2008/2/1, Gerhard Kulzer <[hidden email]>: On Friday 01 February 2008 Gilles Caulier wrote: Including KDE4 code ? (:=))) Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Gilles Caulier wrote:
[...] > Please test, and report. Works fine, with a lot of nice features (i.e. which filters are active, even including the tags-filter) - excellent stuff - thanks a lot! (On the cosmetic side there is only that the LED is pretty large and therefore slightly cut-off. But it is visible, and that's the most important bit!) Best, Arnd _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
I have created a new blog entry about LED :
http://www.digikam.org/?q=node/296 Gilles 2008/2/1, Arnd Baecker <[hidden email]>: On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Gilles Caulier wrote: _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Dnia Friday 01 of February 2008, Gilles Caulier napisał:
> 2008/2/1, Mikolaj Machowski <[hidden email]>: > > Dnia Friday 01 of February 2008, Gilles Caulier napisał: > > > Red color is to indicate than something is wrong, dangerous, etc... > > > > > > This is not the case here. Is just to ping user than filters are > > > active. Orange is better for that... But it's just my viewpoint... > > > > > > Mik, Gerhard ? > > > > Nice idea. Few ideas for improvements. > > > > 1. Visual: lack of left-, top-margins looks ugly. LED should be > > centered in status bar. > > Ah, i'm happy to read these word. This is you Mik (:=))) > > Yes, the widget is not centered... And this is not my fault. The widget > come from kdelibs and this is another one badly implemented. The widget > drawing method always use the top/left corner as reference. Content is > never centered like an usual widget... During years of observing of other computer users I noticed one really strange thing (I am not sarcastic or ironic here, this is really strange for me). Application may be stripped from features, may crash each five minutes, may even have terrible usability but if it has pretty interface, widgets placed perfectly to last pixel people will use it "because it is good looking". This works the other way: if application looks bad, misplaced widgets, not native interface, not common interface, etc users will never feel comfortable with it. Each mishap - even obviously caused with PEBKAC - will be always placed on "that strange program". So, I am always trying to point deficiencies in that arena. m. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
2008/2/1, Mikolaj Machowski <[hidden email]>: Dnia Friday 01 of February 2008, Gilles Caulier napisał: I'm totally agree. GUI construction is always big job to do and are generally studied by specialist with an amount of user reports. This is the only way to have a confortable program for everybody, and in this case opensource workflow is really well adapted, if it's used properlly (team must have a good communication with users and vice versa). At home i have a great gui tester : my wife (:=))) Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Dnia Friday 01 of February 2008, Gilles Caulier napisał:
> > Ok, done in svn with rev. #769396. > > Please test, and report. Many thanks. Everything looks great :) m. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |