Dear List
I am trying to install 0.9.4 (on Ubuntu Hardy, not Kubuntu) according to the instructions at http://www.digikam.org/drupal/download?q=download/tarball (I am not generally familiar with this sort of thing but can at least follow instructions!) I get as far as ./configure --prefix=/usr and eventually receive this message in the terminal: checking for X... configure: error: Can't find X libraries. Please check your installation and add the correct paths! Does anybody have a list of dependencies for doing this install so that I could simply do a sudo apt-get install [all needed files] and thus ensure a proper install? With grateful thanks, Martin _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
On Fr, 18.07.2008, 15:20, Martin Fisher wrote:
> Does anybody have a list of dependencies for doing this install so that > I could simply do a sudo apt-get install [all needed files] and thus > ensure a proper install? Hi Martin, maybe the package you are looking for is called xorg-dev. For compiling, also make sure to have build-essential installed. Best, Gandalf > > With grateful thanks, Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Martin Fisher-3
Hi Martin,
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Martin Fisher wrote: > Dear List > > I am trying to install 0.9.4 (on Ubuntu Hardy, not Kubuntu) according to > the instructions at > http://www.digikam.org/drupal/download?q=download/tarball > > (I am not generally familiar with this sort of thing but can at least > follow instructions!) > > I get as far as > > ./configure --prefix=/usr > > and eventually receive this message in the terminal: > > checking for X... configure: error: Can't find X libraries. Please check > your installation and add the correct paths! > > Does anybody have a list of dependencies for doing this install so that > I could simply do a sudo apt-get install [all needed files] and thus > ensure a proper install? Unfortunately I don't have a list of dependencies, but it would be nice if you could collect them on the way, so that we could put it on the web-page... For this one: aptitude install libx11-dev should help. But there will be more. Most likely: aptitude install kdelibs4-dev libgphoto2-dev libjasper-dev libjpeg62-dev liblcms1-dev libqt3-mt-dev libpng12-dev libtiff4-dev automake autoconf HTH a bit, Arnd _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
All dependencies are listed in the README file...
We can not provide a list for every linux distribution out there, because packages are named different throughout them. Andi _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Arnd Baecker
All dependencies are listed in the README file...
We can not provide a list for every linux distribution out there, because packages are named different throughout them. Andi On Friday 18 July 2008 15:57:20 Arnd Baecker wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Martin Fisher wrote: > > Dear List > > > > I am trying to install 0.9.4 (on Ubuntu Hardy, not Kubuntu) according to > > the instructions at > > http://www.digikam.org/drupal/download?q=download/tarball > > > > (I am not generally familiar with this sort of thing but can at least > > follow instructions!) > > > > I get as far as > > > > ./configure --prefix=/usr > > > > and eventually receive this message in the terminal: > > > > checking for X... configure: error: Can't find X libraries. Please check > > your installation and add the correct paths! > > > > Does anybody have a list of dependencies for doing this install so that > > I could simply do a sudo apt-get install [all needed files] and thus > > ensure a proper install? > > Unfortunately I don't have a list of dependencies, > but it would be nice if you could collect them on the way, > so that we could put it on the web-page... > > For this one: > aptitude install libx11-dev > should help. > > But there will be more. Most likely: > aptitude install kdelibs4-dev libgphoto2-dev libjasper-dev libjpeg62-dev > liblcms1-dev libqt3-mt-dev libpng12-dev libtiff4-dev automake autoconf > > HTH a bit, > > Arnd > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Arnd Baecker
Dear All
Thank you for your patience... this helped but now I have run into another problem kde-config --prefix gives me /usr but on using ./configure --prefix=/usr I now receive the error checking for KDE... configure: error: in the prefix, you've chosen, are no KDE headers installed. This will fail. So, check this please and use another prefix! This is proving more difficult than I imagined but thanks again for your patience and for any ideas. Martin On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 15:57 +0200, Arnd Baecker wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Martin Fisher wrote: > > > Dear List > > > > I am trying to install 0.9.4 (on Ubuntu Hardy, not Kubuntu) according to > > the instructions at > > http://www.digikam.org/drupal/download?q=download/tarball > > > > (I am not generally familiar with this sort of thing but can at least > > follow instructions!) > > > > I get as far as > > > > ./configure --prefix=/usr > > > > and eventually receive this message in the terminal: > > > > checking for X... configure: error: Can't find X libraries. Please check > > your installation and add the correct paths! > > > > Does anybody have a list of dependencies for doing this install so that > > I could simply do a sudo apt-get install [all needed files] and thus > > ensure a proper install? > > Unfortunately I don't have a list of dependencies, > but it would be nice if you could collect them on the way, > so that we could put it on the web-page... > > For this one: > aptitude install libx11-dev > should help. > > But there will be more. Most likely: > aptitude install kdelibs4-dev libgphoto2-dev libjasper-dev libjpeg62-dev > liblcms1-dev libqt3-mt-dev libpng12-dev libtiff4-dev automake autoconf > > HTH a bit, > > Arnd > _ _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
try (as root)
apt-get build-dep digkikam this installs all packages that are necessary to compile the packaged version of digikam, it should be sufficient to compile the new version too. Take care of the exiv2 dependency, I have installed exiv2 0.17.1 into the same destination as digikam 0.9.4 My compile scripts are as follows (copy them into the base directory of the untarred sources, adjust DIGIKAMDEST to your liking): #!/bin/sh -xve # exiv2 compilation export DIGIKAMDEST=/opt/digikam_svn export KDEDIRS=$DIGIKAMDEST:/usr export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$DIGIKAMDEST/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH export LDPATH=$DIGIKAMDEST/lib:$LDPATH export PATH=$DIGIKAMDEST/bin:$PATH echo "compile and install exiv2 0.17.1" nice ./configure --prefix=$DIGIKAMDEST && nice make -j2 && sudo make install and #!/bin/sh -xve # digikam compilation export WANT_AUTOCONF_2_5=1 export DIGIKAMDEST=/opt/digikam_svn export KDEDIRS=$DIGIKAMDEST:/usr export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$DIGIKAMDEST/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH export LDPATH=$DIGIKAMDEST/lib:$LDPATH export PATH=$DIGIKAMDEST/bin:$PATH export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=$DIGIKAMDEST/lib/pkgconfig export UNSERMAKE=no nice make -f Makefile.cvs && \ ./configure --prefix=$DIGIKAMDEST --with-extra-includes=$DIGIKAMDEST/include --with-extra-libs=$DIGIKAMDEST/lib && \ nice make -j4 sudo make install Regards - Markus _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Martin Fisher
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Martin Fisher wrote:
> Dear All > > Thank you for your patience... this helped but now I have run into > another problem > > kde-config --prefix > > gives me /usr > > but on using > > ./configure --prefix=/usr > > I now receive the error > > checking for KDE... configure: error: > in the prefix, you've chosen, are no KDE headers installed. This will > fail. > So, check this please and use another prefix! here aptitude install kde-devel should get you a bit further (eg. to the next error ...;-) > This is proving more difficult than I imagined but thanks again for your > patience and for any ideas. Let's make a deal: once you have collected all needed packages, you add a new entry to the wiki about the needed packages for your distribution ... ;-) Best, Arnd _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Arnd
OK, I'm working on it.. I have got 0.9.4 working now, so producing the list of dependencies should not be too hard (Markus' note also helps). Martin On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 18:09 +0200, Arnd Baecker wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Martin Fisher wrote: > > > Dear All > > > > Thank you for your patience... this helped but now I have run into > > another problem > > > > kde-config --prefix > > > > gives me /usr > > > > but on using > > > > ./configure --prefix=/usr > > > > I now receive the error > > > > checking for KDE... configure: error: > > in the prefix, you've chosen, are no KDE headers installed. This will > > fail. > > So, check this please and use another prefix! > > here > aptitude install kde-devel > should get you a bit further (eg. to the next error ...;-) > > > This is proving more difficult than I imagined but thanks again for your > > patience and for any ideas. > > Let's make a deal: once you have collected all needed packages, > you add a new entry to the wiki about the needed > packages for your distribution ... ;-) > > Best, Arnd Dr Martin Fisher Editor, Oryx - The International Journal of Conservation Fauna & Flora International, 4th Floor, Jupiter House Station Road, Cambridge, CB1 2JD, UK e-mail [hidden email] tel +44 (0)20 81238513 skype martin_pescador Oryx online http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=ORX Jan 2008 Oryx (free) http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayIssue?jid=ORX&volumeId=42&issueId=01 Instructions for Contributors http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayMoreInfo?jid=ORX&type=ifc Online submissions http://www.epress.ac.uk/oryx/webforms/author.php Personal subscriptions http://www.fauna-flora.org/membership.php _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Markus Spring
On Friday 18 July 2008, Markus Spring wrote:
> try (as root) > > apt-get build-dep digkikam Alas, I am also having trouble with 0.9.4 (and all the beta's and RC's)...No matter what combo (all /usr/local compiles for libs or distro packages) I get crashes after the scan.... I only mention that (not meaning to highjack) because I am also on Ubuntu Hardy... [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xb588d6c0 (LWP 24142)] [KCrash handler] #6 0xb7f3e410 in __kernel_vsyscall () #7 0xb5aa7085 in raise () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #8 0xb5aa8a01 in abort () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #9 0xb5cac480 in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 #10 0xb5ca9d05 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 #11 0xb5ca9d42 in std::terminate () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 #12 0xb5ca9e6a in __cxa_throw () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 #13 0xb5c401bf in std::__throw_length_error () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 #14 0xb5c84777 in std::string::_Rep::_S_create () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 #15 0xb5c85368 in std::string::_Rep::_M_clone () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 #16 0xb5c85e8e in std::string::assign () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 #17 0xb738d233 in KExiv2Iface::KExiv2::load () from /usr/lib/libkexiv2.so.3 #18 0xb7d4739c in Digikam::DMetadata::load () from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 #19 0xb7d4740c in Digikam::DMetadata::DMetadata () from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 #20 0xb7bb98f8 in Digikam::ScanLib::storeItemInDatabase () from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 #21 0xb7bbb9df in Digikam::ScanLib::allFiles () from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 #22 0xb7bbb98e in Digikam::ScanLib::allFiles () from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 #23 0xb7bbc23f in Digikam::ScanLib::findMissingItems () from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 #24 0xb7bbc50f in Digikam::ScanLib::startScan () from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 #25 0xb7b7207e in Digikam::AlbumManager::setLibraryPath () from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 #26 0xb7b328d3 in Digikam::DigikamApp::DigikamApp () from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 #27 0x0804aeea in main () _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Arnd Baecker
Hello All
Following the discussion today and my eventual success at installing 0.9.4 on Ubuntu 8.04 (not Kubuntu) I have attempted to retrace my steps to determine which packages were required to enable me to compile 0.9.4 I did this by installing digikam, using apt-get autoremove and other things, installing digikam 0.9.3 and then using sudo apt-get build-dep digikam (for 0.9.4), and the result is below. I doubt that it is complete (e.g. I think that at an early stage I had to install a compiler but I did this by hit and miss and I don't remember the details) but I post it here in case it is of any use to anybody. Digikam is a fantastic piece of software and I think it is a pity that it is not available in a Gnome version (f-spot does not even come close). I have no idea how one would do such a thing but I thought I would mention it anyway... With more facilities for handling RAW files (or a plugin to pass the files to rawtherapee?) it would be the best Linux photo workflow software. Tchau, Martin p.s. BTW, I couldn't fine a README file anywhere digikam cryptsetup kdebase-bin kde-devel kdebase-bin-kde3 kdebase-kio-plugins kdelibs-data kdelibs4c2a kdesktop libarts1c2a libavahi-qt3-1 libdbus-qt-1-1c2 libkdcraw3 libkexiv2-3 libkipi0 libkonq4 liblua50 liblualib50 gettext-kde hspell kdelibs4-dev kdesdk-scripts libacl1-dev libart-2.0-dev libarts1-dev libartsc0-dev libasound2-dev libaspell-dev libattr1-dev libaudiofile-dev libavahi-client-dev libavahi-common-dev libavahi-qt3-dev libbz2-dev libdbus-1-dev libesd0-dev libglib2.0-dev libidn11-dev libjasper-dev libkdcraw-dev libkexiv2-dev libkipi0-dev liblua50-dev liblualib50-dev libogg-dev libopenexr-dev libpcre3-dev libpcrecpp0 libsasl2-dev libssl-dev libvorbis-dev libxml2-dev libxslt1-dev lua50 digikam-doc khelpcenter kipi-plugins libkcal2b libkdepim1a libktnef1 kipi-plugins-doc On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 18:09 +0200, Arnd Baecker wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Martin Fisher wrote: > > > Dear All > > > > Thank you for your patience... this helped but now I have run into > > another problem > > > > kde-config --prefix > > > > gives me /usr > > > > but on using > > > > ./configure --prefix=/usr > > > > I now receive the error > > > > checking for KDE... configure: error: > > in the prefix, you've chosen, are no KDE headers installed. This will > > fail. > > So, check this please and use another prefix! > > here > aptitude install kde-devel > should get you a bit further (eg. to the next error ...;-) > > > This is proving more difficult than I imagined but thanks again for your > > patience and for any ideas. > > Let's make a deal: once you have collected all needed packages, > you add a new entry to the wiki about the needed > packages for your distribution ... ;-) > > Best, Arnd _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from mailinglist@endosquid.com
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Brendan wrote:
> On Friday 18 July 2008, Markus Spring wrote: > > try (as root) > > > > apt-get build-dep digkikam > > Alas, I am also having trouble with 0.9.4 (and all the beta's and RC's)...No > matter what combo (all /usr/local compiles for libs or distro packages) I get > crashes after the scan.... > > I only mention that (not meaning to highjack) because I am also on Ubuntu > Hardy... > > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > [New Thread 0xb588d6c0 (LWP 24142)] > [KCrash handler] > #6 0xb7f3e410 in __kernel_vsyscall () > #7 0xb5aa7085 in raise () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 > #8 0xb5aa8a01 in abort () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 > #9 0xb5cac480 in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler () > from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > #10 0xb5ca9d05 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > #11 0xb5ca9d42 in std::terminate () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > #12 0xb5ca9e6a in __cxa_throw () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > #13 0xb5c401bf in std::__throw_length_error () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > #14 0xb5c84777 in std::string::_Rep::_S_create () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > #15 0xb5c85368 in std::string::_Rep::_M_clone () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > #16 0xb5c85e8e in std::string::assign () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > #17 0xb738d233 in KExiv2Iface::KExiv2::load () from /usr/lib/libkexiv2.so.3 > #18 0xb7d4739c in Digikam::DMetadata::load () from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 > #19 0xb7d4740c in Digikam::DMetadata::DMetadata () > from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 > #20 0xb7bb98f8 in Digikam::ScanLib::storeItemInDatabase () > from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 > #21 0xb7bbb9df in Digikam::ScanLib::allFiles () from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 > #22 0xb7bbb98e in Digikam::ScanLib::allFiles () from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 > #23 0xb7bbc23f in Digikam::ScanLib::findMissingItems () > from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 > #24 0xb7bbc50f in Digikam::ScanLib::startScan () from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 > #25 0xb7b7207e in Digikam::AlbumManager::setLibraryPath () > from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 > #26 0xb7b328d3 in Digikam::DigikamApp::DigikamApp () > from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 > #27 0x0804aeea in main () Hmm, I don't understand the above crash report ... To be sure: This is with 0.9.4 final? Which version of exiv2 is installed? E.g. what is the output of dpkg -l | grep exiv2 Or did you install exiv2 and libkexiv2 yourself? (Then exiv2 0.17.1 is the recommended version). Best, Arnd _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Martin Fisher
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Martin Fisher wrote:
> Hello All > > Following the discussion today and my eventual success at installing > 0.9.4 on Ubuntu 8.04 (not Kubuntu) I have attempted to retrace my steps > to determine which packages were required to enable me to compile 0.9.4 This will surely be helpful to others on both ubuntu (and kubuntu), please add this to the wiki (see below at the end). > I did this by installing digikam, using apt-get autoremove and other > things, installing digikam 0.9.3 and then using sudo apt-get build-dep > digikam (for 0.9.4), and the result is below. I doubt that it is > complete (e.g. I think that at an early stage I had to install a > compiler but I did this by hit and miss and I don't remember the > details) but I post it here in case it is of any use to anybody. > > Digikam is a fantastic piece of software and I think it is a pity that > it is not available in a Gnome version (f-spot does not even come > close). Well, it is Digi*K*am (and not Digi*G*am or so ....;-), i.e. it uses a lot of the KDE infrastructure which makes many of the features possible. > I have no idea how one would do such a thing but I thought I > would mention it anyway... On this point I am sure that I can speak for all digikam-devels: there will never be a DigiKam Gnome version! And I really don't understand the need for that, desktop is one thing, applications are another. I happily mix Gnome and KDE style applications on a neither-KDE nor-Gnome desktop. All works fine. > With more facilities for handling RAW files What facilities are you missing? Please file the corresponding wishes in the bug-tracker (but make sure that they are not already mentioned), see http://www.digikam.org/drupal/contrib > (or a plugin to pass the files to rawtherapee?) You can use kcontrol to add any application as a programm to appear for a right-mouse-click under "Open with". > it would be the best > Linux photo workflow software. > > Tchau, Martin > > p.s. BTW, I couldn't fine a README file anywhere tar xjf ~/Desktop/digikam-0.9.4.tar.bz2 less digikam-0.9.4/README > digikam cryptsetup kdebase-bin kde-devel kdebase-bin-kde3 > kdebase-kio-plugins kdelibs-data kdelibs4c2a kdesktop libarts1c2a > libavahi-qt3-1 libdbus-qt-1-1c2 libkdcraw3 libkexiv2-3 libkipi0 > libkonq4 liblua50 liblualib50 gettext-kde hspell kdelibs4-dev > kdesdk-scripts libacl1-dev libart-2.0-dev libarts1-dev libartsc0-dev > libasound2-dev libaspell-dev libattr1-dev libaudiofile-dev > libavahi-client-dev libavahi-common-dev libavahi-qt3-dev libbz2-dev > libdbus-1-dev libesd0-dev libglib2.0-dev libidn11-dev libjasper-dev > libkdcraw-dev libkexiv2-dev libkipi0-dev liblua50-dev liblualib50-dev > libogg-dev libopenexr-dev libpcre3-dev libpcrecpp0 libsasl2-dev > libssl-dev libvorbis-dev libxml2-dev libxslt1-dev lua50 > > digikam-doc khelpcenter > > kipi-plugins libkcal2b libkdepim1a libktnef1 > > kipi-plugins-doc Could you add a new page (e.g.) "Packages for compilation from source" in the wiki: http://wiki.kde.org/tiki-index.php?page=digikam and add the above list (e.g. under a heading "Ubuntu hardy and digikam 0.9.4"). Many thanks, Arnd _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Arnd Baecker
Arnd,
It's always the same problem. Binary compatibility with Exiv2 is broken. I don't know why thi sproblem exist, but it appear generaly when both Exiv2 version are installed on the computer Gilles Caulier 2008/7/19, Arnd Baecker <[hidden email]>: > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Brendan wrote: > >> On Friday 18 July 2008, Markus Spring wrote: >> > try (as root) >> > >> > apt-get build-dep digkikam >> >> Alas, I am also having trouble with 0.9.4 (and all the beta's and >> RC's)...No >> matter what combo (all /usr/local compiles for libs or distro packages) I >> get >> crashes after the scan.... >> >> I only mention that (not meaning to highjack) because I am also on Ubuntu >> Hardy... >> >> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] >> [New Thread 0xb588d6c0 (LWP 24142)] >> [KCrash handler] >> #6 0xb7f3e410 in __kernel_vsyscall () >> #7 0xb5aa7085 in raise () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 >> #8 0xb5aa8a01 in abort () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 >> #9 0xb5cac480 in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler () >> from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 >> #10 0xb5ca9d05 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 >> #11 0xb5ca9d42 in std::terminate () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 >> #12 0xb5ca9e6a in __cxa_throw () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 >> #13 0xb5c401bf in std::__throw_length_error () from >> /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 >> #14 0xb5c84777 in std::string::_Rep::_S_create () from >> /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 >> #15 0xb5c85368 in std::string::_Rep::_M_clone () from >> /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 >> #16 0xb5c85e8e in std::string::assign () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 >> #17 0xb738d233 in KExiv2Iface::KExiv2::load () from >> /usr/lib/libkexiv2.so.3 >> #18 0xb7d4739c in Digikam::DMetadata::load () from >> /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 >> #19 0xb7d4740c in Digikam::DMetadata::DMetadata () >> from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 >> #20 0xb7bb98f8 in Digikam::ScanLib::storeItemInDatabase () >> from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 >> #21 0xb7bbb9df in Digikam::ScanLib::allFiles () from >> /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 >> #22 0xb7bbb98e in Digikam::ScanLib::allFiles () from >> /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 >> #23 0xb7bbc23f in Digikam::ScanLib::findMissingItems () >> from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 >> #24 0xb7bbc50f in Digikam::ScanLib::startScan () from >> /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 >> #25 0xb7b7207e in Digikam::AlbumManager::setLibraryPath () >> from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 >> #26 0xb7b328d3 in Digikam::DigikamApp::DigikamApp () >> from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 >> #27 0x0804aeea in main () > > Hmm, I don't understand the above crash report ... > > To be sure: This is with 0.9.4 final? > Which version of exiv2 is installed? > E.g. what is the output of > dpkg -l | grep exiv2 > Or did you install exiv2 and libkexiv2 yourself? > (Then exiv2 0.17.1 is the recommended version). > > Best, Arnd > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Arnd,
It will be a good stuff to contact Andreas by mail to ask if he know an issue to this problem. Andreas is not in digikam-users mailing list, and i'm sure that he is not aware about crash relevant of both exiv2 version installed on a computer, especially when libkexiv2/digikam is installed in a non core system place. Gilles 2008/7/19, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: > Arnd, > > It's always the same problem. Binary compatibility with Exiv2 is > broken. I don't know why thi sproblem exist, but it appear generaly > when both Exiv2 version are installed on the computer > > Gilles Caulier > > 2008/7/19, Arnd Baecker <[hidden email]>: >> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Brendan wrote: >> >>> On Friday 18 July 2008, Markus Spring wrote: >>> > try (as root) >>> > >>> > apt-get build-dep digkikam >>> >>> Alas, I am also having trouble with 0.9.4 (and all the beta's and >>> RC's)...No >>> matter what combo (all /usr/local compiles for libs or distro packages) I >>> get >>> crashes after the scan.... >>> >>> I only mention that (not meaning to highjack) because I am also on Ubuntu >>> Hardy... >>> >>> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] >>> [New Thread 0xb588d6c0 (LWP 24142)] >>> [KCrash handler] >>> #6 0xb7f3e410 in __kernel_vsyscall () >>> #7 0xb5aa7085 in raise () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 >>> #8 0xb5aa8a01 in abort () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 >>> #9 0xb5cac480 in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler () >>> from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 >>> #10 0xb5ca9d05 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 >>> #11 0xb5ca9d42 in std::terminate () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 >>> #12 0xb5ca9e6a in __cxa_throw () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 >>> #13 0xb5c401bf in std::__throw_length_error () from >>> /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 >>> #14 0xb5c84777 in std::string::_Rep::_S_create () from >>> /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 >>> #15 0xb5c85368 in std::string::_Rep::_M_clone () from >>> /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 >>> #16 0xb5c85e8e in std::string::assign () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 >>> #17 0xb738d233 in KExiv2Iface::KExiv2::load () from >>> /usr/lib/libkexiv2.so.3 >>> #18 0xb7d4739c in Digikam::DMetadata::load () from >>> /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 >>> #19 0xb7d4740c in Digikam::DMetadata::DMetadata () >>> from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 >>> #20 0xb7bb98f8 in Digikam::ScanLib::storeItemInDatabase () >>> from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 >>> #21 0xb7bbb9df in Digikam::ScanLib::allFiles () from >>> /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 >>> #22 0xb7bbb98e in Digikam::ScanLib::allFiles () from >>> /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 >>> #23 0xb7bbc23f in Digikam::ScanLib::findMissingItems () >>> from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 >>> #24 0xb7bbc50f in Digikam::ScanLib::startScan () from >>> /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 >>> #25 0xb7b7207e in Digikam::AlbumManager::setLibraryPath () >>> from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 >>> #26 0xb7b328d3 in Digikam::DigikamApp::DigikamApp () >>> from /usr/lib/libdigikam.so.0 >>> #27 0x0804aeea in main () >> >> Hmm, I don't understand the above crash report ... >> >> To be sure: This is with 0.9.4 final? >> Which version of exiv2 is installed? >> E.g. what is the output of >> dpkg -l | grep exiv2 >> Or did you install exiv2 and libkexiv2 yourself? >> (Then exiv2 0.17.1 is the recommended version). >> >> Best, Arnd >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Arnd Baecker
On Saturday 19 July 2008 06:57:13 Arnd Baecker wrote: > On this point I am sure that I can speak for all digikam-devels: > there will never be a DigiKam Gnome version! You are right (at least speaking for me), I hate programming GTK and as you mentioned before, a lot of KDE stuff is used so porting will never be done (I'm pretty sure). The only thing that bothers me when mixing KDE and Gnome apps (or even pure Qt and KDE apps) are the different looks. I hate that and sure the poster here hates that, too. But ignoring this fact right now digiKam works quite fine in a non KDE environment, even D&D should work the way it is supposed to. Andi _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Arnd Baecker
Many thanks for the various comments - most helpful! I will add to the
wiki (and later today I will test on another laptop I have that has never had digikam, and add to the list if necessary). Martin On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 06:57 +0200, Arnd Baecker wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Martin Fisher wrote: > > > Hello All > > > > Following the discussion today and my eventual success at installing > > 0.9.4 on Ubuntu 8.04 (not Kubuntu) I have attempted to retrace my steps > > to determine which packages were required to enable me to compile 0.9.4 > > This will surely be helpful to others on both ubuntu (and kubuntu), > please add this to the wiki (see below at the end). > > > I did this by installing digikam, using apt-get autoremove and other > > things, installing digikam 0.9.3 and then using sudo apt-get build-dep > > digikam (for 0.9.4), and the result is below. I doubt that it is > > complete (e.g. I think that at an early stage I had to install a > > compiler but I did this by hit and miss and I don't remember the > > details) but I post it here in case it is of any use to anybody. > > > > Digikam is a fantastic piece of software and I think it is a pity that > > it is not available in a Gnome version (f-spot does not even come > > close). > > Well, it is Digi*K*am (and not Digi*G*am or so ....;-), i.e. > it uses a lot of the KDE infrastructure which makes > many of the features possible. > > > I have no idea how one would do such a thing but I thought I > > would mention it anyway... > > On this point I am sure that I can speak for all digikam-devels: > there will never be a DigiKam Gnome version! > And I really don't understand the need for that, > desktop is one thing, applications are another. > I happily mix Gnome and KDE style applications on a neither-KDE > nor-Gnome desktop. All works fine. > > > With more facilities for handling RAW files > > What facilities are you missing? Please file the corresponding > wishes in the bug-tracker (but make sure that they are > not already mentioned), see > http://www.digikam.org/drupal/contrib > > > (or a plugin to pass the files to rawtherapee?) > > You can use kcontrol to add any application as a programm > to appear for a right-mouse-click under "Open with". > > > it would be the best > > Linux photo workflow software. > > > > Tchau, Martin > > > > p.s. BTW, I couldn't fine a README file anywhere > > tar xjf ~/Desktop/digikam-0.9.4.tar.bz2 > less digikam-0.9.4/README > > > digikam cryptsetup kdebase-bin kde-devel kdebase-bin-kde3 > > kdebase-kio-plugins kdelibs-data kdelibs4c2a kdesktop libarts1c2a > > libavahi-qt3-1 libdbus-qt-1-1c2 libkdcraw3 libkexiv2-3 libkipi0 > > libkonq4 liblua50 liblualib50 gettext-kde hspell kdelibs4-dev > > kdesdk-scripts libacl1-dev libart-2.0-dev libarts1-dev libartsc0-dev > > libasound2-dev libaspell-dev libattr1-dev libaudiofile-dev > > libavahi-client-dev libavahi-common-dev libavahi-qt3-dev libbz2-dev > > libdbus-1-dev libesd0-dev libglib2.0-dev libidn11-dev libjasper-dev > > libkdcraw-dev libkexiv2-dev libkipi0-dev liblua50-dev liblualib50-dev > > libogg-dev libopenexr-dev libpcre3-dev libpcrecpp0 libsasl2-dev > > libssl-dev libvorbis-dev libxml2-dev libxslt1-dev lua50 > > > > digikam-doc khelpcenter > > > > kipi-plugins libkcal2b libkdepim1a libktnef1 > > > > kipi-plugins-doc > > Could you add a new page (e.g.) "Packages for compilation from source" > in the wiki: http://wiki.kde.org/tiki-index.php?page=digikam > and add the above list > (e.g. under a heading "Ubuntu hardy and digikam 0.9.4"). > > Many thanks, > > Arnd Dr Martin Fisher Editor, Oryx - The International Journal of Conservation Fauna & Flora International, 4th Floor, Jupiter House Station Road, Cambridge, CB1 2JD, UK e-mail [hidden email] tel +44 (0)20 81238513 skype martin_pescador Oryx online http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=ORX Jan 2008 Oryx (free) http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayIssue?jid=ORX&volumeId=42&issueId=01 Instructions for Contributors http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayMoreInfo?jid=ORX&type=ifc Online submissions http://www.epress.ac.uk/oryx/webforms/author.php Personal subscriptions http://www.fauna-flora.org/membership.php _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
Yes, exactly, the mixing of different styles hurts my aesthetic sense.
But what I was also trying to say was that I think lots more people would use DigiKam if it was also on gnome. But yes, of course, DigiKam works OK under Gnome but a little effort is required - this is not ideal for all sorts of reasons. Martin On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 10:25 +0200, Andi Clemens wrote: > On Saturday 19 July 2008 06:57:13 Arnd Baecker wrote: > > > On this point I am sure that I can speak for all digikam-devels: > > there will never be a DigiKam Gnome version! > > You are right (at least speaking for me), I hate programming GTK and as you > mentioned before, a lot of KDE stuff is used so porting will never be done > (I'm pretty sure). > The only thing that bothers me when mixing KDE and Gnome apps (or even pure Qt > and KDE apps) are the different looks. I hate that and sure the poster here > hates that, too. But ignoring this fact right now digiKam works quite fine in > a non KDE environment, even D&D should work the way it is supposed to. > > Andi _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Martin Fisher wrote:
> Yes, exactly, the mixing of different styles hurts my aesthetic sense. Perfectly understandable! I am not sure if there is anything which could be done (themes etc.?) to make things visually more similar. Even then there will some differences, which can be annoying ... > But what I was also trying to say was that I think lots more people > would use DigiKam if it was also on gnome. Installing digikam in a gnome environment should be no problem if the corresponding packages are available, and they should (of course not yet for 0.9.4 ...). > But yes, of course, DigiKam works OK under Gnome but a little effort is > required - this is not ideal for all sorts of reasons. Actually, it would be good if you could also document the additionally needed things in the wiki as well; I am sure that this will be helpful to other users - already many thanks in advance! Best, Arnd > Martin > > On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 10:25 +0200, Andi Clemens wrote: > > On Saturday 19 July 2008 06:57:13 Arnd Baecker wrote: > > > > > On this point I am sure that I can speak for all digikam-devels: > > > there will never be a DigiKam Gnome version! > > > > You are right (at least speaking for me), I hate programming GTK and as you > > mentioned before, a lot of KDE stuff is used so porting will never be done > > (I'm pretty sure). > > The only thing that bothers me when mixing KDE and Gnome apps (or even pure Qt > > and KDE apps) are the different looks. I hate that and sure the poster here > > hates that, too. But ignoring this fact right now digiKam works quite fine in > > a non KDE environment, even D&D should work the way it is supposed to. > > > > Andi > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Many thanks - I'm working on the wiki right now - it will take shape
over the next few days. Martin On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 10:47 +0200, Arnd Baecker wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Martin Fisher wrote: > > > Yes, exactly, the mixing of different styles hurts my aesthetic sense. > > Perfectly understandable! I am not sure if there is anything > which could be done (themes etc.?) to make things visually > more similar. > Even then there will some differences, which can be annoying ... > > > But what I was also trying to say was that I think lots more people > > would use DigiKam if it was also on gnome. > > Installing digikam in a gnome environment should be no problem > if the corresponding packages are available, and they > should (of course not yet for 0.9.4 ...). > > > But yes, of course, DigiKam works OK under Gnome but a little effort is > > required - this is not ideal for all sorts of reasons. > > Actually, it would be good if you could also document > the additionally needed things in the wiki as well; > I am sure that this will be helpful to other users > - already many thanks in advance! > > Best, Arnd > > > > Martin > > > > On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 10:25 +0200, Andi Clemens wrote: > > > On Saturday 19 July 2008 06:57:13 Arnd Baecker wrote: > > > > > > > On this point I am sure that I can speak for all digikam-devels: > > > > there will never be a DigiKam Gnome version! > > > > > > You are right (at least speaking for me), I hate programming GTK and as you > > > mentioned before, a lot of KDE stuff is used so porting will never be done > > > (I'm pretty sure). > > > The only thing that bothers me when mixing KDE and Gnome apps (or even pure Qt > > > and KDE apps) are the different looks. I hate that and sure the poster here > > > hates that, too. But ignoring this fact right now digiKam works quite fine in > > > a non KDE environment, even D&D should work the way it is supposed to. > > > > > > Andi > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Digikam-users mailing list > > [hidden email] > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > > Dr Martin Fisher Editor, Oryx - The International Journal of Conservation Fauna & Flora International, 4th Floor, Jupiter House Station Road, Cambridge, CB1 2JD, UK e-mail [hidden email] tel +44 (0)20 81238513 skype martin_pescador Oryx online http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=ORX Jan 2008 Oryx (free) http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayIssue?jid=ORX&volumeId=42&issueId=01 Instructions for Contributors http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayMoreInfo?jid=ORX&type=ifc Online submissions http://www.epress.ac.uk/oryx/webforms/author.php Personal subscriptions http://www.fauna-flora.org/membership.php _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |