I've been irritated by the XMP issues for some time so I was very pleased to see some of them getting closed for 2.6.0. I thought I'd try to checkout the code from git with these fixes and see how they behaved. Unfortunately both times I've tried over the last few days, what's in git doesn't compile. Is what's in git expected to configure and compile? Are there any times / days when it's more likely to compile than others?
Should I just wait for beta3 to test the XMP fixes?
The first time I tried, something in libpanorama wouldn't compile. I know C and Java but the error message was complete gibberish to me. The second time (today), the contents of git won't even configure.If what's in git is supposed to configure & compile then I have a log file I can send out showing a variety of messages (e.g. complaints about lack of a version.h file for libkdcraw). Jon _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Can you give us a trace of error. All compile and work fine here.
If you have an error in panorama, it's probably a Boost lib problem... Using current code from git/master is the right way to test. You must take a care to use all kdegraphics/libs from git/master as digiKam and kipi-plugins. With cmake the is an option to turn on. Look README file for details. Best Gilles Caulier 2012/3/25 jon piesing <[hidden email]>: > I've been irritated by the XMP issues for some time so I was very pleased to > see some of them getting closed for 2.6.0. > I thought I'd try to checkout the code from git with these fixes and see how > they behaved. > Unfortunately both times I've tried over the last few days, what's in git > doesn't compile. > > Is what's in git expected to configure and compile? Are there any times / > days when it's more likely to compile than others? > Should I just wait for beta3 to test the XMP fixes? > > The first time I tried, something in libpanorama wouldn't compile. I know C > and Java but the error message was complete gibberish to me. > The second time (today), the contents of git won't even configure. > > If what's in git is supposed to configure & compile then I have a log file I > can send out showing a variety of messages (e.g. complaints about lack of a > version.h file for libkdcraw). > > Jon > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Hi, Thanks for the reply. The attached file contains the results of running cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=debugfull -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=`kde4-config --prefix` .. >& foo. This set of parameters are taken from the instructions http://www.digikam.org/drupal/download?q=download/GIT.
As far as I can see from the messages, it looks like it's taking kipi-plugins (etc) from the git versions. This is a clean check-out from git yesterday. I deleted the entire directory hierarchy from earlier in the week in case that was interfering.
_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users foo (17K) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Gilles, all,
Now I've got the version from git to compile (thanks!!), is it possible to install it alongside an existing install of a released version of digikam or does it have to replace the existing installation? Currently I have 2.5.0 with the main binary installed as /usr/bin/digikam. Jon ----- Original Message ----- > From: Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> > To: jon piesing <[hidden email]>; digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source <[hidden email]> > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, 25 March 2012, 14:40 > Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] testing XMP fixes, git not compiling / configuring > > Can you give us a trace of error. All compile and work fine here. > > If you have an error in panorama, it's probably a Boost lib problem... > > Using current code from git/master is the right way to test. You must > take a care to use all kdegraphics/libs from git/master as digiKam and > kipi-plugins. With cmake the is an option to turn on. Look README file > for details. > > Best > > Gilles Caulier > > 2012/3/25 jon piesing <[hidden email]>: >> I've been irritated by the XMP issues for some time so I was very > pleased to >> see some of them getting closed for 2.6.0. >> I thought I'd try to checkout the code from git with these fixes and > see how >> they behaved. >> Unfortunately both times I've tried over the last few days, what's > in git >> doesn't compile. >> >> Is what's in git expected to configure and compile? Are there any times > / >> days when it's more likely to compile than others? >> Should I just wait for beta3 to test the XMP fixes? >> >> The first time I tried, something in libpanorama wouldn't compile. I > know C >> and Java but the error message was complete gibberish to me. >> The second time (today), the contents of git won't even configure. >> >> If what's in git is supposed to configure & compile then I have a > log file I >> can send out showing a variety of messages (e.g. complaints about lack of a >> version.h file for libkdcraw). >> >> Jon >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
When you process "make install" as root, look where digiKam is install
in your system... Gilles Caulier 2012/3/25 jon piesing <[hidden email]>: > Gilles, all, > > Now I've got the version from git to compile (thanks!!), is it possible to install it alongside an existing install of a released version of digikam or does it have to replace the existing installation? > Currently I have 2.5.0 with the main binary installed as /usr/bin/digikam. > > > Jon > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> >> To: jon piesing <[hidden email]>; digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source <[hidden email]> >> Cc: >> Sent: Sunday, 25 March 2012, 14:40 >> Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] testing XMP fixes, git not compiling / configuring >> >> Can you give us a trace of error. All compile and work fine here. >> >> If you have an error in panorama, it's probably a Boost lib problem... >> >> Using current code from git/master is the right way to test. You must >> take a care to use all kdegraphics/libs from git/master as digiKam and >> kipi-plugins. With cmake the is an option to turn on. Look README file >> for details. >> >> Best >> >> Gilles Caulier >> >> 2012/3/25 jon piesing <[hidden email]>: >>> I've been irritated by the XMP issues for some time so I was very >> pleased to >>> see some of them getting closed for 2.6.0. >>> I thought I'd try to checkout the code from git with these fixes and >> see how >>> they behaved. >>> Unfortunately both times I've tried over the last few days, what's >> in git >>> doesn't compile. >>> >>> Is what's in git expected to configure and compile? Are there any times >> / >>> days when it's more likely to compile than others? >>> Should I just wait for beta3 to test the XMP fixes? >>> >>> The first time I tried, something in libpanorama wouldn't compile. I >> know C >>> and Java but the error message was complete gibberish to me. >>> The second time (today), the contents of git won't even configure. >>> >>> If what's in git is supposed to configure & compile then I have a >> log file I >>> can send out showing a variety of messages (e.g. complaints about lack of a >>> version.h file for libkdcraw). >>> >>> Jon >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >> Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by jon piesing
2012/3/25 jon piesing <[hidden email]>:
> Now I've got the version from git to compile (thanks!!), is it possible to install it alongside an existing install of a released version of digikam or does it have to replace the existing installation? > Currently I have 2.5.0 with the main binary installed as /usr/bin/digikam. Here is what I did on my computer: Instead of -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=`kde4-config --prefix`, use -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=<directory where you want digikam to be>. For example, I use $HOME/Binaries. Then after your cmake [...], make, make install, you will have digikam binaries in $HOME/Binaries/bin. However, to start it, you need to do the following: $ cd $HOME/binaries/bin $ KDEDIRS=$HOME/Binaries ./digikam The big advantage of this is that you don't need to be root to install digikam, hence you won't mess your system... -- Benjamin. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |