[Bug 147429] "and not" option in search function

Posted by Arnd Baecker on Aug 30, 2007; 2:46pm
URL: http://digikam.185.s1.nabble.com/Bug-147429-and-not-option-in-search-function-tp1709439.html

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147429         




------- Additional Comments From arnd.baecker web de  2007-08-30 15:46 -------
The only situation in which an "AND NOT" could be helpful
is when combining several blocks of searches.

Josef, independent of this, does 0.9.2 work fine for you,
or do we still need the "AND NOT"?
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel