) a packaging bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from rudd-o@rudd-o.com
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171778
Marcel Wiesweg marcel wiesweg gmx de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #3 from Marcel Wiesweg <marcel wiesweg gmx de> 2008-09-28 14:45:57 --- When you say "When loading Digikam for the first time", does that imply the problem does only occur on the very first start and it is all right after restarting once? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from rudd-o@rudd-o.com
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171778
--- Comment #4 from Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) <rudd-o rudd-o com> 2008-09-28 18:46:02 --- I can confirm that the problem persists per secula seculorum. It's like the database is built (I can see it takes about a meg in disk) but the digikam album kioslave failed to provide a "directory listing" to digikam itself, every time I click on one of the albums. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from rudd-o@rudd-o.com
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171778
Arnd Baecker arnd baecker web de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #5 from Arnd Baecker <arnd baecker web de> 2008-09-29 07:43:19 --- > I know that you'd rather debug with me a source-built version of digikam, but > that's just unrealistic to ask from every user. As pointed out on the digikam homepage, 0.10-beta2 is "BETA code with many of new bugs not yet fixed", in particular, "DO NOT USE YET IN PRODUCTION". > I have neither the machine nor the desire nor the time to compile digikam from > source, it will take more than a day and render the machine unusable for > anything else while compiling, so I just downgraded to the 0.9.x series. And from the developer side it is not possible to chase a bug like this without further input. Moreover, 0.10-beta3 is out for a while, and most likely (according to the experience of other users), the particular issue you raise is already fixed there or in current svn. Because of this, I am marking this bug as invalid, but don't hesitate to re-open if you have additional information Best, Arnd -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from rudd-o@rudd-o.com
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171778
--- Comment #6 from Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) <rudd-o rudd-o com> 2008-09-29 16:18:35 --- I will probably retest this when beta3 comes out in RPM form. In the meantime, digikam stable is equally not useful to me because the iPod export plugin simply corrupts the photo database intead of copying the photos. So how's that face recognition tagger plugin that I read about a while ago going? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from rudd-o@rudd-o.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171778
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|0.10.0-beta2 |0.10.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from rudd-o@rudd-o.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171778
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|INVALID |FIXED CC| |[hidden email] Version Fixed In|0.10.0 |5.7.0 Component|Database |Database-Albums --- Comment #7 from [hidden email] --- This problem is relevant of digiKam KIO Slaves and all of these have been dropped in favor of a multi-threaded interface to query the database. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |