Hi *,
My workflow includes a grouping of RAW and JPEG files after import. This is quite tedious and I would like to automize that. Is there a possibility to do so? Am I the only one who has this desire or are more people out there that wish to do that? Best regards Axel _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
On Sunday 16 August 2015 15:24:39 Axel Klein wrote:
> Hi *, > > My workflow includes a grouping of RAW and JPEG files after import. > This is quite tedious and I would like to automize that. > Is there a possibility to do so? > > Am I the only one who has this desire or are more people out there that > wish to do that? When I started photographing, I also shot raw+jpg and wanted to group these files automatically. In the meantime, I have moved to raw only. So, while I once had the desire, I do no longer. > > Best regards > Axel > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users signature.asc (836 bytes) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by Axel Klein
Hello,
as far as I see, there is no possibility to actually group by file type. But you can filter out the desired file type. Just click on the filter symbol at the bottom of the screen, and then choose, under MIME type filter, raw files resp. no raw files (in german: MIME-Typ-Filter, then Rohdateien or Keine Rohdateien). I usually have raw files and the corresponding jpegs in the same directory/Album, and this is what I do, when I only want to see JPEGs. If you want to make this permanent, you can also define and save a search by filename (e.g. *.jpg or *.cr2). Greetings Wilfried > Am 16.08.2015 um 15:24 schrieb Axel Klein <[hidden email]>: > > Hi *, > > My workflow includes a grouping of RAW and JPEG files after import. > This is quite tedious and I would like to automize that. > Is there a possibility to do so? > > Am I the only one who has this desire or are more people out there that wish to do that? > > Best regards > Axel > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Axel Klein
Hello,
I use a Python script to group raw and normal pictures that are in the same album (same name but different extension). I have uploaded it here: https://gist.github.com/nudomarinero/af88acf44868a9e5bcdc It assumes that Digikam is using a SQlite database located in your home under "Pictures", but you can pass the option "-d" with the path to the database. Until now, I have not had any problem, but note that the script modifies the database directly and this is potentially dangerous. I would not use it while Digikam is open. The option "-n" is used to just check which files would be grouped without actually updating the database. Please use it at your own risk. It would be great to be able to do this kind of things from within Digikam in the future. Python plug-ins that can add functionality to Digikam. This is implemented already in other software like, for example, Gimp. Best regards, Jose On 16/08/15 14:24, Axel Klein wrote: > Hi *, > > My workflow includes a grouping of RAW and JPEG files after import. > This is quite tedious and I would like to automize that. > Is there a possibility to do so? > > Am I the only one who has this desire or are more people out there > that wish to do that? > > Best regards > Axel > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > -- ------------------------------------------------- Dr Jose Sabater Montes Institute for Astronomy Phone: +44-131-6688311 University of Edinburgh Fax: +44-131-6688264 Royal Observatory E-mail: [hidden email] Blackford Hill Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK ------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Axel Klein
Hi there, Not sure if I understand correctly how you want to group your files. If it's in the way of 1.jpg - 1.raw, 2.jpg - 2.raw, ..., then you could do it with renaming - there's an option to rename different extensions together, but already having the same filename before the extension is a requirement, obviously. (e.g. 1.jpg - 1.raw, 2.jpg - 2.raw, ... to 1new.jpg - 1new.raw, ...). Otherwise I only see the already mentioned filter/ search options. Dr. med. vet., MRCVS -------- Original message -------- From: Wilfried Käding <[hidden email]> Date:16/08/2015 11:48 (GMT-04:00) To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] Automatic Grouping of RAW and JPEG files possible? Hello, as far as I see, there is no possibility to actually group by file type. But you can filter out the desired file type. Just click on the filter symbol at the bottom of the screen, and then choose, under MIME type filter, raw files resp. no raw files (in german: MIME-Typ-Filter, then Rohdateien or Keine Rohdateien). I usually have raw files and the corresponding jpegs in the same directory/Album, and this is what I do, when I only want to see JPEGs. If you want to make this permanent, you can also define and save a search by filename (e.g. *.jpg or *.cr2). Greetings Wilfried > Am 16.08.2015 um 15:24 schrieb Axel Klein <[hidden email]>: > > Hi *, > > My workflow includes a grouping of RAW and JPEG files after import. > This is quite tedious and I would like to automize that. > Is there a possibility to do so? > > Am I the only one who has this desire or are more people out there that wish to do that? > > Best regards > Axel > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by José Sabater Montes
My approach to grouping RAW images with associated JPEGs has been to use Group Selected By Time from the right-click contextual menu. It's usually pretty accurate, but can get confused if your photos are taken in rapid succession. You can determine which file shows up on top of the group by changing the sort order before grouping.
The Python script looks nice, I'll have to give it a try.
On Sunday, August 16, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Jose Sabater Montes wrote:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
With my Canon G11, using CHDK, I shoot raw/jpeg pairs, each photo
is saved as 2 files. Shotwell understands this, displays one thumbnail, the properties show it as a pair. I can access the raw if needed, for most purposes the jpg is sufficient. This is the only feature which prevents me switching over to Digikam. Thanks, Kent On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Tim Burbank <[hidden email]> wrote: > My approach to grouping RAW images with associated JPEGs has been to use > Group Selected By Time from the right-click contextual menu. It's usually > pretty accurate, but can get confused if your photos are taken in rapid > succession. You can determine which file shows up on top of the group by > changing the sort order before grouping. > > The Python script looks nice, I'll have to give it a try. > > -- > Tim Burbank > timburbank.com > > On Sunday, August 16, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Jose Sabater Montes wrote: > > Hello, > > I use a Python script to group raw and normal pictures that are in the > same album (same name but different extension). I have uploaded it here: > https://gist.github.com/nudomarinero/af88acf44868a9e5bcdc > > It assumes that Digikam is using a SQlite database located in your home > under "Pictures", but you can pass the option "-d" with the path to the > database. Until now, I have not had any problem, but note that the > script modifies the database directly and this is potentially dangerous. > I would not use it while Digikam is open. The option "-n" is used to > just check which files would be grouped without actually updating the > database. Please use it at your own risk. > > It would be great to be able to do this kind of things from within > Digikam in the future. Python plug-ins that can add functionality to > Digikam. This is implemented already in other software like, for > example, Gimp. > > Best regards, > Jose > > On 16/08/15 14:24, Axel Klein wrote: > > Hi *, > > My workflow includes a grouping of RAW and JPEG files after import. > This is quite tedious and I would like to automize that. > Is there a possibility to do so? > > Am I the only one who has this desire or are more people out there > that wish to do that? > > Best regards > Axel > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------- > Dr Jose Sabater Montes > Institute for Astronomy Phone: +44-131-6688311 > University of Edinburgh Fax: +44-131-6688264 > Royal Observatory E-mail: [hidden email] > Blackford Hill > Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK > ------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
If you have problems visualizing jpeg+raw:
View-> Group Images - > By format. Now the view will display jpeg first and raw second. On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Kent Tenney <[hidden email]> wrote: > With my Canon G11, using CHDK, I shoot raw/jpeg pairs, each photo > is saved as 2 files. > > Shotwell understands this, displays one thumbnail, the properties show > it as a pair. I can access the raw if needed, for most purposes the > jpg is sufficient. > > This is the only feature which prevents me switching over to Digikam. > > Thanks, > Kent > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Tim Burbank <[hidden email]> wrote: >> My approach to grouping RAW images with associated JPEGs has been to use >> Group Selected By Time from the right-click contextual menu. It's usually >> pretty accurate, but can get confused if your photos are taken in rapid >> succession. You can determine which file shows up on top of the group by >> changing the sort order before grouping. >> >> The Python script looks nice, I'll have to give it a try. >> >> -- >> Tim Burbank >> timburbank.com >> >> On Sunday, August 16, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Jose Sabater Montes wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I use a Python script to group raw and normal pictures that are in the >> same album (same name but different extension). I have uploaded it here: >> https://gist.github.com/nudomarinero/af88acf44868a9e5bcdc >> >> It assumes that Digikam is using a SQlite database located in your home >> under "Pictures", but you can pass the option "-d" with the path to the >> database. Until now, I have not had any problem, but note that the >> script modifies the database directly and this is potentially dangerous. >> I would not use it while Digikam is open. The option "-n" is used to >> just check which files would be grouped without actually updating the >> database. Please use it at your own risk. >> >> It would be great to be able to do this kind of things from within >> Digikam in the future. Python plug-ins that can add functionality to >> Digikam. This is implemented already in other software like, for >> example, Gimp. >> >> Best regards, >> Jose >> >> On 16/08/15 14:24, Axel Klein wrote: >> >> Hi *, >> >> My workflow includes a grouping of RAW and JPEG files after import. >> This is quite tedious and I would like to automize that. >> Is there a possibility to do so? >> >> Am I the only one who has this desire or are more people out there >> that wish to do that? >> >> Best regards >> Axel >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------------------- >> Dr Jose Sabater Montes >> Institute for Astronomy Phone: +44-131-6688311 >> University of Edinburgh Fax: +44-131-6688264 >> Royal Observatory E-mail: [hidden email] >> Blackford Hill >> Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK >> ------------------------------------------------- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Kent Tenney
Claude Gelinas agr. Phyto Ressources Inc. > Le 2015-08-17 à 09:37, Kent Tenney <[hidden email]> a écrit : > > With my Canon G11, using CHDK, I shoot raw/jpeg pairs, each photo > is saved as 2 files. > > Shotwell understands this, displays one thumbnail, the properties show > it as a pair. I can access the raw if needed, for most purposes the > jpg is sufficient. > > This is the only feature which prevents me switching over to Digikam. > > Thanks, > Kent > >> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Tim Burbank <[hidden email]> wrote: >> My approach to grouping RAW images with associated JPEGs has been to use >> Group Selected By Time from the right-click contextual menu. It's usually >> pretty accurate, but can get confused if your photos are taken in rapid >> succession. You can determine which file shows up on top of the group by >> changing the sort order before grouping. >> >> The Python script looks nice, I'll have to give it a try. >> >> -- >> Tim Burbank >> timburbank.com >> >> On Sunday, August 16, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Jose Sabater Montes wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I use a Python script to group raw and normal pictures that are in the >> same album (same name but different extension). I have uploaded it here: >> https://gist.github.com/nudomarinero/af88acf44868a9e5bcdc >> >> It assumes that Digikam is using a SQlite database located in your home >> under "Pictures", but you can pass the option "-d" with the path to the >> database. Until now, I have not had any problem, but note that the >> script modifies the database directly and this is potentially dangerous. >> I would not use it while Digikam is open. The option "-n" is used to >> just check which files would be grouped without actually updating the >> database. Please use it at your own risk. >> >> It would be great to be able to do this kind of things from within >> Digikam in the future. Python plug-ins that can add functionality to >> Digikam. This is implemented already in other software like, for >> example, Gimp. >> >> Best regards, >> Jose >> >> On 16/08/15 14:24, Axel Klein wrote: >> >> Hi *, >> >> My workflow includes a grouping of RAW and JPEG files after import. >> This is quite tedious and I would like to automize that. >> Is there a possibility to do so? >> >> Am I the only one who has this desire or are more people out there >> that wish to do that? >> >> Best regards >> Axel >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------------------- >> Dr Jose Sabater Montes >> Institute for Astronomy Phone: +44-131-6688311 >> University of Edinburgh Fax: +44-131-6688264 >> Royal Observatory E-mail: [hidden email] >> Blackford Hill >> Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK >> ------------------------------------------------- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Veaceslav Munteanu-2
Right, I understand there are ways to deal with it, but
I prefer the Shotwell approach of one thumbnail. Thanks, Kent On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Veaceslav Munteanu <[hidden email]> wrote: > If you have problems visualizing jpeg+raw: > > View-> Group Images - > By format. > > Now the view will display jpeg first and raw second. > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Kent Tenney <[hidden email]> wrote: >> With my Canon G11, using CHDK, I shoot raw/jpeg pairs, each photo >> is saved as 2 files. >> >> Shotwell understands this, displays one thumbnail, the properties show >> it as a pair. I can access the raw if needed, for most purposes the >> jpg is sufficient. >> >> This is the only feature which prevents me switching over to Digikam. >> >> Thanks, >> Kent >> >> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Tim Burbank <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> My approach to grouping RAW images with associated JPEGs has been to use >>> Group Selected By Time from the right-click contextual menu. It's usually >>> pretty accurate, but can get confused if your photos are taken in rapid >>> succession. You can determine which file shows up on top of the group by >>> changing the sort order before grouping. >>> >>> The Python script looks nice, I'll have to give it a try. >>> >>> -- >>> Tim Burbank >>> timburbank.com >>> >>> On Sunday, August 16, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Jose Sabater Montes wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I use a Python script to group raw and normal pictures that are in the >>> same album (same name but different extension). I have uploaded it here: >>> https://gist.github.com/nudomarinero/af88acf44868a9e5bcdc >>> >>> It assumes that Digikam is using a SQlite database located in your home >>> under "Pictures", but you can pass the option "-d" with the path to the >>> database. Until now, I have not had any problem, but note that the >>> script modifies the database directly and this is potentially dangerous. >>> I would not use it while Digikam is open. The option "-n" is used to >>> just check which files would be grouped without actually updating the >>> database. Please use it at your own risk. >>> >>> It would be great to be able to do this kind of things from within >>> Digikam in the future. Python plug-ins that can add functionality to >>> Digikam. This is implemented already in other software like, for >>> example, Gimp. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Jose >>> >>> On 16/08/15 14:24, Axel Klein wrote: >>> >>> Hi *, >>> >>> My workflow includes a grouping of RAW and JPEG files after import. >>> This is quite tedious and I would like to automize that. >>> Is there a possibility to do so? >>> >>> Am I the only one who has this desire or are more people out there >>> that wish to do that? >>> >>> Best regards >>> Axel >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ------------------------------------------------- >>> Dr Jose Sabater Montes >>> Institute for Astronomy Phone: +44-131-6688311 >>> University of Edinburgh Fax: +44-131-6688264 >>> Royal Observatory E-mail: [hidden email] >>> Blackford Hill >>> Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK >>> ------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
I agree. It would be really nice if digikam could treat raw and jpeg as
different versions of the same image. I guess this should be filed as a wishlist item in the KDE bug system. Andrew On 18/08/15 22:28, Kent Tenney wrote: > Right, I understand there are ways to deal with it, but > I prefer the Shotwell approach of one thumbnail. > > Thanks, > Kent > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Veaceslav Munteanu > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> If you have problems visualizing jpeg+raw: >> >> View-> Group Images - > By format. >> >> Now the view will display jpeg first and raw second. >> >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Kent Tenney <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> With my Canon G11, using CHDK, I shoot raw/jpeg pairs, each photo >>> is saved as 2 files. >>> >>> Shotwell understands this, displays one thumbnail, the properties show >>> it as a pair. I can access the raw if needed, for most purposes the >>> jpg is sufficient. >>> >>> This is the only feature which prevents me switching over to Digikam. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Kent >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Tim Burbank <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> My approach to grouping RAW images with associated JPEGs has been to use >>>> Group Selected By Time from the right-click contextual menu. It's usually >>>> pretty accurate, but can get confused if your photos are taken in rapid >>>> succession. You can determine which file shows up on top of the group by >>>> changing the sort order before grouping. >>>> >>>> The Python script looks nice, I'll have to give it a try. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Tim Burbank >>>> timburbank.com >>>> >>>> On Sunday, August 16, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Jose Sabater Montes wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I use a Python script to group raw and normal pictures that are in the >>>> same album (same name but different extension). I have uploaded it here: >>>> https://gist.github.com/nudomarinero/af88acf44868a9e5bcdc >>>> >>>> It assumes that Digikam is using a SQlite database located in your home >>>> under "Pictures", but you can pass the option "-d" with the path to the >>>> database. Until now, I have not had any problem, but note that the >>>> script modifies the database directly and this is potentially dangerous. >>>> I would not use it while Digikam is open. The option "-n" is used to >>>> just check which files would be grouped without actually updating the >>>> database. Please use it at your own risk. >>>> >>>> It would be great to be able to do this kind of things from within >>>> Digikam in the future. Python plug-ins that can add functionality to >>>> Digikam. This is implemented already in other software like, for >>>> example, Gimp. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Jose >>>> >>>> On 16/08/15 14:24, Axel Klein wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi *, >>>> >>>> My workflow includes a grouping of RAW and JPEG files after import. >>>> This is quite tedious and I would like to automize that. >>>> Is there a possibility to do so? >>>> >>>> Am I the only one who has this desire or are more people out there >>>> that wish to do that? >>>> >>>> Best regards >>>> Axel >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ------------------------------------------------- >>>> Dr Jose Sabater Montes >>>> Institute for Astronomy Phone: +44-131-6688311 >>>> University of Edinburgh Fax: +44-131-6688264 >>>> Royal Observatory E-mail: [hidden email] >>>> Blackford Hill >>>> Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK >>>> ------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
For the grouping of RAW and JPEG is this bug open: The last statement here is going in the direction of having different versions, which I think would also fit better my workflow. Also some guys created a patch to group via regexp: I have not tried this one, but created my own patch which just groups images of the same title but with different extensions. In case you are interested I can attach it to bug 126149. BR. Chris. 2015-08-19 0:06 GMT+02:00 Andrew Goodbody <[hidden email]>: I agree. It would be really nice if digikam could treat raw and jpeg as different versions of the same image. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
,
Le jeudi 20 août 2015, Christoph Huckle <[hidden email]> a écrit :
Yes' please attach your patch to the report Gilles Caulier
-- Send with Gmail Mobile _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Okay, I added the patch. Experience with the grouping just brings another question for me: My groups are normally closed, if I tag them only the jpeg gets tagged. Is there a fast way to tag the whole group? If raw & jpeg would be handled as versions, a button exists, but it would still not work with the "automatic apply" of a tag? Thanks! 2015-08-20 16:35 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: , _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |