Hi,
I'm just trying ount the 0.9.4beta3... Normally I set the theme "dessert" as my favorite theme, but since the upcomig 0.9.4 it is impossible to see if a tag is used for all marked pics (so it was light with a mark in it's box) or only used by some of the marked pics (light grey box wich is marked out) In the actual themes in both case the tag-box looks the same. If needed, I've made two small screenshots, one is theme standard, one is dessert... Greets, Christoph PS: I also want to say: thank you for this great programm, it's my absolute favorite tool for managing (and smaller manipulating) my pics... -- GPG-Fingerprint: 171A 6F66 52E5 A6CE D664 2427 832F E711 7442 8261 _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
2008/4/18, [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:
> Hi, > > I'm just trying ount the 0.9.4beta3... > Normally I set the theme "dessert" as my favorite theme, but since the upcomig > 0.9.4 it is impossible to see if a tag is used for all marked pics (so it was > light with a mark in it's box) or only used by some of the marked pics (light > grey box wich is marked out) > > In the actual themes in both case the tag-box looks the same. If needed, I've > made two small screenshots, one is theme standard, one is > dessert... Well, with 0.9.4, i have don't touch the color scheme as well. I have just apply the colors theme to the rest of GUI. What the difference with 0.9.3 for ex about tag selection ? Gilles Caulier _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Am Freitag, 18. April 2008 17:09:24 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> 2008/4/18, [hidden email] <[hidden email]>: > > Hi, > > > > I'm just trying ount the 0.9.4beta3... > > Normally I set the theme "dessert" as my favorite theme, but since the > > upcomig 0.9.4 it is impossible to see if a tag is used for all marked > > pics (so it was light with a mark in it's box) or only used by some of > > the marked pics (light grey box wich is marked out) > > > > In the actual themes in both case the tag-box looks the same. If needed, > > I've made two small screenshots, one is theme standard, one is > > dessert... > > Well, with 0.9.4, i have don't touch the color scheme as well. I have > just apply the colors theme to the rest of GUI. What the difference > with 0.9.3 for ex about tag selection ? > > Gilles Caulier > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users the menue-cursor was more / better visible, the tag window was white, and the selected tag was marked (all selected pics with this tag) or selected in a light grey box (if only some of the selected pics had this tag) This are the points which I remember in this moment - there could certainly some more differences between both versions... Christoph -- GPG-Fingerprint: 171A 6F66 52E5 A6CE D664 2427 832F E711 7442 8261 _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users signature.asc (201 bytes) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Am Freitag, 18. April 2008 17:09:24 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> Well, with 0.9.4, i have don't touch the color scheme as well. I have > just apply the colors theme to the rest of GUI. What the difference > with 0.9.3 for ex about tag selection ? In 0.9.3 the Tag selection window was allways with white background, so it was very easy to see, if a tag was eg patially selected, because in this case the checkbox was filled out with light grey. So no selectzion = white box, selected all = white box checked out. The visibility of the menues was also better. I'm not shure about the colors, but it was much better because of the inversion of the actual selected menuepoint. Eg. in the desert sheme the menue cursor only is a very little more lighten than the other points in the actual menue. greetz, christoph -- GPG-Fingerprint: 171A 6F66 52E5 A6CE D664 2427 832F E711 7442 8261 _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users signature.asc (201 bytes) Download Attachment |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |