http://digikam.185.s1.nabble.com/Processing-RAW-images-to-get-to-the-look-of-the-jpg-preview-tp3609237p3622195.html
> It´s too bad that the saved curve not can be recalled in batch cue. I
> Rinus
>
> Op 24-06-11 11:58, Remco Viëtor schreef:
>> on Friday 24 June 2011, Sven Burmeister wrote:
>>> Am Donnerstag, 23. Juni 2011, 11:48:20 schrieb Martin:
>>>> I don't think your problem is gamma only. The gamma curve only depends
>>>> on the colour model you use to view the picture (sRBG, Adobe RBG,
>>>> Apple RGB ...). It should almost never be necessary to adjust this by
>>>> hand. But I have no clue what the problem of digikam is here.
>>> Could you please try the digikam demosaicing tool with highlights set to
>>> "blend" or "rebuild". I tried to avoid the gamma setting (1,7) but while it
>>> works without gamma and adjusting the luminosity curve for most parts of the
>>> picture, areas that are almost black (dark blue) remain far too dark. If I
>> use
>>> gamma it works better. So I wonder how it could be done without.
>>>
>> Iirc, Digikam (at least in certain modes) develops the RAW files with a linear
>> curve (i.e. gamma=1.0), like dcraw in its default settings. So you will have
>> to set gamma to the value you want (2.2 usually, except for old Macs, that
>> used 1.8). Luckily, the values you set is remembered for next use.
>>
>> Remco
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>
[hidden email]
>>
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users>>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users>