|
Hi,
I recently bought a new hard drive copied all my /home stuff to it. Used the old disk as a backup - mounted in /mnt/backup - moved all files on it into /mnt/backup/home (as I will use it to backup /etc too) This breaks digikam badly all tags disapear... but it could have been worse... I have come to the conclusion that this is the root cause of my problems is because of the uuid. It could have been worse... If I simply had mounted the old disk as /mnt/backup it would have "worked" with all new files going to the "backup" disk... Tried the trick below - yea, I had backups of digikam4.db! > sqlite3 digikam4.db update AlbumRoots set identifier="volumeid:?path=/home" where identifier="volumeid:?uuid=xxxxxxxx"; .quit (Actually not the "were..." since all my folders were located under /home) But starting digikam causes a rescan... (might be because I upgraded to OpenSuSE Tumbleweed, using digikam 1.9) It is still scanning... but I am worried... /RogerL > > On Wednesday 13 August 2008 21:36:38 gerhard at mail.morbitzer.de wrote: > > > I have a problem with 0.10b3 where digikam is innocent: > > > I use btrfs 0.16 (linux equivalent of zfs) for my /home. btrfs is not yet > > > supported by volume-id0, so the UUID is not detected by the system and > > > digikam. And digikam 0.10 doesn't work with my image folder as it stores > > > the UUID in the DB collection path, 0.9.5 works perfectly. > > > > > > Is there any trick to convince digikam to accept my drive? > > > > > > Gerhard > > > > I found a solution to my problem. Marcel has built-in three different ways > > of uniquely identifying a collection > > - uuid > > - path > > - hash on root folder (for CD/DVD) > > > > The solution in my case is: > > - to have a backup of digikam4db (otherwise as soon as you open digikam > > DB wil be corrupted with the new uuid-less drive) > > - to open digikam4.db and change in the AlbumRoots the Identifier from > > volumeid:?uuid=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to volumeid:?path=/home (if > > /home is the the volume of the uuid-less drive. > > - that's it, start digikam 0.10 and all is there. > > We have definitely to solve this in code, so that a path identifier is used if > the uuid is invalid. These are just situations that have never been tested. I > will look at t he code, where something may go wrong and probably ask you > some questions when I find some time. Currently I'm in Sydney and need to see > the city :-) > > Btw, similar problems may occur when someone starts to use network file > systems as album roots. There are still some open ends and it needs testing. > > Marcel _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
Following up on my own message Noticed that digikam scanned the complete /home sqlite3 digikam4.db update AlbumRoots set identifier='volumeid:?path=/home'||specificPath; .quit Works better but it feels like I loose tags - but not all in a folder - strange... (should specificPath be cleared?) Files were copied with cp -a so file dates are the same - but new disk uses ext4, old used ext3... /RogerL On Tuesday 03 May 2011, Roger Larsson wrote: > Hi, > I recently bought a new hard drive copied all my /home stuff to it. > Used the old disk as a backup > - mounted in /mnt/backup > - moved all files on it into /mnt/backup/home (as I will use it to backup > /etc too) > > This breaks digikam badly all tags disapear... but it could have been > worse... > > I have come to the conclusion that this is the root cause of my problems is > because of the uuid. It could have been worse... > If I simply had mounted the old disk as /mnt/backup it would have "worked" > with all new files going to the "backup" disk... > > Tried the trick below - yea, I had backups of digikam4.db! > > > sqlite3 digikam4.db > > update AlbumRoots set identifier="volumeid:?path=/home" where > identifier="volumeid:?uuid=xxxxxxxx"; > .quit > > (Actually not the "were..." since all my folders were located under /home) > > But starting digikam causes a rescan... (might be because I upgraded to > OpenSuSE Tumbleweed, using digikam 1.9) > It is still scanning... but I am worried... > > /RogerL > > > > On Wednesday 13 August 2008 21:36:38 gerhard at mail.morbitzer.de wrote: > > > > I have a problem with 0.10b3 where digikam is innocent: > > > > I use btrfs 0.16 (linux equivalent of zfs) for my /home. btrfs is not > > yet > > > > > supported by volume-id0, so the UUID is not detected by the system > > > > and digikam. And digikam 0.10 doesn't work with my image folder as > > > > it stores the UUID in the DB collection path, 0.9.5 works perfectly. > > > > > > > > Is there any trick to convince digikam to accept my drive? > > > > > > > > Gerhard > > > > > > I found a solution to my problem. Marcel has built-in three different > > > ways of uniquely identifying a collection > > > - uuid > > > - path > > > - hash on root folder (for CD/DVD) > > > > > > The solution in my case is: > > > - to have a backup of digikam4db (otherwise as soon as you open digikam > > the > > > > DB wil be corrupted with the new uuid-less drive) > > > - to open digikam4.db and change in the AlbumRoots the Identifier from > > > volumeid:?uuid=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to volumeid:?path=/home > > > (if /home is the the volume of the uuid-less drive. > > > - that's it, start digikam 0.10 and all is there. > > > > We have definitely to solve this in code, so that a path identifier is > > used > > if > > > the uuid is invalid. These are just situations that have never been > > tested. > > I > > > will look at t he code, where something may go wrong and probably ask you > > some questions when I find some time. Currently I'm in Sydney and need to > > see > > > the city :-) > > > > Btw, similar problems may occur when someone starts to use network file > > systems as album roots. There are still some open ends and it needs > > testing. > > > > Marcel > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-devel mailing list > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
