[Bug 160740] New: digikam: handbook says that libgphoto2 is required but does not say whether it should be compiled with exif support

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 160740] New: digikam: handbook says that libgphoto2 is required but does not say whether it should be compiled with exif support

odalman
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160740         
           Summary: digikam: handbook says that libgphoto2 is required but
                    does not say whether it should be compiled with exif
                    support
           Product: digikam
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Gentoo Packages
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: NOR
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: digikam-devel kde org
        ReportedBy: esigra gmail com


Version:           0.9.2-final (using KDE 3.5.8)
Installed from:    Gentoo Packages
OS:                Linux

The digikam handbook says at [help:/digikam/requirements.html] that libgphoto2 is required but does not say whether it should be compiled with exif support. The expected behaviour is to say which compile options are needed. The options are "doc exif hal nls".

Does digikam need libgphoto2 with exif support or does digikam somehow support exif on its own (maybe through libkexif)?
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 160740] digikam: handbook says that libgphoto2 is required but does not say whether it should be compiled with exif support

Marcus Meissner-4
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160740         




------- Additional Comments From marcus jet franken de  2008-04-12 11:52 -------
EXIF support is required for thumbnail retrieval on some libgphoto2 camera drivers. It is not mandatory, but well, you might not see thumbnails or the thumbnail extraction mighht be very slow.

Your choice in the end.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 160740] digikam: handbook says that libgphoto2 is required but does not say whether it should be compiled with exif support

odalman
In reply to this post by odalman
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160740         




------- Additional Comments From esigra gmail com  2008-04-12 12:35 -------
I have used libgphoto2 without exif for a while and could retrieve thumbnails fine. The camera driver that seems to be used is ptp2. Maybe libgphoto can automatically select the exif option if a driver that needs it is compiled. Will --with-libexif=auto do that (or will it just automatically find if/where libexif is installed)?

Is there some other feature (such as auto rotation) that needs exif support in libgphoto2 or can it simply be omitted if thumbnail retrieval works fine without it?
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 160740] digikam: handbook says that libgphoto2 is required but does not say whether it should be compiled with exif support

Gilles Caulier-4
In reply to this post by odalman
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160740         




------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles gmail com  2008-04-12 22:06 -------
esigra,

For me, it's not relevant of digiKam if libgphoto2 need libexif to work fine. Also, it's relevant of packaging team to compile libgphoto2 on the right way.

Gerhard,

what do you think about add a comment in handbook ?

Arnd,

The comment from Marcus in #1 is important : i remember few report in B.K.O about users who can't see thumbs in cameragui iconview...

Gilles Caulier
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 160740] digikam: handbook says that libgphoto2 is required but does not say whether it should be compiled with exif support

odalman
In reply to this post by odalman
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160740         




------- Additional Comments From esigra gmail com  2008-04-13 00:35 -------
The question that the digikam handbook should answer is whether libgphoto2 needs to be built with exif to do whatever digikam uses libgphoto2 for. For example:

"libgphoto2 needs to be built with exif to retrieve thumbnails to Digikam using any of the drivers X, Y and Z. If none of those drivers are used, Digikam can use libgphoto2 built without exif without loss of functionality."
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 160740] digikam: handbook says that libgphoto2 is required but does not say whether it should be compiled with exif support

Gilles Caulier-4
In reply to this post by odalman
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160740         
caulier.gilles gmail com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles gmail com  2008-05-27 15:06 -------
SVN commit 813343 by cgilles:

add note to handbook about libexif/libgphoto2 support
BUGS: 160740


 M  +4 -1      index.docbook  


WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=813343
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 160740] digikam: handbook says that libgphoto2 is required but does not say whether it should be compiled with exif support

odalman
In reply to this post by odalman
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160740         




------- Additional Comments From esigra gmail com  2008-05-31 12:22 -------
I read that text. I think "properlly" should be "properly".
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 160740] digikam: handbook says that libgphoto2 is required but does not say whether it should be compiled with exif support

Gilles Caulier-4
In reply to this post by odalman
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160740         




------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles gmail com  2008-05-31 12:34 -------
SVN commit 814805 by cgilles:

digiKam handbook : fix typo
CCBUGS: 160740


 M  +1 -1      index.docbook  


WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=814805
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel