[Bug 158484] New: Make image quickfilter configurable on a per album basis

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158484         
           Summary: Make image quickfilter configurable on a per album basis
           Product: digikam
           Version: 0.9.3
          Platform: unspecified
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: wishlist
          Priority: NOR
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: digikam-devel kde org
        ReportedBy: janziehm gmx de


Version:           0.9.3 (using 3.5.8, Debian Package 4:3.5.8.dfsg.1-7 (lenny/sid))
Compiler:          Target: i486-linux-gnu
OS:                Linux (i686) release 2.6.24-2.6.24.2.slh.11-sidux-686

I would like to keep the settings of the image quickfilter fixed for albums where I have many jpegs as well as cr2 files, but would only like to display jpegs. Is there a general option to quickly turn the display of certain file formats on and off and save those settings so they will be remembered when I reopen the application?
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158484         
caulier.gilles gmail com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|general                     |Filter



------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles gmail com  2008-02-27 05:43 -------
Marcel,

this entry is relevant of a new setting from DB. this is dedicaced to KDE4 of course...

Are you agree to add a new DB field to store icon view filter settings in DB ?

Gilles
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158484         
caulier.gilles gmail com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |marcel.wiesweg gmx de



------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles gmail com  2008-03-28 10:34 -------
Marcel,

Are you seen my comment #1?

Gilles Caulier
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Marcel Wiesweg]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158484         




------- Additional Comments From marcel.wiesweg gmx de  2008-03-29 18:11 -------
If we store this in the DB, it means the setting is "global", i.e. if there should be multiple users per DB some day, the setting would apply for all of them.
I am not sure if this quality applies to such settings; if you think so, we can store it in the DB (in the settings table?)
In the other case, we can store this in the usual KConfig settings just as well.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Arnd Baecker]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158484         




------- Additional Comments From arnd.baecker web de  2008-03-29 19:23 -------
To me this sounds more like a per-user, view option, nothing which
should go into the data-base.
On the other hand this would mean to store such a list of albums
with their settings in the configuration file. Is this a feasible approach?
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158484         




------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles gmail com  2008-03-29 19:26 -------
Good question Marcel...

But storing filter setting by album will take place on config file especially with huge collection.

Also, loading this settings will take a while at startup...

Mik, Gerhard, Arnd, Fabien, your viewpoint is welcome here.

Gilles
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158484         




------- Additional Comments From mikmach wp pl  2008-03-29 22:29 -------
> Mik,


This is definitely "per user" setting so not place in base as Marcel
said. It it means performance hit - scrap it. Sorry but this setting can
be done quickly in interface so such trade off is a big no, no.

OTOH this is reasonable wish. Maybe mark it as LATER - if there will be
made space by performance gains in other areas implement it?
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel